Trial Outcomes & Findings for Bupropion Versus Escitalopram on Reward Circuitry and Motivational Deficits (NCT NCT04352101)

NCT ID: NCT04352101

Last Updated: 2023-12-29

Results Overview

Targeted FC is calculated as the degree of correlation in activity between a 3mm3 radius sphere in VS and the vmPFC cluster identified as being reward-sensitive in neuroimaging meta-analyses and as used to define vmPFC in previous work. Subject-level correlations for degree of vmPFC-VS FC is Fisher's Z transformed {Z(R)=0.5ln\[(1+R)/(1-R)\]}, a standard method for calculating fMRI functional connectivity, whereby greater Z-scores reflected stronger correlated functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) activity (i.e., higher VS-vmPFC connectivity). For each study timepoint, Z-scores will be extracted and the change in mean FC values compared to baseline will be calculated. The central value is 0, and the standard deviation depends on the sample variance. Increasing values indicate increasing connectivity between the indicated brain regions (VS and vmPFC). There are no relevant thresholds, and there is no direct interpretation of results in terms of clinical improvement.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE4

Target enrollment

18 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline, Week 4, Week 8

Results posted on

2023-12-29

Participant Flow

Participants were recruited from the Emory Clinic in Atlanta, Georgia, USA. Participant enrollment began September 23, 2020 and the final follow-up assessment occurred July 25, 2022.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Bupropion
Participants randomized to take bupropion for 8 weeks. Participants took 150 milligrams per day (mg/d) of bupropion extended release (XL) for two weeks, then the dose increased to 300mg/d, as tolerated, for the remaining 6 weeks of the study.
Escitalopram
Participants randomized to take escitalopram for 8 weeks. Participants took 10mg/d of escitalopram for two weeks, then the dose increased to 20mg/d, as tolerated, for the remaining 6 weeks of the study.
Overall Study
STARTED
10
8
Overall Study
COMPLETED
8
7
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
2
1

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Bupropion
Participants randomized to take bupropion for 8 weeks. Participants took 150 milligrams per day (mg/d) of bupropion extended release (XL) for two weeks, then the dose increased to 300mg/d, as tolerated, for the remaining 6 weeks of the study.
Escitalopram
Participants randomized to take escitalopram for 8 weeks. Participants took 10mg/d of escitalopram for two weeks, then the dose increased to 20mg/d, as tolerated, for the remaining 6 weeks of the study.
Overall Study
Physician Decision
2
1

Baseline Characteristics

Bupropion Versus Escitalopram on Reward Circuitry and Motivational Deficits

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Bupropion
n=10 Participants
Participants randomized to take bupropion for 8 weeks. Participants took 150 milligrams per day (mg/d) of bupropion XL for two weeks, then the dose increased to 300mg/d, as tolerated, for the remaining 6 weeks of the study.
Escitalopram
n=8 Participants
Participants randomized to take escitalopram for 8 weeks. Participants took 10mg/d of escitalopram for two weeks, then the dose increased to 20mg/d, as tolerated, for the remaining 6 weeks of the study.
Total
n=18 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
39.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.0 • n=5 Participants
41.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3 • n=7 Participants
40.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
10 participants
n=5 Participants
8 participants
n=7 Participants
18 participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8

Population: This analysis includes participants with available and analyzable fMRI scans both at baseline and post-treatment.

Targeted FC is calculated as the degree of correlation in activity between a 3mm3 radius sphere in VS and the vmPFC cluster identified as being reward-sensitive in neuroimaging meta-analyses and as used to define vmPFC in previous work. Subject-level correlations for degree of vmPFC-VS FC is Fisher's Z transformed {Z(R)=0.5ln\[(1+R)/(1-R)\]}, a standard method for calculating fMRI functional connectivity, whereby greater Z-scores reflected stronger correlated functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) activity (i.e., higher VS-vmPFC connectivity). For each study timepoint, Z-scores will be extracted and the change in mean FC values compared to baseline will be calculated. The central value is 0, and the standard deviation depends on the sample variance. Increasing values indicate increasing connectivity between the indicated brain regions (VS and vmPFC). There are no relevant thresholds, and there is no direct interpretation of results in terms of clinical improvement.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bupropion
n=7 Participants
Participants randomized to take bupropion for 8 weeks. Participants took 150 milligrams per day (mg/d) of bupropion XL for two weeks, then the dose increased to 300mg/d, as tolerated, for the remaining 6 weeks of the study.
Escitalopram
n=5 Participants
Participants randomized to take escitalopram for 8 weeks. Participants took 10mg/d of escitalopram for two weeks, then the dose increased to 20mg/d, as tolerated, for the remaining 6 weeks of the study.
Change in Targeted Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex-Ventral Striatal (vmPFC-VS) Functional Connectivity (FC)
Baseline to Week 4
0.02 Z-score
Standard Deviation 0.14
-0.13 Z-score
Standard Deviation 0.16
Change in Targeted Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex-Ventral Striatal (vmPFC-VS) Functional Connectivity (FC)
Baseline to Week 8
0.02 Z-score
Standard Deviation 0.20
0.09 Z-score
Standard Deviation 0.19

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8

Population: One participant in the Bupropion group was excluded prior to completing this task, and another did not complete the task due to shoulder pain during the task. One participant in the Escitalopram group did not complete the task at the Week 4 visit because the visit was seen virtually (due to illness) and neuropsychological testing was not performed.

The Effort-Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT) is a computer-based multi-trial game to assess motivation. Participants are given an opportunity to choose different task difficulty levels to obtain monetary rewards (easy tasks have low rewards while hard tasks have higher rewards). Each trial has a high, medium, or low probability of success, and this information is given to the participant when they are deciding between easy and hard tasks. The task lasts for 20 minutes, and first 50 trials are analyzed. The proportion of hard-task choices across each level of probability is calculated. Possible values range between 0 to1 with 1 being a better outcome indicating the mean probability of making a hard (high effort) choice. Lower proportions of hard task choices indicate decreased motivation.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bupropion
n=8 Participants
Participants randomized to take bupropion for 8 weeks. Participants took 150 milligrams per day (mg/d) of bupropion XL for two weeks, then the dose increased to 300mg/d, as tolerated, for the remaining 6 weeks of the study.
Escitalopram
n=8 Participants
Participants randomized to take escitalopram for 8 weeks. Participants took 10mg/d of escitalopram for two weeks, then the dose increased to 20mg/d, as tolerated, for the remaining 6 weeks of the study.
Proportion of Hard-Task Choices During the Effort-Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT)
Baseline
0.392 proportion of hard-task choices
Standard Deviation 0.257
0.450 proportion of hard-task choices
Standard Deviation 0.290
Proportion of Hard-Task Choices During the Effort-Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT)
Week 2
0.450 proportion of hard-task choices
Standard Deviation 0.316
0.385 proportion of hard-task choices
Standard Deviation 0.275
Proportion of Hard-Task Choices During the Effort-Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT)
Week 4
0.348 proportion of hard-task choices
Standard Deviation 0.207
0.321 proportion of hard-task choices
Standard Deviation 0.215
Proportion of Hard-Task Choices During the Effort-Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT)
Week 8
0.360 proportion of hard-task choices
Standard Deviation 0.229
0.323 proportion of hard-task choices
Standard Deviation 0.158

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8

Population: This analysis includes participants who were still participating in the study at the indicated study visit.

The SHAPS-C is a 14-item clinician-administered scale assessing the amount of pleasure during common daily activities that the participant has experienced in the past week. Responses are given on a scale of 1 to 4 where 1 = lots of pleasure and 4 = no pleasure. Total scores range from 14 to 56 with lower scores indicating greater enjoyment of activities.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bupropion
n=10 Participants
Participants randomized to take bupropion for 8 weeks. Participants took 150 milligrams per day (mg/d) of bupropion XL for two weeks, then the dose increased to 300mg/d, as tolerated, for the remaining 6 weeks of the study.
Escitalopram
n=8 Participants
Participants randomized to take escitalopram for 8 weeks. Participants took 10mg/d of escitalopram for two weeks, then the dose increased to 20mg/d, as tolerated, for the remaining 6 weeks of the study.
Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS-C) Score
Baseline
39.400 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.535
38.625 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.200
Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS-C) Score
Week 2
36.222 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.629
33.375 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.534
Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS-C) Score
Week 4
33.778 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.680
27.250 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.196
Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS-C) Score
Week 6
35.375 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.963
25.250 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.559
Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS-C) Score
Week 8
32.125 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.125
24.857 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.890

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8

Population: This analysis includes participants who were still participating in the study at the indicated study visit. One participant in the Bupropion group did not complete this assessment at the Week 4 visit.

The MAP-SR is an 18-item self-report inventory that has been validated in psychiatric populations and is designed to disentangle motivational and consummatory components of everyday activities over a 24-hr period. Responses are given on a 5-point scale where 0 = no pleasure or motivation and 4 = extreme pleasure or motivation. Total scores range from 0 to 72 and higher scores indicate greater motivation and pleasure during everyday activities.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bupropion
n=10 Participants
Participants randomized to take bupropion for 8 weeks. Participants took 150 milligrams per day (mg/d) of bupropion XL for two weeks, then the dose increased to 300mg/d, as tolerated, for the remaining 6 weeks of the study.
Escitalopram
n=8 Participants
Participants randomized to take escitalopram for 8 weeks. Participants took 10mg/d of escitalopram for two weeks, then the dose increased to 20mg/d, as tolerated, for the remaining 6 weeks of the study.
Motivation and Pleasure Scale-Self-Report (MAP-SR) Score
Baseline
27.800 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.829
28.000 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.211
Motivation and Pleasure Scale-Self-Report (MAP-SR) Score
Week 2
29.333 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.846
34.875 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.493
Motivation and Pleasure Scale-Self-Report (MAP-SR) Score
Week 4
35.250 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.254
42.500 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.199
Motivation and Pleasure Scale-Self-Report (MAP-SR) Score
Week 6
37.250 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.876
44.750 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.852
Motivation and Pleasure Scale-Self-Report (MAP-SR) Score
Week 8
38.000 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.529
45.714 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.232

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8

Population: This analysis includes participants who were still participating in the study at the indicated study visit.

The IDS-SR is a 30-item self-reported measurement of depression severity. Responses are given on a 4-point scale where 0 = no problems and 3 = severe problems. Total scores are based on 28 items and range from 0 to 84 with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms of depression.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Bupropion
n=10 Participants
Participants randomized to take bupropion for 8 weeks. Participants took 150 milligrams per day (mg/d) of bupropion XL for two weeks, then the dose increased to 300mg/d, as tolerated, for the remaining 6 weeks of the study.
Escitalopram
n=8 Participants
Participants randomized to take escitalopram for 8 weeks. Participants took 10mg/d of escitalopram for two weeks, then the dose increased to 20mg/d, as tolerated, for the remaining 6 weeks of the study.
Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-Report (IDS-SR)
Baseline
38.800 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.942
42.250 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.906
Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-Report (IDS-SR)
Week 2
30.222 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.729
30.250 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.407
Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-Report (IDS-SR)
Week 4
23.556 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.577
21.500 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.258
Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-Report (IDS-SR)
Week 6
25.000 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.464
16.250 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.235
Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-Report (IDS-SR)
Week 8
23.875 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.532
18.143 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.734

Adverse Events

Bupropion

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 6 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Escitalopram

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 6 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Bupropion
n=10 participants at risk
Participants randomized to take bupropion for 8 weeks. Participants took 150 milligrams per day (mg/d) of bupropion XL for two weeks, then the dose increased to 300mg/d, as tolerated, for the remaining 6 weeks of the study.
Escitalopram
n=8 participants at risk
Participants randomized to take escitalopram for 8 weeks. Participants took 10mg/d of escitalopram for two weeks, then the dose increased to 20mg/d, as tolerated, for the remaining 6 weeks of the study.
Endocrine disorders
Nocturnal perspiration
10.0%
1/10 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
0.00%
0/8 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Itching
20.0%
2/10 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
0.00%
0/8 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
General disorders
Lightheadedness
10.0%
1/10 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
0.00%
0/8 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
General disorders
Headache
10.0%
1/10 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
12.5%
1/8 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
General disorders
Dry mouth
10.0%
1/10 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
0.00%
0/8 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
Cardiac disorders
Chest pain
10.0%
1/10 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
0.00%
0/8 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
Vascular disorders
High blood pressure
10.0%
1/10 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
0.00%
0/8 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Enlarged lymph nodes
10.0%
1/10 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
0.00%
0/8 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in limb
10.0%
1/10 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
0.00%
0/8 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
Psychiatric disorders
Stress
10.0%
1/10 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
0.00%
0/8 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
General disorders
Insomnia
10.0%
1/10 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
0.00%
0/8 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
20.0%
2/10 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
37.5%
3/8 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
General disorders
Vivid dreams
10.0%
1/10 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
0.00%
0/8 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
Psychiatric disorders
Anxious mood
20.0%
2/10 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
0.00%
0/8 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
0.00%
0/10 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
12.5%
1/8 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
General disorders
Sleep disturbance
0.00%
0/10 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
12.5%
1/8 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
General disorders
Fatigue
0.00%
0/10 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
25.0%
2/8 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
General disorders
Drowsiness
0.00%
0/10 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
12.5%
1/8 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Tightness in jaw
0.00%
0/10 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
12.5%
1/8 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
General disorders
Nightmares
0.00%
0/10 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
12.5%
1/8 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Decreased libido
0.00%
0/10 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.
12.5%
1/8 • Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the baseline assessment and continued through the final assessment at Week 8.

Additional Information

Andrew H. Miller, MD

Emory University

Phone: 404-727-8260

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place