Outcomes of Subthreshold Laser Versus Intravitreal Injection of Ranibizumab in Diabetic Macular Edema

NCT ID: NCT04332133

Last Updated: 2020-04-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-12-31

Study Completion Date

2019-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is To compare the anatomical and functional results of intravitreal( IV) injection of ranibizumab with sub threshold micropulse laser ( SML) in treatment of Diabetic macular edema (DME) both anatomically by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD OCT) and functionally by best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Diabetic macular edema (DME) causes significant visual loss in diabetic patients. About 20% and 40% of patients with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), respectively, develop DME. One-third of diabetic patients who have had DM for more than twenty years will develop DME . Early impairment in the function of the middle and inner layers of the retina has been reported in diabetic patients before appearance of vascular complications . A good independent guide of macular function in patients with DME is multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG) readings from the macular area, which strongly associate with morphologic alterations in the macula. Some investigators suggested that temporal characteristic (implicit time) of mfERG waves are more important than amplitudes for evaluation of retinal function in diabetic patients. They concluded that patients with DM show temporal changes indicating delayed neural transmission due to local impairment of blood glucose metabolism. In contrast, others emphasize the importance of both parameters (implicit time and amplitude) in identifying retinal affection in DM.

Intravitreal (IV) injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents provided good visual outcomes in treatment of DME. However, IV anti-VEGF injections are expensive, need to be repeated many times and have the potential risk of causing endophthalmitis . Subthreshold micropulse laser (SML) treatment of DME has the same effect as conventional laser treatment, nonetheless, there is less damage to adjacent tissues of the burn area in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). SML allows laser emission to be divided into bursts of short cyclic pulses that remain for microseconds permitting substantial cooling amid these short pulses .

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetic Macular Edema

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

group 1

group 1 of DME which treated by SML

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

laser interference,INTRAVITREAL INJECTION

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

sub threshold micro pulse laser for DME for group 1 and intravitreal injection of Ranibizumab for group 2

group 2

Group 2 of DME which treated by intravitreal injection of Ranibizumab

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

laser interference,INTRAVITREAL INJECTION

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

sub threshold micro pulse laser for DME for group 1 and intravitreal injection of Ranibizumab for group 2

group 3

control group of diabetic patients received no treatment

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

laser interference,INTRAVITREAL INJECTION

sub threshold micro pulse laser for DME for group 1 and intravitreal injection of Ranibizumab for group 2

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* DME with BCVA\<0.5 decimal Snellen acuity.
* Controlled blood glucose (HbA1c) \<6.5%.

Exclusion Criteria

* History of previous intraocular surgery,
* History of previous laser treatment,
* History of previous IV injection,
* Macular disease or ischemia,
* Proliferative diabetic retinopathy,
* Vitreoretinal traction,
* Interruption of external limiting membrane (ELM) or ellipsoid zone (EZ).
* Dense media opacity,
* Optic disc pathology
* History of strokes or ischaemic heart diseases.
* patients with (CST) \> 400 µm on OCT .
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Minia University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Raafat Mohyeldeen Abdelrahman Abdallah

associate professor of ophthalmology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Raafat Abdallah, A.professor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

ophthalmology department,faculty of medicine, minia university

Mahmoud Genidy, professor

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

ophthalmology department,faculty of medicine, minia university

Wagiha Massoud, professor

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

ophthalmology department,faculty of medicine, minia university

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Klein R, Knudtson MD, Lee KE, Gangnon R, Klein BE. The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy XXIII: the twenty-five-year incidence of macular edema in persons with type 1 diabetes. Ophthalmology. 2009 Mar;116(3):497-503. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.10.016. Epub 2009 Jan 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19167079 (View on PubMed)

Lung JC, Swann PG, Wong DS, Chan HH. Global flash multifocal electroretinogram: early detection of local functional changes and its correlations with optical coherence tomography and visual field tests in diabetic eyes. Doc Ophthalmol. 2012 Oct;125(2):123-35. doi: 10.1007/s10633-012-9343-0. Epub 2012 Jul 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22828871 (View on PubMed)

Yamamoto S, Yamamoto T, Hayashi M, Takeuchi S. Morphological and functional analyses of diabetic macular edema by optical coherence tomography and multifocal electroretinograms. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2001 Feb;239(2):96-101. doi: 10.1007/s004170000238.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11372551 (View on PubMed)

Fortune B, Schneck ME, Adams AJ. Multifocal electroretinogram delays reveal local retinal dysfunction in early diabetic retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999 Oct;40(11):2638-51.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10509661 (View on PubMed)

Abdelrahman A, Massoud W, Elshafei AMK, Genidy M, Abdallah RMA. Anatomical and functional outcomes of subthreshold micropulse laser versus intravitreal ranibizumab injection in treatment of diabetic macular edema. Int J Retina Vitreous. 2020 Dec 3;6(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s40942-020-00265-6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33292788 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Diabetic Macular Edema(DME)

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.