Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
315 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-08-13
2022-07-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
FC levels can also accurately predict the degree of healing seen within the bowel at colonoscopy.
FC testing is labour intensive, and results are often indeterminate. There is interest in a newer test called quantitative Faecal Immunochemical Testing (qFIT) in patients with CD. qFIT measures the amount of blood within the stool and is used in the Scottish Bowel Cancer Screening Programme. qFIT is an easier and more acceptable test for patients and is less labour intensive and cheaper for the lab to process than FC.
qFIT is a useful test to 'rule-out' significant colorectal pathology including bowel cancer, high risk polyps and inflammatory bowel disease in patients in the primary care setting. It has also been used to predict the degree of healing seen within the bowel at colonoscopy and to predict the risk of relapse in patients with UC, but not in CD. There are no studies in the UK to date comparing FIT to FC as a monitoring test in patients with well-controlled CD.
Unpublished audit data from our group has suggested that low serum zinc has higher predictive accuracy at determining risk of future flare than both FC and CRP; we are unsure if this is due to higher faecal losses in 'grumbling' CD patients.
This study could identify a cheaper, more acceptable and easier to interpret test to guide disease activity monitoring, flare risk and treatment decisions in quiescent CD.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Assessment of Mucosal Activity to Improve the Prognosis of Patients With Crohn's Disease Treated With Immunosuppressants
NCT01562951
Genomic/Epigenomic Biomarkers of Deregulation of Immune System in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
NCT02878395
Blood and Stool Molecular Biomarkers Longitudinal Detection Study in Crohn's Disease (CD) Patients
NCT03566407
Identification by Cytometry by Mass of Predictive Immunological Profiles of Answer to Treatmentby Biotherapics for Patients With Crohn's Disease
NCT03712826
Understanding the Relationship Between Infliximab Levels to Clinical Response of Remicade in Crohn's Disease
NCT01438151
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Stool sampling for disease monitoring in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is non-invasive, cost-effective and acceptable to patients. Faecal calprotectin (FC) and quantitative Faecal Immunochemical Testing (qFIT) are both stool-based tests.
FC is a surrogate marker of neutrophil influx into the gut lumen. It accurately predicts mucosal healing (MH) at colonoscopy, and thus FC is already widely used in clinical practice in disease monitoring in CD patients.
qFIT, testing stool for haemoglobin, has been used in the Scottish Bowel Cancer Screening Programme since November 2017. A 'negative' qFIT is also a useful 'rule-out' test for significant colorectal pathology (including colorectal cancer, high-risk adenomas and IBD) in primary care. qFIT has been shown to predict MH in both CD and ulcerative colitis (UC), and has been used to predict relapse in patients with UC but not CD. There is no UK study to date comparing the ability of qFIT and FC to predict flare in CD.
qFIT is a cheaper, more stable test with a quicker turn-around time than FC. It is also less labour intensive for the lab.
CRP is a cheap and easily available biomarker but is insensitive, non-specific and inferior to FC at predicting relapse in CD. CRP can also be elevated by infective complications or other concomitant inflammatory disease which makes its interpretation difficult. New data from our group has suggested that low serum zinc has higher predictive accuracy at determining risk of future flare than both FC and CRP; we are unsure if this is due to higher faecal losses in 'grumbling' CD patients.
This observational, prospective cohort study will recruit patients with luminal (affecting small and/or large bowel) CD in clinical remission (i.e. asymptomatic). A stool sample will be used to check a qFIT and faecal zinc in addition to the routinely monitored FC. At the time of routine blood collection, an additional sample will be taken to check plasma zinc. CRP is already checked routinely.
Patients will be followed up for one year, or until flare/relapse - this information will be accessed remotely through electronic patient records.
The ability of qFIT, serum zinc and faecal zinc to predict relapse in CD will be compared to FC using area under the ROC curve (AUC).
Primary study aim:
To compare the ability of qFIT and FC at predicting relapse/flare in patients with quiescent (inactive) luminal (affecting the small and large bowel) CD.
Relapse (or flare) is defined as the need for new or additional treatment for CD, hospitalisation for CD, or CD related surgery.
Primary hypothesis:
qFIT is not inferior to FC at predicting flare in quiescent (inactive) luminal (affecting the small and large bowel) CD.
Secondary study aim:
Compare the ability of serum/faecal zinc and CRP at predicting relapse in patients with quiescent (inactive) luminal (affecting the small and/or large bowel) CD.
Secondary hypothesis:
Serum/faecal zinc is superior to CRP at predicting relapse/flare in patients with quiescent (inactive) luminal (affecting the small and large bowel) CD.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Adults with Crohn's disease in remission
All patients recruited will submit two samples to facilitate faecal zinc and qFIT in addition to FC which is standard of care. All patients recruited will have an additional tube of blood taken to measure serum zinc at the same time as they have their routine (standard of care) monitoring bloods taken - no additional venepuncture will be required.
Faecal calprotectin (FC)
FC is a surrogate marker of neutrophil influx into the gut lumen. It accurately predicts mucosal healing (MH) at colonoscopy, and thus is already widely used in clinical practice in disease monitoring in CD patients (standard of care).
quantitative Faecal Immunochemical Testing (qFIT)
Stool test for haemoglobin. It has been shown to predict mucosal healing in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. This study will compare the ability of qFIT and FC to predict flare in CD (qFIT is a cheaper, more stable test with a quicker turn-around time than FC, and is also less labour intensive for the lab).
Serum and faecal zinc
Blood sample for serum zinc will be taken at same time as routine (standard of care) monitoring bloods which include CRP - no additional venipuncture will be required. A single stool sample will be sufficient to measure FC (as outlines above) and faecal zinc. This study will compare the ability of serum/faecal zinc and CRP at predicting relapse in patients with quiescent (inactive) luminal (affecting the small and/or large bowel) CD.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Faecal calprotectin (FC)
FC is a surrogate marker of neutrophil influx into the gut lumen. It accurately predicts mucosal healing (MH) at colonoscopy, and thus is already widely used in clinical practice in disease monitoring in CD patients (standard of care).
quantitative Faecal Immunochemical Testing (qFIT)
Stool test for haemoglobin. It has been shown to predict mucosal healing in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. This study will compare the ability of qFIT and FC to predict flare in CD (qFIT is a cheaper, more stable test with a quicker turn-around time than FC, and is also less labour intensive for the lab).
Serum and faecal zinc
Blood sample for serum zinc will be taken at same time as routine (standard of care) monitoring bloods which include CRP - no additional venipuncture will be required. A single stool sample will be sufficient to measure FC (as outlines above) and faecal zinc. This study will compare the ability of serum/faecal zinc and CRP at predicting relapse in patients with quiescent (inactive) luminal (affecting the small and/or large bowel) CD.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. In clinical remission as defined by Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI) \<4
3. Aged 18-50
4. On any CD-related therapy or indeed no therapy
5. Having FC checked anyway to monitor mucosal disease activity
Exclusion Criteria
2. Short gut syndrome necessitating total parenteral nutrition (TPN); otherwise patients with stomas allowed.
3. Current or previous colorectal carcinoma or high-risk adenoma, active diverticular disease (diverticulitis) or haemorrhoids
4. Ulcerative or indeterminate colitis
5. Patients taking NSAIDs, warfarin, heparin, anti-platelet therapy or DOACs.
18 Years
50 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Glasgow Royal Infirmary
Glasgow, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
246230
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
20/WS/0028
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.