Trial Outcomes & Findings for Treatment of Post-Operative Pain Following Orthopedic Surgery With SPRINT® Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System (NCT NCT04341948)

NCT ID: NCT04341948

Last Updated: 2025-08-27

Results Overview

All participants were asked to complete daily diaries to record their average knee pain during the past 24 hours on each day of a 7-day period using an 11-point numerical rating scale where 0 represents "No Pain" and 10 represents "Pain as bad as you can imagine." The average pain scores were calculated across the 7-day diary(s) at baseline and across weeks 5 to 8 post-start of treatment. Percent reduction was then calculated for each participant. To be considered a success, participants must have experienced ≥ 50% reduction in average knee pain. The number of successes is presented.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

56 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline and 5 to 8 weeks post-Start of Treatment (SOT)

Results posted on

2025-08-27

Participant Flow

After obtaining informed consent, participants were evaluated for eligibility.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Group 1 (Treatment)
Participants in Group 1 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received electrical stimulation for up to 8 weeks with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
Group 2 (Control)
Participants in Group 2 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received up to 8 weeks of sham stimulation. Three months after start of sham treatment, participants were given the option to crossover and receive electrical stimulation treatment with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
Overall Study
STARTED
29
27
Overall Study
Randomized
29
27
Overall Study
Safety Analysis Set
28
27
Overall Study
Full Analysis Set
20
21
Overall Study
Per Protocol Set
16
19
Overall Study
Group 2 Crossover Safety Set
0
11
Overall Study
COMPLETED
15
20
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
14
7

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Group 1 (Treatment)
Participants in Group 1 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received electrical stimulation for up to 8 weeks with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
Group 2 (Control)
Participants in Group 2 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received up to 8 weeks of sham stimulation. Three months after start of sham treatment, participants were given the option to crossover and receive electrical stimulation treatment with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
Overall Study
Adverse Event
0
1
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
6
1
Overall Study
Physician Decision
1
2
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Participant
6
3
Overall Study
Lack of compliance by Participant
1
0

Baseline Characteristics

Treatment of Post-Operative Pain Following Orthopedic Surgery With SPRINT® Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Group 1 (Treatment)
n=29 Participants
Participants in Group 1 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received electrical stimulation for up to 8 weeks with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
Group 2 (Control)
n=27 Participants
Participants in Group 2 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received up to 8 weeks of sham stimulation. Three months after start of sham treatment, participants were given the option to crossover and receive electrical stimulation treatment with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
Total
n=56 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
15 Participants
n=93 Participants
16 Participants
n=4 Participants
31 Participants
n=27 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
14 Participants
n=93 Participants
11 Participants
n=4 Participants
25 Participants
n=27 Participants
Age, Continuous
64.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5 • n=93 Participants
62.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6 • n=4 Participants
63.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1 • n=27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
25 Participants
n=93 Participants
19 Participants
n=4 Participants
44 Participants
n=27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants
n=93 Participants
8 Participants
n=4 Participants
12 Participants
n=27 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants
n=93 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
2 Participants
n=27 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
27 Participants
n=93 Participants
27 Participants
n=4 Participants
54 Participants
n=27 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants
n=93 Participants
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
3 Participants
n=27 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
10 Participants
n=93 Participants
4 Participants
n=4 Participants
14 Participants
n=27 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
17 Participants
n=93 Participants
22 Participants
n=4 Participants
39 Participants
n=27 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
29 Participants
n=93 Participants
27 Participants
n=4 Participants
56 Participants
n=27 Participants
Employment Status
Currently Working
6 Participants
n=93 Participants
11 Participants
n=4 Participants
17 Participants
n=27 Participants
Employment Status
Retired (not due to health)
13 Participants
n=93 Participants
8 Participants
n=4 Participants
21 Participants
n=27 Participants
Employment Status
Unemployed
3 Participants
n=93 Participants
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
5 Participants
n=27 Participants
Employment Status
Disabled / Retired (due to health)
7 Participants
n=93 Participants
5 Participants
n=4 Participants
12 Participants
n=27 Participants
Employment Status
Other (Retired (not due to health) and employed part-time)
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
1 Participants
n=27 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 5 to 8 weeks post-Start of Treatment (SOT)

Population: Full Analysis Set presented. To account for missing data due to missed visits and early terminations, data were also imputed using a mixed-effects model.

