Trial Outcomes & Findings for Treatment of Post-Operative Pain Following Orthopedic Surgery With SPRINT® Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System (NCT NCT04341948)
NCT ID: NCT04341948
Last Updated: 2025-08-27
Results Overview
All participants were asked to complete daily diaries to record their average knee pain during the past 24 hours on each day of a 7-day period using an 11-point numerical rating scale where 0 represents "No Pain" and 10 represents "Pain as bad as you can imagine." The average pain scores were calculated across the 7-day diary(s) at baseline and across weeks 5 to 8 post-start of treatment. Percent reduction was then calculated for each participant. To be considered a success, participants must have experienced ≥ 50% reduction in average knee pain. The number of successes is presented.
COMPLETED
NA
56 participants
Baseline and 5 to 8 weeks post-Start of Treatment (SOT)
2025-08-27
Participant Flow
After obtaining informed consent, participants were evaluated for eligibility.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Group 1 (Treatment)
Participants in Group 1 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received electrical stimulation for up to 8 weeks with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
|
Group 2 (Control)
Participants in Group 2 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received up to 8 weeks of sham stimulation. Three months after start of sham treatment, participants were given the option to crossover and receive electrical stimulation treatment with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
29
|
27
|
|
Overall Study
Randomized
|
29
|
27
|
|
Overall Study
Safety Analysis Set
|
28
|
27
|
|
Overall Study
Full Analysis Set
|
20
|
21
|
|
Overall Study
Per Protocol Set
|
16
|
19
|
|
Overall Study
Group 2 Crossover Safety Set
|
0
|
11
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
15
|
20
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
14
|
7
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Group 1 (Treatment)
Participants in Group 1 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received electrical stimulation for up to 8 weeks with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
|
Group 2 (Control)
Participants in Group 2 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received up to 8 weeks of sham stimulation. Three months after start of sham treatment, participants were given the option to crossover and receive electrical stimulation treatment with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
6
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
1
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Participant
|
6
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Lack of compliance by Participant
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Treatment of Post-Operative Pain Following Orthopedic Surgery With SPRINT® Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Group 1 (Treatment)
n=29 Participants
Participants in Group 1 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received electrical stimulation for up to 8 weeks with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
|
Group 2 (Control)
n=27 Participants
Participants in Group 2 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received up to 8 weeks of sham stimulation. Three months after start of sham treatment, participants were given the option to crossover and receive electrical stimulation treatment with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
|
Total
n=56 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
15 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
14 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
64.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5 • n=93 Participants
|
62.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6 • n=4 Participants
|
63.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1 • n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
25 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
44 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
4 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
2 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
27 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
54 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
2 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
10 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
17 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
39 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
29 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
56 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Employment Status
Currently Working
|
6 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Employment Status
Retired (not due to health)
|
13 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Employment Status
Unemployed
|
3 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Employment Status
Disabled / Retired (due to health)
|
7 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Employment Status
Other (Retired (not due to health) and employed part-time)
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 5 to 8 weeks post-Start of Treatment (SOT)Population: Full Analysis Set presented. To account for missing data due to missed visits and early terminations, data were also imputed using a mixed-effects model.
All participants were asked to complete daily diaries to record their average knee pain during the past 24 hours on each day of a 7-day period using an 11-point numerical rating scale where 0 represents "No Pain" and 10 represents "Pain as bad as you can imagine." The average pain scores were calculated across the 7-day diary(s) at baseline and across weeks 5 to 8 post-start of treatment. Percent reduction was then calculated for each participant. To be considered a success, participants must have experienced ≥ 50% reduction in average knee pain. The number of successes is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1 (Treatment)
n=20 Participants
Participants in Group 1 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received electrical stimulation for up to 8 weeks with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
|
Group 2 (Control)
n=21 Participants
Participants in Group 2 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received up to 8 weeks of sham stimulation. Three months after start of sham treatment, participants were given the option to crossover and receive electrical stimulation treatment with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
|
Group 2 Crossover Safety Set
Participants who were consented, randomized to Group 2 (Control), received sham stimulation treatment, and crossed over to receive electrical stimulation via the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Reduction in Average Pain Intensity: Number of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Average Pain Intensity
|
12 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 13 months for each Group 1 participant and up to 16 months for Group 2 participants that opted to cross over (time from baseline to last study visit)Population: Safety Analysis Set presented.
At each study visit following the baseline assessment at Visit 1, participants were questioned if any changes in their medical status or condition have occurred since their previous visit. If the participant experienced a change that was a study-related adverse event, an Adverse Event Form was completed by the site. The number of participants that experienced at least one study-related adverse event is reported here. Adverse Events are reported by the trial phase in which they occurred: Group 1 Treatment (active stimulation), Group 2 Control (sham stimulation), and Group 2 Crossover Safety Set (active stimulation).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1 (Treatment)
n=28 Participants
Participants in Group 1 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received electrical stimulation for up to 8 weeks with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
|
Group 2 (Control)
n=27 Participants
Participants in Group 2 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received up to 8 weeks of sham stimulation. Three months after start of sham treatment, participants were given the option to crossover and receive electrical stimulation treatment with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
|
Group 2 Crossover Safety Set
n=11 Participants
Participants who were consented, randomized to Group 2 (Control), received sham stimulation treatment, and crossed over to receive electrical stimulation via the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Study-Related Adverse Device Effects
|
9 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 1 to 4-weeks post-start of treatment (SOT)Population: Full Analysis Set presented.
All participants were asked to complete daily diaries to record their average knee pain intensity during the past 24 hours on each day of a 7-day period using an 11-point numerical rating scale where 0 represents "No Pain" and 10 represents "Pain as bad as you can imagine." The average pain score was calculated across the 7-day diary(s) at baseline and across weeks 1 to 4 post-start of treatment. Percent reduction was then calculated for each participant. To be considered a success, participants must have experienced ≥ 50% reduction in average knee pain. The number of successes is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1 (Treatment)
n=20 Participants
Participants in Group 1 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received electrical stimulation for up to 8 weeks with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
|
Group 2 (Control)
n=21 Participants
Participants in Group 2 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received up to 8 weeks of sham stimulation. Three months after start of sham treatment, participants were given the option to crossover and receive electrical stimulation treatment with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
|
Group 2 Crossover Safety Set
Participants who were consented, randomized to Group 2 (Control), received sham stimulation treatment, and crossed over to receive electrical stimulation via the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Reduction in Average Pain Intensity: Number of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Average Pain Intensity
|
7 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 3-months post-start of treatment (SOT), 6-months post-SOT, 9-months post-SOT, 12-months post-SOTPopulation: Full Analysis Set presented. According to the planned study protocol, Group 2 was not assessed for this outcome at 6, 9, and 12-months due to crossover to receive active stimulation. To account for missing data due to missed visits and early terminations, data were also imputed using a mixed-effects model for Group 2 at 3-months post-SOT and for Group 1 at 6, 9, and 12-months post-SOT.
All participants were asked to complete daily diaries to record their average knee pain intensity during the past 24 hours on each day of a 7-day period using an 11-point numerical rating scale where 0 represents "No Pain" and 10 represents "Pain as bad as you can imagine." The average pain score was calculated across the 7-day diary for each participant at baseline and at 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-months post-start of treatment. Percent reduction was then calculated for each participant. To be considered a success, participants must have experienced ≥ 50% reduction in average knee pain. The number of successes is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1 (Treatment)
n=20 Participants
Participants in Group 1 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received electrical stimulation for up to 8 weeks with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
|
Group 2 (Control)
n=21 Participants
Participants in Group 2 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received up to 8 weeks of sham stimulation. Three months after start of sham treatment, participants were given the option to crossover and receive electrical stimulation treatment with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
|
Group 2 Crossover Safety Set
Participants who were consented, randomized to Group 2 (Control), received sham stimulation treatment, and crossed over to receive electrical stimulation via the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Long-term Durability of Average Pain Relief: Number of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Average Pain Intensity
3-months Post-SOT
|
10.00 participants (with imputed values)
|
5.00 participants (with imputed values)
|
—
|
|
Long-term Durability of Average Pain Relief: Number of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Average Pain Intensity
6-months Post-SOT
|
9.96 participants (with imputed values)
|
—
|
—
|
|
Long-term Durability of Average Pain Relief: Number of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Average Pain Intensity
9-months Post-SOT
|
9.02 participants (with imputed values)
|
—
|
—
|
|
Long-term Durability of Average Pain Relief: Number of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Average Pain Intensity
12-months Post-SOT
|
10.36 participants (with imputed values)
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 to 4-weeks post-start of treatment (SOT), 5 to 8-weeks post-SOT, 3-months post-SOT, 6-months post-SOT, 9-months post-SOT, and 12-months post-SOTPopulation: Full Analysis Set presented. According to the planned study protocol, Group 2 was not assessed for this outcome at 6, 9, and 12-months due to crossover to receive active stimulation. To account for missing data due to missed visits and early terminations, data were also imputed using a mixed-effects model for Group 2 at 3-months post-SOT and for Group 1 at 6, 9, and 12-months post-SOT.
All participants were asked to complete daily diaries to record their average knee pain intensity during the past 24 hours on each day of a 7-day period using an 11-point numerical rating scale where 0 represents "No Pain" and 10 represents "Pain as bad as you can imagine." The mean pain score was calculated across the 7-day diary(s) for each participant at baseline, 1-4 weeks post-start of treatment (SOT), 5-8 weeks post-SOT, and at 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-months post-SOT. The mean pain score is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1 (Treatment)
n=20 Participants
Participants in Group 1 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received electrical stimulation for up to 8 weeks with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
|
Group 2 (Control)
n=21 Participants
Participants in Group 2 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received up to 8 weeks of sham stimulation. Three months after start of sham treatment, participants were given the option to crossover and receive electrical stimulation treatment with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
|
Group 2 Crossover Safety Set
Participants who were consented, randomized to Group 2 (Control), received sham stimulation treatment, and crossed over to receive electrical stimulation via the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Pain Relief
Baseline
|
7.26 score on a scale (with imputed values)
Standard Deviation 1.24
|
7.21 score on a scale (with imputed values)
Standard Deviation 1.44
|
—
|
|
Mean Pain Relief
1 to 4 weeks Post-SOT
|
4.37 score on a scale (with imputed values)
Standard Deviation 2.02
|
5.65 score on a scale (with imputed values)
Standard Deviation 2.16
|
—
|
|
Mean Pain Relief
5 to 8 weeks Post-SOT
|
3.32 score on a scale (with imputed values)
Standard Deviation 2.18
|
5.34 score on a scale (with imputed values)
Standard Deviation 2.56
|
—
|
|
Mean Pain Relief
3-months Post-SOT
|
3.69 score on a scale (with imputed values)
Standard Deviation 2.67
|
5.37 score on a scale (with imputed values)
Standard Deviation 2.76
|
—
|
|
Mean Pain Relief
6-months Post-SOT
|
4.04 score on a scale (with imputed values)
Standard Deviation 2.78
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Pain Relief
9-months Post-SOT
|
4.00 score on a scale (with imputed values)
Standard Deviation 2.71
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Pain Relief
12-months Post-SOT
|
4.15 score on a scale (with imputed values)
Standard Deviation 2.75
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 1 to 4 weeks post-start of treatment (SOT), and 5 to 8 weeks post-SOT, 3-months post-SOT, 6-months post-SOT, 9-months post-SOT, and 12-months post-SOTPopulation: Full Analysis Set presented. According to the planned study protocol, Group 2 was not assessed for this outcome at 6, 9, and 12-months due to crossover to receive active stimulation. Participants that did not report any pain medications during the study were excluded. Data were not available for one Group 2 participant at 3-months post-SOT, five Group 1 participants at 6-months post-SOT, three Group 1 participants at 9-months post-SOT, and six Group 1 participants at 12-months post-SOT.
Participants recorded the amount/type of analgesics used in daily diaries. A blinded, third-party medication committee reviewed participants' diary medications for each time period to determine if each participant's analgesic usage changed. The committee determined whether there was No change (no change in dosage or change is not clinically meaningful to impact pain outcomes), an Increase (clinically meaningful increase in medication that would impact pain outcomes), or a Decrease (clinically meaningful decrease in medication that would impact pain outcomes) for each time period compared to baseline. The number of participants with a Decrease in analgesic medication usage for pain are reported. Participants that did not report any pain medications during the study were excluded from the analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1 (Treatment)
n=17 Participants
Participants in Group 1 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received electrical stimulation for up to 8 weeks with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
|
Group 2 (Control)
n=20 Participants
Participants in Group 2 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received up to 8 weeks of sham stimulation. Three months after start of sham treatment, participants were given the option to crossover and receive electrical stimulation treatment with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
|
Group 2 Crossover Safety Set
Participants who were consented, randomized to Group 2 (Control), received sham stimulation treatment, and crossed over to receive electrical stimulation via the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Pain Medication Usage
12-months post-SOT
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Pain Medication Usage
1 to 4 weeks post-SOT
|
8 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
|
Pain Medication Usage
5 to 8 weeks post-SOT
|
11 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
—
|
|
Pain Medication Usage
3-months post-SOT
|
8 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
|
Pain Medication Usage
6-months post-SOT
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Pain Medication Usage
9-months post-SOT
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 1), 4-weeks post-SOT (Visit 6), and 8-weeks post-SOT (Visit 10)Population: Full Analysis Set presented. Data were not available for one Group 1 participant and two Group 2 participants at 4-weeks post-SOT and for one Group 2 participant at 8-weeks post-SOT.
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) questionnaire has 13 questions that assess rumination, magnification, and helplessness. Participants are asked to think back on painful experiences in the past and reflect on how often they had specific thoughts or feelings. Each of the 13 questions is scored on a 5-point scale where 0 represents "not at all," and 4 represents "all the time." The scores from each question were summed for each participant to provide a total PCS score, with a possible range from 0 to 52 with higher scores indicating a greater tendency to catastrophize pain (i.e. a higher score indicates a worse outcome). The mean score for each time point is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1 (Treatment)
n=20 Participants
Participants in Group 1 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received electrical stimulation for up to 8 weeks with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
|
Group 2 (Control)
n=21 Participants
Participants in Group 2 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received up to 8 weeks of sham stimulation. Three months after start of sham treatment, participants were given the option to crossover and receive electrical stimulation treatment with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
|
Group 2 Crossover Safety Set
Participants who were consented, randomized to Group 2 (Control), received sham stimulation treatment, and crossed over to receive electrical stimulation via the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Visit 1: Baseline
|
24.30 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.92
|
27.14 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.81
|
—
|
|
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Visit 6: 4-weeks Post-SOT
|
12.53 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.41
|
16.47 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.63
|
—
|
|
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Visit 10: 8-weeks Post-SOT
|
9.30 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.29
|
14.75 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.35
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 4-weeks post-start of treatment (SOT)(Visit 6), 8-weeks post-SOT (Visit 10), 3-months post-SOT (Visit 11), 6-months post-SOT (Visit 12), 9-months post-SOT (Visit 13), and 12-months post-SOT (Visit 14)Population: Full Analysis Set presented. According to the planned study protocol, Group 2 was not assessed for this outcome at 6, 9, and 12-months due to crossover to receive active stimulation. Missing data due to missed visits and early terminations were also imputed using a mixed-effects model for outcomes at 6, 9, and 12-months post-SOT. Data were not available for one Group 1 and two Group 2 participants at 4-weeks, one Group 2 participant at 8-weeks, and one Group 2 participant at 3-months post-SOT.
The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Survey asks participants to rate their improvement with treatment on a 7-point scale ranging from -3 to 0 to +3, where -3 represents "very much worse," 0 is "no change," and +3 represents "very much improved" as compared to before stimulation treatment. The participants combine all the components of their experience into one overall score. The mean score of each group was calculated for each time frame.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1 (Treatment)
n=20 Participants
Participants in Group 1 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received electrical stimulation for up to 8 weeks with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
|
Group 2 (Control)
n=21 Participants
Participants in Group 2 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received up to 8 weeks of sham stimulation. Three months after start of sham treatment, participants were given the option to crossover and receive electrical stimulation treatment with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
|
Group 2 Crossover Safety Set
Participants who were consented, randomized to Group 2 (Control), received sham stimulation treatment, and crossed over to receive electrical stimulation via the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Visit 6: 4-weeks Post-SOT
|
1.42 score on a scale (with imputed values)
Standard Deviation 1.22
|
1.05 score on a scale (with imputed values)
Standard Deviation 0.97
|
—
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Visit 10: 8-weeks Post-SOT
|
1.80 score on a scale (with imputed values)
Standard Deviation 1.06
|
1.15 score on a scale (with imputed values)
Standard Deviation 1.18
|
—
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Visit 11: 3-months Post-SOT
|
1.75 score on a scale (with imputed values)
Standard Deviation 1.16
|
0.75 score on a scale (with imputed values)
Standard Deviation 1.25
|
—
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Visit 12: 6-months Post-SOT
|
1.32 score on a scale (with imputed values)
Standard Deviation 1.49
|
—
|
—
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Visit 13: 9-months Post-SOT
|
1.01 score on a scale (with imputed values)
Standard Deviation 1.58
|
—
|
—
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Visit 14: 12-months Post-SOT
|
1.11 score on a scale (with imputed values)
Standard Deviation 1.36
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 1), 8-weeks post-start of treatment (SOT) (Visit 10), 3-months post-SOT (Visit 11), 6-months post-SOT (Visit 12), 9-months post-SOT (Visit 13), and 12-months post-SOT (Visit 14)Population: Full Analysis Set presented. According to the planned study protocol, Group 2 was not assessed for this outcome at 6, 9, and 12-months due to crossover to receive active stimulation. For participants that completed treatment, missing data due to missed visits and early terminations were also imputed using a mixed-effects model at 6, 9, and 12-months post-SOT. Data were not available for one Group 2 participant at 8-weeks and 3-months post-SOT.
Question 9 of the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-9) is a 7-part question that assesses the level of interference that participants experience in their daily lives due to pain. The 7 categories are general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life. Participants were asked to rate how much their post-surgical knee pain interferes with each aspect on an 11-point numerical scale where 0 represents "Does Not Interfere" and 10 represents "Completely Interferes." The average of these 7 scores was calculated for each participant at each time point. Percent reduction was then calculated for each participant. To be considered a success, participants must have experienced ≥ 50% reduction in pain interference. The number of successes is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1 (Treatment)
n=20 Participants
Participants in Group 1 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received electrical stimulation for up to 8 weeks with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
|
Group 2 (Control)
n=21 Participants
Participants in Group 2 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received up to 8 weeks of sham stimulation. Three months after start of sham treatment, participants were given the option to crossover and receive electrical stimulation treatment with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
|
Group 2 Crossover Safety Set
Participants who were consented, randomized to Group 2 (Control), received sham stimulation treatment, and crossed over to receive electrical stimulation via the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Pain Interference: Number of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Pain Interference
Visit 10: 8-weeks Post-SOT
|
13.00 participants (with imputed values)
|
11.00 participants (with imputed values)
|
—
|
|
Pain Interference: Number of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Pain Interference
Visit 11: 3-months Post-SOT
|
11.00 participants (with imputed values)
|
6.00 participants (with imputed values)
|
—
|
|
Pain Interference: Number of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Pain Interference
Visit 12: 6-months Post-SOT
|
11.20 participants (with imputed values)
|
—
|
—
|
|
Pain Interference: Number of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Pain Interference
Visit 13: 9-months Post-SOT
|
11.16 participants (with imputed values)
|
—
|
—
|
|
Pain Interference: Number of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Pain Interference
Visit 14: 12-months Post-SOT
|
11.14 participants (with imputed values)
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 1), 8-weeks post-start of treatment (SOT) (Visit 10), 3-months post-SOT (Visit 11), 6-months post-SOT (Visit 12), 9-months post-SOT (Visit 13), and 12-months post-SOT (Visit 14)Population: Full Analysis Set presented. According to the planned study protocol, Group 2 was not assessed for this outcome at 6, 9, and 12-months due to crossover to receive active stimulation. For participants that completed treatment, missing data due to missed visits and early terminations were also imputed using a mixed-effects model at 6, 9, and 12-months post-SOT. Data were not available for one Group 2 participant at 8-weeks and 3-months post-SOT.
The Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) questionnaire consists of 24 items that evaluate pain, stiffness, and physical functional disability. Each item is scored on an 11-point numerical rating scale from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate greater pain, stiffness, and disability. For each participant, the scores from each of the 24 items were averaged to calculate the participant's total score, with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 10. The mean total score was then calculated across participants and percent reduction was calculated for each time point. To be considered a success, participants must have experienced ≥ 33% reduction in their score. The number of successes is presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1 (Treatment)
n=20 Participants
Participants in Group 1 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received electrical stimulation for up to 8 weeks with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
|
Group 2 (Control)
n=21 Participants
Participants in Group 2 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received up to 8 weeks of sham stimulation. Three months after start of sham treatment, participants were given the option to crossover and receive electrical stimulation treatment with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
|
Group 2 Crossover Safety Set
Participants who were consented, randomized to Group 2 (Control), received sham stimulation treatment, and crossed over to receive electrical stimulation via the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Function (i.e., Physical Recovery)
Visit 10: 8-weeks Post-SOT
|
16.00 participants (with imputed values)
|
11.00 participants (with imputed values)
|
—
|
|
Function (i.e., Physical Recovery)
Visit 11: 3-months Post-SOT
|
13.00 participants (with imputed values)
|
9.00 participants (with imputed values)
|
—
|
|
Function (i.e., Physical Recovery)
Visit 12: 6-months Post-SOT
|
11.42 participants (with imputed values)
|
—
|
—
|
|
Function (i.e., Physical Recovery)
Visit 13: 9-months Post-SOT
|
12.22 participants (with imputed values)
|
—
|
—
|
|
Function (i.e., Physical Recovery)
Visit 14: 12-months Post-SOT
|
11.08 participants (with imputed values)
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 1), 8-weeks post-start of treatment (SOT) (Visit 10), and 3-months post-SOT (Visit 11)Population: Full Analysis set presented. Data were unavailable for two Group 1 participants and one Group 2 participant at 8-weeks post-SOT and for four Group 1 participants and one Group 2 participant at 3-months post-SOT.
The total distance that a participant could walk in 6 minutes was recorded, and participants unable to walk at all were given a score of 0 meters. The mean distance was then determined across participants. The baseline score was compared to the score at the specified intervals after start of therapy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group 1 (Treatment)
n=20 Participants
Participants in Group 1 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received electrical stimulation for up to 8 weeks with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
|
Group 2 (Control)
n=21 Participants
Participants in Group 2 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received up to 8 weeks of sham stimulation. Three months after start of sham treatment, participants were given the option to crossover and receive electrical stimulation treatment with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
|
Group 2 Crossover Safety Set
Participants who were consented, randomized to Group 2 (Control), received sham stimulation treatment, and crossed over to receive electrical stimulation via the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
Visit 1: Baseline
|
267.29 meters
Standard Deviation 108.91
|
291.94 meters
Standard Deviation 91.12
|
—
|
|
Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
Visit 10: 8-weeks Post-SOT
|
354.29 meters
Standard Deviation 197.63
|
253.36 meters
Standard Deviation 142.77
|
—
|
|
Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
Visit 11: 3-months Post-SOT
|
318.11 meters
Standard Deviation 164.83
|
269.77 meters
Standard Deviation 156.50
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Group 1 (Treatment)
Group 2 (Control)
Group 2 Crossover Safety Set
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Group 1 (Treatment)
n=28 participants at risk
Participants in Group 1 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received electrical stimulation for up to 8 weeks with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
|
Group 2 (Control)
n=27 participants at risk
Participants in Group 2 were consented and met all eligibility criteria prior to randomization. These participants had leads placed in their mid to upper thigh and received up to 8 weeks of sham stimulation. Three months after start of sham treatment, participants were given the option to crossover and receive electrical stimulation treatment with the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
|
Group 2 Crossover Safety Set
n=11 participants at risk
Participants who were consented, randomized to Group 2 (Control), received sham stimulation treatment, and crossed over to receive electrical stimulation via the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain at lead site
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • Each participant enrolled was assessed for adverse events from the time of informed consent through their final study visit. For Group 1, the total assessment period was approximately 13 months for each participant. Each Group 2 participant that did not crossover to receive stimulation treatment was assessed through their study participation (approximately 3 months). Group 2 participants that crossed over to receive treatment were each assessed for approximately 16 months.
|
0.00%
0/27 • Each participant enrolled was assessed for adverse events from the time of informed consent through their final study visit. For Group 1, the total assessment period was approximately 13 months for each participant. Each Group 2 participant that did not crossover to receive stimulation treatment was assessed through their study participation (approximately 3 months). Group 2 participants that crossed over to receive treatment were each assessed for approximately 16 months.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Each participant enrolled was assessed for adverse events from the time of informed consent through their final study visit. For Group 1, the total assessment period was approximately 13 months for each participant. Each Group 2 participant that did not crossover to receive stimulation treatment was assessed through their study participation (approximately 3 months). Group 2 participants that crossed over to receive treatment were each assessed for approximately 16 months.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin irritation
|
25.0%
7/28 • Number of events 7 • Each participant enrolled was assessed for adverse events from the time of informed consent through their final study visit. For Group 1, the total assessment period was approximately 13 months for each participant. Each Group 2 participant that did not crossover to receive stimulation treatment was assessed through their study participation (approximately 3 months). Group 2 participants that crossed over to receive treatment were each assessed for approximately 16 months.
|
40.7%
11/27 • Number of events 15 • Each participant enrolled was assessed for adverse events from the time of informed consent through their final study visit. For Group 1, the total assessment period was approximately 13 months for each participant. Each Group 2 participant that did not crossover to receive stimulation treatment was assessed through their study participation (approximately 3 months). Group 2 participants that crossed over to receive treatment were each assessed for approximately 16 months.
|
36.4%
4/11 • Number of events 5 • Each participant enrolled was assessed for adverse events from the time of informed consent through their final study visit. For Group 1, the total assessment period was approximately 13 months for each participant. Each Group 2 participant that did not crossover to receive stimulation treatment was assessed through their study participation (approximately 3 months). Group 2 participants that crossed over to receive treatment were each assessed for approximately 16 months.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Itching at bandage, pad, and/or lead exit sites
|
7.1%
2/28 • Number of events 3 • Each participant enrolled was assessed for adverse events from the time of informed consent through their final study visit. For Group 1, the total assessment period was approximately 13 months for each participant. Each Group 2 participant that did not crossover to receive stimulation treatment was assessed through their study participation (approximately 3 months). Group 2 participants that crossed over to receive treatment were each assessed for approximately 16 months.
|
11.1%
3/27 • Number of events 3 • Each participant enrolled was assessed for adverse events from the time of informed consent through their final study visit. For Group 1, the total assessment period was approximately 13 months for each participant. Each Group 2 participant that did not crossover to receive stimulation treatment was assessed through their study participation (approximately 3 months). Group 2 participants that crossed over to receive treatment were each assessed for approximately 16 months.
|
18.2%
2/11 • Number of events 2 • Each participant enrolled was assessed for adverse events from the time of informed consent through their final study visit. For Group 1, the total assessment period was approximately 13 months for each participant. Each Group 2 participant that did not crossover to receive stimulation treatment was assessed through their study participation (approximately 3 months). Group 2 participants that crossed over to receive treatment were each assessed for approximately 16 months.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Discoloration/bruising at lead exit site
|
3.6%
1/28 • Number of events 1 • Each participant enrolled was assessed for adverse events from the time of informed consent through their final study visit. For Group 1, the total assessment period was approximately 13 months for each participant. Each Group 2 participant that did not crossover to receive stimulation treatment was assessed through their study participation (approximately 3 months). Group 2 participants that crossed over to receive treatment were each assessed for approximately 16 months.
|
7.4%
2/27 • Number of events 2 • Each participant enrolled was assessed for adverse events from the time of informed consent through their final study visit. For Group 1, the total assessment period was approximately 13 months for each participant. Each Group 2 participant that did not crossover to receive stimulation treatment was assessed through their study participation (approximately 3 months). Group 2 participants that crossed over to receive treatment were each assessed for approximately 16 months.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Each participant enrolled was assessed for adverse events from the time of informed consent through their final study visit. For Group 1, the total assessment period was approximately 13 months for each participant. Each Group 2 participant that did not crossover to receive stimulation treatment was assessed through their study participation (approximately 3 months). Group 2 participants that crossed over to receive treatment were each assessed for approximately 16 months.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin tear at bandage or connector site
|
0.00%
0/28 • Each participant enrolled was assessed for adverse events from the time of informed consent through their final study visit. For Group 1, the total assessment period was approximately 13 months for each participant. Each Group 2 participant that did not crossover to receive stimulation treatment was assessed through their study participation (approximately 3 months). Group 2 participants that crossed over to receive treatment were each assessed for approximately 16 months.
|
7.4%
2/27 • Number of events 2 • Each participant enrolled was assessed for adverse events from the time of informed consent through their final study visit. For Group 1, the total assessment period was approximately 13 months for each participant. Each Group 2 participant that did not crossover to receive stimulation treatment was assessed through their study participation (approximately 3 months). Group 2 participants that crossed over to receive treatment were each assessed for approximately 16 months.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Each participant enrolled was assessed for adverse events from the time of informed consent through their final study visit. For Group 1, the total assessment period was approximately 13 months for each participant. Each Group 2 participant that did not crossover to receive stimulation treatment was assessed through their study participation (approximately 3 months). Group 2 participants that crossed over to receive treatment were each assessed for approximately 16 months.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Granuloma
|
0.00%
0/28 • Each participant enrolled was assessed for adverse events from the time of informed consent through their final study visit. For Group 1, the total assessment period was approximately 13 months for each participant. Each Group 2 participant that did not crossover to receive stimulation treatment was assessed through their study participation (approximately 3 months). Group 2 participants that crossed over to receive treatment were each assessed for approximately 16 months.
|
0.00%
0/27 • Each participant enrolled was assessed for adverse events from the time of informed consent through their final study visit. For Group 1, the total assessment period was approximately 13 months for each participant. Each Group 2 participant that did not crossover to receive stimulation treatment was assessed through their study participation (approximately 3 months). Group 2 participants that crossed over to receive treatment were each assessed for approximately 16 months.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1 • Each participant enrolled was assessed for adverse events from the time of informed consent through their final study visit. For Group 1, the total assessment period was approximately 13 months for each participant. Each Group 2 participant that did not crossover to receive stimulation treatment was assessed through their study participation (approximately 3 months). Group 2 participants that crossed over to receive treatment were each assessed for approximately 16 months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Exacerbation of existing pain
|
0.00%
0/28 • Each participant enrolled was assessed for adverse events from the time of informed consent through their final study visit. For Group 1, the total assessment period was approximately 13 months for each participant. Each Group 2 participant that did not crossover to receive stimulation treatment was assessed through their study participation (approximately 3 months). Group 2 participants that crossed over to receive treatment were each assessed for approximately 16 months.
|
3.7%
1/27 • Number of events 1 • Each participant enrolled was assessed for adverse events from the time of informed consent through their final study visit. For Group 1, the total assessment period was approximately 13 months for each participant. Each Group 2 participant that did not crossover to receive stimulation treatment was assessed through their study participation (approximately 3 months). Group 2 participants that crossed over to receive treatment were each assessed for approximately 16 months.
|
0.00%
0/11 • Each participant enrolled was assessed for adverse events from the time of informed consent through their final study visit. For Group 1, the total assessment period was approximately 13 months for each participant. Each Group 2 participant that did not crossover to receive stimulation treatment was assessed through their study participation (approximately 3 months). Group 2 participants that crossed over to receive treatment were each assessed for approximately 16 months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Uncomfortable stimulation
|
0.00%
0/28 • Each participant enrolled was assessed for adverse events from the time of informed consent through their final study visit. For Group 1, the total assessment period was approximately 13 months for each participant. Each Group 2 participant that did not crossover to receive stimulation treatment was assessed through their study participation (approximately 3 months). Group 2 participants that crossed over to receive treatment were each assessed for approximately 16 months.
|
0.00%
0/27 • Each participant enrolled was assessed for adverse events from the time of informed consent through their final study visit. For Group 1, the total assessment period was approximately 13 months for each participant. Each Group 2 participant that did not crossover to receive stimulation treatment was assessed through their study participation (approximately 3 months). Group 2 participants that crossed over to receive treatment were each assessed for approximately 16 months.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1 • Each participant enrolled was assessed for adverse events from the time of informed consent through their final study visit. For Group 1, the total assessment period was approximately 13 months for each participant. Each Group 2 participant that did not crossover to receive stimulation treatment was assessed through their study participation (approximately 3 months). Group 2 participants that crossed over to receive treatment were each assessed for approximately 16 months.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place