Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study of Guselkumab in Participants With Active Lupus Nephritis (NCT NCT04376827)
NCT ID: NCT04376827
Last Updated: 2025-03-30
Results Overview
Percentage of participants achieving at least 50% decrease in proteinuria from baseline at Week 24 was reported. Proteinuria analysis was based on urine protein creatinine ratio (UPCR) and was defined as the presence of an excess of serum proteins in the urine, which may be an early sign of kidney disease.
TERMINATED
PHASE2
33 participants
Week 24
2025-03-30
Participant Flow
Randomization was stratified by geographic region (North America, Latin America, Asia Pacific and Europe) and Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) level (less than \[\<\] 3 milligrams per milligram \[mg/mg\] and greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 3 mg/mg).
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Placebo
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Guselkumab
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Double Blind Period: Week 0 to Week 52
STARTED
|
16
|
17
|
|
Double Blind Period: Week 0 to Week 52
COMPLETED
|
9
|
8
|
|
Double Blind Period: Week 0 to Week 52
NOT COMPLETED
|
7
|
9
|
|
LTE Phase:Week 52 to 96(LTE Termination)
STARTED
|
4
|
1
|
|
LTE Phase:Week 52 to 96(LTE Termination)
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
|
LTE Phase:Week 52 to 96(LTE Termination)
NOT COMPLETED
|
4
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Placebo
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Guselkumab
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Double Blind Period: Week 0 to Week 52
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
1
|
|
Double Blind Period: Week 0 to Week 52
Study Terminated by Sponsor
|
6
|
8
|
|
LTE Phase:Week 52 to 96(LTE Termination)
Protocol-specified withdrawal criterion met
|
1
|
0
|
|
LTE Phase:Week 52 to 96(LTE Termination)
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
1
|
|
LTE Phase:Week 52 to 96(LTE Termination)
Study Terminated by Sponsor
|
3
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study of Guselkumab in Participants With Active Lupus Nephritis
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Placebo
n=16 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Guselkumab
n=17 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Total
n=33 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
38.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.69 • n=93 Participants
|
35.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.07 • n=4 Participants
|
37 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.86 • n=27 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
>= 55 years
|
1 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
< 55 years
|
15 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
14 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
2 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
4 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
12 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
1 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
3 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
12 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
ARGENTINA
|
5 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
MEXICO
|
1 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
RUSSIAN FEDERATION
|
2 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
TAIWAN
|
3 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
THAILAND
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
UKRAINE
|
5 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
UNITED STATES
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 24Population: Full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention.
Percentage of participants achieving at least 50% decrease in proteinuria from baseline at Week 24 was reported. Proteinuria analysis was based on urine protein creatinine ratio (UPCR) and was defined as the presence of an excess of serum proteins in the urine, which may be an early sign of kidney disease.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=17 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=16 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least 50 Percent (%) Decrease From Baseline in Proteinuria at Week 24
|
35.3 percentage of participants
|
56.3 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 24Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention.
Percentage of participants who achieved CRR at Week 24 were reported. CRR was defined as UPCR less than (\<) 0.5 milligrams per milligrams (mg/mg), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) greater than or equal to (\>=) 60 milliliter per minute per 1.73 meter square (mL/min/1.73m\^2) or no confirmed decrease \>=20% from baseline and prednisone dose less than or equal to (\<=) 10 milligrams per day (mg/d). Participant was considered as achieved CRR who did not discontinue study intervention for any reason excluding COVID-19 related discontinuations or met the medication intercurrent event (exceeded baseline glucocorticoid dose, increase above 10 mg/d prednisone equivalent after Week 12, use of new or increased dose of concomitant medication related to LN or other immunosuppressive agents, within 8 weeks prior to the outcome measure (OM) time point (Week 24) or initiation of prohibited medications at any time prior to the endpoint time point (Week 24).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=17 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=16 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Complete Renal Response (CRR) at Week 24
|
17.6 percentage of participants
|
18.8 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 52Population: The Full Analyses Set for Week 52 (FASC52) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention and had the opportunity to complete the Week 52 visit prior to study termination. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Percentage of participants who achieved CRR at Week 52 were reported. CRR was defined as UPCR less than (\<) 0.5 mg/mg, eGFR \>= 60 mL/min/1.73m\^2 or no confirmed decrease \>=20% from baseline and prednisone dose \<= 10 mg/d. Participant was considered as achieved CRR who did not discontinue study intervention for any reason excluding COVID-19 related discontinuations or met the medication intercurrent event (exceeded baseline glucocorticoid dose, increase above 10 mg/d prednisone equivalent after Week 12, use of new or increased dose of concomitant medication related to LN or other immunosuppressive agents, within 8 weeks prior to the outcome measure time point (Week 52) or initiation of prohibited medications at any time prior to the outcome measure time point (Week 52).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=11 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=12 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved CRR at Week 52
|
9.1 percentage of participants
|
25.0 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Week 16 through Week 24Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention.
