Physiological-based Cord Clamping in Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia
NCT ID: NCT04373902
Last Updated: 2025-09-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
140 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-05-11
2026-07-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The investigators will perform a multicentre, randomised controlled trial in infants with an isolated CDH. Before birth, infants will be randomised to either PBCC or immediate cord clamping, stratified by treatment centre and severity of pulmonary hypoplasia on antenatal ultrasound. For performing PBCC a purpose-designed resuscitation module (the Concord Birth Trolley) will be used.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Delayed Cord Clamping for Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia
NCT03314233
Initiation of Resuscitation While Attached to the Cord With Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia
NCT03094039
Fetal Surgery for Moderate Left Sided Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia.
NCT00763737
Fetoscopic Tracheal Balloon Occlusion in Left Diaphragmatic Hernia
NCT00373438
Fetoscopic Tracheal Balloon Occlusion in Unborns With Severe Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia - EUROTRIAL I
NCT00373763
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Physiological-based cord clamping
In PBCC, the Concord will be placed next to the bed of the mother and all equipment will be checked before the second stage of labour has started. The infant will be placed on the platform of the Concord immediately after birth, avoiding any traction or pressure on the cord and avoiding heat loss by radiation heating. The umbilical cord will not be clamped until the infant is considered respiratory stable, which is defined as the presence of a heart rate \>100 bpm and preductal oxygen saturation \>85%, while using an fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) of \<0.5. The minimum and maximum times of cord clamping are three and ten minutes after birth, respectively. Oxytocin administration will be postponed until after cord clamping if there are no obstetric concerns. At any time, the attending neonatologist and obstetrician can decide that PBCC should not be performed or be interrupted. In that case, the infant can be placed on the standard resuscitation table for (further) stabilisation.
Physiological-based cord clamping
See 'Arm'
Immediate cord clamping
In the immediate cord clamping group, the cord will be clamped immediately after birth. The infant will then be transferred to the standard neonatal resuscitation table. After cord clamping, all infants will be managed according to the standardised neonatal management protocol for infants with a CDH, which is a consensus of current clinical guidelines by the CDH EURO consortium.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Physiological-based cord clamping
See 'Arm'
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Isolated CDH: no associated structural or genetic abnormalities that are diagnosed before birth
* Gestational age at delivery ≥35.0 weeks
* Parental written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Gestational age at delivery \<35.0 weeks
* Maternal contraindications: anterior placenta praevia, placental abruption
* High urgency caesarean section, with intended interval to delivery \<15 min
* Cases that have been treated during pregnancy with experimental drug therapy aiming to decrease the occurrence of pulmonary hypertension
* Twin pregnancies in which the infant diagnosed with a CDH is born first
* Multiple birth \>2 (triplets or higher order)
35 Weeks
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Erasmus Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Philip L.J. DeKoninck
Principal Investigator, Dr.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Monash University
Melbourne, , Australia
Medical University Graz
Graz, , Austria
University Hospitals leuven
Leuven, , Belgium
Universitätskrankenhaus Bonn
Bonn, , Germany
Universitätsklinik Mannheim
Mannheim, , Germany
Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesu
Rome, , Italy
Radboudumc University Medical Center
Nijmegen, , Netherlands
Erasmus MC University Medical Center - Sophia Children's Hospital
Rotterdam, , Netherlands
Karolinska University Hospital
Stockholm, , Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Horn-Oudshoorn EJJ, Vermeulen MJ, Knol R, Bout-Rebel R, Te Pas AB, Hooper SB, Otter SCMC, Wijnen RMH, Crossley KJ, Rafat N, Schaible T, de Boode WP, Debeer A, Urlesberger B, Roberts CT, Kipfmueller F, Capolupo I, Burgos CM, Hansen BE, Reiss IKM, DeKoninck PLJ. Multicentre, randomised controlled trial of physiological-based cord clamping versus immediate cord clamping in infants with a congenital diaphragmatic hernia (PinC): statistical analysis plan. Trials. 2024 Mar 20;25(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08027-7.
Horn-Oudshoorn EJJ, Knol R, Vermeulen MJ, Te Pas AB, Hooper SB, Cochius-den Otter SCM, Wijnen RMH, Crossley KJ, Rafat N, Schaible T, de Boode WP, Debeer A, Urlesberger B, Roberts CT, Kipfmueller F, Reiss IKM, DeKoninck PLJ. Physiological-based cord clamping versus immediate cord clamping for infants born with a congenital diaphragmatic hernia (PinC): study protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 18;12(3):e054808. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054808.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NL7853
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
PinC CDH trial
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.