Trial Outcomes & Findings for Bupropion Versus Escitalopram on Reward Circuitry and Motivational Deficits (NCT NCT04352101)
NCT ID: NCT04352101
Last Updated: 2023-12-29
Results Overview
Targeted FC is calculated as the degree of correlation in activity between a 3mm3 radius sphere in VS and the vmPFC cluster identified as being reward-sensitive in neuroimaging meta-analyses and as used to define vmPFC in previous work. Subject-level correlations for degree of vmPFC-VS FC is Fisher's Z transformed {Z(R)=0.5ln\[(1+R)/(1-R)\]}, a standard method for calculating fMRI functional connectivity, whereby greater Z-scores reflected stronger correlated functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) activity (i.e., higher VS-vmPFC connectivity). For each study timepoint, Z-scores will be extracted and the change in mean FC values compared to baseline will be calculated. The central value is 0, and the standard deviation depends on the sample variance. Increasing values indicate increasing connectivity between the indicated brain regions (VS and vmPFC). There are no relevant thresholds, and there is no direct interpretation of results in terms of clinical improvement.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
18 participants
Baseline, Week 4, Week 8
2023-12-29
Participant Flow
Participants were recruited from the Emory Clinic in Atlanta, Georgia, USA. Participant enrollment began September 23, 2020 and the final follow-up assessment occurred July 25, 2022.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Bupropion
Participants randomized to take bupropion for 8 weeks. Participants took 150 milligrams per day (mg/d) of bupropion extended release (XL) for two weeks, then the dose increased to 300mg/d, as tolerated, for the remaining 6 weeks of the study.
|
Escitalopram
Participants randomized to take escitalopram for 8 weeks. Participants took 10mg/d of escitalopram for two weeks, then the dose increased to 20mg/d, as tolerated, for the remaining 6 weeks of the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
10
|
8
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
8
|
7
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Bupropion
Participants randomized to take bupropion for 8 weeks. Participants took 150 milligrams per day (mg/d) of bupropion extended release (XL) for two weeks, then the dose increased to 300mg/d, as tolerated, for the remaining 6 weeks of the study.
|
Escitalopram
Participants randomized to take escitalopram for 8 weeks. Participants took 10mg/d of escitalopram for two weeks, then the dose increased to 20mg/d, as tolerated, for the remaining 6 weeks of the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
2
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Bupropion Versus Escitalopram on Reward Circuitry and Motivational Deficits
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Bupropion
n=10 Participants
Participants randomized to take bupropion for 8 weeks. Participants took 150 milligrams per day (mg/d) of bupropion XL for two weeks, then the dose increased to 300mg/d, as tolerated, for the remaining 6 weeks of the study.
|
Escitalopram
n=8 Participants
Participants randomized to take escitalopram for 8 weeks. Participants took 10mg/d of escitalopram for two weeks, then the dose increased to 20mg/d, as tolerated, for the remaining 6 weeks of the study.
|
Total
n=18 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
39.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.0 • n=5 Participants
|
41.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3 • n=7 Participants
|
40.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
10 participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 participants
n=7 Participants
|
18 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8Population: This analysis includes participants with available and analyzable fMRI scans both at baseline and post-treatment.
Targeted FC is calculated as the degree of correlation in activity between a 3mm3 radius sphere in VS and the vmPFC cluster identified as being reward-sensitive in neuroimaging meta-analyses and as used to define vmPFC in previous work. Subject-level correlations for degree of vmPFC-VS FC is Fisher's Z transformed {Z(R)=0.5ln\[(1+R)/(1-R)\]}, a standard method for calculating fMRI functional connectivity, whereby greater Z-scores reflected stronger correlated functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) activity (i.e., higher VS-vmPFC connectivity). For each study timepoint, Z-scores will be extracted and the change in mean FC values compared to baseline will be calculated. The central value is 0, and the standard deviation depends on the sample variance. Increasing values indicate increasing connectivity between the indicated brain regions (VS and vmPFC). There are no relevant thresholds, and there is no direct interpretation of results in terms of clinical improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bupropion
n=7 Participants
Participants randomized to take bupropion for 8 weeks. Participants took 150 milligrams per day (mg/d) of bupropion XL for two weeks, then the dose increased to 300mg/d, as tolerated, for the remaining 6 weeks of the study.