Percentage of participants achieving a sustained reduction in steroid dose less than or equal to (\<=) 10 mg/day of prednisone or equivalent from week 16 through Week 24were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=17 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=16 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Sustained Reduction in Steroid Dose <=10 mg/d of Prednisone or Equivalent From Week 16 Through Week 24
|
94.1 percentage of participants
|
87.5 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 52Population: FASC52 included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention and had the opportunity to complete the Week 52 visit prior to study termination. Here 'N' (number of participants analysed) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Percentage of participants achieving at least 50% decrease in proteinuria from baseline at Week 52 were reported. Proteinuria analysis was based on urine protein creatinine ratio (UPCR) and was defined as the presence of an excess of serum proteins in the urine, which may be an early sign of kidney disease.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=11 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=12 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least 50% Decrease in Proteinuria From Baseline at Week 52
|
27.3 percentage of participants
|
25.0 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 24Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention.
Percentage of participants with UPCR \<0.5 mg/mg at Week 24 were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=17 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=16 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) < 0.5 mg/mg at Week 24
|
29.4 percentage of participants
|
25.0 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 24Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study intervention.
Percentage of participants with UPCR less than 0.75 mg/mg at Week 24 were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=17 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=16 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With UPCR < 0.75 mg/mg at Week 24
|
35.3 percentage of participants
|
37.5 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 24Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
Percentage of participants who achieved CRR through Week 24 was reported. CRR was defined as UPCR\<0.5 mg/mg, eGFR \>= 60 mL/min/1.73m\^2 or no confirmed decrease\>=20% from baseline and prednisone dose \<= 10 mg/d. Participant was considered as achieved CRR who did not discontinue study intervention for any reason excluding COVID-19 related discontinuations or met the medication intercurrent event (exceeded baseline glucocorticoid dose, increase above 10 mg/d prednisone equivalent after Week 12, use of new or increased dose of concomitant medication related to lupus nephritis (LN) or other immunosuppressive agents, within 8 weeks prior to the outcome measure time point (Week 24) or initiation of prohibited medications at any time prior to the outcome measure time point (Week 24).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=17 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=16 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved CRR Through Week 24
|
23.5 Percentage of participants
|
37.5 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 52Population: FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
Percentage of participants with TF through Week 52 was reported. TF was defined as time to the first occurrence of TF from baseline. Participant was considered to have treatment failure, who did not continue study intervention for any reason excluding COVID-19 related discontinuations or met the medication intercurrent event (exceeded baseline glucocorticoid dose, increase above 10 mg/d prednisone equivalent after Week 12, use of new or increased dose of concomitant medication related to LN or other immunosuppressive agents, within 8 weeks prior to the outcome measure time point (Week 52) or initiation of prohibited medications at any time prior to the outcome measure time point (Week 52).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=17 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=16 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure (TF) Through Week 52
|
35.3 Percentage of participants
|
18.8 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)Population: Safety analysis set (SAS) included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for this outcome measure under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
Number of participants with AEs were reported. An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal (investigational or non-investigational) product did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. Therefore, it could be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to that medicinal product.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=17 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=16 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
|
12 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)Population: SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for this outcome measure under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
Number of Participants with SAEs were reported. An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal (investigational or non-investigational) product did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. Therefore, it could be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to that medicinal product. A SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a suspected transmission of any infectious agent via a medicinal product, or was medically important.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=17 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=16 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)Population: SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for this outcome measure under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
Number of participants with related AEs were reported. An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal (investigational or non-investigational) product did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. Therefore, it could be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to that medicinal product. Related AE was defined as the AE assessed by the investigator related to study agent.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=17 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=16 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Related AEs
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)Population: SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for this outcome measure under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
Number of participants with AEs leading to discontinuation of study intervention were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=17 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=16 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With AEs Leading to Discontinuation of Study Intervention
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)Population: SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for this outcome measure under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
Number of participants with infections as assessed by the investigator were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=17 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=16 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Infections
|
6 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)Population: SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for this outcome measure under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
Number of participants with serious infections as assessed by the investigator were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=17 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=16 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Serious Infections
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)Population: SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. For this outcome measure, no data was collected and analyzed due to premature termination of the study.
Number of participants with infections requiring oral or parenteral antimicrobial treatment planned to be were reported.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)Population: SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for this outcome measure under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
Number of participants with AEs temporally (a reaction that occurred during or within 1 hour after infusion) associated with an infusion were reported. AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal (investigational or non-investigational) product does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. Therefore, it can be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to that medicinal product.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=17 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=16 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With AEs Temporally Associated With an Infusion
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)Population: SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for this outcome measure under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
Number of participants with injection-site reactions as assessed by the investigator were reported. An injection-site reaction is any adverse reaction at a SC study intervention injection-site.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=17 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=16 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With AEs With Injection-site Reactions
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Population: SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants with available data for this OM. Since a small number of participants only entered LTE phase than planned enrollment count, planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this OM.
Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: activated partial thromboplastin time was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=13 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=12 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time
Week 24
|
0.96 Seconds
Standard Deviation 3.869
|
0.78 Seconds
Standard Deviation 1.734
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time
Week 52
|
—
|
0.88 Seconds
Standard Deviation 1.387
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Population: SAS included all subjects who received at least one dose of study intervention. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies to number of participants with available data for this OM. Since a small number of participants only entered LTE phase than planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this OM.
Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: basophils was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=12 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=13 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Basophils
Week 24
|
-0.009 10^9 cells per liter
Standard Deviation 0.0502
|
-0.009 10^9 cells per liter
Standard Deviation 0.0512
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Basophils
Week 52
|
—
|
-0.070 10^9 cells per liter
Standard Deviation 0.0990
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: eosinophils was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=12 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=13 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Eosinophils
Week 24
|
-0.041 10^9 cells per liter
Standard Deviation 0.1620
|
0.022 10^9 cells per liter
Standard Deviation 0.0472
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Eosinophils
Week 52
|
—
|
0.000 10^9 cells per liter
Standard Deviation 0.0283
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: erythrocytes mean corpuscular hemoglobin was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=12 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=13 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin
Week 24
|
-0.8 petagram (pg)
Standard Deviation 1.06
|
0.1 petagram (pg)
Standard Deviation 1.38
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin
Week 52
|
—
|
-1.5 petagram (pg)
Standard Deviation 2.12
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: erythrocytes mean corpuscular volume was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=11 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=13 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Volume
Week 24
|
-3.3 femtoliter (fL)
Standard Deviation 5.37
|
0.5 femtoliter (fL)
Standard Deviation 6.35
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Erythrocytes Mean Corpuscular Volume
Week 52
|
—
|
-4.0 femtoliter (fL)
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Population: SAS included all subjects who received at least one dose of study intervention. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this OM. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than planned enrollment count, planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this OM.
Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: erythrocytes was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=12 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=13 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Erythrocytes
Week 24
|
0.12 10^12 cells per liter
Standard Deviation 0.577
|
-0.16 10^12 cells per liter
Standard Deviation 0.582
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Erythrocytes
Week 52
|
—
|
-0.40 10^12 cells per liter
Standard Deviation 0.566
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Population: SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Here 'n' refers to the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this OM. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this OM.
Change from baseline in clinical Laboratory parameter: hematocrit was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=11 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=13 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Hematocrit
Week 24
|
-0.004 percentage of blood cells
Standard Deviation 0.0356
|
-0.013 percentage of blood cells
Standard Deviation 0.0411
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Hematocrit
Week 52
|
—
|
-0.055 percentage of blood cells
Standard Deviation 0.0495
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: hemoglobin was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=12 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=13 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Hemoglobin
Week 24
|
-0.3 grams per liter (g/L)
Standard Deviation 14.82
|
-5.2 grams per liter (g/L)
Standard Deviation 15.57
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Hemoglobin
Week 52
|
—
|
-17.0 grams per liter (g/L)
Standard Deviation 22.63
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants of both with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: leukocytes was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=12 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=13 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter Leukocytes
Week 24
|
-1.157 10^9 cells per liter
Standard Deviation 3.1246
|
-0.622 10^9 cells per liter
Standard Deviation 3.8729
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter Leukocytes
Week 52
|
—
|
-5.120 10^9 cells per liter
Standard Deviation 7.7499
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies to number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants of both with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: lymphocytes was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=12 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=13 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Lymphocytes
