Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study of PXL065 in Patients With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) (NCT NCT04321343)
NCT ID: NCT04321343
Last Updated: 2023-08-29
Results Overview
MRI-PDFF was performed using a standardized imaging protocol, and a central reader analyzed the results. The central reader for this study trained the local imaging centers and provided the imaging manual. Relative change from baseline to Week 36 was calculated as follows: (LFC at Week 36 - LFC at baseline) / LFC at baseline x 100. The primary analysis was performed for the Intent-to-treat Set (ITTS) using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model adjusting for treatment, for stratification factors, and for the baseline LFC as a continuous covariate. LFC missing values at Week 36 were imputed using a multivariate imputation approach by fully conditional specification regression method assuming Missing At Random Mechanism.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
117 participants
Baseline and Week 36
2023-08-29
Participant Flow
Patients were screened for the study at 28 sites in the United States between 01Sep2020 and 07Sep2021.
Following a Screening period of maximum 12 weeks, patients who have met all the applicable Inclusion criteria and none of the Exclusion criteria were to be randomized.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
PXL065 7.5 mg QD
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 15 mg QD
PXL065 15 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 22.5 mg QD
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + PXL065 15 mg oral tablet
|
Placebo
Placebo oral tablets
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
25
|
32
|
30
|
30
|
|
Overall Study
Completed the Double-blind Period
|
21
|
23
|
27
|
24
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
21
|
23
|
27
|
23
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
4
|
9
|
3
|
7
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
PXL065 7.5 mg QD
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 15 mg QD
PXL065 15 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 22.5 mg QD
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + PXL065 15 mg oral tablet
|
Placebo
Placebo oral tablets
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Pregnancy
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
6
|
0
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
Baseline Characteristics
Study of PXL065 in Patients With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
PXL065 7.5 mg QD
n=25 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 15 mg QD
n=32 Participants
PXL065 15 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 22.5 mg QD
n=30 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + PXL065 15 mg oral tablet
|
Placebo
n=30 Participants
Placebo oral tablets
|
Total
n=117 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
19 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
92 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
6 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
50.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.28 • n=93 Participants
|
54.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.86 • n=4 Participants
|
53.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.36 • n=27 Participants
|
54.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.15 • n=483 Participants
|
53.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.63 • n=36 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
14 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
67 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
11 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
50 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
11 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
41 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
14 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
24 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
76 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
1 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
1 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
22 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
106 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
|
T2DM status (stratification group)
T2DM patients
|
10 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
48 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
|
T2DM status (stratification group)
Non-T2DM patients
|
15 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
69 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
|
NASH CRN fibrosis score (stratification group)
F1
|
9 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
41 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
|
NASH CRN fibrosis score (stratification group)
F2 or F3
|
16 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
76 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 36Population: Intent-to-treat set (ITTS), defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
MRI-PDFF was performed using a standardized imaging protocol, and a central reader analyzed the results. The central reader for this study trained the local imaging centers and provided the imaging manual. Relative change from baseline to Week 36 was calculated as follows: (LFC at Week 36 - LFC at baseline) / LFC at baseline x 100. The primary analysis was performed for the Intent-to-treat Set (ITTS) using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model adjusting for treatment, for stratification factors, and for the baseline LFC as a continuous covariate. LFC missing values at Week 36 were imputed using a multivariate imputation approach by fully conditional specification regression method assuming Missing At Random Mechanism.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PXL065 7.5 mg QD
n=25 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 15 mg QD
n=32 Participants
PXL065 15 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 22.5 mg QD
n=30 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + PXL065 15 mg oral tablet
|
Placebo
n=30 Participants
Placebo oral tablets
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Relative Change From Baseline to Week 36 in the Percentage of Liver Fat Content (LFC) (Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging - Proton Density Fat Fraction [MRI-PDFF])
|
-22.900 percentage of change in LFC
Standard Error 7.104
|
-18.590 percentage of change in LFC
Standard Error 6.904
|
-21.335 percentage of change in LFC
Standard Error 6.446
|
2.413 percentage of change in LFC
Standard Error 6.619
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 36Population: Intent-to-treat set (ITTS), defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
MRI-PDFF was performed using a standardized imaging protocol, and a central reader analyzed the results. The central reader for this study trained the local imaging centers and provided the imaging manual. The sensitivity analysis was performed for the Intent-to-treat Set (ITTS) using a non parametric pairwise Wilcoxon test stratified according to T2DM status and NASH CRN fibrosis scoring system. LFC missing values at Week 36 were imputed using a multivariate imputation approach by fully conditional specification regression method assuming Missing At Random Mechanism.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PXL065 7.5 mg QD
n=25 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 15 mg QD
n=32 Participants
PXL065 15 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 22.5 mg QD
n=30 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + PXL065 15 mg oral tablet
|
Placebo
n=30 Participants
Placebo oral tablets
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Relative Change From Baseline to Week 36 in the Percentage of LFC (Assessed by MRI-PDFF) (Wilcoxon Test Sensitivity Analysis)
|
-26.555 percentage of change in LFC
Interval -42.7 to -5.664
|
-25.353 percentage of change in LFC
Interval -36.586 to -9.826
|
-24.782 percentage of change in LFC
Interval -48.391 to -9.096
|
0.937 percentage of change in LFC
Interval -21.632 to 26.116
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 36Population: Intent-to-treat set (ITTS), defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
MRI-PDFF was performed using a standardized imaging protocol, and a central reader analyzed the results. The central reader for this study trained the local imaging centers and provided the imaging manual. Absolute change from baseline to Week 36 was calculated as follows: LFC at Week 36 - LFC at baseline. The analysis of the absolute change in LFC was performed for the Intent-to-treat Set (ITTS) using an ANCOVA model adjusting for treatment, for stratification factors, and for the baseline LFC as a continuous covariate. LFC missing values at Week 36 were imputed using a multivariate imputation approach by fully conditional specification regression method assuming Missing At Random Mechanism.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PXL065 7.5 mg QD
n=25 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 15 mg QD
n=32 Participants
PXL065 15 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 22.5 mg QD
n=30 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + PXL065 15 mg oral tablet
|
Placebo
n=30 Participants
Placebo oral tablets
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 36 in the Percentage of LFC (Assessed by MRI-PDFF)
|
-4.934 percentage of LFC
Standard Error 1.381
|
-4.360 percentage of LFC
Standard Error 1.305
|
-4.584 percentage of LFC
Standard Error 1.207
|
-0.263 percentage of LFC
Standard Error 1.228
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 36Population: ITTS, defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. For patients with missing Week 36/Early termination, multiple imputation by fully conditional specification methods was used for analysis, although the n counts and percentages reflect only the observed data.
Responders were defined as patients who achieved a clinically meaningful relative reduction of at least 30% in LFC from baseline to Week 36 as assessed by MRI-PDFF
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PXL065 7.5 mg QD
n=20 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 15 mg QD
n=24 Participants
PXL065 15 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 22.5 mg QD
n=27 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + PXL065 15 mg oral tablet
|
Placebo
n=25 Participants
Placebo oral tablets
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Responders (Relative Reduction of at Least 30% in LFC) at Week 36
Responder
|
8 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Percentage of Responders (Relative Reduction of at Least 30% in LFC) at Week 36
Non-responder
|
12 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 36Population: ITTS, defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PXL065 7.5 mg QD
n=25 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 15 mg QD
n=32 Participants
PXL065 15 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 22.5 mg QD
n=30 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + PXL065 15 mg oral tablet
|
Placebo
n=30 Participants
Placebo oral tablets
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Alanine Amino Transferase (ALT)
|
-18.4 U/L
Standard Error 6.0
|
-13.6 U/L
Standard Error 5.9
|
-6.7 U/L
Standard Error 5.4
|
-11.9 U/L
Standard Error 5.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 36Population: Subset of patients with increased baseline value from the ITTS, defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
Normalization of ALT was analyzed in the subset of patients with baseline greater than the upper reference range. Patients were classed as responders if ALT normalized, i.e. decreased to \< upper reference range at a post baseline visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PXL065 7.5 mg QD
n=17 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 15 mg QD
n=24 Participants
PXL065 15 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 22.5 mg QD
n=24 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + PXL065 15 mg oral tablet
|
Placebo
n=18 Participants
Placebo oral tablets
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Responders (Normalization of ALT)
Responder
|
3 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Percentage of Responders (Normalization of ALT)
Non-responder
|
14 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 36Population: ITTS, defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PXL065 7.5 mg QD
n=25 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 15 mg QD
n=32 Participants
PXL065 15 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 22.5 mg QD
n=30 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + PXL065 15 mg oral tablet
|
Placebo
n=30 Participants
Placebo oral tablets
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Aspartate Amino Transferase (AST)
|
-10.1 U/L
Standard Error 6.5
|
-10.2 U/L
Standard Error 6.3
|
-4.9 U/L
Standard Error 5.8
|
-7.2 U/L
Standard Error 6.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 36Population: Subset of patients with increased baseline value from the ITTS, defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
Normalization of AST was analyzed in the subset of patients with baseline greater than the upper reference range. Patients were classed as responders if AST normalized, i.e. decreased to \< upper reference range at a post baseline visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PXL065 7.5 mg QD
n=17 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 15 mg QD
n=17 Participants
PXL065 15 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 22.5 mg QD
n=19 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + PXL065 15 mg oral tablet
|
Placebo
n=16 Participants
Placebo oral tablets
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Responders (Normalization of AST)
Responder
|
9 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Percentage of Responders (Normalization of AST)
Non-responder
|
8 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 36Population: ITTS, defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PXL065 7.5 mg QD
n=25 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 15 mg QD
n=32 Participants
PXL065 15 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 22.5 mg QD
n=30 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + PXL065 15 mg oral tablet
|
Placebo
n=30 Participants
Placebo oral tablets
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Gamma Glutamyltransferase (GGT)
|
-12.2 U/L
Standard Error 7.6
|
-21.8 U/L
Standard Error 7.5
|
-6.9 U/L
Standard Error 6.9
|
-4.2 U/L
Standard Error 7.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 36Population: ITTS, defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PXL065 7.5 mg QD
n=25 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 15 mg QD
n=32 Participants
PXL065 15 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 22.5 mg QD
n=30 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + PXL065 15 mg oral tablet
|
Placebo
n=30 Participants
Placebo oral tablets
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP)
|
-2.8 U/L
Standard Error 2.7
|
-8.0 U/L
Standard Error 2.7
|
-5.8 U/L
Standard Error 2.5
|
3.1 U/L
Standard Error 2.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 36Population: ITTS, defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
Pro-C3 is the released N-terminal pro-peptide of type III collagen. It is a fibrosis marker. Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PXL065 7.5 mg QD
n=25 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 15 mg QD
n=32 Participants
PXL065 15 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 22.5 mg QD
n=30 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + PXL065 15 mg oral tablet
|
Placebo
n=30 Participants
Placebo oral tablets
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Pro-C3
|
-2.054 ng/mL
Standard Error 1.182
|
-1.753 ng/mL
Standard Error 1.089
|
-2.481 ng/mL
Standard Error 1.050
|
-1.041 ng/mL
Standard Error 0.893
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 36Population: ITTS, defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
ELF score is an extracellular matrix marker set consisting of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1 (TIMP-1), amino-terminal propeptide of type III procollagen (PIIINP) and hyaluronic acid (HA) showing good correlations with fibrosis stages in chronic liver disease.The set cutoffs for this scoring are: ELF \< 7.7: no to mild fibrosis; ELF between 7.7 - 9.8: moderate fibrosis; ELF between 9.8 - 11.3: severe fibrosis; and ELF \> or = 11.3: cirrhosis. Blood samples used for TIMP-1, PIIINP and HA were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PXL065 7.5 mg QD
n=25 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 15 mg QD
n=32 Participants
PXL065 15 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 22.5 mg QD
n=30 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + PXL065 15 mg oral tablet
|
Placebo
n=30 Participants
Placebo oral tablets
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) Score
|
-0.142 Score
Standard Error 0.168
|
-0.206 Score
Standard Error 0.153
|
-0.358 Score
Standard Error 0.130
|
-0.079 Score
Standard Error 0.130
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 36Population: ITTS, defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
Fib-4 score is a non invasive method based on clinical determinations that indicates the level of fibrosis/ scarring of the liver. The set cutoffs for this scoring are: Fib-4 \< 1.45: absence of cirrhosis; Fib-4 between 1.45 - 3.25: inconclusive and Fib-4 \> 3.25: cirrhosis. Fib-4 score was calculated as (Age \[years\] × AST \[U/L\]) / (platelet \[10\^9/L\] × √\[ALT \[U/L\]\]). Blood samples used for AST, ALT and platelet counts were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PXL065 7.5 mg QD
n=25 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 15 mg QD
n=32 Participants
PXL065 15 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 22.5 mg QD
n=30 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + PXL065 15 mg oral tablet
|
Placebo
n=30 Participants
Placebo oral tablets
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Fibrosis-4 (Fib-4) Score
|
-0.040 Score
Standard Error 0.127
|
-0.107 Score
Standard Error 0.124
|
-0.198 Score
Standard Error 0.109
|
-0.012 Score
Standard Error 0.110
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 36Population: ITTS, defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
The NFS is based on a combination of clinical and laboratory measurements (i.e. age, glycemia, BMI, platelet, albumin and AST/ALT ratio). The set cutoffs for this scoring are: \< -1.455 for exclusion of advance fibrosis, \> -1.455 to \< or = 0.675 for indetermined, and \> 0.675 for presence of advance fibrosis. NFS was calculated as: 1.675 + 0.037 x age (years) + 0.094 x BMI (kg/m²) + 1.13 x Impaired Fasting Glucose or Diabetes (yes =1; no=0) + 0.99 x AST/ALT ratio - 0.013 x platelet (10\^9/L) - 0.66 x albumin (g/dL)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PXL065 7.5 mg QD
n=25 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 15 mg QD
n=32 Participants
PXL065 15 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 22.5 mg QD
n=30 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + PXL065 15 mg oral tablet
|
Placebo
n=30 Participants
Placebo oral tablets
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in NAFLD Fibrosis Score
|
0.170 Score
Standard Error 0.192
|
-0.006 Score
Standard Error 0.188
|
-0.264 Score
Standard Error 0.167
|
0.215 Score
Standard Error 0.167
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 36Population: Patients With Week 36 Assessment from the Intent-to-treat set (ITTS), defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
Improvement in fibrosis is defined as a decrease of at least one stage in NASH CRN fibrosis score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PXL065 7.5 mg QD
n=21 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 15 mg QD
n=22 Participants
PXL065 15 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 22.5 mg QD
n=26 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + PXL065 15 mg oral tablet
|
Placebo
n=23 Participants
Placebo oral tablets
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Improvement of at Least 1 Point in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score From Baseline to Week 36
Responder
|
9 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Improvement of at Least 1 Point in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score From Baseline to Week 36
Non-responder
|
12 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 36Population: Patients With Week 36 Assessment from the Intent-to-treat set (ITTS), defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
NAS is the NAFLD activity score, calculated as the sum of steatosis, lobular inflammation and ballooning scores. Improvement in NAS is defined as a decrease of at least 2 points. No worsening in NASH CRN fibrosis score means that the score remained stable or decreased.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PXL065 7.5 mg QD
n=21 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 15 mg QD
n=22 Participants
PXL065 15 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 22.5 mg QD
n=26 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + PXL065 15 mg oral tablet
|
Placebo
n=23 Participants
Placebo oral tablets
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Improvement in NAS of at Least 2 Points With no Worsening in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score From Baseline to Week 36
Responder
|
8 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Improvement in NAS of at Least 2 Points With no Worsening in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score From Baseline to Week 36
Non-responder
|
13 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 36Population: Patients With Week 36 Assessment from the Intent-to-treat set (ITTS), defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
NASH resolution is defined as a NAS score of 0-1 for inflammation, 0 for ballooning, and any value for steatosis. No worsening in NASH CRN fibrosis score means that the score remained stable or decreased.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PXL065 7.5 mg QD
n=21 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 15 mg QD
n=22 Participants
PXL065 15 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 22.5 mg QD
n=26 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + PXL065 15 mg oral tablet
|
Placebo
n=23 Participants
Placebo oral tablets
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NASH Resolution With no Worsening in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score at Week 36
Responder
|
8 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
NASH Resolution With no Worsening in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score at Week 36
Non-responder
|
13 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
18 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 36Population: Patients With Week 36 Assessment from the Intent-to-treat set (ITTS), defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
NASH resolution is defined as a NAS score of 0-1 for inflammation, 0 for ballooning, and any value for steatosis. Improvement in fibrosis is defined as a decrease of at least one stage in NASH CRN fibrosis score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PXL065 7.5 mg QD
n=21 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 15 mg QD
n=22 Participants
PXL065 15 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 22.5 mg QD
n=26 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + PXL065 15 mg oral tablet
|
Placebo
n=23 Participants
Placebo oral tablets
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NASH Resolution With Improvement of at Least 1 Point in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score at Week 36
Responder
|
7 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
NASH Resolution With Improvement of at Least 1 Point in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score at Week 36
Non-responder
|
14 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 36Population: ITTS, defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PXL065 7.5 mg QD
n=25 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 15 mg QD
n=32 Participants
PXL065 15 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 22.5 mg QD
n=30 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + PXL065 15 mg oral tablet
|
Placebo
n=30 Participants
Placebo oral tablets
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
|
0.14 percentage of glycated hemoglobin
Standard Error 0.11
|
-0.06 percentage of glycated hemoglobin
Standard Error 0.10
|
-0.20 percentage of glycated hemoglobin
Standard Error 0.10
|
0.21 percentage of glycated hemoglobin
Standard Error 0.10
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 36Population: ITTS, defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PXL065 7.5 mg QD
n=25 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 15 mg QD
n=32 Participants
PXL065 15 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 22.5 mg QD
n=30 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + PXL065 15 mg oral tablet
|
Placebo
n=30 Participants
Placebo oral tablets
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
|
0.147 mmol/L
Standard Error 0.286
|
0.361 mmol/L
Standard Error 0.278
|
0.205 mmol/L
Standard Error 0.251
|
0.198 mmol/L
Standard Error 0.269
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 36Population: ITTS, defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PXL065 7.5 mg QD
n=25 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 15 mg QD
n=32 Participants
PXL065 15 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 22.5 mg QD
n=30 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + PXL065 15 mg oral tablet
|
Placebo
n=30 Participants
Placebo oral tablets
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Serum Insulin
|
-78.08 pmol/L
Standard Error 28.01
|
-39.76 pmol/L
Standard Error 26.71
|
-56.55 pmol/L
Standard Error 23.40
|
6.85 pmol/L
Standard Error 24.06
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 36Population: ITTS, defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PXL065 7.5 mg QD
n=25 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 15 mg QD
n=32 Participants
PXL065 15 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 22.5 mg QD
n=30 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + PXL065 15 mg oral tablet
|
Placebo
n=30 Participants
Placebo oral tablets
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Serum C-peptide
|
-0.205 nmol/L
Standard Error 0.116
|
-0.222 nmol/L
Standard Error 0.110
|
-0.250 nmol/L
Standard Error 0.095
|
0.051 nmol/L
Standard Error 0.102
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 36Population: ITTS, defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
HOMA-IR was calculated as: Serum C-peptide (ng/mL) × FPG (mg/dL) / 405 Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory. HOMA-IR is an indicator of insulin resistance. The higher the value, the greater the insulin resistance. There is no minimum or maximum index score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PXL065 7.5 mg QD
n=25 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 15 mg QD
n=32 Participants
PXL065 15 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 22.5 mg QD
n=30 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + PXL065 15 mg oral tablet
|
Placebo
n=30 Participants
Placebo oral tablets
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)
|
-0.086 Index
Standard Error 0.134
|
-0.123 Index
Standard Error 0.127
|
-0.210 Index
Standard Error 0.106
|
0.111 Index
Standard Error 0.116
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 36Population: ITTS, defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
The QUICKI was calculated as: 1 / (log (FPG \[mg/dL\]) + log (C-peptide \[ng/mL\])). Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory. QUICKI is an indicator of insulin resistance. Lower numbers reflect greater insulin resistance. There is no minimum or maximum index score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PXL065 7.5 mg QD
n=25 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 15 mg QD
n=32 Participants
PXL065 15 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 22.5 mg QD
n=30 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + PXL065 15 mg oral tablet
|
Placebo
n=30 Participants
Placebo oral tablets
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index (QUICKI)
|
0.006 Index
Standard Error 0.009
|
0.007 Index
Standard Error 0.009
|
0.012 Index
Standard Error 0.008
|
-0.005 Index
Standard Error 0.008
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 36Population: ITTS, defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
The Adipo-IR was calculated as: Fasting serum Free Fatty Acids (mmol/L) x Fasting serum insulin (μIU/mL) Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory. The Adipo-IR is a marker of adipose tissue insulin resistance. Higher the value, the greater the insulin resistance. There is no minimum or maximum index score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PXL065 7.5 mg QD
n=25 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 15 mg QD
n=32 Participants
PXL065 15 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 22.5 mg QD
n=30 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + PXL065 15 mg oral tablet
|
Placebo
n=30 Participants
Placebo oral tablets
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Adipo-IR
|
-36.18 Index
Standard Error 16.53
|
-17.01 Index
Standard Error 13.78
|
-41.87 Index
Standard Error 12.37
|
12.77 Index
Standard Error 13.03
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 36Population: ITTS, defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PXL065 7.5 mg QD
n=25 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 15 mg QD
n=32 Participants
PXL065 15 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 22.5 mg QD
n=30 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + PXL065 15 mg oral tablet
|
Placebo
n=30 Participants
Placebo oral tablets
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Adiponectin
|
1.532 µg/mL
Standard Error 0.679
|
2.688 µg/mL
Standard Error 0.646
|
4.734 µg/mL
Standard Error 0.624
|
-0.143 µg/mL
Standard Error 0.595
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 36Population: Safety Set, defined as all as-treated patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
Body weight was measured using a scale with appropriate resolution, placed on a stable, flat surface. Shoes, bulky layers of clothing, and jackets had to be removed so that only light clothing remained.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PXL065 7.5 mg QD
n=25 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 15 mg QD
n=32 Participants
PXL065 15 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 22.5 mg QD
n=30 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + PXL065 15 mg oral tablet
|
Placebo
n=30 Participants
Placebo oral tablets
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Weight
|
1.080 kg
Standard Error 0.673
|
2.356 kg
Standard Error 0.636
|
0.577 kg
Standard Error 0.603
|
-0.103 kg
Standard Error 0.623
|
POST_HOC outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 36Population: ITTS, defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
PIIINP is the amino-terminal propeptide of type III procollagen. It is a fibrosis marker. Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PXL065 7.5 mg QD
n=25 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 15 mg QD
n=32 Participants
PXL065 15 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 22.5 mg QD
n=30 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + PXL065 15 mg oral tablet
|
Placebo
n=30 Participants
Placebo oral tablets
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in PIIINP
|
-2.385 µg/mL
Standard Error 0.875
|
-2.732 µg/mL
Standard Error 0.796
|
-3.354 µg/mL
Standard Error 0.674
|
-1.134 µg/mL
Standard Error 0.672
|
POST_HOC outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 36Population: Patients With Week 36 Assessment from the Intent-to-treat set (ITTS), defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
NAS is the NAFLD activity score, calculated as the sum of steatosis, lobular inflammation and ballooning scores. Improvement in NAS is defined as a decrease of at least 2 points.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PXL065 7.5 mg QD
n=21 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 15 mg QD
n=22 Participants
PXL065 15 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 22.5 mg QD
n=26 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + PXL065 15 mg oral tablet
|
Placebo
n=23 Participants
Placebo oral tablets
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Improvement of at Least 2 Points in NAS
Responder
|
9 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Improvement of at Least 2 Points in NAS
Non-responder
|
12 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
POST_HOC outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 36Population: Patients With Week 36 Assessment from the Intent-to-treat set (ITTS), defined as all as-randomized patients who received at least one dose of study treatment.
Improvement in fibrosis is defined as a decrease of at least one stage in NASH CRN fibrosis score. No worsening of NASH is defined as no increase in steatosis, inflammation or ballooning
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PXL065 7.5 mg QD
n=21 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 15 mg QD
n=22 Participants
PXL065 15 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 22.5 mg QD
n=26 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + PXL065 15 mg oral tablet
|
Placebo
n=23 Participants
Placebo oral tablets
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Improvement of at Least 1 Point in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score With no Worsening of NASH From Baseline to Week 36
Responder
|
8 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Improvement of at Least 1 Point in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score With no Worsening of NASH From Baseline to Week 36
Non-responder
|
13 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
18 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
POST_HOC outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 36Population: Safety Set, defined as all as-treated patients who received at least one dose of study treatment, Excluding Week 36 for one patient (erroneous data), and Excluding Patients With Weight Loss \> 10kg from Baseline to Week 36.
Body weight was measured using a scale with appropriate resolution, placed on a stable, flat surface. Shoes, bulky layers of clothing, and jackets had to be removed so that only light clothing remained.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PXL065 7.5 mg QD
n=25 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 15 mg QD
n=32 Participants
PXL065 15 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 22.5 mg QD
n=30 Participants
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + PXL065 15 mg oral tablet
|
Placebo
n=30 Participants
Placebo oral tablets
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Weight Excluding Week 36 for One Patient (Erroneous Data), and Excluding Patients With Weight Loss > 10kg From Baseline to Week 36
|
0.599 kg
Standard Error 0.656
|
2.304 kg
Standard Error 0.614
|
0.543 kg
Standard Error 0.583
|
0.319 kg
Standard Error 0.612
|
Adverse Events
PXL065 7.5 mg QD
PXL065 15 mg QD
PXL065 22.5 mg QD
Placebo
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
PXL065 7.5 mg QD
n=25 participants at risk
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 15 mg QD
n=32 participants at risk
PXL065 15 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 22.5 mg QD
n=30 participants at risk
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + PXL065 15 mg oral tablet
|
Placebo
n=30 participants at risk
Placebo oral tablets
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
COVID-19
|
0.00%
0/25 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/32 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
0.00%
0/25 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
3.1%
1/32 • Number of events 1 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/30 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/30 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.00%
0/25 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
3.1%
1/32 • Number of events 1 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/30 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/30 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
|
General disorders
Death
|
0.00%
0/25 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/32 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/30 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Biliary dyskinesia
|
4.0%
1/25 • Number of events 1 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/32 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/30 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/30 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural pain
|
4.0%
1/25 • Number of events 1 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/32 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/30 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/30 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
0.00%
0/25 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
3.1%
1/32 • Number of events 1 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/30 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/30 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Metabolic acidosis
|
0.00%
0/25 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
3.1%
1/32 • Number of events 1 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/30 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/30 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal chest pain
|
0.00%
0/25 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
3.1%
1/32 • Number of events 1 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/30 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/30 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
PXL065 7.5 mg QD
n=25 participants at risk
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 15 mg QD
n=32 participants at risk
PXL065 15 mg oral tablet + Placebo oral tablet
|
PXL065 22.5 mg QD
n=30 participants at risk
PXL065 7.5 mg oral tablet + PXL065 15 mg oral tablet
|
Placebo
n=30 participants at risk
Placebo oral tablets
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
COVID-19
|
0.00%
0/25 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
3.1%
1/32 • Number of events 1 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
23.3%
7/30 • Number of events 7 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
12.0%
3/25 • Number of events 5 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
6.2%
2/32 • Number of events 2 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/30 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
4.0%
1/25 • Number of events 1 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
3.1%
1/32 • Number of events 1 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
10.0%
3/30 • Number of events 3 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/30 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.00%
0/25 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
6.2%
2/32 • Number of events 3 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster
|
4.0%
1/25 • Number of events 1 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/32 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/30 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tooth infection
|
8.0%
2/25 • Number of events 2 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
3.1%
1/32 • Number of events 1 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/30 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/30 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
4.0%
1/25 • Number of events 1 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/32 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/30 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
12.0%
3/25 • Number of events 4 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
6.2%
2/32 • Number of events 4 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
8.0%
2/25 • Number of events 2 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
3.1%
1/32 • Number of events 1 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
10.0%
3/30 • Number of events 3 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/30 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
4.0%
1/25 • Number of events 1 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
6.2%
2/32 • Number of events 2 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
10.0%
3/30 • Number of events 3 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/30 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
12.0%
3/25 • Number of events 3 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
3.1%
1/32 • Number of events 1 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/30 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
0.00%
0/25 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
6.2%
2/32 • Number of events 2 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/30 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/30 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
16.0%
4/25 • Number of events 7 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
25.0%
8/32 • Number of events 12 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
23.3%
7/30 • Number of events 9 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 3 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
8.0%
2/25 • Number of events 2 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
6.2%
2/32 • Number of events 2 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
|
0.00%
0/25 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/32 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/30 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
16.0%
4/25 • Number of events 4 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
9.4%
3/32 • Number of events 3 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/30 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/30 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.00%
0/25 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
12.5%
4/32 • Number of events 4 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 4 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
12.0%
3/25 • Number of events 3 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/32 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
10.0%
3/30 • Number of events 3 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
4.0%
1/25 • Number of events 1 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
6.2%
2/32 • Number of events 2 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/30 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
|
8.0%
2/25 • Number of events 2 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
6.2%
2/32 • Number of events 2 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/30 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/30 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
4.0%
1/25 • Number of events 1 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
6.2%
2/32 • Number of events 2 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/30 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/30 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in jaw
|
8.0%
2/25 • Number of events 2 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/32 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/30 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/30 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
12.0%
3/25 • Number of events 3 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
3.1%
1/32 • Number of events 1 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
10.0%
3/30 • Number of events 4 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
10.0%
3/30 • Number of events 3 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
16.0%
4/25 • Number of events 4 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/32 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
10.0%
3/30 • Number of events 5 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural pain
|
4.0%
1/25 • Number of events 1 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
3.1%
1/32 • Number of events 2 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
13.3%
4/30 • Number of events 5 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
0.00%
0/25 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
9.4%
3/32 • Number of events 3 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
0.00%
0/25 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
3.1%
1/32 • Number of events 1 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/30 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
0.00%
0/25 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/32 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/30 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
6.7%
2/30 • Number of events 2 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
4.0%
1/25 • Number of events 1 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
12.5%
4/32 • Number of events 4 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/30 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
12.0%
3/25 • Number of events 3 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/32 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
13.3%
4/30 • Number of events 5 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
0.00%
0/30 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
0.00%
0/25 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
6.2%
2/32 • Number of events 2 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
3.3%
1/30 • Number of events 1 • All AEs were collected from the time of ICF signature to the End-of-study Visit, ie 38 weeks on average.
Only events that occur after the first dose intake of IMP of the Double-blind (DB) treatment period or if they were present prior to the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period and increased in severity or relationship to IMP after the first intake of IMP of the DB treatment period were considered as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs). Only TEAEs (regardless of the relationship) are presented in this section.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place