Trial Outcomes & Findings for NEO Rehab Program for Premature Infants at Risk for Cerebral Palsy (NCT NCT04330859)
NCT ID: NCT04330859
Last Updated: 2024-10-15
Results Overview
The following measure will be used to measure study acceptability: % Recruitment rates during enrollment period
COMPLETED
NA
70 participants
from day 1 of study screening through end of screening (approximately 1 year and3 months).
2024-10-15
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Parent-driven Multimodal Interventions
Parent-driven intervention bundle of 6 evidence-based elements: vocal soothing, scent exchange, comforting touch, kangaroo care, infant massage and physical therapy
NeoRehab Bundle: The NICU rehabilitation program includes six multimodal, GA appropriate, parent-administered interventions (vocal soothing, scent exchange, comforting touch, kangaroo care, infant massage and physical therapy)
|
Routine Care (Control Group)
Routine care per unit guidelines
Routine care: Routine NICU care including talking, touching and holding the participant per unit guideline as well as physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech therapy per unit guideline
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
36
|
34
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
25
|
26
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
11
|
8
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
NEO Rehab Program for Premature Infants at Risk for Cerebral Palsy
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Intervention
n=34 Participants
Parent-driven intervention bundle of 6 evidence-based elements: vocal soothing, scent exchange, comforting touch, kangaroo care, infant massage and physical therapy
NeoRehab Bundle: The NICU rehabilitation program includes six multimodal, GA appropriate, parent-administered interventions (vocal soothing, scent exchange, comforting touch, kangaroo care, infant massage and physical therapy)
|
Routine Care
n=33 Participants
Routine care per unit guidelines
Routine care: Routine NICU care including talking, touching and holding the participant per unit guideline as well as physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech therapy per unit guideline
|
Total
n=67 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
34 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
33 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
67 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
28.02 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.70 • n=5 Participants
|
28.75 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.68 • n=7 Participants
|
28.39 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.69 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
43 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race · Black
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race · Caucasian
|
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
55 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: from day 1 of study screening through end of screening (approximately 1 year and3 months).The following measure will be used to measure study acceptability: % Recruitment rates during enrollment period
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Study Acceptability
n=99 Participants
Acceptability of enrollment into study
|
Control
Routine care
|
|---|---|---|
|
Acceptability
|
70 Participants
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From discharge to 3 months follow-upThe following measure will be used to assess the retention rate of study participants: \- Rate of follow-up at the 3 month outpatient visit
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Study Acceptability
n=70 Participants
Acceptability of enrollment into study
|
Control
Routine care
|
|---|---|---|
|
Retention Rates
|
73 percentage of participants
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: from study enrollment (day 1) to study dischargeAdherence rates were monitored by daily activity logs of interventions from enrollment day 1 to discharge for each visit day
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Study Acceptability
n=32 Participants
Acceptability of enrollment into study
|
Control
n=33 Participants
Routine care
|
|---|---|---|
|
Adherence Rates
|
0 percentage of participants
|
0 percentage of participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 monthsMotor outcomes will be assessed at NICU discharge and at 3 months using the Test of Infant Motor Performance (TIMP); 3 months outcome reported. TIMP score range = 0-142; lower scores indicate worse motor performance
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Study Acceptability
n=22 Participants
Acceptability of enrollment into study
|
Control
n=21 Participants
Routine care
|
|---|---|---|
|
Impact of the NeoRehab Bundle on Motor Performance Using the Test of Infant Motor Performance (TIMP)
|
86 score on a scale
Interval 73.0 to 100.0
|
91 score on a scale
Interval 83.0 to 99.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 monthsNeurologic function will be assessed at NICU discharge and at 3 months postmenstrual age using the Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination (HINE) instrument, 3 months outcome reported. The HINE is a 26 items scale that evaluates cranial nerve function, posture, quality and quantity of movements, muscle tone, and reflexes and reactions. Lower the score the poorer the motor function. HINE score range = 0-78 (with lower score indicating lower motor performance). The HINE has a sensitivity of 90% for prediction of motor outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Study Acceptability
n=25 Participants
Acceptability of enrollment into study
|
Control
n=26 Participants
Routine care
|
|---|---|---|
|
Impact of the NeoRehab Bundle on Neurologic Function as Assessed by the Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination (HINE).
|
58.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.2
|
57.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.2
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 monthsPopulation: Abnormal general movements = absent fidgety classification
The impact of the intervention on the infants' general movement will be assessed at NICU discharge and at 3 months postmenstrual age using the general movement assessment (GMA) tool. The GMA has been shown to reliably identify infants at high risk for CP and can be implemented shortly after birth making it an ideal screening tool for preterm infants. Cramped-synchronized writhing general movements followed by absent fidgety general movements is a movement pattern that has been shown to be highly specific of later development of cerebral palsy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Study Acceptability
n=23 Participants
Acceptability of enrollment into study
|
Control
n=28 Participants
Routine care
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percent Abnormal General Movements
|
57 percentage of participants
|
54 percentage of participants
|
Adverse Events
Intervention
Routine Care
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Santina Zanelli
University of Virginia Children's Hospital
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place