Week 24
|
-0.032 10^9 cells per Liter
Standard Deviation 0.3860
|
0.006 10^9 cells per Liter
Standard Deviation 0.5213
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Lymphocytes
Week 52
|
—
|
-0.545 10^9 cells per Liter
Standard Deviation 1.0960
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies to the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: monocytes was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=12 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=13 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Monocytes
Week 24
|
-0.002 10^9 cells per liter
Standard Deviation 0.1268
|
-0.014 10^9 cells per liter
Standard Deviation 0.3277
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Monocytes
Week 52
|
—
|
-0.510 10^9 cells per liter
Standard Deviation 0.7354
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: segmented neutrophils was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=12 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=13 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Hematology Parameter: Segmented Neutrophils
Week 24
|
-1.074 10^9 cells per liter
Standard Deviation 2.9652
|
-0.630 10^9 cells per liter
Standard Deviation 3.2494
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Hematology Parameter: Segmented Neutrophils
Week 52
|
—
|
-3.990 10^9 cells per liter
Standard Deviation 5.8548
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: platelets was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=12 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=13 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Platelets
Week 24
|
-17.8 10^9 cells per liter
Standard Deviation 61.89
|
-36.7 10^9 cells per liter
Standard Deviation 61.43
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Platelets
Week 52
|
—
|
-70.5 10^9 cells per liter
Standard Deviation 67.18
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: prothrombin international normalized ratio was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=13 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=13 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Prothrombin International Normalized Ratio
Week 24
|
0.01 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.064
|
0.02 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.090
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Prothrombin International Normalized Ratio
Week 52
|
—
|
0.00 Ratio
Standard Deviation 0.000
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: prothrombin time was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=13 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=13 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Prothrombin Time
Week 24
|
0.16 second
Standard Deviation 0.425
|
0.18 second
Standard Deviation 0.766
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Prothrombin Time
Week 52
|
—
|
-0.03 second
Standard Deviation 0.359
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in clinical laboratory hematology parameter:reticulocytes/erythrocytes was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=11 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=13 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Reticulocytes/Erythrocytes
Week 24
|
-0.0001 percentage of blood cells
Standard Deviation 0.00541
|
-0.0007 percentage of blood cells
Standard Deviation 0.00485
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Reticulocytes/Erythrocytes
Week 52
|
—
|
0.0000 percentage of blood cells
Standard Deviation 0.01414
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: alanine aminotransferase was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=16 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Alanine Aminotransferase
Week 24
|
-3.1 Enzyme units per liter
Standard Deviation 6.57
|
2.6 Enzyme units per liter
Standard Deviation 10.98
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Alanine Aminotransferase
Week 52
|
—
|
2.3 Enzyme units per liter
Standard Deviation 4.92
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: albumin was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=16 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Albumin
Week 24
|
1.9 Grams per Liter (g/L)
Standard Deviation 4.58
|
2.4 Grams per Liter (g/L)
Standard Deviation 5.57
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Albumin
Week 52
|
-3.0 Grams per Liter (g/L)
Standard Deviation NA
Here, NA signifies that SD could not be calculated for single participant.
|
3.5 Grams per Liter (g/L)
Standard Deviation 5.32
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: alkaline phosphatase was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=16 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Alkaline Phosphatase
Week 24
|
1.7 Enzyme units per liter
Standard Deviation 8.07
|
1.9 Enzyme units per liter
Standard Deviation 16.75
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Alkaline Phosphatase
Week 52
|
6.0 Enzyme units per liter
Standard Deviation NA
Here, NA signifies that SD could not be calculated for single participant.
|
6.5 Enzyme units per liter
Standard Deviation 5.00
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants of both with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: aspartate aminotransferase was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=13 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=13 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Aspartate Aminotransferase
Week 24
|
-0.7 Enzyme units per liter
Standard Deviation 5.41
|
0.0 Enzyme units per liter
Standard Deviation 4.97
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Aspartate Aminotransferase
Week 52
|
1.0 Enzyme units per liter
Standard Deviation NA
Here, NA signifies that SD could not be calculated for single participant.
|
1.5 Enzyme units per liter
Standard Deviation 2.38
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: bicarbonate was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=12 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=13 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Bicarbonate
Week 24
|
0.21 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 5.41
|
-0.78 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 4.97
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Bicarbonate
Week 52
|
—
|
-2.20 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 2.38
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: bilirubin was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=16 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Bilirubin
Week 24
|
0.3 micromole per liter
Standard Deviation 2.46
|
0.1 micromole per liter
Standard Deviation 1.98
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Bilirubin
Week 52
|
4.0 micromole per liter
Standard Deviation NA
Here, NA signifies that SD could not be calculated for single participant.
|
-0.3 micromole per liter
Standard Deviation 2.06
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: calcium was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=16 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Calcium
Week 24
|
0.073 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 0.0958
|
0.039 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 0.1172
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Calcium
Week 52
|
0.010 mmol/L
Standard Deviation NA
Here, NA signifies that SD could not be calculated for single participant.