All participants were asked to complete daily diaries to record their average knee pain during the past 24 hours on each day of a 7-day period using an 11-point numerical rating scale where 0 represents "No Pain" and 10 represents "Pain as bad as you can imagine." The average pain scores were calculated across the 7-day diary(s) at baseline and across weeks 5 to 8 post-start of treatment. Percent reduction was then calculated for each participant. To be considered a success, participants must have experienced ≥ 50% reduction in average knee pain. The number of successes is presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 1 (Treatment)
n=20 Participants
Participants in Group 1 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received electrical stimulation for up to 8 weeks with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
Group 2 (Control)
n=21 Participants
Participants in Group 2 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received up to 8 weeks of sham stimulation. Three months after start of sham treatment, participants were given the option to crossover and receive electrical stimulation treatment with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
Group 2 Crossover Safety Set
Participants who were consented, randomized to Group 2 (Control), received sham stimulation treatment, and crossed over to receive electrical stimulation via the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
Reduction in Average Pain Intensity: Number of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Average Pain Intensity
12 Participants
5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 13 months for each Group 1 participant and up to 16 months for Group 2 participants that opted to cross over (time from baseline to last study visit)

Population: Safety Analysis Set presented.

At each study visit following the baseline assessment at Visit 1, participants were questioned if any changes in their medical status or condition have occurred since their previous visit. If the participant experienced a change that was a study-related adverse event, an Adverse Event Form was completed by the site. The number of participants that experienced at least one study-related adverse event is reported here. Adverse Events are reported by the trial phase in which they occurred: Group 1 Treatment (active stimulation), Group 2 Control (sham stimulation), and Group 2 Crossover Safety Set (active stimulation).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 1 (Treatment)
n=28 Participants
Participants in Group 1 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received electrical stimulation for up to 8 weeks with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
Group 2 (Control)
n=27 Participants
Participants in Group 2 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received up to 8 weeks of sham stimulation. Three months after start of sham treatment, participants were given the option to crossover and receive electrical stimulation treatment with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
Group 2 Crossover Safety Set
n=11 Participants
Participants who were consented, randomized to Group 2 (Control), received sham stimulation treatment, and crossed over to receive electrical stimulation via the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
Study-Related Adverse Device Effects
9 Participants
14 Participants
5 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 1 to 4-weeks post-start of treatment (SOT)

Population: Full Analysis Set presented.

All participants were asked to complete daily diaries to record their average knee pain intensity during the past 24 hours on each day of a 7-day period using an 11-point numerical rating scale where 0 represents "No Pain" and 10 represents "Pain as bad as you can imagine." The average pain score was calculated across the 7-day diary(s) at baseline and across weeks 1 to 4 post-start of treatment. Percent reduction was then calculated for each participant. To be considered a success, participants must have experienced ≥ 50% reduction in average knee pain. The number of successes is presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 1 (Treatment)
n=20 Participants
Participants in Group 1 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received electrical stimulation for up to 8 weeks with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
Group 2 (Control)
n=21 Participants
Participants in Group 2 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received up to 8 weeks of sham stimulation. Three months after start of sham treatment, participants were given the option to crossover and receive electrical stimulation treatment with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
Group 2 Crossover Safety Set
Participants who were consented, randomized to Group 2 (Control), received sham stimulation treatment, and crossed over to receive electrical stimulation via the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
Reduction in Average Pain Intensity: Number of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Average Pain Intensity
7 Participants
3 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, 3-months post-start of treatment (SOT), 6-months post-SOT, 9-months post-SOT, 12-months post-SOT

Population: Full Analysis Set presented. According to the planned study protocol, Group 2 was not assessed for this outcome at 6, 9, and 12-months due to crossover to receive active stimulation. To account for missing data due to missed visits and early terminations, data were also imputed using a mixed-effects model for Group 2 at 3-months post-SOT and for Group 1 at 6, 9, and 12-months post-SOT.

