Study of Efficacy and Safety of Canakinumab Treatment for CRS in Participants With COVID-19-induced Pneumonia

NCT ID: NCT04362813

Last Updated: 2022-01-24

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

454 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-04-30

Study Completion Date

2020-12-22

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess the efficacy and safety of canakinumab plus standard-of-care (SOC) compared with placebo plus SOC in patients with COVID-19-induced pneumonia and cytokine release syndrome (CRS).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This was a Phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess the efficacy and safety of canakinumab in patients with COVID-19-induced pneumonia and cytokine release syndrome (CRS). The study enrolled patients to canakinumab or placebo, in addition to standard of care (SOC) per local practice, which may have included anti-viral treatment, corticosteroids and/or supportive care.

Patients who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either canakinumab + SOC or placebo + SOC and were dosed immediately after ensuring that the patient met all eligibility criteria. Patients in the canakinumab arm were dosed on Day 1 with canakinumab 450 mg for body weight of 40-\<60 kg, 600 mg for 60-80 kg or 750 mg for \>80 kg in 250 mL of 5% dextrose infused IV over 2 hours. Patients in the placebo arm were administered with 250 mL of 5% dextrose infused IV over 2 hours.

The study included:

* Screening period of 0-1 day
* Study period from initial dose on Day 1 to Day 29 or hospital discharge
* Follow-up to Day 127 The primary objective was to demonstrate the benefit of canakinumab + SOC in increasing the chance of survival without ever requiring invasive mechanical ventilation among patients with COVID-19-induced pneumonia and CRS.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) in Patients With COVID-19-induced Pneumonia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Canakinumab

Canakinumab 450 mg for body weight 40-\<60 kg, 600 mg for 60-80 kg or 750 mg for \>80 kg in 250 mL of 5% dextrose infused IV over 2 hours. Single dose on Day 1.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Canakinumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Canakinumab 450 mg for body weight 40-\<60 kg, 600 mg for 60-80 kg or 750 mg for \>80 kg in 250 mL of 5% dextrose infused IV over 2 hours. Single dose on Day 1.

Placebo

250 mL of 5% dextrose infused IV over 2 hours. Single dose on Day 1.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

250 mL of 5% dextrose infused IV over 2 hours. Single dose on Day 1.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Canakinumab

Canakinumab 450 mg for body weight 40-\<60 kg, 600 mg for 60-80 kg or 750 mg for \>80 kg in 250 mL of 5% dextrose infused IV over 2 hours. Single dose on Day 1.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

250 mL of 5% dextrose infused IV over 2 hours. Single dose on Day 1.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

ACZ885

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adults ≥ 18 years old (for US only: patients ≥ 12 years old, although no children ever enrolled. This was an adult trial.)
* Body weight ≥40 kg
* Informed consent must be obtained prior to participation in this study. For US patients 12 - \< 18 years old; parent/guardian consent must be obtained and assent if applicable.
* Clinically diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 virus by PCR or by other approved diagnostic methodology
* Hospitalized with COVID-19-induced pneumonia evidenced by chest x-ray or CT scan with pulmonary infiltrates
* SpO2 ≤ 93% on room air or arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2)/ fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) \< 300mmHg
* C-reactive protein ≥20 mg/L or ferritin level ≥600 µg/L

Exclusion Criteria

* History of hypersensitivity to canakinumab or to biologic drugs
* Intubated and on mechanical ventilation (invasive) at time of randomization
* Treatment with immunomodulators or immunosuppressant drugs, including but not limited to tocilizumab, TNF inhibitors and anti-IL-17 agents within 5 half-lives or 30 days (whichever is longer) prior to randomization with the exception of anakinra which is excluded within 5 half-lives only. Note: Immunomodulators (topical or inhaled) for asthma and atopic dermatitis and corticosteroids (any route of administration) are permitted.
* Suspected or known untreated active bacterial, fungal, viral, or parasitic infection with the exception of COVID-19
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Novartiis Pharmaceuticals

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Novartis Investigative Site

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Glendale, California, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Bergamo, BG, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Cona, FE, Italy

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Barnaul, , Russia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Ryazan, , Russia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

S-Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Sestroretsk, , Russia

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

San Sebastián de los Reyes, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Barnet, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Coventry, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

Leeds, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Novartis Investigative Site

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States France Italy Russia Spain United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sedhai YR, Sears M, Vecchie A, Bonaventura A, Greer J, Spence K, Tackett H, Turner J, Pak M, Patel N, Black M, Wohlford G, Clary RE, Duke C, Hardin M, Kemp H, Priday A, Sims EK Jr, Mihalick V, Ho AC, Ibe I, Harmon M, Markley R, Van Tassell B, Abbate A. Clinical trial enrollment at a rural satellite hospital during COVID-19 pandemic. J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Apr 8;5(1):e136. doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.777. eCollection 2021.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34367680 (View on PubMed)

Caricchio R, Abbate A, Gordeev I, Meng J, Hsue PY, Neogi T, Arduino R, Fomina D, Bogdanov R, Stepanenko T, Ruiz-Seco P, Gonzalez-Garcia A, Chen Y, Li Y, Whelan S, Noviello S; CAN-COVID Investigators. Effect of Canakinumab vs Placebo on Survival Without Invasive Mechanical Ventilation in Patients Hospitalized With Severe COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2021 Jul 20;326(3):230-239. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.9508.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34283183 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://www.novctrd.com/ctrdweb/patientsummary/patientsummaries?patientSummaryId=971

A Plain Language Trial Summary is available on novctrd.com

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2020-001370-30

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CACZ885D2310

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

TD-0903 for ALI Associated With COVID-19
NCT04402866 COMPLETED PHASE2
Tocilizumab Treatment in Patients With COVID-19
NCT04363853 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE2
A Phase II/III Study of Sargramostim
NCT04642950 COMPLETED PHASE2/PHASE3