|
0.000 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 0.1871
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: chloride was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=16 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Chloride
Week 24
|
0.7 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 0.0958
|
0.1 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 4.50
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Chloride
Week 52
|
2.0 mmol/L
Standard Deviation NA
Here, NA signifies that SD could not be calculated for single participant.
|
2.0 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 4.83
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: cholesterol was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=15 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Cholesterol
Week 24
|
0.017 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 0.7818
|
-1.325 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 1.3026
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Cholesterol
Week 52
|
0.210 mmol/L
Standard Deviation NA
Here, NA signifies that SD could not be calculated for single participant.
|
-2.235 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 1.6588
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: creatine kinase was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=16 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Creatine Kinase
Week 24
|
-0.5 Enzyme units per liter
Standard Deviation 53.94
|
3.3 Enzyme units per liter
Standard Deviation 42.22
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Creatine Kinase
Week 52
|
-2.0 Enzyme units per liter
Standard Deviation NA
Here, NA signifies that SD could not be calculated for single participant.
|
-8.8 Enzyme units per liter
Standard Deviation 36.65
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: creatinine was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=16 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Creatinine
Week 24
|
6.7 micromole per liter
Standard Deviation 16.78
|
0.6 micromole per liter
Standard Deviation 18.30
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Creatinine
Week 52
|
-5.0 micromole per liter
Standard Deviation NA
Here, NA signifies that SD could not be calculated for single participant.
|
-3.3 micromole per liter
Standard Deviation 7.54
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: protein was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=16 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Protein
Week 24
|
2.9 g/L
Standard Deviation 16.78
|
3.0 g/L
Standard Deviation 8.83
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Protein
Week 52
|
1.0 g/L
Standard Deviation NA
Here, NA signifies that SD could not be calculated for single participant.
|
7.0 g/L
Standard Deviation 7.39
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: phosphate was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=16 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Phosphate
Week 24
|
0.030 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 0.2916
|
0.060 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 0.1498
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Phosphate
Week 52
|
0.220 mmol/L
Standard Deviation NA
Here, NA signifies that SD could not be calculated for single participant.
|
-0.035 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 0.2213
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: sodium was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=16 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Sodium
Week 24
|
0.4 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 4.24
|
-0.7 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 2.30
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Sodium
Week 52
|
3.0 mmol/L
Standard Deviation NA
Here, NA signifies that SD could not be calculated for single participant.
|
1.0 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 1.41
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: potassium was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=16 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Potassium
Week 24
|
0.13 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 0.402
|
0.19 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 0.704
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Potassium
Week 52
|
0.00 mmol/L
Standard Deviation NA
Here, NA signifies that SD could not be calculated for single participant.
|
0.03 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 0.457
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, and Week 52Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: urea nitrogen was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=16 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Urea Nitrogen
Week 24
|
0.71 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 2.177
|
-1.23 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 3.106
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Urea Nitrogen
Week 52
|
0.50 mmol/L
Standard Deviation NA
Here, NA signifies that SD could not be calculated for single participant.
|
-1.60 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 1.564
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 24 and 52Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) refers to the number of participants evaluable at each specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants of both with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: GFR from Creatinine Adjusted for BSA was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=16 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) From Creatinine Adjusted for Body Surface Area (BSA)
Week 24
|
-5.87 milliliter/minute/1.73 meter square
Standard Deviation 17.150
|
0.44 milliliter/minute/1.73 meter square
Standard Deviation 21.639
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) From Creatinine Adjusted for Body Surface Area (BSA)
Week 52
|
5.60 milliliter/minute/1.73 meter square
Standard Deviation NA
Here, NA signifies that SD could not be calculated for single participant.
|
6.75 milliliter/minute/1.73 meter square
Standard Deviation 22.588
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 24 and 52Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) refers to the number of participants evaluable at each specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants of both with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: gamma glutamyl transferase and lactate dehydrogenase were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=16 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Gamma Glutamyl and Transferase Lactate Dehydrogenase
gamma glutamyl transferase: Week 24
|
-3.0 Enzyme units per liter
Standard Deviation 9.70
|
-0.6 Enzyme units per liter
Standard Deviation 15.01
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Gamma Glutamyl and Transferase Lactate Dehydrogenase
gamma glutamyl transferase: Week 52
|
-2.0 Enzyme units per liter
Standard Deviation NA
Here, NA signifies that SD could not be calculated for single participant.
|
1.0 Enzyme units per liter
Standard Deviation 8.60
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Gamma Glutamyl and Transferase Lactate Dehydrogenase
Lactate dehydogenase: Week 24
|
-2.5 Enzyme units per liter
Standard Deviation 17.52
|
-14.5 Enzyme units per liter
Standard Deviation 47.90
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Gamma Glutamyl and Transferase Lactate Dehydrogenase
Lactate dehydogenase: Week 52
|
7.0 Enzyme units per liter
Standard Deviation NA
Here, NA signifies that SD could not be calculated for single participant.
|
-62.5 Enzyme units per liter
Standard Deviation 40.31
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 24, 52Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at each specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants of both with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: glucose and magnesium were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=16 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Glucose and Magnesium
Glucose: Week 24
|
-0.04 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)
Standard Deviation 0.908
|
-0.23 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)
Standard Deviation 1.041
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Glucose and Magnesium
Glucose:: Week 52
|
0.20 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)
Standard Deviation NA
Here, NA signifies that SD could not be calculated for single participant.
|
-0.03 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)
Standard Deviation 0.126
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Glucose and Magnesium
Magnesium: Week 24
|
-0.022 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)
Standard Deviation 0.0607
|
-0.024 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)
Standard Deviation 0.0696
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Glucose and Magnesium
Magnesium: Week 52
|
-0.010 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)
Standard Deviation NA
Here, NA signifies that SD could not be calculated for single participant.
|
-0.068 millimoles per liter (mmol/L)
Standard Deviation 0.0842
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 24 and 52Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: protein was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=16 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Protein
Week 24
|
2.9 gram per Liter (g/L)
Standard Deviation 6.55
|
3.0 gram per Liter (g/L)
Standard Deviation 8.83
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Protein
Week 52
|
1.0 gram per Liter (g/L)
Standard Deviation NA
Here, NA signifies that SD could not be calculated for single participant.
|
7.0 gram per Liter (g/L)
Standard Deviation 7.39
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 52Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at each specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in chemistry parameter: protein/creatinine was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=16 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=15 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters: Protein/Creatinine
Week 24
|
-0.821 mg/mg
Standard Deviation 2.4250
|
-1.509 mg/mg
Standard Deviation 1.9494
|
|
Change From Baseline in Chemistry Parameters: Protein/Creatinine
Week 52
|
-0.352 mg/mg
Standard Deviation 1.6960
|
-1.586 mg/mg
Standard Deviation 1.7966
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 24, 52Population: SAS population. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at each specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: urate was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=16 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=14 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Urate
Week 24
|
8.4 micromole per liter
Standard Deviation 48.61
|
-73.4 micromole per liter
Standard Deviation 104.11
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Urate
Week 52
|
-2.0 micromole per liter
Standard Deviation NA
Here, NA signifies that SD could not be calculated for single participant.
|
-79.5 micromole per liter
Standard Deviation 79.38
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 0), Weeks 24 and 52Population: SAS population.Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at each specified timepoints. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants of both with available data for this outcome measure. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, the planned analysis of change from baseline for the safety parameters was not performed for the LTE phase for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in clinical laboratory parameter: urine protein was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=17 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=15 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Urine Protein
Week 24
|
-310.3 milligram per liter
Standard Deviation 1494.58
|
-1322.1 milligram per liter
Standard Deviation 1865.82
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameter: Urine Protein
Week 52
|
-166.4 milligram per liter
Standard Deviation 1099.54
|
-1821.7 milligram per liter
Standard Deviation 2334.78
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)Population: SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE phase than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for this outcome measure under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
Number of participants with maximum US NCI-CTCAE toxicity grade (Grade 4) in clinical laboratory parameters: hematology and chemistry were reported. Toxicity were graded as Grade 1: Mild, Grade 2: Moderate; Grade 3: Severe. Grade 4: Life-threatening and Grade 5: Death.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=17 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=16 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and Chemistry
Hypoalbuminemia
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and Chemistry
Hypoglycemia
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and Chemistry
Hypokalemia
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and Chemistry
Hypomagnesemia
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and Chemistry
Hyponatremia
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and Chemistry
Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time Prolonged
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and Chemistry
Anemia
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and Chemistry
Hemoglobin Increased
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and Chemistry
Leukocytosis
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and Chemistry
Lymphocyte Count Decreased
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and Chemistry
Lymphocyte Count Increased
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and Chemistry
Neutrophil Count Decreased
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and Chemistry
Platelet Count Decreased
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and Chemistry
White Blood Cell Decreased
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and Chemistry
Alanine Aminotransferase Increased
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and Chemistry
Alkaline Phosphatase Increased
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and Chemistry
Aspartate Aminotransferase Increased
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and Chemistry
Blood Bilirubin Increased
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and Chemistry
CPK Increased
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and Chemistry
Cholesterol High
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and Chemistry
Creatinine Increase
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and Chemistry
GGT Increased
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and Chemistry
Hypermagnesemia
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and Chemistry
Hypernatremia
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Maximum US National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Toxicity Grade (Grade 4) in Clinical Laboratory Parameters: Hematology and Chemistry
Hypertriglyceridemia
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 60Population: SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention.
Percentage of participants with abnormal vital signs: Systolic and Diastolic blood pressure were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
n=17 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=16 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs: Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure
Systolic Blood Pressure: <85 mmHg
|
0 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs: Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure
Systolic Blood Pressure::>180 mmHg
|
5.9 percentage of participants
|
6.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs: Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure
Diastolic Blood Pressure: <55 mmHg
|
0 percentage of participants
|
6.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Vital Signs: Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure
Diastolic Blood Pressure: >115 mmHg
|
0 percentage of participants
|
6.3 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Predose: Weeks 0,4,8,12,16,20,24, 36; Post-dose: Week 0 (1 hour after intravenous administration), Day 2, Week 52 and 60Population: Pharmacokinetic analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 administration of guselkumab and had at least one post-dose sample collection. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Data for this OM was not planned to be collected and analyzed for placebo arm. Since small number of participants only entered LTE phase than the planned enrollment, planned serum concentration analysis was not performed for LTE phase for this OM.
Serum Concentration of guselkumab were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=16 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Serum Concentration of Guselkumab
Week 0, predose
|
—
|
0.00 microgram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 0.000
|
|
Serum Concentration of Guselkumab
Week 0, 1h after IV administration
|
—
|
146.20 microgram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 41.273
|
|
Serum Concentration of Guselkumab
Day 2, post-dose
|
—
|
96.55 microgram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 33.805
|
|
Serum Concentration of Guselkumab
Week 4, predose
|
—
|
11.20 microgram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 7.175
|
|
Serum Concentration of Guselkumab
Week 8, predose
|
—
|
12.85 microgram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 9.549
|
|
Serum Concentration of Guselkumab
Week 12, predose
|
—
|
18.17 microgram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 11.784
|
|
Serum Concentration of Guselkumab
Week 16, pre-dose
|
—
|
9.89 microgram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 5.016
|
|
Serum Concentration of Guselkumab
Week 20, predose
|
—
|
7.63 microgram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 4.689
|
|
Serum Concentration of Guselkumab
Week 24, predose
|
—
|
6.42 microgram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 3.447
|
|
Serum Concentration of Guselkumab
Week 36, predose
|
—
|
6.57 microgram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 1.827
|
|
Serum Concentration of Guselkumab
Week 52, post-dose
|
—
|
6.13 microgram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 3.262
|
|
Serum Concentration of Guselkumab
Week 60, post-dose
|
—
|
0.39 microgram/milliliter
Standard Deviation 0.641
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline (Week 0) through Week 24 and Week 60Population: Immunogenecity analysis set inlcuded all participants who received at least 1 administration of guselkumab and had at least one post-dose sample collection. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants evaluable at specified timepoints. Data for this outcome measure was not planned to be collected and analyzed for the placebo arm.
Treatment-boosted ADA positive participants: participants who were positive at baseline and whose titers increased 2-fold at any time after treatment. Titer values were categorized as\<=1:10, 10 to 100, 100 to 1000, \>1000.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Guselkumab
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Placebo
n=17 Participants
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-boosted Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response
Week 24
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-boosted Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Response
Week 60
|
—
|
1 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Placebo
Guselkumab
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=16 participants at risk
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Guselkumab
n=17 participants at risk
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Nervous system disorders
Basal Ganglia Stroke
|
6.2%
1/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
0.00%
0/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Lupus Nephritis
|
0.00%
0/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
5.9%
1/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Placebo
n=16 participants at risk
In double-blind period, participants received placebo matched to guselkumab (400 milligrams \[mg\]) intravenous (IV) infusion at Weeks 0, 4 and 8 and placebo matched to guselkumab (200 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection every 4 weeks (q4w) from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved complete renal response (CRR) at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered the long-term extension (LTE) phase and continued to receive placebo matched to guselkumab SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
Guselkumab
n=17 participants at risk
In double-blind period, participants received guselkumab 400 mg IV infusion at Weeks 0, 4, and 8 and guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 12 through Week 48 along with standard-of-care treatment of MMF/MPA and glucocorticoids. Participants who achieved CRR at Week 48 and 52, and completed the Week 52 assessments entered LTE phase and continued to receive guselkumab 200 mg SC injection q4w from Week 52 through Week 84 (that is., up to LTE phase treatment termination).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
6.2%
1/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
17.6%
3/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Iron Deficiency Anaemia
|
6.2%
1/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
0.00%
0/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
|
12.5%
2/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
0.00%
0/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphopenia
|
18.8%
3/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
0.00%
0/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
6.2%
1/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
0.00%
0/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Left Ventricular Hypertrophy
|
0.00%
0/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
5.9%
1/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Endocrine disorders
Hypothyroidism
|
0.00%
0/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
5.9%
1/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Eye disorders
Ocular Myasthenia
|
0.00%
0/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
5.9%
1/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Pain Upper
|
12.5%
2/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
0.00%
0/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Chronic Gastritis
|
0.00%
0/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
5.9%
1/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
6.2%
1/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
0.00%
0/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrooesophageal Reflux Disease
|
0.00%
0/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