|
Escitalopram
n=5 Participants
Participants randomized to take escitalopram for 8 weeks. Participants took 10mg/d of escitalopram for two weeks, then the dose increased to 20mg/d, as tolerated, for the remaining 6 weeks of the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Targeted Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex-Ventral Striatal (vmPFC-VS) Functional Connectivity (FC)
Baseline to Week 4
|
0.02 Z-score
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
-0.13 Z-score
Standard Deviation 0.16
|
|
Change in Targeted Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex-Ventral Striatal (vmPFC-VS) Functional Connectivity (FC)
Baseline to Week 8
|
0.02 Z-score
Standard Deviation 0.20
|
0.09 Z-score
Standard Deviation 0.19
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8Population: One participant in the Bupropion group was excluded prior to completing this task, and another did not complete the task due to shoulder pain during the task. One participant in the Escitalopram group did not complete the task at the Week 4 visit because the visit was seen virtually (due to illness) and neuropsychological testing was not performed.
The Effort-Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT) is a computer-based multi-trial game to assess motivation. Participants are given an opportunity to choose different task difficulty levels to obtain monetary rewards (easy tasks have low rewards while hard tasks have higher rewards). Each trial has a high, medium, or low probability of success, and this information is given to the participant when they are deciding between easy and hard tasks. The task lasts for 20 minutes, and first 50 trials are analyzed. The proportion of hard-task choices across each level of probability is calculated. Possible values range between 0 to1 with 1 being a better outcome indicating the mean probability of making a hard (high effort) choice. Lower proportions of hard task choices indicate decreased motivation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bupropion
n=8 Participants
Participants randomized to take bupropion for 8 weeks. Participants took 150 milligrams per day (mg/d) of bupropion XL for two weeks, then the dose increased to 300mg/d, as tolerated, for the remaining 6 weeks of the study.
|
Escitalopram
n=8 Participants
Participants randomized to take escitalopram for 8 weeks. Participants took 10mg/d of escitalopram for two weeks, then the dose increased to 20mg/d, as tolerated, for the remaining 6 weeks of the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Hard-Task Choices During the Effort-Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT)
Baseline
|
0.392 proportion of hard-task choices
Standard Deviation 0.257
|
0.450 proportion of hard-task choices
Standard Deviation 0.290
|
|
Proportion of Hard-Task Choices During the Effort-Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT)
Week 2
|
0.450 proportion of hard-task choices
Standard Deviation 0.316
|
0.385 proportion of hard-task choices
Standard Deviation 0.275
|
|
Proportion of Hard-Task Choices During the Effort-Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT)
Week 4
|
0.348 proportion of hard-task choices
Standard Deviation 0.207
|
0.321 proportion of hard-task choices
Standard Deviation 0.215
|
|
Proportion of Hard-Task Choices During the Effort-Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT)
Week 8
|
0.360 proportion of hard-task choices
Standard Deviation 0.229
|
0.323 proportion of hard-task choices
Standard Deviation 0.158
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8Population: This analysis includes participants who were still participating in the study at the indicated study visit.
The SHAPS-C is a 14-item clinician-administered scale assessing the amount of pleasure during common daily activities that the participant has experienced in the past week. Responses are given on a scale of 1 to 4 where 1 = lots of pleasure and 4 = no pleasure. Total scores range from 14 to 56 with lower scores indicating greater enjoyment of activities.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bupropion
n=10 Participants
Participants randomized to take bupropion for 8 weeks. Participants took 150 milligrams per day (mg/d) of bupropion XL for two weeks, then the dose increased to 300mg/d, as tolerated, for the remaining 6 weeks of the study.
|
Escitalopram
n=8 Participants
Participants randomized to take escitalopram for 8 weeks. Participants took 10mg/d of escitalopram for two weeks, then the dose increased to 20mg/d, as tolerated, for the remaining 6 weeks of the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS-C) Score
Baseline
|
39.400 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.535
|
38.625 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.200
|
|
Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS-C) Score
Week 2
|
36.222 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.629
|
33.375 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.534
|
|
Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS-C) Score
Week 4
|
33.778 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.680
|
27.250 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.196
|
|
Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS-C) Score
Week 6
|
35.375 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.963
|
25.250 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.559
|
|
Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS-C) Score
Week 8
|
32.125 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.125
|
24.857 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.890
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8Population: This analysis includes participants who were still participating in the study at the indicated study visit. One participant in the Bupropion group did not complete this assessment at the Week 4 visit.
The MAP-SR is an 18-item self-report inventory that has been validated in psychiatric populations and is designed to disentangle motivational and consummatory components of everyday activities over a 24-hr period. Responses are given on a 5-point scale where 0 = no pleasure or motivation and 4 = extreme pleasure or motivation. Total scores range from 0 to 72 and higher scores indicate greater motivation and pleasure during everyday activities.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bupropion
n=10 Participants
Participants randomized to take bupropion for 8 weeks. Participants took 150 milligrams per day (mg/d) of bupropion XL for two weeks, then the dose increased to 300mg/d, as tolerated, for the remaining 6 weeks of the study.
|
Escitalopram
n=8 Participants
Participants randomized to take escitalopram for 8 weeks. Participants took 10mg/d of escitalopram for two weeks, then the dose increased to 20mg/d, as tolerated, for the remaining 6 weeks of the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Motivation and Pleasure Scale-Self-Report (MAP-SR) Score
Baseline
|
27.800 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.829
|
28.000 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.211
|
|
Motivation and Pleasure Scale-Self-Report (MAP-SR) Score
Week 2
|
29.333 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.846
|
34.875 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.493
|
|
Motivation and Pleasure Scale-Self-Report (MAP-SR) Score
Week 4
|
35.250 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.254
|
42.500 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.199
|
|
Motivation and Pleasure Scale-Self-Report (MAP-SR) Score
Week 6
|
37.250 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.876
|
44.750 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.852
|
|
Motivation and Pleasure Scale-Self-Report (MAP-SR) Score
Week 8
|
38.000 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.529
|
45.714 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.232
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8Population: This analysis includes participants who were still participating in the study at the indicated study visit.
The IDS-SR is a 30-item self-reported measurement of depression severity. Responses are given on a 4-point scale where 0 = no problems and 3 = severe problems. Total scores are based on 28 items and range from 0 to 84 with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms of depression.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Bupropion
n=10 Participants
Participants randomized to take bupropion for 8 weeks. Participants took 150 milligrams per day (mg/d) of bupropion XL for two weeks, then the dose increased to 300mg/d, as tolerated, for the remaining 6 weeks of the study.
|
Escitalopram
n=8 Participants
Participants randomized to take escitalopram for 8 weeks. Participants took 10mg/d of escitalopram for two weeks, then the dose increased to 20mg/d, as tolerated, for the remaining 6 weeks of the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-Report (IDS-SR)
Baseline
|
38.800 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.942
|
42.250 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.906
|
|
Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-Report (IDS-SR)
Week 2
|
30.222 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.729
|
30.250 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.407
|
|
Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-Report (IDS-SR)
Week 4
|
23.556 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.577
|
21.500 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.258
|
|
Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-Report (IDS-SR)
Week 6
|
25.000 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.464
|
16.250 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.235
|
|
Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-Report (IDS-SR)
Week 8
|
23.875 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.532
|
18.143 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.734
|
Adverse Events
Bupropion
Escitalopram
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Bupropion
n=10 participants at risk
Participants randomized to take bupropion for 8 weeks. Participants took 150 milligrams per day (mg/d) of bupropion XL for two weeks, then the dose increased to 300mg/d, as tolerated, for the remaining 6 weeks of the study.
|
Escitalopram
n=8 participants at risk
Participants randomized to take escitalopram for 8 weeks. Participants took 10mg/d of escitalopram for two weeks, then the dose increased to 20mg/d, as tolerated, for the remaining 6 weeks of the study.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Endocrine disorders
Nocturnal perspiration
|
10.0%
1/10 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Itching
|
20.0%
2/10 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
|
|
General disorders
Lightheadedness
|
10.0%
1/10 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
|
|
General disorders
Headache
|
10.0%
1/10 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
|
|
General disorders
Dry mouth
|
10.0%
1/10 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Chest pain
|
10.0%
1/10 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
|
|
Vascular disorders
High blood pressure
|
10.0%
1/10 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Enlarged lymph nodes
|
10.0%
1/10 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in limb
|
10.0%
1/10 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Stress
|
10.0%
1/10 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
|
|
General disorders
Insomnia
|
10.0%
1/10 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
20.0%
2/10 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
|
37.5%
3/8 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
|
|
General disorders
Vivid dreams
|
10.0%
1/10 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxious mood
|
20.0%
2/10 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
|
0.00%
0/8 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
|
0.00%
0/10 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
|
|
General disorders
Sleep disturbance
|
0.00%
0/10 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
0.00%
0/10 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
|
25.0%
2/8 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
|
|
General disorders
Drowsiness
|
0.00%
0/10 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Tightness in jaw
|
0.00%
0/10 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
|
|
General disorders
Nightmares
|
0.00%
0/10 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Decreased libido
|
0.00%
0/10 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
|
12.5%
1/8 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place