Ivermectin Effect on SARS-CoV-2 Replication in Patients With COVID-19
NCT ID: NCT04381884
Last Updated: 2020-10-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
45 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-05-18
2020-09-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
COVidIVERmectin: Ivermectin for Treatment of Covid-19
NCT04438850
Efficacy of Ivermectin in Outpatients With Non-severe COVID-19
NCT04834115
Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Ivermectin in Subjects Infected With SARS-CoV-2 With or Without Symptoms
NCT04407507
Evaluation of the Impact of the Administration of Single Dose of Ivermectin in the Early Phase of COVID-19
NCT05040724
A Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Different Doses of Ivermectin for COVID-19
NCT04431466
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This medicine is orally administered and is usually used for the treatment against nematodes and ectoparasites, making this drug the first-choice medication for onchocerciasis, lymph filariasis, itch and strongylosis.
Until now, SARS-CoV-2 viral load dynamics has not been clearly determined. However, works tending to a preliminary characterization of the viral load (VL) behavior have emerged. One of them, the most substantial one, includes the work done by Kai-Wang showing the VL behavior during the 30 days before the onset of COVID-19 symptoms (Kai-Wang To et al; 2020). In this work, an average of 7.5 oropharyngeal samples of individuals with severe (n=10) and moderate (n=13) COVID-19 have been assessed. Time between the onset of symptoms and hospitalization ranged between 0 and 13 days, with a mean of 4 days. VL median at day 0 in all patients was 5.2 log10 copies/mL, and no significant differences between severe and moderate COVID-19 groups occurred. The viral load peak observed during the first week from the onset of symptoms had a median equal to 6.91 (Q1-Q3: 4.27-7.40) and 5.29 (Q1-Q3: 3.91-7.56) log10 copies/mL in severe and moderate COVID-19 patients, respectively. There was no significant difference between both groups (p=0.52). Likewise, no difference between patients with and without comorbidities has been observed (n of patients equal to 12 and 11, respectively) as per initial VL (p=0.49) and peak VL (p=0.29). However, it has been observed that the VL peak was directly associated with the age of the patient (R2=0.48 and p=0.02). In a combined analysis of all patients (n=23), it has been observed that the VL grows in the first days following the onset of symptoms and that, in the 5-6 days, VL falls sharply, reaching a lower mean value, yet similar to that of the day 0. General VL behavior from day 9 to 30 showed a negative slope (VL fall) equal to -0.15 (95% confidence interval: -0.19 to -0.11) log10 per daya. It must be emphasized that by day 20 from the onset of symptoms, VL mean continues to be quantifiable (4 log10 copies/mL), and that 7/23 (30%) patients show viral RNA detection after such day.
In other paper, the VL of 17 patients with an age median of 59 (range 26-76 years) has been studied, who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 (Zou et al; 2020). Nonetheless, VL measurement by nasal swab was performed in 16 patients and quantification was conducted relatively, expressed in Ct values (cycle threshold), which is related with the VL copies detected in the molecular reaction: the lower the Ct value, the greater the VL, and vice versa. The feature worth noting of such work is that VL dynamics varies widely from one patient to another. Contrary to the work of Kai-Wang To et al. \[1\], the VL peak seems to occur earlier (first three days), whereas the sharp VL fall is at day 6 approximately, from which day the VL is undetectable in most patients. Only very few patients show detectable viral RNA after 10 days from the onset of symptoms.
In other work, pharyngeal swabs performed in 67 patients have been studied (Pan et al; 2020). VL dynamics similar to that reported by Kai-Wang To et al. is observed, with a VL of approximately 4 to 5 log10 copies/mL at day 0 of the onset of symptoms, a peak at day 6/7 (8 log10 copies/mL) and a sharp fall from day 8 of the onset of symptoms. A temporary onset of viremia is observed with a VL of 4 log10 copies/mL up to day 15 from the onset of symptoms.
Finally, in the work published by Wölfel et al. \[4\] much more accelerated dynamics than that in the work of Kai-Wang To et al. and Pan et al. (Wölfel et al; 2020) is observed, and the peak appearing much earlier than the day 4 from the onset of symptoms in the nine studied patients. Additionally, in 8 patients, the VL falls sharply reaching values below the quantification limit (2 log10 copies/mL) at day 10-11 following the onset of symptoms. Although there are transient VL relapses after day 10, this value remains very close to the study quantification limit.