All participants were asked to complete daily diaries to record their average knee pain intensity during the past 24 hours on each day of a 7-day period using an 11-point numerical rating scale where 0 represents "No Pain" and 10 represents "Pain as bad as you can imagine." The average pain score was calculated across the 7-day diary for each participant at baseline and at 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-months post-start of treatment. Percent reduction was then calculated for each participant. To be considered a success, participants must have experienced ≥ 50% reduction in average knee pain. The number of successes is presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 1 (Treatment)
n=20 Participants
Participants in Group 1 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received electrical stimulation for up to 8 weeks with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
Group 2 (Control)
n=21 Participants
Participants in Group 2 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received up to 8 weeks of sham stimulation. Three months after start of sham treatment, participants were given the option to crossover and receive electrical stimulation treatment with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
Group 2 Crossover Safety Set
Participants who were consented, randomized to Group 2 (Control), received sham stimulation treatment, and crossed over to receive electrical stimulation via the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
Long-term Durability of Average Pain Relief: Number of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Average Pain Intensity
3-months Post-SOT
10.00 participants (with imputed values)
5.00 participants (with imputed values)
Long-term Durability of Average Pain Relief: Number of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Average Pain Intensity
6-months Post-SOT
9.96 participants (with imputed values)
Long-term Durability of Average Pain Relief: Number of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Average Pain Intensity
9-months Post-SOT
9.02 participants (with imputed values)
Long-term Durability of Average Pain Relief: Number of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Average Pain Intensity
12-months Post-SOT
10.36 participants (with imputed values)

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, 1 to 4-weeks post-start of treatment (SOT), 5 to 8-weeks post-SOT, 3-months post-SOT, 6-months post-SOT, 9-months post-SOT, and 12-months post-SOT

Population: Full Analysis Set presented. According to the planned study protocol, Group 2 was not assessed for this outcome at 6, 9, and 12-months due to crossover to receive active stimulation. To account for missing data due to missed visits and early terminations, data were also imputed using a mixed-effects model for Group 2 at 3-months post-SOT and for Group 1 at 6, 9, and 12-months post-SOT.

All participants were asked to complete daily diaries to record their average knee pain intensity during the past 24 hours on each day of a 7-day period using an 11-point numerical rating scale where 0 represents "No Pain" and 10 represents "Pain as bad as you can imagine." The mean pain score was calculated across the 7-day diary(s) for each participant at baseline, 1-4 weeks post-start of treatment (SOT), 5-8 weeks post-SOT, and at 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-months post-SOT. The mean pain score is presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 1 (Treatment)
n=20 Participants
Participants in Group 1 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received electrical stimulation for up to 8 weeks with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
Group 2 (Control)
n=21 Participants
Participants in Group 2 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received up to 8 weeks of sham stimulation. Three months after start of sham treatment, participants were given the option to crossover and receive electrical stimulation treatment with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
Group 2 Crossover Safety Set
Participants who were consented, randomized to Group 2 (Control), received sham stimulation treatment, and crossed over to receive electrical stimulation via the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
Mean Pain Relief
Baseline
7.26 score on a scale (with imputed values)
Standard Deviation 1.24
7.21 score on a scale (with imputed values)
Standard Deviation 1.44
Mean Pain Relief
1 to 4 weeks Post-SOT
4.37 score on a scale (with imputed values)
Standard Deviation 2.02
5.65 score on a scale (with imputed values)
Standard Deviation 2.16
Mean Pain Relief
5 to 8 weeks Post-SOT
3.32 score on a scale (with imputed values)
Standard Deviation 2.18
5.34 score on a scale (with imputed values)
Standard Deviation 2.56
Mean Pain Relief
3-months Post-SOT
3.69 score on a scale (with imputed values)
Standard Deviation 2.67
5.37 score on a scale (with imputed values)
Standard Deviation 2.76
Mean Pain Relief
6-months Post-SOT
4.04 score on a scale (with imputed values)
Standard Deviation 2.78
Mean Pain Relief
9-months Post-SOT
4.00 score on a scale (with imputed values)
Standard Deviation 2.71
Mean Pain Relief
12-months Post-SOT
4.15 score on a scale (with imputed values)
Standard Deviation 2.75

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, 1 to 4 weeks post-start of treatment (SOT), and 5 to 8 weeks post-SOT, 3-months post-SOT, 6-months post-SOT, 9-months post-SOT, and 12-months post-SOT

Population: Full Analysis Set presented. According to the planned study protocol, Group 2 was not assessed for this outcome at 6, 9, and 12-months due to crossover to receive active stimulation. Participants that did not report any pain medications during the study were excluded. Data were not available for one Group 2 participant at 3-months post-SOT, five Group 1 participants at 6-months post-SOT, three Group 1 participants at 9-months post-SOT, and six Group 1 participants at 12-months post-SOT.

Participants recorded the amount/type of analgesics used in daily diaries. A blinded, third-party medication committee reviewed participants' diary medications for each time period to determine if each participant's analgesic usage changed. The committee determined whether there was No change (no change in dosage or change is not clinically meaningful to impact pain outcomes), an Increase (clinically meaningful increase in medication that would impact pain outcomes), or a Decrease (clinically meaningful decrease in medication that would impact pain outcomes) for each time period compared to baseline. The number of participants with a Decrease in analgesic medication usage for pain are reported. Participants that did not report any pain medications during the study were excluded from the analysis.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 1 (Treatment)
n=17 Participants
Participants in Group 1 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received electrical stimulation for up to 8 weeks with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
Group 2 (Control)
n=20 Participants
Participants in Group 2 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received up to 8 weeks of sham stimulation. Three months after start of sham treatment, participants were given the option to crossover and receive electrical stimulation treatment with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
Group 2 Crossover Safety Set
Participants who were consented, randomized to Group 2 (Control), received sham stimulation treatment, and crossed over to receive electrical stimulation via the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
Pain Medication Usage
12-months post-SOT
4 Participants
Pain Medication Usage
1 to 4 weeks post-SOT
8 Participants
9 Participants
Pain Medication Usage
5 to 8 weeks post-SOT
11 Participants
10 Participants
Pain Medication Usage
3-months post-SOT
8 Participants
8 Participants
Pain Medication Usage
6-months post-SOT
5 Participants
Pain Medication Usage
9-months post-SOT
4 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 1), 4-weeks post-SOT (Visit 6), and 8-weeks post-SOT (Visit 10)

Population: Full Analysis Set presented. Data were not available for one Group 1 participant and two Group 2 participants at 4-weeks post-SOT and for one Group 2 participant at 8-weeks post-SOT.

The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) questionnaire has 13 questions that assess rumination, magnification, and helplessness. Participants are asked to think back on painful experiences in the past and reflect on how often they had specific thoughts or feelings. Each of the 13 questions is scored on a 5-point scale where 0 represents "not at all," and 4 represents "all the time." The scores from each question were summed for each participant to provide a total PCS score, with a possible range from 0 to 52 with higher scores indicating a greater tendency to catastrophize pain (i.e. a higher score indicates a worse outcome). The mean score for each time point is presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 1 (Treatment)
n=20 Participants
Participants in Group 1 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received electrical stimulation for up to 8 weeks with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
Group 2 (Control)
n=21 Participants
Participants in Group 2 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received up to 8 weeks of sham stimulation. Three months after start of sham treatment, participants were given the option to crossover and receive electrical stimulation treatment with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
Group 2 Crossover Safety Set
Participants who were consented, randomized to Group 2 (Control), received sham stimulation treatment, and crossed over to receive electrical stimulation via the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Visit 1: Baseline
24.30 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.92
27.14 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.81
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Visit 6: 4-weeks Post-SOT
12.53 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.41
16.47 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.63
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Visit 10: 8-weeks Post-SOT
9.30 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.29
14.75 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.35

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 4-weeks post-start of treatment (SOT)(Visit 6), 8-weeks post-SOT (Visit 10), 3-months post-SOT (Visit 11), 6-months post-SOT (Visit 12), 9-months post-SOT (Visit 13), and 12-months post-SOT (Visit 14)

Population: Full Analysis Set presented. According to the planned study protocol, Group 2 was not assessed for this outcome at 6, 9, and 12-months due to crossover to receive active stimulation. Missing data due to missed visits and early terminations were also imputed using a mixed-effects model for outcomes at 6, 9, and 12-months post-SOT. Data were not available for one Group 1 and two Group 2 participants at 4-weeks, one Group 2 participant at 8-weeks, and one Group 2 participant at 3-months post-SOT.

The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Survey asks participants to rate their improvement with treatment on a 7-point scale ranging from -3 to 0 to +3, where -3 represents "very much worse," 0 is "no change," and +3 represents "very much improved" as compared to before stimulation treatment. The participants combine all the components of their experience into one overall score. The mean score of each group was calculated for each time frame.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 1 (Treatment)
n=20 Participants
Participants in Group 1 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received electrical stimulation for up to 8 weeks with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
Group 2 (Control)
n=21 Participants
Participants in Group 2 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received up to 8 weeks of sham stimulation. Three months after start of sham treatment, participants were given the option to crossover and receive electrical stimulation treatment with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
Group 2 Crossover Safety Set
Participants who were consented, randomized to Group 2 (Control), received sham stimulation treatment, and crossed over to receive electrical stimulation via the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Visit 6: 4-weeks Post-SOT
1.42 score on a scale (with imputed values)
Standard Deviation 1.22
1.05 score on a scale (with imputed values)
Standard Deviation 0.97
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Visit 10: 8-weeks Post-SOT
1.80 score on a scale (with imputed values)
Standard Deviation 1.06
1.15 score on a scale (with imputed values)
Standard Deviation 1.18
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Visit 11: 3-months Post-SOT
1.75 score on a scale (with imputed values)
Standard Deviation 1.16
0.75 score on a scale (with imputed values)
Standard Deviation 1.25
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Visit 12: 6-months Post-SOT
1.32 score on a scale (with imputed values)
Standard Deviation 1.49
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Visit 13: 9-months Post-SOT
1.01 score on a scale (with imputed values)
Standard Deviation 1.58
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Visit 14: 12-months Post-SOT
1.11 score on a scale (with imputed values)
Standard Deviation 1.36

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 1), 8-weeks post-start of treatment (SOT) (Visit 10), 3-months post-SOT (Visit 11), 6-months post-SOT (Visit 12), 9-months post-SOT (Visit 13), and 12-months post-SOT (Visit 14)

Population: Full Analysis Set presented. According to the planned study protocol, Group 2 was not assessed for this outcome at 6, 9, and 12-months due to crossover to receive active stimulation. For participants that completed treatment, missing data due to missed visits and early terminations were also imputed using a mixed-effects model at 6, 9, and 12-months post-SOT. Data were not available for one Group 2 participant at 8-weeks and 3-months post-SOT.

Question 9 of the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-9) is a 7-part question that assesses the level of interference that participants experience in their daily lives due to pain. The 7 categories are general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life. Participants were asked to rate how much their post-surgical knee pain interferes with each aspect on an 11-point numerical scale where 0 represents "Does Not Interfere" and 10 represents "Completely Interferes." The average of these 7 scores was calculated for each participant at each time point. Percent reduction was then calculated for each participant. To be considered a success, participants must have experienced ≥ 50% reduction in pain interference. The number of successes is presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 1 (Treatment)
n=20 Participants
Participants in Group 1 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received electrical stimulation for up to 8 weeks with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
Group 2 (Control)
n=21 Participants
Participants in Group 2 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received up to 8 weeks of sham stimulation. Three months after start of sham treatment, participants were given the option to crossover and receive electrical stimulation treatment with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
Group 2 Crossover Safety Set
Participants who were consented, randomized to Group 2 (Control), received sham stimulation treatment, and crossed over to receive electrical stimulation via the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
Pain Interference: Number of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Pain Interference
Visit 10: 8-weeks Post-SOT
13.00 participants (with imputed values)
11.00 participants (with imputed values)
Pain Interference: Number of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Pain Interference
Visit 11: 3-months Post-SOT
11.00 participants (with imputed values)
6.00 participants (with imputed values)
Pain Interference: Number of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Pain Interference
Visit 12: 6-months Post-SOT
11.20 participants (with imputed values)
Pain Interference: Number of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Pain Interference
Visit 13: 9-months Post-SOT
11.16 participants (with imputed values)
Pain Interference: Number of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Pain Interference
Visit 14: 12-months Post-SOT
11.14 participants (with imputed values)

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 1), 8-weeks post-start of treatment (SOT) (Visit 10), 3-months post-SOT (Visit 11), 6-months post-SOT (Visit 12), 9-months post-SOT (Visit 13), and 12-months post-SOT (Visit 14)

Population: Full Analysis Set presented. According to the planned study protocol, Group 2 was not assessed for this outcome at 6, 9, and 12-months due to crossover to receive active stimulation. For participants that completed treatment, missing data due to missed visits and early terminations were also imputed using a mixed-effects model at 6, 9, and 12-months post-SOT. Data were not available for one Group 2 participant at 8-weeks and 3-months post-SOT.

The Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) questionnaire consists of 24 items that evaluate pain, stiffness, and physical functional disability. Each item is scored on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate greater pain, stiffness, and disability. For each participant, the scores from each of the 24 items were averaged to calculate the participant's total score, with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 10. The mean total score was then calculated across participants and percent reduction was calculated for each time point. To be considered a success, participants must have experienced ≥ 33% reduction in their score. The number of successes is presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 1 (Treatment)
n=20 Participants
Participants in Group 1 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received electrical stimulation for up to 8 weeks with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
Group 2 (Control)
n=21 Participants
Participants in Group 2 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received up to 8 weeks of sham stimulation. Three months after start of sham treatment, participants were given the option to crossover and receive electrical stimulation treatment with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
Group 2 Crossover Safety Set
Participants who were consented, randomized to Group 2 (Control), received sham stimulation treatment, and crossed over to receive electrical stimulation via the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
Function (i.e., Physical Recovery)
Visit 10: 8-weeks Post-SOT
16.00 participants (with imputed values)
11.00 participants (with imputed values)
Function (i.e., Physical Recovery)
Visit 11: 3-months Post-SOT
13.00 participants (with imputed values)
9.00 participants (with imputed values)
Function (i.e., Physical Recovery)
Visit 12: 6-months Post-SOT
11.42 participants (with imputed values)
Function (i.e., Physical Recovery)
Visit 13: 9-months Post-SOT
12.22 participants (with imputed values)
Function (i.e., Physical Recovery)
Visit 14: 12-months Post-SOT
11.08 participants (with imputed values)

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 1), 8-weeks post-start of treatment (SOT) (Visit 10), and 3-months post-SOT (Visit 11)

Population: Full Analysis set presented. Data were unavailable for two Group 1 participants and one Group 2 participant at 8-weeks post-SOT and for four Group 1 participants and one Group 2 participant at 3-months post-SOT.

The total distance that a participant could walk in 6 minutes was recorded, and participants unable to walk at all were given a score of 0 meters. The mean distance was then determined across participants. The baseline score was compared to the score at the specified intervals after start of therapy.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Group 1 (Treatment)
n=20 Participants
Participants in Group 1 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received electrical stimulation for up to 8 weeks with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
Group 2 (Control)
n=21 Participants
Participants in Group 2 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received up to 8 weeks of sham stimulation. Three months after start of sham treatment, participants were given the option to crossover and receive electrical stimulation treatment with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
Group 2 Crossover Safety Set
Participants who were consented, randomized to Group 2 (Control), received sham stimulation treatment, and crossed over to receive electrical stimulation via the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
Visit 1: Baseline
267.29 meters
Standard Deviation 108.91
291.94 meters
Standard Deviation 91.12
Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
Visit 10: 8-weeks Post-SOT
354.29 meters
Standard Deviation 197.63
253.36 meters
Standard Deviation 142.77
Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
Visit 11: 3-months Post-SOT
318.11 meters
Standard Deviation 164.83
269.77 meters
Standard Deviation 156.50

Adverse Events

Group 1 (Treatment)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 9 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Group 2 (Control)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 14 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Group 2 Crossover Safety Set

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 5 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Group 1 (Treatment)
n=28 participants at risk
Participants in Group 1 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received electrical stimulation for up to 8 weeks with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
Group 2 (Control)
n=27 participants at risk
Participants in Group 2 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received up to 8 weeks of sham stimulation. Three months after start of sham treatment, participants were given the option to crossover and receive electrical stimulation treatment with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
Group 2 Crossover Safety Set
n=11 participants at risk
Participants who were consented, randomized to Group 2 (Control), received sham stimulation treatment, and crossed over to receive electrical stimulation via the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain at lead site
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • Each participant enrolled was assessed for adverse events from the time of informed consent through their final study visit. For Group 1, the total assessment period was approximately 13 months for each participant. Each Group 2 participant that did not crossover to receive stimulation treatment was assessed through their study participation (approximately 3 months). Group 2 participants that crossed over to receive treatment were each assessed for approximately 16 months.
0.00%
0/27 • Each participant enrolled was assessed for adverse events from the time of informed consent through their final study visit. For Group 1, the total assessment period was approximately 13 months for each participant. Each Group 2 participant that did not crossover to receive stimulation treatment was assessed through their study participation (approximately 3 months). Group 2 participants that crossed over to receive treatment were each assessed for approximately 16 months.
0.00%
0/11 • Each participant enrolled was assessed for adverse events from the time of informed consent through their final study visit. For Group 1, the total assessment period was approximately 13 months for each participant. Each Group 2 participant that did not crossover to receive stimulation treatment was assessed through their study participation (approximately 3 months). Group 2 participants that crossed over to receive treatment were each assessed for approximately 16 months.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin irritation
25.0%
7/28 • Number of events 7 • Each participant enrolled was assessed for adverse events from the time of informed consent through their final study visit. For Group 1, the total assessment period was approximately 13 months for each participant. Each Group 2 participant that did not crossover to receive stimulation treatment was assessed through their study participation (approximately 3 months). Group 2 participants that crossed over to receive treatment were each assessed for approximately 16 months.
40.7%
11/27 • Number of events 15 • Each participant enrolled was assessed for adverse events from the time of informed consent through their final study visit. For Group 1, the total assessment period was approximately 13 months for each participant. Each Group 2 participant that did not crossover to receive stimulation treatment was assessed through their study participation (approximately 3 months). Group 2 participants that crossed over to receive treatment were each assessed for approximately 16 months.
36.4%
4/11 • Number of events 5 • Each participant enrolled was assessed for adverse events from the time of informed consent through their final study visit. For Group 1, the total assessment period was approximately 13 months for each participant. Each Group 2 participant that did not crossover to receive stimulation treatment was assessed through their study participation (approximately 3 months). Group 2 participants that crossed over to receive treatment were each assessed for approximately 16 months.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Itching at bandage, pad, and/or lead exit sites
7.1%
2/28 • Number of events 3 • Each participant enrolled was assessed for adverse events from the time of informed consent through their final study visit. For Group 1, the total assessment period was approximately 13 months for each participant. Each Group 2 participant that did not crossover to receive stimulation treatment was assessed through their study participation (approximately 3 months). Group 2 participants that crossed over to receive treatment were each assessed for approximately 16 months.
11.1%
3/27 • Number of events 3 • Each participant enrolled was assessed for adverse events from the time of informed consent through their final study visit. For Group 1, the total assessment period was approximately 13 months for each participant. Each Group 2 participant that did not crossover to receive stimulation treatment was assessed through their study participation (approximately 3 months). Group 2 participants that crossed over to receive treatment were each assessed for approximately 16 months.
18.2%
2/11 • Number of events 2 • Each participant enrolled was assessed for adverse events from the time of informed consent through their final study visit. For Group 1, the total assessment period was approximately 13 months for each participant. Each Group 2 participant that did not crossover to receive stimulation treatment was assessed through their study participation (approximately 3 months). Group 2 participants that crossed over to receive treatment were each assessed for approximately 16 months.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Discoloration/bruising at lead exit site
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • Each participant enrolled was assessed for adverse events from the time of informed consent through their final study visit. For Group 1, the total assessment period was approximately 13 months for each participant. Each Group 2 participant that did not crossover to receive stimulation treatment was assessed through their study participation (approximately 3 months). Group 2 participants that crossed over to receive treatment were each assessed for approximately 16 months.
7.4%
2/27 • Number of events 2 • Each participant enrolled was assessed for adverse events from the time of informed consent through their final study visit. For Group 1, the total assessment period was approximately 13 months for each participant. Each Group 2 participant that did not crossover to receive stimulation treatment was assessed through their study participation (approximately 3 months). Group 2 participants that crossed over to receive treatment were each assessed for approximately 16 months.
0.00%
0/11 • Each participant enrolled was assessed for adverse events from the time of informed consent through their final study visit. For Group 1, the total assessment period was approximately 13 months for each participant. Each Group 2 participant that did not crossover to receive stimulation treatment was assessed through their study participation (approximately 3 months). Group 2 participants that crossed over to receive treatment were each assessed for approximately 16 months.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin tear at bandage or connector site
0.00%
0/28 • Each participant enrolled was assessed for adverse events from the time of informed consent through their final study visit. For Group 1, the total assessment period was approximately 13 months for each participant. Each Group 2 participant that did not crossover to receive stimulation treatment was assessed through their study participation (approximately 3 months). Group 2 participants that crossed over to receive treatment were each assessed for approximately 16 months.
7.4%
2/27 • Number of events 2 • Each participant enrolled was assessed for adverse events from the time of informed consent through their final study visit. For Group 1, the total assessment period was approximately 13 months for each participant. Each Group 2 participant that did not crossover to receive stimulation treatment was assessed through their study participation (approximately 3 months). Group 2 participants that crossed over to receive treatment were each assessed for approximately 16 months.
0.00%
0/11 • Each participant enrolled was assessed for adverse events from the time of informed consent through their final study visit. For Group 1, the total assessment period was approximately 13 months for each participant. Each Group 2 participant that did not crossover to receive stimulation treatment was assessed through their study participation (approximately 3 months). Group 2 participants that crossed over to receive treatment were each assessed for approximately 16 months.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Granuloma
0.00%
0/28 • Each participant enrolled was assessed for adverse events from the time of informed consent through their final study visit. For Group 1, the total assessment period was approximately 13 months for each participant. Each Group 2 participant that did not crossover to receive stimulation treatment was assessed through their study participation (approximately 3 months). Group 2 participants that crossed over to receive treatment were each assessed for approximately 16 months.
0.00%
0/27 • Each participant enrolled was assessed for adverse events from the time of informed consent through their final study visit. For Group 1, the total assessment period was approximately 13 months for each participant. Each Group 2 participant that did not crossover to receive stimulation treatment was assessed through their study participation (approximately 3 months). Group 2 participants that crossed over to receive treatment were each assessed for approximately 16 months.
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1 • Each participant enrolled was assessed for adverse events from the time of informed consent through their final study visit. For Group 1, the total assessment period was approximately 13 months for each participant. Each Group 2 participant that did not crossover to receive stimulation treatment was assessed through their study participation (approximately 3 months). Group 2 participants that crossed over to receive treatment were each assessed for approximately 16 months.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Exacerbation of existing pain
0.00%
0/28 • Each participant enrolled was assessed for adverse events from the time of informed consent through their final study visit. For Group 1, the total assessment period was approximately 13 months for each participant. Each Group 2 participant that did not crossover to receive stimulation treatment was assessed through their study participation (approximately 3 months). Group 2 participants that crossed over to receive treatment were each assessed for approximately 16 months.
3.7%
1/27 • Number of events 1 • Each participant enrolled was assessed for adverse events from the time of informed consent through their final study visit. For Group 1, the total assessment period was approximately 13 months for each participant. Each Group 2 participant that did not crossover to receive stimulation treatment was assessed through their study participation (approximately 3 months). Group 2 participants that crossed over to receive treatment were each assessed for approximately 16 months.
0.00%
0/11 • Each participant enrolled was assessed for adverse events from the time of informed consent through their final study visit. For Group 1, the total assessment period was approximately 13 months for each participant. Each Group 2 participant that did not crossover to receive stimulation treatment was assessed through their study participation (approximately 3 months). Group 2 participants that crossed over to receive treatment were each assessed for approximately 16 months.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Uncomfortable stimulation
0.00%
0/28 • Each participant enrolled was assessed for adverse events from the time of informed consent through their final study visit. For Group 1, the total assessment period was approximately 13 months for each participant. Each Group 2 participant that did not crossover to receive stimulation treatment was assessed through their study participation (approximately 3 months). Group 2 participants that crossed over to receive treatment were each assessed for approximately 16 months.
0.00%
0/27 • Each participant enrolled was assessed for adverse events from the time of informed consent through their final study visit. For Group 1, the total assessment period was approximately 13 months for each participant. Each Group 2 participant that did not crossover to receive stimulation treatment was assessed through their study participation (approximately 3 months). Group 2 participants that crossed over to receive treatment were each assessed for approximately 16 months.
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1 • Each participant enrolled was assessed for adverse events from the time of informed consent through their final study visit. For Group 1, the total assessment period was approximately 13 months for each participant. Each Group 2 participant that did not crossover to receive stimulation treatment was assessed through their study participation (approximately 3 months). Group 2 participants that crossed over to receive treatment were each assessed for approximately 16 months.

Additional Information

Clinical Affairs

SPR

Phone: 216-378-9106

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place