Adding Vertical Correction to Scapular Recognition on Patients With Frozen Shoulder

NCT ID: NCT04369144

Last Updated: 2020-05-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

34 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-11-15

Study Completion Date

2019-12-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of adding a continual vertical downward correction to dynamic scapular recognition exercise on scapular dyskinesis and shoulder pain and disability in patients with frozen shoulder.

Design: A double-blinded randomized controlled study Setting: Out-patient clinic Subjects: Sixty-seven subjects with unilateral frozen shoulder Interventions: Participants were distributed into two groups. The intervention group performed the dynamic scapular recognition exercise and continual vertical downward correction using rigid taping with 50%-75% tension. The control group performed a similar dynamic scapular recognition exercise using a wireless biofeedback system and placebo taping. A scapular dyskinesis test with caliper was utilized to measure scapular dyskinesis, a digital inclinometer was utilized to evaluate the scapular upward rotation and shoulder ROMs, and the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) was utilized to evaluate the shoulder pain and disability.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Frozen Shoulder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Double-blinded Randomized Controlled study
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention group

The dynamic scapular recognition exercise + rigid taping with 50%-75% tension.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Dynamic Scapular Recognition exercise

Intervention Type OTHER

The intervention group received continual vertical downward correction using a standardized rigid tape. A hypoallergenic tape (Hypafix; BSN Medical GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) was used with 50% to 75% tension. Two rigid tapes were applied; the first one is placed from just superior to the midpoint of the superior border of the scapula to the level of T12 and the second tapes were placed from just superior to the superior angle of the scapula to the level of T12. The level of T12 was used as the end of both taps to increase the lever arm of the applied force and to decrease the incidence of peeling off of the tape. No tape was applied from the lateral angle of the scapula because it might impair the upward rotation of the scapula. Both taps were performed after each session and removed immediately before the next session

Control

The dynamic scapular recognition exercise + placebo taping

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Dynamic Scapular Recognition exercise

Intervention Type OTHER

The intervention group received continual vertical downward correction using a standardized rigid tape. A hypoallergenic tape (Hypafix; BSN Medical GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) was used with 50% to 75% tension. Two rigid tapes were applied; the first one is placed from just superior to the midpoint of the superior border of the scapula to the level of T12 and the second tapes were placed from just superior to the superior angle of the scapula to the level of T12. The level of T12 was used as the end of both taps to increase the lever arm of the applied force and to decrease the incidence of peeling off of the tape. No tape was applied from the lateral angle of the scapula because it might impair the upward rotation of the scapula. Both taps were performed after each session and removed immediately before the next session

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dynamic Scapular Recognition exercise

The intervention group received continual vertical downward correction using a standardized rigid tape. A hypoallergenic tape (Hypafix; BSN Medical GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) was used with 50% to 75% tension. Two rigid tapes were applied; the first one is placed from just superior to the midpoint of the superior border of the scapula to the level of T12 and the second tapes were placed from just superior to the superior angle of the scapula to the level of T12. The level of T12 was used as the end of both taps to increase the lever arm of the applied force and to decrease the incidence of peeling off of the tape. No tape was applied from the lateral angle of the scapula because it might impair the upward rotation of the scapula. Both taps were performed after each session and removed immediately before the next session

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Rigid Taping

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* The existence of a unilateral frozen shoulder with incapability of the participant to raise the arm more than 100 degrees in the plane of the scapula.
* Aa restriction in both passive and active shoulder ROM
* The existence of pain that affects performing activities of daily living\[19\]

Exclusion Criteria

* The presence of any shoulder problem contraindicated for performing exercises to the shoulder joint, such as active inflammatory disease, cancer, active infection, recent subluxations or dislocations, fractures, and surgeries nearby the shoulder region. Furthermore, the patient was excluded if he/she had no signs of scapular dyskinesis.
Minimum Eligible Age

45 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Beni-Suef University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ayman Mohamed

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

beni Suef University

Banī Suwayf, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Scapula recognition and taping

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.