In conclusion, if the works of Kai-Wang and Pan are considered, a greater viral RNA half-life is expected at day 10 following the onset of symptoms. Even though in the works of Zou and Wölfel the peak occurs much earlier than the first five days and viral negativity occurs after day 10-11 following the onset of symptoms. Method variability among the many works is a limiting factor when comparing the outcomes. That is why, due to the sample size in Kai Wang et al (n=23) and Zou et al (n=67), it is suggested to use these works as reference and to consider the works of Pan (n=17) and Wölfel (n=9) as part of behavior diversity. It is important to define the period in which therapy is to be initiated from the onset of symptoms so that the sharp fall observed post-peak is not a factor that biases the potential antiviral effect of the drug.
Considering these backgrounds along with the preliminary study with ivermectin, it is not possible to define a specific, progressive outcome for the reduction of the VL, but it may be expressed in a variation percentage with respect to the control population (without therapy) at the end of treatment. This percentage difference between the treated population and the untreated population must be greater than the variation observed for the study day or period in the patients included in the above mentioned works, since such percentage difference would replicate the behavior in our control population.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
IVERMECTIN (IVER P®)
Patients in this group will receive Ivermectin (IVER P®) 600 µg / kg / once daily plus standard care.
IVERMECTIN (IVER P®) arm will receive IVM 600 µg / kg once daily plus standard care. CONTROL arm will receive standard care.
IVERMECTIN (IVER P®) arm will receive IVM 600 µg / kg once daily plus standard care. CONTROL arm will receive standard care.
CONTROL
Patients in this group will receive standard care.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
IVERMECTIN (IVER P®) arm will receive IVM 600 µg / kg once daily plus standard care. CONTROL arm will receive standard care.
IVERMECTIN (IVER P®) arm will receive IVM 600 µg / kg once daily plus standard care. CONTROL arm will receive standard care.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients infected by SARS-CoV-2 confirmed by PCR.
3. Hospitalized patients with symptoms onset 5 days before executing the Informed Consent.
4. No comorbidities affecting the patient´s prognosis, rendering them high risk patients.
5. Documented acceptance to participate by means of the execution of the Informed Consent.
6. Female patients of childbearing age must have a negative pregnancy test and must use adequate contraceptive methods (for example, intrauterine devices, hormonal contraceptives, barrier methods, chastity or tubal ligation) during their participation in the study and for one month after the last medication dose in the case of those receiving ivermectin.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients meeting COVID-19 severity criteria, with respiratory distress or requiring intensive care.
3. Using medications having potential activity against SARS-CoV-2 such as hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine, lopinavir, ritonavir, remdesivir, azithromycin in the last 3 months.
4. Use of immunodepressants (including systemic corticosteroids) in the last 30 days.
5. Known HIV infection with CD4 count \<300 cell/µL.
6. Pregnant or lactating patients.
7. Patients with other acute infectious diseases.
8. Patients with medical conditions such as malabsorption syndromes affecting proper ivermectin absorption.
9. Patients with acute allergy conditions or with severe allergic reactions background.
10. Patients with autoimmune disease and/or decompensated chronic diseases.
11. Patients with uncontrolled, intercurrent diseases including renal impairment, hepatic impairment, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable chest angina, heart arrhythmia or psychiatric conditions that may limit adherence to CT requirements.
18 Years
69 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Universidad Nacional de Salta
OTHER
Centro de Investigación Veterinaria Tandil CIVETAN
UNKNOWN
Hospital de Pediatría Prof Dr. Juan P. Garrahan
UNKNOWN
Universidad Nacional de Quilmes
UNKNOWN
Laboratorio Elea Phoenix S.A.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital de Cuenca Alta
Cañuelas, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Centro de Educación Médica e Investigaciones Clínicas "Norberto Quirno" CEMIC
Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires F.D., Argentina
Hospital de Infecciosas Francisco Javier Muñiz
Buenos Aires, , Argentina
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Krolewiecki A, Lifschitz A, Moragas M, Travacio M, Valentini R, Alonso DF, Solari R, Tinelli MA, Cimino RO, Alvarez L, Fleitas PE, Ceballos L, Golemba M, Fernandez F, Fernandez de Oliveira D, Astudillo G, Baeck I, Farina J, Cardama GA, Mangano A, Spitzer E, Gold S, Lanusse C. Antiviral effect of high-dose ivermectin in adults with COVID-19: A proof-of-concept randomized trial. EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Jun 18;37:100959. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100959. eCollection 2021 Jul.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IVM-AR-1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.