11.8%
2/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
6.2%
1/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
0.00%
0/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Toothache
|
6.2%
1/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
0.00%
0/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
6.2%
1/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
0.00%
0/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
General disorders
Injection Site Erythema
|
6.2%
1/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
0.00%
0/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
6.2%
1/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
0.00%
0/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bacterial Vaginosis
|
0.00%
0/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
5.9%
1/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.00%
0/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
5.9%
1/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Covid-19
|
18.8%
3/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
0.00%
0/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
6.2%
1/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
0.00%
0/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes Zoster
|
12.5%
2/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
5.9%
1/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
0.00%
0/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
11.8%
2/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia Bacterial
|
6.2%
1/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
0.00%
0/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pyelonephritis Chronic
|
0.00%
0/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
5.9%
1/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper Respiratory Tract Infection
|
6.2%
1/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
0.00%
0/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary Tract Infection
|
12.5%
2/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
11.8%
2/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Medication Error
|
0.00%
0/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
11.8%
2/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skin Laceration
|
6.2%
1/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
0.00%
0/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine Aminotransferase Increased
|
0.00%
0/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
5.9%
1/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Investigations
Blood Bicarbonate Decreased
|
6.2%
1/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
0.00%
0/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Investigations
Blood Creatine Phosphokinase Increased
|
6.2%
1/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
0.00%
0/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Investigations
Blood Pressure Increased
|
0.00%
0/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
5.9%
1/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Investigations
Heart Rate Increased
|
0.00%
0/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
5.9%
1/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Investigations
Liver Function Test Increased
|
0.00%
0/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
5.9%
1/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Investigations
White Blood Cell Count Increased
|
0.00%
0/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
5.9%
1/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dyslipidaemia
|
0.00%
0/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
5.9%
1/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperkalaemia
|
6.2%
1/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
5.9%
1/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperlipidaemia
|
0.00%
0/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
5.9%
1/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperuricaemia
|
12.5%
2/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
5.9%
1/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
6.2%
1/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
0.00%
0/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Vitamin D Deficiency
|
6.2%
1/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
0.00%
0/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
6.2%
1/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
0.00%
0/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back Pain
|
6.2%
1/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
0.00%
0/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle Spasms
|
6.2%
1/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
0.00%
0/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscular Weakness
|
6.2%
1/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
0.00%
0/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in Extremity
|
6.2%
1/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
0.00%
0/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Sle Arthritis
|
6.2%
1/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
0.00%
0/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
|
0.00%
0/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
5.9%
1/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
0.00%
0/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
11.8%
2/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hypoaesthesia
|
6.2%
1/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
0.00%
0/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Post Herpetic Neuralgia
|
0.00%
0/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
5.9%
1/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Sciatica
|
6.2%
1/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
0.00%
0/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Tension Headache
|
6.2%
1/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
0.00%
0/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Lupus Nephritis
|
12.5%
2/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
29.4%
5/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dry Skin
|
6.2%
1/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
0.00%
0/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin Striae
|
0.00%
0/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
5.9%
1/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Urticaria
|
0.00%
0/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
5.9%
1/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
12.5%
2/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
11.8%
2/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
6.2%
1/16 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
0.00%
0/17 • DB period: From Week 0 up to 12 week safety follow-up (i.e., up to Week 60); LTE phase: From Week 52 up to LTE phase termination (i.e., up to Week 96)
SAS included all participants who received at least one dose of study intervention. Since a small number of participants only entered the LTE period than the planned enrollment count, no separate adverse events analysis was performed for the LTE phase participants and thus, data of both DB period and LTE phase were presented together for AEs (SAEs and non- SAEs) and all cause mortality data under the arms: placebo and guselkumab.
|
Additional Information
Senior Director Clinical Research MD
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee If an investigator wishes to publish information from the study, a copy of the manuscript must be provided to the sponsor for review at least 60 days before submission for publication or presentation. If requested by the sponsor in writing, the investigator will with hold such publication for up to an additional 60 days.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER