Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Long-term Comparison of Esketamine Nasal Spray Versus Quetiapine Extended Release, Both in Combination With a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor/Serotonin-Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitor, in Participants With Treatment Resistant Major Depressive Disorder (NCT NCT04338321)
NCT ID: NCT04338321
Last Updated: 2025-04-29
Results Overview
Percentage of participants with remission as assessed by the MADRS at Week 8 was reported. The MADRS is a clinician-rated scale designed to measure depression severity and to detect changes due to antidepressant treatment. The scale consists of 10 items, each of which is scored from 0 (item is not present or is normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptoms), for a total possible score of 60. Higher scores represent a more severe condition. The MADRS evaluates apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts. A participant was defined as being in remission if the MADRS total score was less than or equal to (\<=)10 and no treatment or study discontinuation before Week 8.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
676 participants
Week 8
2025-04-29
Participant Flow
Participants who discontinued the treatment early still remained in the study and were followed up until the end of study.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Esketamine Nasal Spray + Oral Antidepressant (AD)
Participants received treatment with esketamine nasal spray (28 milligrams \[mg\] \[initial dose for elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years and adults of Japanese ancestry\], 56 mg \[initial dose for adult participants aged 18 to 64 years\], or 84 mg \[maximum dose esketamine nasal spray\]) twice-weekly with a flexible dose regimen from Day 1 until Week 4, once weekly from Week 5 to Week 8 and once-weekly or once every 2 weeks from Week 9 to Week 32 in combination with continuing serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor/selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI/SNRI).
|
Quetiapine Extended Release (XR) + Oral AD
Participants continued to take their current SSRI/SNRI augmented with quetiapine XR as per the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) (or local equivalent, if applicable) at an initial dose of 50 mg/day on Days 1-2, 150 mg/day on Days 3-4 (lowest effective dose) in adult participants aged 18 to 64 years; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day on Day 5 and onward were based on individual participant evaluation. In elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years, the initial dose was 50 mg/day on Days 1-3, 100 mg/day on Days 4-7, and 150 mg/day on Day 8; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day were based on individual participant evaluation no earlier than Day 22.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
336
|
340
|
|
Overall Study
Treated (Safety Analysis Set)
|
334
|
336
|
|
Overall Study
Completed Treatment
|
258
|
203
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
274
|
232
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
62
|
108
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Esketamine Nasal Spray + Oral Antidepressant (AD)
Participants received treatment with esketamine nasal spray (28 milligrams \[mg\] \[initial dose for elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years and adults of Japanese ancestry\], 56 mg \[initial dose for adult participants aged 18 to 64 years\], or 84 mg \[maximum dose esketamine nasal spray\]) twice-weekly with a flexible dose regimen from Day 1 until Week 4, once weekly from Week 5 to Week 8 and once-weekly or once every 2 weeks from Week 9 to Week 32 in combination with continuing serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor/selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI/SNRI).
|
Quetiapine Extended Release (XR) + Oral AD
Participants continued to take their current SSRI/SNRI augmented with quetiapine XR as per the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) (or local equivalent, if applicable) at an initial dose of 50 mg/day on Days 1-2, 150 mg/day on Days 3-4 (lowest effective dose) in adult participants aged 18 to 64 years; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day on Day 5 and onward were based on individual participant evaluation. In elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years, the initial dose was 50 mg/day on Days 1-3, 100 mg/day on Days 4-7, and 150 mg/day on Day 8; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day were based on individual participant evaluation no earlier than Day 22.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
4
|
10
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
4
|
9
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
45
|
69
|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
5
|
9
|
|
Overall Study
Other
|
3
|
10
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Long-term Comparison of Esketamine Nasal Spray Versus Quetiapine Extended Release, Both in Combination With a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor/Serotonin-Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitor, in Participants With Treatment Resistant Major Depressive Disorder
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Esketamine Nasal Spray + Oral Antidepressant (AD)
n=336 Participants
Participants received treatment with esketamine nasal spray (28 milligrams \[mg\] \[initial dose for elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years and adults of Japanese ancestry\], 56 mg \[initial dose for adult participants aged 18 to 64 years\], or 84 mg \[maximum dose esketamine nasal spray\]) twice-weekly with a flexible dose regimen from Day 1 until Week 4, once weekly from Week 5 to Week 8 and once-weekly or once every 2 weeks from Week 9 to Week 32 in combination with continuing serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor/selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI/SNRI).
|
Quetiapine Extended Release (XR) + Oral AD
n=340 Participants
Participants continued to take their current SSRI/SNRI augmented with quetiapine XR as per the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) (or local equivalent, if applicable) at an initial dose of 50 mg/day on Days 1-2, 150 mg/day on Days 3-4 (lowest effective dose) in adult participants aged 18 to 64 years; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day on Day 5 and onward were based on individual participant evaluation. In elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years, the initial dose was 50 mg/day on Days 1-3, 100 mg/day on Days 4-7, and 150 mg/day on Day 8; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day were based on individual participant evaluation no earlier than Day 22.
|
Total
n=676 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
44.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6 • n=5 Participants
|
45.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.38 • n=7 Participants
|
45 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
225 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
222 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
447 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
111 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
118 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
229 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
137 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
152 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
289 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
185 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
171 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
356 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 8Population: The full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants.
Percentage of participants with remission as assessed by the MADRS at Week 8 was reported. The MADRS is a clinician-rated scale designed to measure depression severity and to detect changes due to antidepressant treatment. The scale consists of 10 items, each of which is scored from 0 (item is not present or is normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptoms), for a total possible score of 60. Higher scores represent a more severe condition. The MADRS evaluates apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts. A participant was defined as being in remission if the MADRS total score was less than or equal to (\<=)10 and no treatment or study discontinuation before Week 8.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Esketamine Nasal Spray + Oral Antidepressant (AD)
n=336 Participants
Participants received treatment with esketamine nasal spray (28 milligrams \[mg\] \[initial dose for elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years and adults of Japanese ancestry\], 56 mg \[initial dose for adult participants aged 18 to 64 years\], or 84 mg \[maximum dose esketamine nasal spray\]) twice-weekly with a flexible dose regimen from Day 1 until Week 4, once weekly from Week 5 to Week 8 and once-weekly or once every 2 weeks from Week 9 to Week 32 in combination with continuing serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor/selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI/SNRI).
|
Quetiapine Extended Release (XR) + Oral AD
n=340 Participants
Participants continued to take their current SSRI/SNRI augmented with quetiapine XR as per the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) (or local equivalent, if applicable) at an initial dose of 50 mg/day on Days 1-2, 150 mg/day on Days 3-4 (lowest effective dose) in adult participants aged 18 to 64 years; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day on Day 5 and onward were based on individual participant evaluation. In elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years, the initial dose was 50 mg/day on Days 1-3, 100 mg/day on Days 4-7, and 150 mg/day on Day 8; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day were based on individual participant evaluation no earlier than Day 22.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Remission as Assessed by the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Score at Week 8
|
27.1 Percentage of participants
|
17.6 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 32Population: The FAS includes all randomized participants.
Percentage of participants with both remission at Week 8 and relapse-free until Week 32 were reported. A participant was defined as being in remission if the MADRS total score was \<= 10 and no treatment or study discontinuation before Week 8. A relapse was defined by any of following: a) Worsening of depressive symptoms as indicated by MADRS total score greater than or equal to (\>=) 22 confirmed by 1 additional assessment of MADRS total score \>= 22 within the next 5 to 15 days. The date of the second MADRS assessment was used for the date of relapse; b) Any psychiatric hospitalization for: worsening of depression, suicide prevention or suicide attempt, the start date of hospitalization was the date of relapse; c) Suicide attempt, completed suicide, or any other clinically relevant event determined by investigator's judgment to be indicative of a relapse of depressive illness, but without hospitalized. The onset of the event was used for the date of relapse.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Esketamine Nasal Spray + Oral Antidepressant (AD)
n=336 Participants
Participants received treatment with esketamine nasal spray (28 milligrams \[mg\] \[initial dose for elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years and adults of Japanese ancestry\], 56 mg \[initial dose for adult participants aged 18 to 64 years\], or 84 mg \[maximum dose esketamine nasal spray\]) twice-weekly with a flexible dose regimen from Day 1 until Week 4, once weekly from Week 5 to Week 8 and once-weekly or once every 2 weeks from Week 9 to Week 32 in combination with continuing serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor/selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI/SNRI).
|
Quetiapine Extended Release (XR) + Oral AD
n=340 Participants
Participants continued to take their current SSRI/SNRI augmented with quetiapine XR as per the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) (or local equivalent, if applicable) at an initial dose of 50 mg/day on Days 1-2, 150 mg/day on Days 3-4 (lowest effective dose) in adult participants aged 18 to 64 years; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day on Day 5 and onward were based on individual participant evaluation. In elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years, the initial dose was 50 mg/day on Days 1-3, 100 mg/day on Days 4-7, and 150 mg/day on Day 8; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day were based on individual participant evaluation no earlier than Day 22.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Both Remission at Week 8 and Relapse-free Until Week 32
|
21.7 Percentage of Participants
|
14.1 Percentage of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32Population: The FAS included all randomized participants. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified time points.
Change from baseline in clinician-rated overall MADRS score was reported. The MADRS is a clinician-rated scale designed to measure depression severity and to detect changes due to antidepressant treatment. The scale consists of 10 items, each of which is scored from 0 (item is not present or is normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptoms), summed up for a total possible score range of 0 to 60. Higher scores represent a more severe condition. The MADRS evaluates apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Esketamine Nasal Spray + Oral Antidepressant (AD)
n=327 Participants
Participants received treatment with esketamine nasal spray (28 milligrams \[mg\] \[initial dose for elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years and adults of Japanese ancestry\], 56 mg \[initial dose for adult participants aged 18 to 64 years\], or 84 mg \[maximum dose esketamine nasal spray\]) twice-weekly with a flexible dose regimen from Day 1 until Week 4, once weekly from Week 5 to Week 8 and once-weekly or once every 2 weeks from Week 9 to Week 32 in combination with continuing serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor/selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI/SNRI).
|
Quetiapine Extended Release (XR) + Oral AD
n=330 Participants
Participants continued to take their current SSRI/SNRI augmented with quetiapine XR as per the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) (or local equivalent, if applicable) at an initial dose of 50 mg/day on Days 1-2, 150 mg/day on Days 3-4 (lowest effective dose) in adult participants aged 18 to 64 years; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day on Day 5 and onward were based on individual participant evaluation. In elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years, the initial dose was 50 mg/day on Days 1-3, 100 mg/day on Days 4-7, and 150 mg/day on Day 8; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day were based on individual participant evaluation no earlier than Day 22.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall MADRS Score
Week 1
|
-5.3 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 5.71
|
-3.7 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 4.65
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall MADRS Score
Week 2
|
-9.0 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 6.87
|
-6.1 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 6.52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall MADRS Score
Week 4
|
-12.8 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 7.50
|
-9.8 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 7.32
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall MADRS Score
Week 6
|
-14.9 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 8.27
|
-12.2 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 8.11
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall MADRS Score
Week 8
|
-16.4 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 8.67
|
-14.3 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 8.26
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall MADRS Score
Week 10
|
-18.2 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 8.32
|
-16.2 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 7.38
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall MADRS Score
Week 12
|
-18.4 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 8.26
|
-16.7 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 8.16
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall MADRS Score
Week 14
|
-19.0 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 8.06
|
-17.1 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 8.06
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall MADRS Score
Week 16
|
-19.6 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 8.16
|
-17.8 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 8.23
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall MADRS Score
Week 18
|
-19.9 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 8.59
|
-18.1 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 8.36
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall MADRS Score
Week 20
|
-20.1 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 8.75
|
-19.1 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 8.11
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall MADRS Score
Week 22
|
-20.6 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 8.32
|
-19.5 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 8.04
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall MADRS Score
Week 24
|
-21.0 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 8.58
|
-20.1 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 7.96
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall MADRS Score
Week 26
|
-21.2 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 8.19
|
-20.0 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 8.18
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall MADRS Score
Week 28
|
-21.5 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 8.33
|
-20.8 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 8.33
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall MADRS Score
Week 30
|
-21.8 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 8.66
|
-20.6 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 8.39
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall MADRS Score
Week 32
|
-22.2 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 8.12
|
-20.5 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 8.58
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, LOCF at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32Population: The FAS included all randomized participants. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Change from baseline in clinician-rated overall MADRS score at LOCF was reported. The MADRS is a clinician-rated scale designed to measure depression severity and to detect changes due to antidepressant treatment. The scale consists of 10 items, each of which is scored from 0 (item is not present or is normal) to 6 (severe or continuous presence of the symptoms), summed up for a total possible score range of 0 to 60. Higher scores represent a more severe condition. The MADRS evaluates apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, sleep, appetite, concentration, lassitude, interest level, pessimistic thoughts, and suicidal thoughts. LOCF is defined as the participants who had a missing value or who stopped treatment at a specific time point had their last non-missing value carried forward.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Esketamine Nasal Spray + Oral Antidepressant (AD)
n=327 Participants
Participants received treatment with esketamine nasal spray (28 milligrams \[mg\] \[initial dose for elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years and adults of Japanese ancestry\], 56 mg \[initial dose for adult participants aged 18 to 64 years\], or 84 mg \[maximum dose esketamine nasal spray\]) twice-weekly with a flexible dose regimen from Day 1 until Week 4, once weekly from Week 5 to Week 8 and once-weekly or once every 2 weeks from Week 9 to Week 32 in combination with continuing serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor/selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI/SNRI).
|
Quetiapine Extended Release (XR) + Oral AD
n=330 Participants
Participants continued to take their current SSRI/SNRI augmented with quetiapine XR as per the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) (or local equivalent, if applicable) at an initial dose of 50 mg/day on Days 1-2, 150 mg/day on Days 3-4 (lowest effective dose) in adult participants aged 18 to 64 years; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day on Day 5 and onward were based on individual participant evaluation. In elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years, the initial dose was 50 mg/day on Days 1-3, 100 mg/day on Days 4-7, and 150 mg/day on Day 8; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day were based on individual participant evaluation no earlier than Day 22.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall MADRS Score at Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Week 30
|
-19.2 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 10.10
|
-15.2 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 11.11
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall MADRS Score at Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Week 2
|
-9.0 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 6.86
|
-5.8 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 6.53
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall MADRS Score at Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Week 4
|
-12.6 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 7.63
|
-8.9 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 7.70
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall MADRS Score at Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Week 6
|
-14.5 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 8.47
|
-10.7 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 8.78
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall MADRS Score at Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Week 8
|
-15.7 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 9.07
|
-12.0 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 9.30
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall MADRS Score at Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Week 10
|
-16.9 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 9.15
|
-12.8 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 9.24
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall MADRS Score at Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Week 12
|
-17.1 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 9.22
|
-13.1 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 9.82
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall MADRS Score at Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Week 14
|
-17.6 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 9.08
|
-13.2 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 9.88
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall MADRS Score at Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Week 16
|
-18.1 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 9.24
|
-13.7 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 10.17
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall MADRS Score at Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Week 18
|
-18.1 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 9.60
|
-13.8 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 10.26
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall MADRS Score at Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Week 20
|
-18.2 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 9.80
|
-14.3 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 10.46
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall MADRS Score at Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Week 22
|
-18.7 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 9.83
|
-14.6 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 10.56
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall MADRS Score at Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Week 24
|
-18.8 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 9.88
|
-14.8 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 10.77
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall MADRS Score at Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Week 26
|
-19.0 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 9.76
|
-14.9 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 10.76
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall MADRS Score at Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Week 28
|
-19.1 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 9.88
|
-15.2 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 11.08
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall MADRS Score at Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Week 32
|
-19.6 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 9.94
|
-15.1 Unit on scale
Standard Deviation 11.18
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32Population: The FAS included all randomized participants. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified time points.
Change from baseline in clinician-rated overall severity of depressive illness as assessed by CGI-S scale score was reported. The CGI-S provides an overall clinician-determined summary measure of the severity of the participant's illness that takes into account all available information, including knowledge of the participant's history, psychosocial circumstances, symptoms, behavior, and the impact of the symptoms on the participant's ability to function. The CGI-S evaluates the severity of psychopathology on a scale of 1 to 7. Considering total clinical experience, a participant is assessed on severity of mental illness at the time of rating according to: 1 = normal (not at all ill); 2 = borderline mentally ill; 3 = mildly ill; 4 = moderately ill; 5 = markedly ill; 6 = severely ill; 7 = among the most extremely ill participants. Negative change in score indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Esketamine Nasal Spray + Oral Antidepressant (AD)
n=327 Participants
Participants received treatment with esketamine nasal spray (28 milligrams \[mg\] \[initial dose for elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years and adults of Japanese ancestry\], 56 mg \[initial dose for adult participants aged 18 to 64 years\], or 84 mg \[maximum dose esketamine nasal spray\]) twice-weekly with a flexible dose regimen from Day 1 until Week 4, once weekly from Week 5 to Week 8 and once-weekly or once every 2 weeks from Week 9 to Week 32 in combination with continuing serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor/selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI/SNRI).
|
Quetiapine Extended Release (XR) + Oral AD
n=331 Participants
Participants continued to take their current SSRI/SNRI augmented with quetiapine XR as per the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) (or local equivalent, if applicable) at an initial dose of 50 mg/day on Days 1-2, 150 mg/day on Days 3-4 (lowest effective dose) in adult participants aged 18 to 64 years; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day on Day 5 and onward were based on individual participant evaluation. In elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years, the initial dose was 50 mg/day on Days 1-3, 100 mg/day on Days 4-7, and 150 mg/day on Day 8; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day were based on individual participant evaluation no earlier than Day 22.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) Scale Score
Week 1
|
-0.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 0.58
|
-0.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 0.53
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) Scale Score
Week 2
|
-0.7 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 0.79
|
-0.5 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 0.77
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) Scale Score
Week 3
|
-1.0 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 0.88
|
-0.7 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 0.83
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) Scale Score
Week 4
|
-1.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 0.94
|
-1.0 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) Scale Score
Week 8
|
-1.7 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 0.98
|
-1.4 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) Scale Score
Week 12
|
-1.9 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.00
|
-1.7 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.07
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) Scale Score
Week 16
|
-2.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
|
-1.9 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.15
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) Scale Score
Week 20
|
-2.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.04
|
-2.0 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.22
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) Scale Score
Week 24
|
-2.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.06
|
-2.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.22
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) Scale Score
Week 28
|
-2.4 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.02
|
-2.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.19
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) Scale Score
Week 32
|
-2.5 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.05
|
-2.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.21
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, LOCF at Weeks 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32Population: The FAS included all randomized participants. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Change from Baseline in clinician-rated overall severity of depressive illness as assessed by CGI-S scale score at LOCF was reported. The CGI-S provides an overall clinician-determined summary measure of the severity of the participant's illness that takes into account all available information, including knowledge of the participant's history, psychosocial circumstances, symptoms, behavior, and the impact of the symptoms on the participant's ability to function. The CGI-S evaluates the severity of psychopathology on a scale of 1 to 7. A participant is assessed on severity of mental illness at the time of rating according to: 1 = normal (not at all ill); 2 = borderline mentally ill; 3 = mildly ill; 4 = moderately ill; 5 = markedly ill; 6 = severely ill; 7 = among the most extremely ill participants. LOCF is defined as the participants who had a missing value or who stopped treatment at a specific time point had their last non-missing value carried forward.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Esketamine Nasal Spray + Oral Antidepressant (AD)
n=327 Participants
Participants received treatment with esketamine nasal spray (28 milligrams \[mg\] \[initial dose for elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years and adults of Japanese ancestry\], 56 mg \[initial dose for adult participants aged 18 to 64 years\], or 84 mg \[maximum dose esketamine nasal spray\]) twice-weekly with a flexible dose regimen from Day 1 until Week 4, once weekly from Week 5 to Week 8 and once-weekly or once every 2 weeks from Week 9 to Week 32 in combination with continuing serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor/selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI/SNRI).
|
Quetiapine Extended Release (XR) + Oral AD
n=331 Participants
Participants continued to take their current SSRI/SNRI augmented with quetiapine XR as per the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) (or local equivalent, if applicable) at an initial dose of 50 mg/day on Days 1-2, 150 mg/day on Days 3-4 (lowest effective dose) in adult participants aged 18 to 64 years; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day on Day 5 and onward were based on individual participant evaluation. In elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years, the initial dose was 50 mg/day on Days 1-3, 100 mg/day on Days 4-7, and 150 mg/day on Day 8; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day were based on individual participant evaluation no earlier than Day 22.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-S Scale Score at LOCF
Week 2
|
-0.7 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 0.79
|
-0.5 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 0.75
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-S Scale Score at LOCF
Week 3
|
-1.0 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 0.88
|
-0.7 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 0.84
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-S Scale Score at LOCF
Week 4
|
-1.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 0.95
|
-0.9 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-S Scale Score at LOCF
Week 8
|
-1.6 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.02
|
-1.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.10
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-S Scale Score at LOCF
Week 12
|
-1.8 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.09
|
-1.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.18
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-S Scale Score at LOCF
Week 16
|
-1.9 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.16
|
-1.4 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.26
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-S Scale Score at LOCF
Week 20
|
-2.0 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.17
|
-1.5 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.32
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-S Scale Score at LOCF
Week 24
|
-2.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.22
|
-1.5 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.35
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-S Scale Score at LOCF
Week 28
|
-2.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.22
|
-1.6 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.36
|
|
Change From Baseline in Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-S Scale Score at LOCF
Week 32
|
-2.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.27
|
-1.6 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 1.40
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32Population: The FAS included all randomized participants. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified time points.
Clinician-rated overall severity of depressive illness as assessed by CGI-C scale score was reported. The CGI-C evaluates the total improvement whether or not entirely due to drug treatment on a scale of 1 to 7. Compared to the condition at baseline, a participant is assessed on how much he/she has changed, according to: 1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = minimally improved; 4 = no change; 5 = minimally worse; 6 = much worse; 7 = very much worse. Higher scores indicate more severity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Esketamine Nasal Spray + Oral Antidepressant (AD)
n=327 Participants
Participants received treatment with esketamine nasal spray (28 milligrams \[mg\] \[initial dose for elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years and adults of Japanese ancestry\], 56 mg \[initial dose for adult participants aged 18 to 64 years\], or 84 mg \[maximum dose esketamine nasal spray\]) twice-weekly with a flexible dose regimen from Day 1 until Week 4, once weekly from Week 5 to Week 8 and once-weekly or once every 2 weeks from Week 9 to Week 32 in combination with continuing serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor/selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI/SNRI).
|
Quetiapine Extended Release (XR) + Oral AD
n=331 Participants
Participants continued to take their current SSRI/SNRI augmented with quetiapine XR as per the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) (or local equivalent, if applicable) at an initial dose of 50 mg/day on Days 1-2, 150 mg/day on Days 3-4 (lowest effective dose) in adult participants aged 18 to 64 years; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day on Day 5 and onward were based on individual participant evaluation. In elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years, the initial dose was 50 mg/day on Days 1-3, 100 mg/day on Days 4-7, and 150 mg/day on Day 8; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day were based on individual participant evaluation no earlier than Day 22.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by Clinical Global Impression - Change (CGI-C) Scale Score
Week 1
|
3.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 0.77
|
3.6 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 0.72
|
|
Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by Clinical Global Impression - Change (CGI-C) Scale Score
Week 2
|
2.9 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 0.87
|
3.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 0.85
|
|
Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by Clinical Global Impression - Change (CGI-C) Scale Score
Week 3
|
2.7 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 0.83
|
3.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 0.84
|
|
Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by Clinical Global Impression - Change (CGI-C) Scale Score
Week 4
|
2.4 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 0.85
|
2.9 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 0.96
|
|
Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by Clinical Global Impression - Change (CGI-C) Scale Score
Week 8
|
2.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 0.84
|
2.4 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 0.93
|
|
Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by Clinical Global Impression - Change (CGI-C) Scale Score
Week 12
|
2.0 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 0.85
|
2.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 0.89
|
|
Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by Clinical Global Impression - Change (CGI-C) Scale Score
Week 16
|
1.9 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 0.87
|
2.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 0.99
|
|
Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by Clinical Global Impression - Change (CGI-C) Scale Score
Week 20
|
1.8 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 0.85
|
2.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
|
|
Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by Clinical Global Impression - Change (CGI-C) Scale Score
Week 24
|
1.8 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 0.85
|
2.0 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 0.84
|
|
Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by Clinical Global Impression - Change (CGI-C) Scale Score
Week 28
|
1.7 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 0.84
|
2.0 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 0.91
|
|
Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by Clinical Global Impression - Change (CGI-C) Scale Score
Week 32
|
1.6 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 0.81
|
1.9 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 0.88
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, LOCF at Weeks 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32Population: The FAS included all randomized participants. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
Number of participants with clinician-rated overall severity of depressive illness as assessed by CGI-C scale score at LOCF was reported. The CGI-C evaluates the total improvement whether or not entirely due to drug treatment on a scale of 1 to 7. Compared to the condition at baseline, a participant is assessed on how much he/she has changed, according to: 1 = very much improved; 2 = much improved; 3 = minimally improved; 4 = no change; 5 = minimally worse; 6 = much worse; 7 = very much worse. Higher scores indicate more severity. LOCF is defined as the participants who had a missing value or who stopped treatment at a specific time point had their last non-missing value carried forward.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Esketamine Nasal Spray + Oral Antidepressant (AD)
n=327 Participants
Participants received treatment with esketamine nasal spray (28 milligrams \[mg\] \[initial dose for elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years and adults of Japanese ancestry\], 56 mg \[initial dose for adult participants aged 18 to 64 years\], or 84 mg \[maximum dose esketamine nasal spray\]) twice-weekly with a flexible dose regimen from Day 1 until Week 4, once weekly from Week 5 to Week 8 and once-weekly or once every 2 weeks from Week 9 to Week 32 in combination with continuing serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor/selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI/SNRI).
|
Quetiapine Extended Release (XR) + Oral AD
n=331 Participants
Participants continued to take their current SSRI/SNRI augmented with quetiapine XR as per the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) (or local equivalent, if applicable) at an initial dose of 50 mg/day on Days 1-2, 150 mg/day on Days 3-4 (lowest effective dose) in adult participants aged 18 to 64 years; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day on Day 5 and onward were based on individual participant evaluation. In elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years, the initial dose was 50 mg/day on Days 1-3, 100 mg/day on Days 4-7, and 150 mg/day on Day 8; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day were based on individual participant evaluation no earlier than Day 22.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
No change at Week 28
|
24 Participants
|
48 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Very much worse at Week 24
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Very much improved at Week 28
|
127 Participants
|
71 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Much improved at Week 28
|
121 Participants
|
104 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Very much improved at Week 2
|
6 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Much improved at Week 2
|
97 Participants
|
39 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Minimally improved at Week 2
|
141 Participants
|
149 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
No change at Week 2
|
75 Participants
|
108 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Minimally worse at Week 2
|
6 Participants
|
26 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Much worse at Week 2
|
1 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Very much worse at Week 2
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Very much improved at Week 3
|
14 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Much improved at Week 3
|
126 Participants
|
57 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Minimally improved at Week 3
|
135 Participants
|
159 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
No change at Week 3
|
45 Participants
|
81 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Minimally worse at Week 3
|
6 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Much worse at Week 3
|
0 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Very much worse at Week 3
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Very much improved at Week 4
|
41 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Much improved at Week 4
|
150 Participants
|
83 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Minimally improved at Week 4
|
102 Participants
|
152 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
No change at Week 4
|
29 Participants
|
52 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Minimally worse at Week 4
|
4 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Much worse at Week 4
|
0 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Very much worse at Week 4
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Very much improved at Week 8
|
68 Participants
|
38 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Much improved at Week 8
|
165 Participants
|
118 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Minimally improved at Week 8
|
68 Participants
|
105 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
No change at Week 8
|
18 Participants
|
44 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Minimally worse at Week 8
|
5 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Much worse at Week 8
|
2 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Very much worse at Week 8
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Very much improved at Week 12
|
83 Participants
|
45 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Much improved at Week 12
|
156 Participants
|
120 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Minimally improved at Week 12
|
53 Participants
|
92 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
No change at Week 12
|
24 Participants
|
47 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Minimally worse at Week 12
|
9 Participants
|
18 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Much worse at Week 12
|
1 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Very much worse at Week 12
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Very much improved at Week 16
|
100 Participants
|
55 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Much improved at Week 16
|
136 Participants
|
111 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Minimally improved at Week 16
|
58 Participants
|
84 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
No change at Week 16
|
25 Participants
|
49 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Minimally worse at Week 16
|
5 Participants
|
23 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Much worse at Week 16
|
2 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Very much worse at Week 16
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Very much improved at Week 20
|
106 Participants
|
61 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Much improved at Week 20
|
137 Participants
|
110 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Minimally improved at Week 20
|
55 Participants
|
83 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
No change at Week 20
|
19 Participants
|
49 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Minimally worse at Week 20
|
7 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Much worse at Week 20
|
2 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Very much worse at Week 20
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Very much improved at Week 24
|
123 Participants
|
64 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Much improved at Week 24
|
123 Participants
|
109 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Minimally improved at Week 24
|
48 Participants
|
86 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
No change at Week 24
|
25 Participants
|
44 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Minimally worse at Week 24
|
6 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Much worse at Week 24
|
1 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Minimally improved at Week 28
|
46 Participants
|
80 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Minimally worse at Week 28
|
7 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Much worse at Week 28
|
1 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Very much worse at Week 28
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Very much improved at Week 32
|
148 Participants
|
82 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Much improved at Week 32
|
103 Participants
|
96 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Minimally improved at Week 32
|
42 Participants
|
81 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
No change at Week 32
|
28 Participants
|
43 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Minimally worse at Week 32
|
4 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Much worse at Week 32
|
1 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinician-rated Overall Severity of Depressive Illness as Assessed by CGI-C Scale Score at LOCF
Very much worse at Week 32
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32Population: The FAS included all randomized participants. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified time points.
Change from baseline in participant-reported depressive symptoms as assessed by PHQ 9-item total score was reported. The PHQ-9 is a validated 9-item, patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure to assess depressive symptoms. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale (0=not at all, 1=several days, 2=more than half the days, and 3=nearly every day). The participant's item responses are summed to provide a total score (range of 0 to 27), with higher scores indicating greater severity of depressive symptoms. The severity of the PHQ-9 is categorized as follows: None-minimal (0-4), Mild (5-9), Moderate (10-14), Moderately Severe (15-19) and Severe (20-27).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Esketamine Nasal Spray + Oral Antidepressant (AD)
n=322 Participants
Participants received treatment with esketamine nasal spray (28 milligrams \[mg\] \[initial dose for elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years and adults of Japanese ancestry\], 56 mg \[initial dose for adult participants aged 18 to 64 years\], or 84 mg \[maximum dose esketamine nasal spray\]) twice-weekly with a flexible dose regimen from Day 1 until Week 4, once weekly from Week 5 to Week 8 and once-weekly or once every 2 weeks from Week 9 to Week 32 in combination with continuing serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor/selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI/SNRI).
|
Quetiapine Extended Release (XR) + Oral AD
n=316 Participants
Participants continued to take their current SSRI/SNRI augmented with quetiapine XR as per the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) (or local equivalent, if applicable) at an initial dose of 50 mg/day on Days 1-2, 150 mg/day on Days 3-4 (lowest effective dose) in adult participants aged 18 to 64 years; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day on Day 5 and onward were based on individual participant evaluation. In elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years, the initial dose was 50 mg/day on Days 1-3, 100 mg/day on Days 4-7, and 150 mg/day on Day 8; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day were based on individual participant evaluation no earlier than Day 22.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Depressive Symptoms as Assessed by Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) 9-item Total Score
Week 2
|
-4.9 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 4.90
|
-3.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 4.62
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Depressive Symptoms as Assessed by Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) 9-item Total Score
Week 4
|
-6.7 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 5.25
|
-5.0 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 5.06
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Depressive Symptoms as Assessed by Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) 9-item Total Score
Week 6
|
-8.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 5.37
|
-6.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 5.64
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Depressive Symptoms as Assessed by Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) 9-item Total Score
Week 8
|
-8.9 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 5.74
|
-7.4 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 5.58
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Depressive Symptoms as Assessed by Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) 9-item Total Score
Week 10
|
-9.6 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 5.37
|
-8.4 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 5.58
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Depressive Symptoms as Assessed by Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) 9-item Total Score
Week 12
|
-9.8 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 5.78
|
-8.7 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 5.65
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Depressive Symptoms as Assessed by Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) 9-item Total Score
Week 14
|
-10.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 5.49
|
-8.5 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 5.76
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Depressive Symptoms as Assessed by Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) 9-item Total Score
Week 16
|
-10.5 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 5.50
|
-9.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 5.77
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Depressive Symptoms as Assessed by Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) 9-item Total Score
Week 18
|
-10.6 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 5.79
|
-9.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 5.74
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Depressive Symptoms as Assessed by Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) 9-item Total Score
Week 20
|
-10.4 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 5.64
|
-9.4 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 5.97
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Depressive Symptoms as Assessed by Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) 9-item Total Score
Week 22
|
-10.7 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 5.74
|
-9.5 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 5.87
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Depressive Symptoms as Assessed by Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) 9-item Total Score
Week 24
|
-10.6 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 5.84
|
-9.7 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 6.08
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Depressive Symptoms as Assessed by Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) 9-item Total Score
Week 26
|
-10.9 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 5.88
|
-9.7 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 6.21
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Depressive Symptoms as Assessed by Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) 9-item Total Score
Week 28
|
-10.9 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 6.16
|
-10.0 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 6.23
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Depressive Symptoms as Assessed by Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) 9-item Total Score
Week 30
|
-11.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 6.39
|
-10.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 6.08
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Depressive Symptoms as Assessed by Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) 9-item Total Score
Week 32
|
-11.4 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 6.40
|
-10.5 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 6.01
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, LOCF at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32Population: The FAS included all randomized participants. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified time points.
Change from baseline in participant-reported depressive symptoms as assessed by PHQ 9-item total score at LOCF was reported. The PHQ-9 is a validated 9-item, PRO measure to assess depressive symptoms. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale (0=not at all, 1=several days, 2=more than half the days, and 3=nearly every day). The participant's item responses are summed to provide a total score (range of 0 to 27), with higher scores indicating greater severity of depressive symptoms. The severity of the PHQ-9 is categorized as follows: None-minimal (0-4), Mild (5-9), Moderate (10-14), Moderately Severe (15-19) and Severe (20-27). LOCF is defined as participants who had a missing value or who stopped treatment at a specific time point had their last non-missing value carried forward.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Esketamine Nasal Spray + Oral Antidepressant (AD)
n=322 Participants
Participants received treatment with esketamine nasal spray (28 milligrams \[mg\] \[initial dose for elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years and adults of Japanese ancestry\], 56 mg \[initial dose for adult participants aged 18 to 64 years\], or 84 mg \[maximum dose esketamine nasal spray\]) twice-weekly with a flexible dose regimen from Day 1 until Week 4, once weekly from Week 5 to Week 8 and once-weekly or once every 2 weeks from Week 9 to Week 32 in combination with continuing serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor/selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI/SNRI).
|
Quetiapine Extended Release (XR) + Oral AD
n=316 Participants
Participants continued to take their current SSRI/SNRI augmented with quetiapine XR as per the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) (or local equivalent, if applicable) at an initial dose of 50 mg/day on Days 1-2, 150 mg/day on Days 3-4 (lowest effective dose) in adult participants aged 18 to 64 years; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day on Day 5 and onward were based on individual participant evaluation. In elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years, the initial dose was 50 mg/day on Days 1-3, 100 mg/day on Days 4-7, and 150 mg/day on Day 8; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day were based on individual participant evaluation no earlier than Day 22.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Depressive Symptoms as Assessed by PHQ 9-item Total Score at LOCF
Week 2
|
-4.9 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 4.90
|
-3.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 4.62
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Depressive Symptoms as Assessed by PHQ 9-item Total Score at LOCF
Week 4
|
-6.6 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 5.33
|
-4.7 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 5.06
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Depressive Symptoms as Assessed by PHQ 9-item Total Score at LOCF
Week 6
|
-7.8 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 5.51
|
-5.6 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 5.69
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Depressive Symptoms as Assessed by PHQ 9-item Total Score at LOCF
Week 8
|
-8.5 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 5.94
|
-6.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 5.86
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Depressive Symptoms as Assessed by PHQ 9-item Total Score at LOCF
Week 10
|
-9.0 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 5.75
|
-7.0 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 5.90
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Depressive Symptoms as Assessed by PHQ 9-item Total Score at LOCF
Week 12
|
-9.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 6.13
|
-7.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 6.07
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Depressive Symptoms as Assessed by PHQ 9-item Total Score at LOCF
Week 14
|
-9.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 5.93
|
-6.9 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 6.12
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Depressive Symptoms as Assessed by PHQ 9-item Total Score at LOCF
Week 16
|
-9.6 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 5.98
|
-7.4 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 6.20
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Depressive Symptoms as Assessed by PHQ 9-item Total Score at LOCF
Week 18
|
-9.5 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 6.26
|
-7.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 6.21
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Depressive Symptoms as Assessed by PHQ 9-item Total Score at LOCF
Week 20
|
-9.4 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 6.12
|
-7.4 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 6.32
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Depressive Symptoms as Assessed by PHQ 9-item Total Score at LOCF
Week 22
|
-9.7 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 6.27
|
-7.5 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 6.31
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Depressive Symptoms as Assessed by PHQ 9-item Total Score at LOCF
Week 24
|
-9.5 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 6.35
|
-7.5 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 6.47
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Depressive Symptoms as Assessed by PHQ 9-item Total Score at LOCF
Week 26
|
-9.7 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 6.46
|
-7.5 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 6.56
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Depressive Symptoms as Assessed by PHQ 9-item Total Score at LOCF
Week 28
|
-9.7 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 6.66
|
-7.6 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 6.64
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Depressive Symptoms as Assessed by PHQ 9-item Total Score at LOCF
Week 30
|
-9.9 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 6.85
|
-7.6 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 6.61
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Depressive Symptoms as Assessed by PHQ 9-item Total Score at LOCF
Week 32
|
-10.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 6.94
|
-8.0 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 6.70
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32Population: The FAS included all randomized participants. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified time points.
Change from baseline in participant-reported functional impairment and associated disability as assessed by SDS total score was reported. The SDS is a validated PRO measure consisting of a 5-item questionnaire that has been widely used and accepted for assessment of functional impairment and associated disability. The first 3 items assess disruption of (1) work/school, (2) social life, and (3) family life/home responsibilities using a rating scale from 0 to 10. It also has 1 item assessing days lost from school or work and 1 item assessing days of underproductivity. The scores for the first 3 items are summed to create a total score of 0 to 30, where higher score indicates greater impairment. Scores \<=2 for each item and \<= 6 for the total score are considered functional remission.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Esketamine Nasal Spray + Oral Antidepressant (AD)
n=310 Participants
Participants received treatment with esketamine nasal spray (28 milligrams \[mg\] \[initial dose for elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years and adults of Japanese ancestry\], 56 mg \[initial dose for adult participants aged 18 to 64 years\], or 84 mg \[maximum dose esketamine nasal spray\]) twice-weekly with a flexible dose regimen from Day 1 until Week 4, once weekly from Week 5 to Week 8 and once-weekly or once every 2 weeks from Week 9 to Week 32 in combination with continuing serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor/selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI/SNRI).
|
Quetiapine Extended Release (XR) + Oral AD
n=303 Participants
Participants continued to take their current SSRI/SNRI augmented with quetiapine XR as per the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) (or local equivalent, if applicable) at an initial dose of 50 mg/day on Days 1-2, 150 mg/day on Days 3-4 (lowest effective dose) in adult participants aged 18 to 64 years; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day on Day 5 and onward were based on individual participant evaluation. In elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years, the initial dose was 50 mg/day on Days 1-3, 100 mg/day on Days 4-7, and 150 mg/day on Day 8; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day were based on individual participant evaluation no earlier than Day 22.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Functional Impairment and Associated Disability as Assessed by Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score
Week 4
|
-5.9 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 6.58
|
-4.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 5.89
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Functional Impairment and Associated Disability as Assessed by Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score
Week 8
|
-8.6 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 7.03
|
-6.8 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 7.63
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Functional Impairment and Associated Disability as Assessed by Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score
Week 12
|
-9.7 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 7.54
|
-8.6 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 6.94
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Functional Impairment and Associated Disability as Assessed by Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score
Week 16
|
-10.6 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 7.29
|
-9.0 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 7.50
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Functional Impairment and Associated Disability as Assessed by Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score
Week 20
|
-10.9 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 7.57
|
-9.0 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 7.41
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Functional Impairment and Associated Disability as Assessed by Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score
Week 24
|
-11.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 7.88
|
-10.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 7.76
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Functional Impairment and Associated Disability as Assessed by Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score
Week 28
|
-11.9 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 7.84
|
-10.8 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 8.03
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Functional Impairment and Associated Disability as Assessed by Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score
Week 32
|
-12.6 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 8.09
|
-11.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 8.06
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, LOCF at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32Population: The FAS included all randomized participants. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified time points.
Change from baseline in participant-reported functional impairment and associated disability as assessed by SDS total score at LOCF was reported. The SDS is a validated PRO measure consisting of a 5-item questionnaire for assessment of functional impairment and associated disability. The first 3 items assess disruption of (1) work/school, (2) social life, and (3) family life/home responsibilities using a rating scale from 0 to 10. It also has 1 item assessing days lost from school or work and 1 item assessing days of underproductivity. The scores for the first 3 items are summed to create a total score of 0 to 30, where higher score indicates greater impairment. Scores \<=2 for each item and \<= 6 for the total score are considered functional remission. LOCF is defined as the participants who had a missing value or who stopped treatment at a specific time point had their last non-missing value carried forward.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Esketamine Nasal Spray + Oral Antidepressant (AD)
n=310 Participants
Participants received treatment with esketamine nasal spray (28 milligrams \[mg\] \[initial dose for elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years and adults of Japanese ancestry\], 56 mg \[initial dose for adult participants aged 18 to 64 years\], or 84 mg \[maximum dose esketamine nasal spray\]) twice-weekly with a flexible dose regimen from Day 1 until Week 4, once weekly from Week 5 to Week 8 and once-weekly or once every 2 weeks from Week 9 to Week 32 in combination with continuing serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor/selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI/SNRI).
|
Quetiapine Extended Release (XR) + Oral AD
n=303 Participants
Participants continued to take their current SSRI/SNRI augmented with quetiapine XR as per the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) (or local equivalent, if applicable) at an initial dose of 50 mg/day on Days 1-2, 150 mg/day on Days 3-4 (lowest effective dose) in adult participants aged 18 to 64 years; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day on Day 5 and onward were based on individual participant evaluation. In elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years, the initial dose was 50 mg/day on Days 1-3, 100 mg/day on Days 4-7, and 150 mg/day on Day 8; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day were based on individual participant evaluation no earlier than Day 22.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Functional Impairment and Associated Disability as Assessed by SDS Total Score at LOCF
Week 4
|
-5.9 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 6.58
|
-4.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 5.89
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Functional Impairment and Associated Disability as Assessed by SDS Total Score at LOCF
Week 8
|
-8.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 7.06
|
-5.8 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 7.45
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Functional Impairment and Associated Disability as Assessed by SDS Total Score at LOCF
Week 12
|
-9.0 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 7.59
|
-6.8 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 7.59
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Functional Impairment and Associated Disability as Assessed by SDS Total Score at LOCF
Week 16
|
-9.8 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 7.47
|
-7.0 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 7.99
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Functional Impairment and Associated Disability as Assessed by SDS Total Score at LOCF
Week 20
|
-9.9 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 7.75
|
-7.0 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 7.97
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Functional Impairment and Associated Disability as Assessed by SDS Total Score at LOCF
Week 24
|
-10.0 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 8.13
|
-7.6 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 8.37
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Functional Impairment and Associated Disability as Assessed by SDS Total Score at LOCF
Week 28
|
-10.4 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 8.21
|
-7.9 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 8.69
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Functional Impairment and Associated Disability as Assessed by SDS Total Score at LOCF
Week 32
|
-11.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 8.56
|
-8.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 8.78
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32Population: The FAS included all randomized participants. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified categories with time points.
Change from baseline in participant-reported HRQoL and health status as assessed by SF-36 scale score was reported. The SF-36 consists of 8 subscales (physical function, role limitations due to physical problems, pain, general health perception, vitality, social function, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health). Participants self-report on items in a subscale that have between 2-6 choices per item using likert-type responses (for example: none of the time, some of the time, etc.). Summations of item scores of the same subscale give the subscale scores, which are transformed into a range from 0 to 100; 0= worst HRQoL, 100=best HRQoL. Higher scores indicate better health status.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Esketamine Nasal Spray + Oral Antidepressant (AD)
n=319 Participants
Participants received treatment with esketamine nasal spray (28 milligrams \[mg\] \[initial dose for elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years and adults of Japanese ancestry\], 56 mg \[initial dose for adult participants aged 18 to 64 years\], or 84 mg \[maximum dose esketamine nasal spray\]) twice-weekly with a flexible dose regimen from Day 1 until Week 4, once weekly from Week 5 to Week 8 and once-weekly or once every 2 weeks from Week 9 to Week 32 in combination with continuing serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor/selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI/SNRI).
|
Quetiapine Extended Release (XR) + Oral AD
n=308 Participants
Participants continued to take their current SSRI/SNRI augmented with quetiapine XR as per the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) (or local equivalent, if applicable) at an initial dose of 50 mg/day on Days 1-2, 150 mg/day on Days 3-4 (lowest effective dose) in adult participants aged 18 to 64 years; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day on Day 5 and onward were based on individual participant evaluation. In elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years, the initial dose was 50 mg/day on Days 1-3, 100 mg/day on Days 4-7, and 150 mg/day on Day 8; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day were based on individual participant evaluation no earlier than Day 22.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Vitality Week 20
|
13.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.67
|
12.6 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.64
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Vitality Week 24
|
13.4 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.83
|
12.9 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.26
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Physical Functioning Week 4
|
3.5 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 7.16
|
2.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 6.85
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Physical Functioning Week 8
|
5.4 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 7.64
|
3.8 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 8.19
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Physical Functioning Week 12
|
5.8 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 8.29
|
4.7 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 8.00
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Physical Functioning Week 16
|
6.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 8.36
|
5.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 8.42
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Physical Functioning Week 20
|
6.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 8.62
|
5.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 8.87
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Physical Functioning Week 24
|
6.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 9.01
|
5.9 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 9.23
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Physical Functioning Week 28
|
6.4 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 8.68
|
6.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 9.51
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Physical Functioning Week 32
|
6.8 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 8.79
|
6.4 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 9.58
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Role-Physical Week 4
|
5.7 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 9.57
|
3.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 9.75
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Role-Physical Week 8
|
7.5 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.49
|
6.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.67
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Role-Physical Week 12
|
8.8 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.59
|
7.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.38
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Role-Physical Week 16
|
10.0 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.60
|
8.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 12.47
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Role-Physical Week 20
|
10.0 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.75
|
8.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 12.34
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Role-Physical Week 24
|
10.4 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.97
|
9.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 12.50
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Role-Physical Week 28
|
10.9 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.92
|
8.8 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 12.62
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Role-Physical Week 32
|
11.7 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.97
|
9.4 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 12.39
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Body Pain Week 4
|
3.7 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 9.05
|
2.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 8.50
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Body Pain Week 8
|
4.5 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.04
|
4.0 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 8.85
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Body Pain Week 12
|
5.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 9.93
|
5.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 9.71
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Body Pain Week 16
|
5.6 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.05
|
5.5 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Body Pain Week 20
|
5.7 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.14
|
6.0 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.41
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Body Pain Week 24
|
6.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.68
|
6.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.64
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Body Pain Week 28
|
6.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.32
|
6.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.34
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Body Pain Week 32
|
6.7 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.03
|
7.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.62
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
General Health Week 4
|
5.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 7.85
|
3.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 7.45
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
General Health Week 8
|
7.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 8.63
|
5.7 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 8.50
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
General Health Week 12
|
7.9 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 8.79
|
6.4 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 9.02
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
General Health Week 16
|
8.8 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 9.09
|
7.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 9.55
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
General Health Week 20
|
9.0 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 9.30
|
7.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 9.71
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
General Health Week 24
|
9.5 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 9.73
|
7.7 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.05
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
General Health Week 28
|
10.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 9.71
|
8.8 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.38
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
General Health Week 32
|
10.6 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.25
|
9.7 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.33
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Vitality Week 4
|
8.7 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 9.13
|
5.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 7.75
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Vitality Week 8
|
11.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.04
|
9.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 9.44
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Vitality Week 12
|
12.4 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.36
|
10.8 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 9.79
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Vitality Week 16
|
13.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.69
|
12.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 9.88
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Vitality Week 28
|
14.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.25
|
13.9 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.19
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Vitality Week 32
|
15.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.64
|
14.0 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.34
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Social Functioning Week 4
|
7.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.32
|
5.0 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 8.83
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Social Functioning Week 8
|
11.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.42
|
8.7 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 9.59
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Social Functioning Week 12
|
12.4 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.29
|
10.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.45
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Social Functioning Week 16
|
13.5 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.92
|
11.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.24
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Social Functioning Week 20
|
13.6 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.65
|
11.7 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.73
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Social Functioning Week 24
|
14.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.55
|
12.5 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.75
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Social Functioning Week 28
|
15.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.26
|
13.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.15
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Social Functioning Week 32
|
16.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.34
|
13.8 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.47
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Role-Emotional Week 4
|
8.6 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 9.62
|
5.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 9.53
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Role-Emotional Week 8
|
12.7 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.67
|
10.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.30
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Role-Emotional Week 12
|
13.8 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.70
|
12.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.48
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Role-Emotional Week 16
|
15.4 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.30
|
13.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 12.07
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Role-Emotional Week 20
|
15.8 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.26
|
13.4 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.14
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Role-Emotional Week 24
|
16.0 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.79
|
14.7 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.71
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Role-Emotional Week 28
|
17.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 12.44
|
15.0 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.58
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Role-Emotional Week 32
|
18.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 12.49
|
14.9 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 12.62
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Mental Health Week 4
|
9.8 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 9.77
|
6.7 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 9.34
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Mental Health Week 8
|
13.5 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.37
|
11.6 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.78
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Mental Health Week 12
|
15.0 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.50
|
13.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.84
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Mental Health Week 16
|
16.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.04
|
14.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.01
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Mental Health Week 20
|
16.5 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.90
|
14.7 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.36
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Mental Health Week 24
|
16.6 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.69
|
15.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.45
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Mental Health Week 28
|
17.6 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.40
|
16.5 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 12.16
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Health Status as Assessed by 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Scale Score
Mental Health Week 32
|
18.4 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.89
|
17.0 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 12.05
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, LOCF at Weeks 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32Population: The FAS included all randomized participants. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified categories with time points. LOCF was applied only for participants whose questionnaire was completely missing. No LOCF imputation was done on partially completed questionnaire.
Change from baseline in participant-reported HRQoL and health status as assessed by SF-36 domain scores at LOCF was reported. The SF-36 consists of 8 subscales (physical function, role limitations due to physical problems, pain, general health perception, vitality, social function, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health). Participants self-report on items in a subscale that have between 2-6 choices per item using likert-type responses (for example: none of the time, some of the time, etc.). Summations of item scores of the same subscale give the subscale scores, which are transformed into a range from 0 to 100; 0= worst HRQoL, 100=best HRQoL. Higher scores indicate better health status. LOCF is defined as participants who had a missing value or who stopped treatment at a specific time point had their last non-missing value carried forward.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Esketamine Nasal Spray + Oral Antidepressant (AD)
n=319 Participants
Participants received treatment with esketamine nasal spray (28 milligrams \[mg\] \[initial dose for elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years and adults of Japanese ancestry\], 56 mg \[initial dose for adult participants aged 18 to 64 years\], or 84 mg \[maximum dose esketamine nasal spray\]) twice-weekly with a flexible dose regimen from Day 1 until Week 4, once weekly from Week 5 to Week 8 and once-weekly or once every 2 weeks from Week 9 to Week 32 in combination with continuing serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor/selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI/SNRI).
|
Quetiapine Extended Release (XR) + Oral AD
n=308 Participants
Participants continued to take their current SSRI/SNRI augmented with quetiapine XR as per the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) (or local equivalent, if applicable) at an initial dose of 50 mg/day on Days 1-2, 150 mg/day on Days 3-4 (lowest effective dose) in adult participants aged 18 to 64 years; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day on Day 5 and onward were based on individual participant evaluation. In elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years, the initial dose was 50 mg/day on Days 1-3, 100 mg/day on Days 4-7, and 150 mg/day on Day 8; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day were based on individual participant evaluation no earlier than Day 22.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
Physical Functioning Week 8
|
5.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 7.61
|
3.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 8.15
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
Physical Functioning Week 12
|
5.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 8.22
|
3.9 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 7.96
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
Physical Functioning Week 16
|
5.6 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 8.33
|
4.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 8.27
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
Physical Functioning Week 20
|
5.5 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 8.63
|
4.0 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 8.48
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
Physical Functioning Week 24
|
5.6 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 8.83
|
4.4 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 8.84
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
Physical Functioning Week 28
|
5.6 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 8.71
|
4.5 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 8.97
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
Physical Functioning Week 32
|
6.0 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 8.77
|
4.6 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 9.05
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
Role-Physical Week 8
|
7.4 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.51
|
5.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.50
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
Role-Physical Week 12
|
8.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.87
|
5.7 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.31
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
Role-Physical Week 16
|
9.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.49
|
6.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 12.23
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
Role-Physical Week 20
|
9.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.69
|
6.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 12.09
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
Role-Physical Week 24
|
9.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.93
|
6.9 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 12.48
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
Role-Physical Week 28
|
9.4 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 12.00
|
6.8 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 12.36
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
Role-Physical Week 32
|
10.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 12.21
|
7.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 12.29
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
Body Pain Week 8
|
4.4 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 9.84
|
3.5 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 8.79
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
Body Pain Week 12
|
4.8 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 9.99
|
4.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 9.51
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
Body Pain Week 16
|
5.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.14
|
4.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.02
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
Body Pain Week 20
|
5.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.85
|
4.5 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.05
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
Body Pain Week 24
|
5.6 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.45
|
4.4 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.26
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
Body Pain Week 28
|
5.4 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.01
|
4.5 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.78
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
Body Pain Week 32
|
6.0 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.93
|
5.0 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.10
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
General Health Week 8
|
6.9 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 8.85
|
4.9 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 8.19
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
General Health Week 12
|
7.4 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 9.19
|
5.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 8.68
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
General Health Week 16
|
8.0 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 9.41
|
5.6 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 9.20
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
General Health Week 20
|
8.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 9.60
|
5.5 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 9.37
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
General Health Week 24
|
8.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.08
|
5.6 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 9.57
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
General Health Week 28
|
8.6 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.19
|
6.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.01
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
General Health Week 32
|
9.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.78
|
6.7 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.18
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
Vitality Week 8
|
11.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.08
|
7.8 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 9.46
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
Vitality Week 12
|
11.7 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.48
|
8.7 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 9.98
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
Vitality Week 16
|
12.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.81
|
9.5 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.26
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
Vitality Week 20
|
12.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.94
|
9.6 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.77
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
Vitality Week 24
|
12.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.04
|
9.6 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.34
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
Vitality Week 28
|
12.8 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.43
|
10.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.53
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
Vitality Week 32
|
13.8 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.99
|
10.4 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.65
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
Social Functioning Week 8
|
10.7 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.31
|
7.6 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 9.72
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
Social Functioning Week 12
|
11.4 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.29
|
8.6 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.47
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
Social Functioning Week 16
|
12.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.24
|
9.0 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.22
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
Social Functioning Week 20
|
12.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.91
|
9.1 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.92
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
Social Functioning Week 24
|
12.7 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.81
|
9.5 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.63
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
Social Functioning Week 28
|
13.0 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 12.09
|
9.8 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.49
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
Social Functioning Week 32
|
14.0 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 12.35
|
10.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.71
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
Role-Emotional Week 8
|
12.0 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.75
|
8.6 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.30
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
Role-Emotional Week 12
|
12.7 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.89
|
9.8 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.82
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
Role-Emotional Week 16
|
14.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.53
|
10.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 12.32
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
Role-Emotional Week 20
|
14.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.77
|
10.4 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.67
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
Role-Emotional Week 24
|
14.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 12.15
|
11.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 12.22
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
Role-Emotional Week 28
|
15.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 12.91
|
11.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 12.30
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
Role-Emotional Week 32
|
16.0 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 13.16
|
11.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 12.96
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
Mental Health Week 8
|
12.9 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 10.76
|
9.8 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.04
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
Mental Health Week 12
|
14.0 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.09
|
10.6 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.44
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
Mental Health Week 16
|
14.7 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.63
|
10.9 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.85
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
Mental Health Week 20
|
15.0 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 11.64
|
11.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 12.07
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
Mental Health Week 24
|
14.8 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 12.24
|
11.5 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 12.23
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
Mental Health Week 28
|
15.5 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 12.35
|
12.2 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 13.01
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported HRQoL and Health Status as Assessed by SF-36 Scale Score at LOCF
Mental Health Week 32
|
16.3 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 12.90
|
12.6 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 13.08
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32Population: The FAS included all randomized participants. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified time points.
Change from baseline in participant-reported quality of life as assessed by QLDS total score was reported. The QLDS is a disease-specific validated PRO measure which assesses the impact that depression has on a participant's quality of life. It is a 34-item self-rated questionnaire which consists of dichotomous response questions, with the response being either True/Not True. Each statement on the QLDS is given a score of "1" or "0". A score of "1" is indicative of adverse quality of life. All item scores are summed to give a total score that ranges from 0 (good quality of life) to 34 (very poor quality of life). A higher score indicates a more severe condition.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Esketamine Nasal Spray + Oral Antidepressant (AD)
n=318 Participants
Participants received treatment with esketamine nasal spray (28 milligrams \[mg\] \[initial dose for elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years and adults of Japanese ancestry\], 56 mg \[initial dose for adult participants aged 18 to 64 years\], or 84 mg \[maximum dose esketamine nasal spray\]) twice-weekly with a flexible dose regimen from Day 1 until Week 4, once weekly from Week 5 to Week 8 and once-weekly or once every 2 weeks from Week 9 to Week 32 in combination with continuing serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor/selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI/SNRI).
|
Quetiapine Extended Release (XR) + Oral AD
n=305 Participants
Participants continued to take their current SSRI/SNRI augmented with quetiapine XR as per the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) (or local equivalent, if applicable) at an initial dose of 50 mg/day on Days 1-2, 150 mg/day on Days 3-4 (lowest effective dose) in adult participants aged 18 to 64 years; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day on Day 5 and onward were based on individual participant evaluation. In elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years, the initial dose was 50 mg/day on Days 1-3, 100 mg/day on Days 4-7, and 150 mg/day on Day 8; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day were based on individual participant evaluation no earlier than Day 22.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Quality of Life as Assessed by Quality of Life in Depression Scale (QLDS) Total Score
Week 4
|
-8.9 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 8.83
|
-5.6 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 7.43
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Quality of Life as Assessed by Quality of Life in Depression Scale (QLDS) Total Score
Week 8
|
-12.0 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 9.36
|
-9.1 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 9.31
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Quality of Life as Assessed by Quality of Life in Depression Scale (QLDS) Total Score
Week 12
|
-13.5 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 9.30
|
-10.9 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 9.52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Quality of Life as Assessed by Quality of Life in Depression Scale (QLDS) Total Score
Week 16
|
-14.2 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 9.39
|
-11.6 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 9.39
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Quality of Life as Assessed by Quality of Life in Depression Scale (QLDS) Total Score
Week 20
|
-14.3 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 9.50
|
-12.1 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 9.74
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Quality of Life as Assessed by Quality of Life in Depression Scale (QLDS) Total Score
Week 24
|
-14.9 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 9.44
|
-12.8 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 9.64
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Quality of Life as Assessed by Quality of Life in Depression Scale (QLDS) Total Score
Week 28
|
-15.6 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 9.42
|
-13.7 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 9.51
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Quality of Life as Assessed by Quality of Life in Depression Scale (QLDS) Total Score
Week 32
|
-16.0 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 9.55
|
-14.2 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 9.96
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, LOCF at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32Population: The FAS included all randomized participants. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified time points.
Change from baseline in participant-reported quality of life as assessed by QLDS total score at LOCF was reported. The QLDS is a disease-specific validated PRO measure which assesses the impact that depression has on a participant's quality of life. It is a 34-item self-rated questionnaire which consists of dichotomous response questions, with the response being either True/Not True. Each statement on the QLDS is given a score of "1" or "0". A score of "1" is indicative of adverse quality of life. All item scores are summed to give a total score that ranges from 0 (good quality of life) to 34 (very poor quality of life). A higher score indicates a more severe condition. LOCF is defined as the participants who had a missing value or who stopped treatment at a specific time point had their last non-missing value carried forward.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Esketamine Nasal Spray + Oral Antidepressant (AD)
n=318 Participants
Participants received treatment with esketamine nasal spray (28 milligrams \[mg\] \[initial dose for elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years and adults of Japanese ancestry\], 56 mg \[initial dose for adult participants aged 18 to 64 years\], or 84 mg \[maximum dose esketamine nasal spray\]) twice-weekly with a flexible dose regimen from Day 1 until Week 4, once weekly from Week 5 to Week 8 and once-weekly or once every 2 weeks from Week 9 to Week 32 in combination with continuing serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor/selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI/SNRI).
|
Quetiapine Extended Release (XR) + Oral AD
n=305 Participants
Participants continued to take their current SSRI/SNRI augmented with quetiapine XR as per the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) (or local equivalent, if applicable) at an initial dose of 50 mg/day on Days 1-2, 150 mg/day on Days 3-4 (lowest effective dose) in adult participants aged 18 to 64 years; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day on Day 5 and onward were based on individual participant evaluation. In elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years, the initial dose was 50 mg/day on Days 1-3, 100 mg/day on Days 4-7, and 150 mg/day on Day 8; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day were based on individual participant evaluation no earlier than Day 22.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Quality of Life as Assessed by QLDS Total Score at LOCF
Week 4
|
-8.9 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 8.83
|
-5.6 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 7.43
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Quality of Life as Assessed by QLDS Total Score at LOCF
Week 8
|
-11.3 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 9.59
|
-8.1 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 9.22
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Quality of Life as Assessed by QLDS Total Score at LOCF
Week 12
|
-12.3 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 9.73
|
-9.0 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 9.62
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Quality of Life as Assessed by QLDS Total Score at LOCF
Week 16
|
-13.0 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 9.86
|
-9.3 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 9.80
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Quality of Life as Assessed by QLDS Total Score at LOCF
Week 20
|
-13.0 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 9.93
|
-9.5 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 10.02
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Quality of Life as Assessed by QLDS Total Score at LOCF
Week 24
|
-13.3 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 9.98
|
-9.8 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 10.18
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Quality of Life as Assessed by QLDS Total Score at LOCF
Week 28
|
-13.6 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 10.06
|
-10.3 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 10.26
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Quality of Life as Assessed by QLDS Total Score at LOCF
Week 32
|
-14.1 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 10.29
|
-10.5 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 10.59
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32Population: The FAS included all randomized participants. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified time points.
Change from baseline in participant-reported health-related quality of Life as assessed by EQ-5D-5L score: health status index was reported. The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized 2-part instrument used to measure health outcomes, primarily designed for self-completion by respondents. It consists of the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and the EQ Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS). The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each of the 5 dimensions is divided into 5 levels of perceived problems (level 1 = no problem, level 2 = slight problems, level 3 = moderate problems, level 4 = severe problems, level 5 = extreme problems). The participant selects an answer for each of the 5 dimensions considering the response that best matches his or her health "today." Responses were used to generate health status index which ranges from 0 (dead) and 1 (full health), a lower score indicates worse health.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Esketamine Nasal Spray + Oral Antidepressant (AD)
n=320 Participants
Participants received treatment with esketamine nasal spray (28 milligrams \[mg\] \[initial dose for elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years and adults of Japanese ancestry\], 56 mg \[initial dose for adult participants aged 18 to 64 years\], or 84 mg \[maximum dose esketamine nasal spray\]) twice-weekly with a flexible dose regimen from Day 1 until Week 4, once weekly from Week 5 to Week 8 and once-weekly or once every 2 weeks from Week 9 to Week 32 in combination with continuing serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor/selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI/SNRI).
|
Quetiapine Extended Release (XR) + Oral AD
n=308 Participants
Participants continued to take their current SSRI/SNRI augmented with quetiapine XR as per the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) (or local equivalent, if applicable) at an initial dose of 50 mg/day on Days 1-2, 150 mg/day on Days 3-4 (lowest effective dose) in adult participants aged 18 to 64 years; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day on Day 5 and onward were based on individual participant evaluation. In elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years, the initial dose was 50 mg/day on Days 1-3, 100 mg/day on Days 4-7, and 150 mg/day on Day 8; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day were based on individual participant evaluation no earlier than Day 22.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life as Assessed by EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Health Status Index
Week 4
|
0.177 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 0.2354
|
0.124 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 0.2280
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life as Assessed by EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Health Status Index
Week 8
|
0.234 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 0.2655
|
0.206 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 0.2463
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life as Assessed by EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Health Status Index
Week 12
|
0.276 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 0.2405
|
0.227 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 0.2367
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life as Assessed by EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Health Status Index
Week 16
|
0.284 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 0.2445
|
0.232 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 0.2431
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life as Assessed by EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Health Status Index
Week 20
|
0.294 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 0.2399
|
0.238 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 0.2423
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life as Assessed by EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Health Status Index
Week 24
|
0.297 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 0.2498
|
0.259 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 0.2489
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life as Assessed by EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Health Status Index
Week 28
|
0.303 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 0.2584
|
0.262 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 0.2492
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life as Assessed by EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Score: Health Status Index
Week 32
|
0.317 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 0.2636
|
0.279 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 0.2581
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, LOCF at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32Population: The FAS included all randomized participants. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified time points.
Change from baseline in participant-reported health-related quality of Life as assessed by EQ-5D-5L score: health status index at LOCF was reported. The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized 2-part instrument used to measure health outcomes, primarily designed for self-completion by respondents. It consists of the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and the EQ-VAS. The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each of the 5 dimensions is divided into 5 levels of perceived problems (level 1 = no problem, level 2 = slight problems, level 3 = moderate problems, level 4 = severe problems, level 5 = extreme problems). The participant selects an answer for each of the 5 dimensions considering the response that best matches his or her health "today." LOCF is defined as the participants who had a missing value or who stopped treatment at a specific time point had their last non-missing value carried forward.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Esketamine Nasal Spray + Oral Antidepressant (AD)
n=320 Participants
Participants received treatment with esketamine nasal spray (28 milligrams \[mg\] \[initial dose for elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years and adults of Japanese ancestry\], 56 mg \[initial dose for adult participants aged 18 to 64 years\], or 84 mg \[maximum dose esketamine nasal spray\]) twice-weekly with a flexible dose regimen from Day 1 until Week 4, once weekly from Week 5 to Week 8 and once-weekly or once every 2 weeks from Week 9 to Week 32 in combination with continuing serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor/selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI/SNRI).
|
Quetiapine Extended Release (XR) + Oral AD
n=308 Participants
Participants continued to take their current SSRI/SNRI augmented with quetiapine XR as per the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) (or local equivalent, if applicable) at an initial dose of 50 mg/day on Days 1-2, 150 mg/day on Days 3-4 (lowest effective dose) in adult participants aged 18 to 64 years; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day on Day 5 and onward were based on individual participant evaluation. In elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years, the initial dose was 50 mg/day on Days 1-3, 100 mg/day on Days 4-7, and 150 mg/day on Day 8; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day were based on individual participant evaluation no earlier than Day 22.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life Group, as Assessed by EQ-5D-5L Score: Health Status Index at LOCF
Week 4
|
0.177 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 0.2354
|
0.124 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 0.2280
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life Group, as Assessed by EQ-5D-5L Score: Health Status Index at LOCF
Week 8
|
0.221 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 0.2681
|
0.175 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 0.2510
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life Group, as Assessed by EQ-5D-5L Score: Health Status Index at LOCF
Week 12
|
0.247 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 0.2552
|
0.187 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 0.2523
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life Group, as Assessed by EQ-5D-5L Score: Health Status Index at LOCF
Week 16
|
0.255 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 0.2580
|
0.188 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 0.2595
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life Group, as Assessed by EQ-5D-5L Score: Health Status Index at LOCF
Week 20
|
0.261 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 0.2600
|
0.187 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 0.2590
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life Group, as Assessed by EQ-5D-5L Score: Health Status Index at LOCF
Week 24
|
0.264 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 0.2627
|
0.196 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 0.2671
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life Group, as Assessed by EQ-5D-5L Score: Health Status Index at LOCF
Week 28
|
0.266 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 0.2739
|
0.195 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 0.2664
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health-related Quality of Life Group, as Assessed by EQ-5D-5L Score: Health Status Index at LOCF
Week 32
|
0.280 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 0.2806
|
0.207 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 0.2739
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32Population: The FAS included all randomized participants. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified time points.
Change from baseline in participant-reported health status as assessed by EQ-5D-5L Score: VAS was reported. The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized 2-part instrument for use as a measure of health outcome, primarily designed for self-completion by respondents. It essentially consists of the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and the EQ-VAS. EQ-VAS self-rating records the respondent's own assessment of his/her overall health status at time of completion, on a scale of 0 (worst health you can imagine) to 100 (best health you can imagine). Positive change in score indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Esketamine Nasal Spray + Oral Antidepressant (AD)
n=318 Participants
Participants received treatment with esketamine nasal spray (28 milligrams \[mg\] \[initial dose for elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years and adults of Japanese ancestry\], 56 mg \[initial dose for adult participants aged 18 to 64 years\], or 84 mg \[maximum dose esketamine nasal spray\]) twice-weekly with a flexible dose regimen from Day 1 until Week 4, once weekly from Week 5 to Week 8 and once-weekly or once every 2 weeks from Week 9 to Week 32 in combination with continuing serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor/selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI/SNRI).
|
Quetiapine Extended Release (XR) + Oral AD
n=310 Participants
Participants continued to take their current SSRI/SNRI augmented with quetiapine XR as per the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) (or local equivalent, if applicable) at an initial dose of 50 mg/day on Days 1-2, 150 mg/day on Days 3-4 (lowest effective dose) in adult participants aged 18 to 64 years; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day on Day 5 and onward were based on individual participant evaluation. In elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years, the initial dose was 50 mg/day on Days 1-3, 100 mg/day on Days 4-7, and 150 mg/day on Day 8; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day were based on individual participant evaluation no earlier than Day 22.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health Status as Assessed by EQ-5D-5L Score: VAS
Week 4
|
13.3 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 18.43
|
9.7 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 17.83
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health Status as Assessed by EQ-5D-5L Score: VAS
Week 8
|
18.9 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 19.84
|
16.1 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 19.64
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health Status as Assessed by EQ-5D-5L Score: VAS
Week 12
|
20.9 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 20.98
|
17.2 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 20.73
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health Status as Assessed by EQ-5D-5L Score: VAS
Week 16
|
21.9 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 20.14
|
20.2 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 22.14
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health Status as Assessed by EQ-5D-5L Score: VAS
Week 20
|
22.3 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 21.20
|
19.6 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 21.59
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health Status as Assessed by EQ-5D-5L Score: VAS
Week 24
|
23.6 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 20.95
|
21.8 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 21.60
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health Status as Assessed by EQ-5D-5L Score: VAS
Week 28
|
25.2 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 20.95
|
23.2 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 22.11
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health Status as Assessed by EQ-5D-5L Score: VAS
Week 32
|
24.9 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 21.65
|
24.5 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 22.64
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, LOCF at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32Population: The FAS included all randomized participants. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified time points.
Change from baseline in participant-reported health status as assessed by EQ-5D-5L score: VAS at LOCF was reported. The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized 2-part instrument for use as a measure of health outcome, primarily designed for self-completion by respondents. It essentially consists of the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and the EQ-VAS. EQ-VAS self-rating records the respondent's own assessment of his/her overall health status at time of completion, on a scale of 0 (worst health you can imagine) to 100 (best health you can imagine). Positive change in score indicates improvement. LOCF is defined as the participants who had a missing value or who stopped treatment at a specific time point had their last non-missing value carried forward.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Esketamine Nasal Spray + Oral Antidepressant (AD)
n=318 Participants
Participants received treatment with esketamine nasal spray (28 milligrams \[mg\] \[initial dose for elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years and adults of Japanese ancestry\], 56 mg \[initial dose for adult participants aged 18 to 64 years\], or 84 mg \[maximum dose esketamine nasal spray\]) twice-weekly with a flexible dose regimen from Day 1 until Week 4, once weekly from Week 5 to Week 8 and once-weekly or once every 2 weeks from Week 9 to Week 32 in combination with continuing serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor/selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI/SNRI).
|
Quetiapine Extended Release (XR) + Oral AD
n=310 Participants
Participants continued to take their current SSRI/SNRI augmented with quetiapine XR as per the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) (or local equivalent, if applicable) at an initial dose of 50 mg/day on Days 1-2, 150 mg/day on Days 3-4 (lowest effective dose) in adult participants aged 18 to 64 years; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day on Day 5 and onward were based on individual participant evaluation. In elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years, the initial dose was 50 mg/day on Days 1-3, 100 mg/day on Days 4-7, and 150 mg/day on Day 8; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day were based on individual participant evaluation no earlier than Day 22.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health Status as Assessed by EQ-5D-5L Score: VAS at LOCF
Week 32
|
22.3 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 22.47
|
18.0 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 23.59
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health Status as Assessed by EQ-5D-5L Score: VAS at LOCF
Week 4
|
13.3 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 18.43
|
9.7 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 17.83
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health Status as Assessed by EQ-5D-5L Score: VAS at LOCF
Week 8
|
18.2 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 19.94
|
14.0 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 20.42
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health Status as Assessed by EQ-5D-5L Score: VAS at LOCF
Week 12
|
19.4 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 21.04
|
14.4 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 21.19
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health Status as Assessed by EQ-5D-5L Score: VAS at LOCF
Week 16
|
20.2 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 20.37
|
16.1 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 22.42
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health Status as Assessed by EQ-5D-5L Score: VAS at LOCF
Week 20
|
20.4 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 21.34
|
15.4 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 22.19
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health Status as Assessed by EQ-5D-5L Score: VAS at LOCF
Week 24
|
21.3 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 21.34
|
16.9 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 22.64
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Health Status as Assessed by EQ-5D-5L Score: VAS at LOCF
Week 28
|
21.9 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 21.78
|
17.3 Units on Scale
Standard Deviation 23.10
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32Population: The FAS included all randomized participants. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified time points.
Change from baseline in participant-reported work productivity as assessed by WPAI: depression questionnaire was reported. The WPAI-D questionnaire is a validated short instrument that assesses impairment in work and other regular activities over the past 7 days. The WPAI yields four types of scores: (a) Absenteeism (work time missed); (b) Presenteeism (impairment at work / reduced on-the-job effectiveness); (c) Work productivity loss (overall work impairment / absenteeism plus presenteeism); (d) Activity Impairment. The first three scores were derived only for respondents who were working (should be missing for non-working), but the last score was applicable for all respondents. Each score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Esketamine Nasal Spray + Oral Antidepressant (AD)
n=310 Participants
Participants received treatment with esketamine nasal spray (28 milligrams \[mg\] \[initial dose for elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years and adults of Japanese ancestry\], 56 mg \[initial dose for adult participants aged 18 to 64 years\], or 84 mg \[maximum dose esketamine nasal spray\]) twice-weekly with a flexible dose regimen from Day 1 until Week 4, once weekly from Week 5 to Week 8 and once-weekly or once every 2 weeks from Week 9 to Week 32 in combination with continuing serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor/selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI/SNRI).
|
Quetiapine Extended Release (XR) + Oral AD
n=307 Participants
Participants continued to take their current SSRI/SNRI augmented with quetiapine XR as per the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) (or local equivalent, if applicable) at an initial dose of 50 mg/day on Days 1-2, 150 mg/day on Days 3-4 (lowest effective dose) in adult participants aged 18 to 64 years; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day on Day 5 and onward were based on individual participant evaluation. In elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years, the initial dose was 50 mg/day on Days 1-3, 100 mg/day on Days 4-7, and 150 mg/day on Day 8; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day were based on individual participant evaluation no earlier than Day 22.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Depression Questionnaire
Activity Impairment Week 20
|
-33.88 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 28.770
|
-30.93 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 27.698
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Depression Questionnaire
Absenteeism Week 4
|
-11.95 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 20.745
|
-8.37 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 25.790
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Depression Questionnaire
Absenteeism Week 8
|
-19.02 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 30.205
|
-13.62 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 31.059
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Depression Questionnaire
Absenteeism Week 12
|
-21.87 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 34.711
|
-17.25 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 31.340
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Depression Questionnaire
Absenteeism Week 16
|
-22.85 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 33.023
|
-14.24 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 37.823
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Depression Questionnaire
Absenteeism Week 20
|
-27.88 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 32.107
|
-18.70 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 35.310
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Depression Questionnaire
Absenteeism Week 24
|
-26.83 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 32.909
|
-21.03 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 34.459
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Depression Questionnaire
Absenteeism Week 28
|
-27.16 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 35.825
|
-17.90 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 31.254
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Depression Questionnaire
Absenteeism Week 32
|
-28.90 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 32.066
|
-16.68 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 29.394
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Depression Questionnaire
Presenteeism Week 4
|
-21.75 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 25.558
|
-9.13 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 21.948
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Depression Questionnaire
Presenteeism Week 8
|
-31.70 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 25.144
|
-16.86 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 27.140
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Depression Questionnaire
Presenteeism Week 12
|
-35.46 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 27.998
|
-23.22 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 29.942
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Depression Questionnaire
Presenteeism Week 16
|
-36.96 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 28.556
|
-24.50 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 31.898
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Depression Questionnaire
Presenteeism Week 20
|
-39.80 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 26.263
|
-26.34 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 33.389
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Depression Questionnaire
Presenteeism Week 24
|
-42.83 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 27.332
|
-31.60 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 30.922
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Depression Questionnaire
Presenteeism Week 28
|
-43.00 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 28.762
|
-33.29 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 34.445
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Depression Questionnaire
Presenteeism Week 32
|
-47.58 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 26.691
|
-33.88 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 33.621
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Depression Questionnaire
Work productivity loss Week 4
|
-20.94 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 25.759
|
-9.46 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 23.374
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Depression Questionnaire
Work productivity loss Week 8
|
-32.91 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 26.244
|
-18.21 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 29.156
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Depression Questionnaire
Work productivity loss Week 12
|
-36.68 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 29.247
|
-25.62 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 35.135
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Depression Questionnaire
Work productivity loss Week 16
|
-38.13 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 30.490
|
-24.50 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 34.089
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Depression Questionnaire
Work productivity loss Week 20
|
-41.11 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 28.643
|
-26.57 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 32.885
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Depression Questionnaire
Work productivity loss Week 24
|
-45.31 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 29.000
|
-30.63 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 34.087
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Depression Questionnaire
Work productivity loss Week 28
|
-44.40 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 32.098
|
-32.61 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 33.836
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Depression Questionnaire
Work productivity loss Week 32
|
-50.20 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 29.176
|
-35.48 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 35.915
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Depression Questionnaire
Activity Impairment Week 4
|
-20.29 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 23.702
|
-13.43 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 20.846
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Depression Questionnaire
Activity Impairment Week 8
|
-30.31 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 27.410
|
-24.25 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 24.187
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Depression Questionnaire
Activity Impairment Week 12
|
-33.96 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 27.218
|
-28.28 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 25.555
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Depression Questionnaire
Activity Impairment Week 16
|
-35.07 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 27.291
|
-30.95 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 27.444
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Depression Questionnaire
Activity Impairment Week 24
|
-36.69 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 29.742
|
-36.84 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 27.000
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Depression Questionnaire
Activity Impairment Week 28
|
-40.00 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 29.828
|
-37.62 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 28.500
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Depression Questionnaire
Activity Impairment Week 32
|
-41.92 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 30.299
|
-39.59 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 27.190
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, LOCF at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32Population: The FAS included all randomized participants. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified time points. LOCF was applied only for participants whose questionnaire was completely missing. No LOCF imputation was done on partially completed questionnaire.
Change from baseline in participant-reported work productivity as assessed by WPAI: depression questionnaire at LOCF was reported. The WPAI-D questionnaire is a validated short instrument that assesses impairment in work and other regular activities over the past 7 days. The WPAI yields four types of scores: (a) Absenteeism (work time missed); (b) Presenteeism (impairment at work / reduced on-the-job effectiveness); (c) Work productivity loss (overall work impairment / absenteeism plus presenteeism); (d) Activity Impairment. The first three scores were derived only for respondents who were working (should be missing for non-working), but the last score was applicable for all respondents. Each score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating greater impairment and less productivity. LOCF is defined as the participants who had a missing value or who stopped treatment at a specific time point had their last non-missing value carried forward.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Esketamine Nasal Spray + Oral Antidepressant (AD)
n=310 Participants
Participants received treatment with esketamine nasal spray (28 milligrams \[mg\] \[initial dose for elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years and adults of Japanese ancestry\], 56 mg \[initial dose for adult participants aged 18 to 64 years\], or 84 mg \[maximum dose esketamine nasal spray\]) twice-weekly with a flexible dose regimen from Day 1 until Week 4, once weekly from Week 5 to Week 8 and once-weekly or once every 2 weeks from Week 9 to Week 32 in combination with continuing serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor/selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI/SNRI).
|
Quetiapine Extended Release (XR) + Oral AD
n=307 Participants
Participants continued to take their current SSRI/SNRI augmented with quetiapine XR as per the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) (or local equivalent, if applicable) at an initial dose of 50 mg/day on Days 1-2, 150 mg/day on Days 3-4 (lowest effective dose) in adult participants aged 18 to 64 years; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day on Day 5 and onward were based on individual participant evaluation. In elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years, the initial dose was 50 mg/day on Days 1-3, 100 mg/day on Days 4-7, and 150 mg/day on Day 8; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day were based on individual participant evaluation no earlier than Day 22.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by WPAI: Depression Questionnaire at LOCF
Absenteeism Week 12
|
-20.23 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 33.590
|
-15.17 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 31.835
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by WPAI: Depression Questionnaire at LOCF
Absenteeism Week 16
|
-21.35 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 31.806
|
-14.14 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 37.534
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by WPAI: Depression Questionnaire at LOCF
Absenteeism Week 20
|
-25.45 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 31.628
|
-16.04 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 37.769
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by WPAI: Depression Questionnaire at LOCF
Absenteeism Week 24
|
-24.41 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 32.403
|
-16.28 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 37.672
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by WPAI: Depression Questionnaire at LOCF
Absenteeism Week 28
|
-23.88 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 34.623
|
-14.14 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 35.849
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by WPAI: Depression Questionnaire at LOCF
Absenteeism Week 32
|
-26.10 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 31.903
|
-13.90 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 36.104
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by WPAI: Depression Questionnaire at LOCF
Presenteeism Week 4
|
-21.75 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 25.558
|
-9.13 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 21.948
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by WPAI: Depression Questionnaire at LOCF
Presenteeism Week 8
|
-29.45 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 26.437
|
-14.84 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 27.067
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by WPAI: Depression Questionnaire at LOCF
Presenteeism Week 12
|
-33.57 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 28.745
|
-17.44 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 29.997
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by WPAI: Depression Questionnaire at LOCF
Presenteeism Week 16
|
-35.00 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 29.075
|
-19.84 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 31.322
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by WPAI: Depression Questionnaire at LOCF
Presenteeism Week 20
|
-36.08 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 28.598
|
-21.41 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 32.862
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by WPAI: Depression Questionnaire at LOCF
Presenteeism Week 24
|
-36.87 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 29.641
|
-22.19 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 32.189
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by WPAI: Depression Questionnaire at LOCF
Presenteeism Week 28
|
-37.40 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 30.924
|
-23.83 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 34.757
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by WPAI: Depression Questionnaire at LOCF
Presenteeism Week 32
|
-40.53 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 30.700
|
-23.44 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 35.526
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by WPAI: Depression Questionnaire at LOCF
Work productivity loss Week 4
|
-20.94 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 25.759
|
-9.46 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 23.374
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by WPAI: Depression Questionnaire at LOCF
Work productivity loss Week 8
|
-30.59 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 26.789
|
-15.35 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 30.059
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by WPAI: Depression Questionnaire at LOCF
Work productivity loss Week 12
|
-34.46 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 29.333
|
-19.27 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 33.905
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by WPAI: Depression Questionnaire at LOCF
Work productivity loss Week 16
|
-36.35 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 30.531
|
-20.75 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 33.545
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by WPAI: Depression Questionnaire at LOCF
Work productivity loss Week 20
|
-37.59 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 30.354
|
-22.58 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 34.117
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by WPAI: Depression Questionnaire at LOCF
Work productivity loss Week 24
|
-39.02 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 31.482
|
-22.54 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 34.635
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by WPAI: Depression Questionnaire at LOCF
Work productivity loss Week 28
|
-39.09 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 33.271
|
-23.85 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 35.152
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by WPAI: Depression Questionnaire at LOCF
Work productivity loss Week 32
|
-43.42 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 32.638
|
-24.89 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 37.870
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by WPAI: Depression Questionnaire at LOCF
Activity Impairment Week 4
|
-20.29 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 23.702
|
-13.43 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 20.846
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by WPAI: Depression Questionnaire at LOCF
Activity Impairment Week 8
|
-28.84 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 27.412
|
-20.39 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 24.599
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by WPAI: Depression Questionnaire at LOCF
Activity Impairment Week 12
|
-31.10 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 27.778
|
-22.81 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 26.264
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by WPAI: Depression Questionnaire at LOCF
Activity Impairment Week 16
|
-31.84 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 28.413
|
-23.68 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 28.014
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by WPAI: Depression Questionnaire at LOCF
Activity Impairment Week 20
|
-30.84 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 29.983
|
-23.62 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 28.185
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by WPAI: Depression Questionnaire at LOCF
Activity Impairment Week 24
|
-32.45 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 31.207
|
-26.71 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 28.821
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by WPAI: Depression Questionnaire at LOCF
Activity Impairment Week 28
|
-34.87 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 31.804
|
-27.07 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 29.965
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by WPAI: Depression Questionnaire at LOCF
Activity Impairment Week 32
|
-36.65 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 32.357
|
-28.40 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 29.930
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by WPAI: Depression Questionnaire at LOCF
Absenteeism Week 4
|
-11.95 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 20.745
|
-8.37 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 25.790
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant-reported Work Productivity as Assessed by WPAI: Depression Questionnaire at LOCF
Absenteeism Week 8
|
-18.28 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 29.417
|
-12.38 Units on scale
Standard Deviation 30.369
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 35Population: The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant participating in a clinical study that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the pharmaceutical/ biological agent under study. TEAEs were those events if they started after administration of the first dose until 14 days after the last dose of study medication for other TEAEs except serious; and first dose until 30 days after the last dose of study medication for serious TEAEs.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Esketamine Nasal Spray + Oral Antidepressant (AD)
n=334 Participants
Participants received treatment with esketamine nasal spray (28 milligrams \[mg\] \[initial dose for elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years and adults of Japanese ancestry\], 56 mg \[initial dose for adult participants aged 18 to 64 years\], or 84 mg \[maximum dose esketamine nasal spray\]) twice-weekly with a flexible dose regimen from Day 1 until Week 4, once weekly from Week 5 to Week 8 and once-weekly or once every 2 weeks from Week 9 to Week 32 in combination with continuing serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor/selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI/SNRI).
|
Quetiapine Extended Release (XR) + Oral AD
n=336 Participants
Participants continued to take their current SSRI/SNRI augmented with quetiapine XR as per the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) (or local equivalent, if applicable) at an initial dose of 50 mg/day on Days 1-2, 150 mg/day on Days 3-4 (lowest effective dose) in adult participants aged 18 to 64 years; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day on Day 5 and onward were based on individual participant evaluation. In elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years, the initial dose was 50 mg/day on Days 1-3, 100 mg/day on Days 4-7, and 150 mg/day on Day 8; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day were based on individual participant evaluation no earlier than Day 22.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
|
307 Participants
|
262 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 35Population: The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
Number of participants with TEAEs of special interest were reported. It included significant TEAEs that were judged to be of special interest because of clinical importance, known or suspected class effects, or based on nonclinical signals. Events such as sedation, depersonalization/derealization disorder, depression suicidal, aggression, allergic cystitis, cholestasis and jaundice of hepatic origin, and many more were considered as TEAEs of special interest.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Esketamine Nasal Spray + Oral Antidepressant (AD)
n=334 Participants
Participants received treatment with esketamine nasal spray (28 milligrams \[mg\] \[initial dose for elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years and adults of Japanese ancestry\], 56 mg \[initial dose for adult participants aged 18 to 64 years\], or 84 mg \[maximum dose esketamine nasal spray\]) twice-weekly with a flexible dose regimen from Day 1 until Week 4, once weekly from Week 5 to Week 8 and once-weekly or once every 2 weeks from Week 9 to Week 32 in combination with continuing serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor/selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI/SNRI).
|
Quetiapine Extended Release (XR) + Oral AD
n=336 Participants
Participants continued to take their current SSRI/SNRI augmented with quetiapine XR as per the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) (or local equivalent, if applicable) at an initial dose of 50 mg/day on Days 1-2, 150 mg/day on Days 3-4 (lowest effective dose) in adult participants aged 18 to 64 years; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day on Day 5 and onward were based on individual participant evaluation. In elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years, the initial dose was 50 mg/day on Days 1-3, 100 mg/day on Days 4-7, and 150 mg/day on Day 8; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day were based on individual participant evaluation no earlier than Day 22.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With TEAEs of Special Interest
|
223 Participants
|
140 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32Population: The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention. Here, 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure. Here, 'n' (number analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified time points.
Number of participants with suicidal ideation or behavior as assessed by C-SSRS score was reported. The C-SSRS is an assessment tool that evaluates suicidal ideation and behavior. Suicidal ideation consists of 5 items: wish to be dead, non-specific active suicidal thoughts, active suicidal ideation with any methods (not plan) without intention to act, active suicidal ideation with some intent to act without specific plan, and active suicidal ideation with specific plan and intent. Suicidal behavior consists of 5 items: preparatory acts or behavior, aborted attempt, interrupted attempt, actual attempt (non-fatal), and completed suicide. The maximum score (from the 10 categories) assigned for each participant was summarized into one of three broad categories: No suicidal ideation or behavior (0), Suicidal ideation (1 - 5), Suicidal behavior (6 - 10). Total score ranges from 1 to 10. Higher scores indicate more severe suicidal ideation and behavior.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Esketamine Nasal Spray + Oral Antidepressant (AD)
n=317 Participants
Participants received treatment with esketamine nasal spray (28 milligrams \[mg\] \[initial dose for elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years and adults of Japanese ancestry\], 56 mg \[initial dose for adult participants aged 18 to 64 years\], or 84 mg \[maximum dose esketamine nasal spray\]) twice-weekly with a flexible dose regimen from Day 1 until Week 4, once weekly from Week 5 to Week 8 and once-weekly or once every 2 weeks from Week 9 to Week 32 in combination with continuing serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor/selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI/SNRI).
|
Quetiapine Extended Release (XR) + Oral AD
n=295 Participants
Participants continued to take their current SSRI/SNRI augmented with quetiapine XR as per the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) (or local equivalent, if applicable) at an initial dose of 50 mg/day on Days 1-2, 150 mg/day on Days 3-4 (lowest effective dose) in adult participants aged 18 to 64 years; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day on Day 5 and onward were based on individual participant evaluation. In elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years, the initial dose was 50 mg/day on Days 1-3, 100 mg/day on Days 4-7, and 150 mg/day on Day 8; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day were based on individual participant evaluation no earlier than Day 22.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Score
Suicidal Ideation Week 1
|
22 Participants
|
25 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Score
Suicidal Behavior Week 1
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Score
Suicidal Ideation Week 2
|
21 Participants
|
32 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Score
Suicidal Behavior Week 2
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Score
Suicidal Ideation Week 3
|
19 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Score
Suicidal Behavior Week 3
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Score
Suicidal Ideation Week 4
|
22 Participants
|
27 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Score
Suicidal Behavior Week 4
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Score
Suicidal Ideation Week 8
|
21 Participants
|
18 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Score
Suicidal Behavior Week 8
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Score
Suicidal Ideation Week 12
|
13 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Score
Suicidal Behavior Week 12
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Score
Suicidal Ideation Week 16
|
12 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Score
Suicidal Behavior Week 16
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Score
Suicidal Ideation Week 20
|
15 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Score
Suicidal Behavior Week 20
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Score
Suicidal Ideation Week 24
|
14 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Score
Suicidal Behavior Week 24
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Score
Suicidal Ideation Week 28
|
8 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Score
Suicidal Behavior Week 28
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Score
Suicidal Ideation Week 32
|
7 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Suicidal Ideation or Behavior as Assessed by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Score
Suicidal Behavior Week 32
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Esketamine Nasal Spray + Oral Antidepressant (AD)
Quetiapine Extended Release (XR) + Oral AD
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Esketamine Nasal Spray + Oral Antidepressant (AD)
n=334 participants at risk
Participants received treatment with esketamine nasal spray (28 milligrams \[mg\] \[initial dose for elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years and adults of Japanese ancestry\], 56 mg \[initial dose for adult participants aged 18 to 64 years\], or 84 mg \[maximum dose esketamine nasal spray\]) twice-weekly with a flexible dose regimen from Day 1 until Week 4, once weekly from Week 5 to Week 8 and once-weekly or once every 2 weeks from Week 9 to Week 32 in combination with continuing serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor/selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI/SNRI).
|
Quetiapine Extended Release (XR) + Oral AD
n=336 participants at risk
Participants continued to take their current SSRI/SNRI augmented with quetiapine XR as per the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) (or local equivalent, if applicable) at an initial dose of 50 mg/day on Days 1-2, 150 mg/day on Days 3-4 (lowest effective dose) in adult participants aged 18 to 64 years; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day on Day 5 and onward were based on individual participant evaluation. In elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years, the initial dose was 50 mg/day on Days 1-3, 100 mg/day on Days 4-7, and 150 mg/day on Day 8; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day were based on individual participant evaluation no earlier than Day 22.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphadenopathy mediastinal
|
0.00%
0/334 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
0.30%
1/336 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute coronary syndrome
|
0.30%
1/334 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/336 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
0.30%
1/334 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/336 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
|
Eye disorders
Retinal detachment
|
0.30%
1/334 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/336 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.00%
0/334 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
0.30%
1/336 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis
|
0.30%
1/334 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/336 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
|
General disorders
Death
|
0.30%
1/334 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/336 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.00%
0/334 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
0.30%
1/336 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
|
Infections and infestations
COVID-19
|
0.30%
1/334 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/336 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cystitis
|
0.00%
0/334 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
0.30%
1/336 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pilonidal disease
|
0.30%
1/334 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/336 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Tendon rupture
|
0.30%
1/334 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/336 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular accident
|
0.00%
0/334 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
0.30%
1/336 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
0.30%
1/334 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/336 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Generalised tonic-clonic seizure
|
0.00%
0/334 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
0.30%
1/336 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Alcoholism
|
0.30%
1/334 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/336 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
0.00%
0/334 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
0.60%
2/336 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Conversion disorder
|
0.00%
0/334 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
0.30%
1/336 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
0.60%
2/334 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
0.89%
3/336 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Major depression
|
0.30%
1/334 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
0.30%
1/336 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Somatic symptom disorder
|
0.60%
2/334 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/336 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Suicidal ideation
|
0.30%
1/334 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
0.89%
3/336 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Suicide attempt
|
0.60%
2/334 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
0.30%
1/336 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Nephrolithiasis
|
0.30%
1/334 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
0.00%
0/336 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal turbinate hypertrophy
|
0.00%
0/334 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
0.30%
1/336 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Esketamine Nasal Spray + Oral Antidepressant (AD)
n=334 participants at risk
Participants received treatment with esketamine nasal spray (28 milligrams \[mg\] \[initial dose for elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years and adults of Japanese ancestry\], 56 mg \[initial dose for adult participants aged 18 to 64 years\], or 84 mg \[maximum dose esketamine nasal spray\]) twice-weekly with a flexible dose regimen from Day 1 until Week 4, once weekly from Week 5 to Week 8 and once-weekly or once every 2 weeks from Week 9 to Week 32 in combination with continuing serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor/selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI/SNRI).
|
Quetiapine Extended Release (XR) + Oral AD
n=336 participants at risk
Participants continued to take their current SSRI/SNRI augmented with quetiapine XR as per the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) (or local equivalent, if applicable) at an initial dose of 50 mg/day on Days 1-2, 150 mg/day on Days 3-4 (lowest effective dose) in adult participants aged 18 to 64 years; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day on Day 5 and onward were based on individual participant evaluation. In elderly participants aged 65 to 74 years, the initial dose was 50 mg/day on Days 1-3, 100 mg/day on Days 4-7, and 150 mg/day on Day 8; a further dose increase to 300 mg/day were based on individual participant evaluation no earlier than Day 22.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
|
18.9%
63/334 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
0.89%
3/336 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
|
Eye disorders
Vision blurred
|
6.3%
21/334 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
0.89%
3/336 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dry mouth
|
0.90%
3/334 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
6.5%
22/336 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
29.3%
98/334 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
3.6%
12/336 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
10.8%
36/334 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
1.5%
5/336 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
5.7%
19/334 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
10.1%
34/336 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
|
Infections and infestations
COVID-19
|
7.2%
24/334 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
8.6%
29/336 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
6.3%
21/334 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
3.3%
11/336 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
|
Investigations
Blood pressure increased
|
8.4%
28/334 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
1.2%
4/336 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
|
Investigations
Weight increased
|
2.7%
9/334 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
12.5%
42/336 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
5.1%
17/334 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
2.7%
9/336 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
46.7%
156/334 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
8.3%
28/336 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dysgeusia
|
12.0%
40/334 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
0.30%
1/336 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
24.6%
82/334 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
12.8%
43/336 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hypoaesthesia
|
5.7%
19/334 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
0.30%
1/336 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Paraesthesia
|
11.1%
37/334 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
0.60%
2/336 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Sedation
|
6.6%
22/334 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
8.6%
29/336 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
|
15.0%
50/334 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
23.2%
78/336 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Confusional state
|
6.0%
20/334 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
0.30%
1/336 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Dissociation
|
28.1%
94/334 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
0.60%
2/336 • All-cause mortality and serious adverse events: until 30 days after last dose (up to Week 35); other AEs: until 14 days after last dose (up to Week 33)
The safety analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of any study intervention.
|
Additional Information
Europe, Middle East, Africa (EMEA) Medical Advisor Spravato
Janssen-Cilag International NV
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee If an investigator wishes to publish information from the study, a copy of the manuscript must be provided to the sponsor for review at least 60 days before submission for publication or presentation. If requested by the sponsor in writing, the investigator will withhold such publication for up to an additional 60 days to allow for filing of a patent application.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER