Trial Outcomes & Findings for Online Trial Examining Validity of the Shared Decision Making Process Survey With Video Vignettes (NCT NCT04317274)
NCT ID: NCT04317274
Last Updated: 2024-01-05
Results Overview
The Shared Decision Making Process is a short, 4-item patient-reported survey that measures the amount of shared decision making that occurs in an interaction. Scores range from 0-4 where higher values indicate a better shared decision making process occurred.
Recruitment status
COMPLETED
Study phase
NA
Target enrollment
401 participants
Primary outcome timeframe
Immediately after viewing each video (typically within 15 minutes of watching the video)
Results posted on
2024-01-05
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
High Cholesterol Good Video First
Participants see videos of a conversation around taking medications (statins) for high cholesterol. Patients see good video first and poor video second.
Good high cholesterol video: The short video illustrated key components of a high quality shared decision making conversation between a doctor and patient actor around treatment of high cholesterol.
Poor high cholesterol video: The short video illustrated a typical conversation between a doctor and patient actor that did not cover key aspects of share decision making around treatment of high cholesterol.
|
Colorectal Cancer Good Video First
Participants see videos of a conversation around screening for colorectal cancer. Patients see good video first and poor video second.
Good colon cancer screening video: The short video illustrated key components of a high quality shared decision making conversation between a doctor and patient actor around screening for colorectal cancer.
Poor colon cancer screening video: The short video illustrated a typical conversation between a doctor and patient actor that did not cover key aspects of share decision making around screening for colorectal cancer.
|
High Cholesterol Poor Video First
Participants see videos of a conversation around taking medications (statins) for high cholesterol. Patients see poor video first and good video second.
Good high cholesterol video: The short video illustrated key components of a high quality shared decision making conversation between a doctor and patient actor around treatment of high cholesterol.
Poor high cholesterol video: The short video illustrated a typical conversation between a doctor and patient actor that did not cover key aspects of share decision making around treatment of high cholesterol.
|
Colorectal Cancer Poor Video First
Participants see videos of a conversation around screening for colorectal cancer. Patients see poor video first and good video second.
Good colon cancer screening video: The short video illustrated key components of a high quality shared decision making conversation between a doctor and patient actor around screening for colorectal cancer.
Poor colon cancer screening video: The short video illustrated a typical conversation between a doctor and patient actor that did not cover key aspects of share decision making around screening for colorectal cancer.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
97
|
94
|
103
|
107
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
95
|
91
|
99
|
103
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
4
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
High Cholesterol Good Video First
Participants see videos of a conversation around taking medications (statins) for high cholesterol. Patients see good video first and poor video second.
Good high cholesterol video: The short video illustrated key components of a high quality shared decision making conversation between a doctor and patient actor around treatment of high cholesterol.
Poor high cholesterol video: The short video illustrated a typical conversation between a doctor and patient actor that did not cover key aspects of share decision making around treatment of high cholesterol.
|
Colorectal Cancer Good Video First
Participants see videos of a conversation around screening for colorectal cancer. Patients see good video first and poor video second.
Good colon cancer screening video: The short video illustrated key components of a high quality shared decision making conversation between a doctor and patient actor around screening for colorectal cancer.
Poor colon cancer screening video: The short video illustrated a typical conversation between a doctor and patient actor that did not cover key aspects of share decision making around screening for colorectal cancer.
|
High Cholesterol Poor Video First
Participants see videos of a conversation around taking medications (statins) for high cholesterol. Patients see poor video first and good video second.
Good high cholesterol video: The short video illustrated key components of a high quality shared decision making conversation between a doctor and patient actor around treatment of high cholesterol.
Poor high cholesterol video: The short video illustrated a typical conversation between a doctor and patient actor that did not cover key aspects of share decision making around treatment of high cholesterol.
|
Colorectal Cancer Poor Video First
Participants see videos of a conversation around screening for colorectal cancer. Patients see poor video first and good video second.
Good colon cancer screening video: The short video illustrated key components of a high quality shared decision making conversation between a doctor and patient actor around screening for colorectal cancer.
Poor colon cancer screening video: The short video illustrated a typical conversation between a doctor and patient actor that did not cover key aspects of share decision making around screening for colorectal cancer.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
participant did not provide enough information to calculate a shared decision making process score
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
4
|
Baseline Characteristics
Online Trial Examining Validity of the Shared Decision Making Process Survey With Video Vignettes
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
High Cholesterol Good Video First
n=95 Participants
Participants see videos of a conversation around taking medications (statins) for high cholesterol. Patients see good video first and poor video second.
Good high cholesterol video: The short video illustrated key components of a high quality shared decision making conversation between a doctor and patient actor around treatment of high cholesterol.
Poor high cholesterol video: The short video illustrated a typical conversation between a doctor and patient actor that did not cover key aspects of share decision making around treatment of high cholesterol.
|
Colorectal Cancer Good Video First
n=91 Participants
Participants see videos of a conversation around screening for colorectal cancer. Patients see good video first and poor video second.
Good colon cancer screening video: The short video illustrated key components of a high quality shared decision making conversation between a doctor and patient actor around screening for colorectal cancer.
Poor colon cancer screening video: The short video illustrated a typical conversation between a doctor and patient actor that did not cover key aspects of share decision making around screening for colorectal cancer.
|
High Cholesterol Poor Video First
n=99 Participants
Participants see videos of a conversation around taking medications (statins) for high cholesterol. Patients see poor video first and good video second.
Good high cholesterol video: The short video illustrated key components of a high quality shared decision making conversation between a doctor and patient actor around treatment of high cholesterol.
Poor high cholesterol video: The short video illustrated a typical conversation between a doctor and patient actor that did not cover key aspects of share decision making around treatment of high cholesterol.
|
Colorectal Cancer Poor Video First
n=103 Participants
Participants see videos of a conversation around screening for colorectal cancer. Patients see poor video first and good video second.
Good colon cancer screening video: The short video illustrated key components of a high quality shared decision making conversation between a doctor and patient actor around screening for colorectal cancer.
Poor colon cancer screening video: The short video illustrated a typical conversation between a doctor and patient actor that did not cover key aspects of share decision making around screening for colorectal cancer.
|
Total
n=388 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
45 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16 • n=93 Participants
|
45 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16 • n=4 Participants
|
45 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16 • n=27 Participants
|
44 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16 • n=483 Participants
|
45 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16 • n=36 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
|
66 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
64 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
72 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
67 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
269 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
|
28 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
36 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
117 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Genderfluid
|
1 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Nonbinary
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
10 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
35 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
85 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
87 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
89 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
92 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
353 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
2 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
5 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
1 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
15 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
50 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
65 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
65 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
70 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
75 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
275 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
1 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
6 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=483 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=36 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
95 participants
n=93 Participants
|
91 participants
n=4 Participants
|
99 participants
n=27 Participants
|
103 participants
n=483 Participants
|
388 participants
n=36 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Immediately after viewing each video (typically within 15 minutes of watching the video)Population: participants who answered the shared decision making process items and provided sufficient information to calculate a SDM Process score.
The Shared Decision Making Process is a short, 4-item patient-reported survey that measures the amount of shared decision making that occurs in an interaction. Scores range from 0-4 where higher values indicate a better shared decision making process occurred.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
High Cholesterol Good Video First
n=95 Participants
Participants see videos of a conversation around taking medications (statins) for high cholesterol. Patients see good video first and poor video second.
Good high cholesterol video: The short video illustrated key components of a high quality shared decision making conversation between a doctor and patient actor around treatment of high cholesterol.
Poor high cholesterol video: The short video illustrated a typical conversation between a doctor and patient actor that did not cover key aspects of share decision making around treatment of high cholesterol.
|
Colorectal Cancer Good Video First
n=91 Participants
Participants see videos of a conversation around screening for colorectal cancer. Patients see good video first and poor video second.
Good colon cancer screening video: The short video illustrated key components of a high quality shared decision making conversation between a doctor and patient actor around screening for colorectal cancer.
Poor colon cancer screening video: The short video illustrated a typical conversation between a doctor and patient actor that did not cover key aspects of share decision making around screening for colorectal cancer.
|
High Cholesterol Poor Video First
n=99 Participants
Participants see videos of a conversation around taking medications (statins) for high cholesterol. Patients see poor video first and good video second.
Good high cholesterol video: The short video illustrated key components of a high quality shared decision making conversation between a doctor and patient actor around treatment of high cholesterol.
Poor high cholesterol video: The short video illustrated a typical conversation between a doctor and patient actor that did not cover key aspects of share decision making around treatment of high cholesterol.
|
Colorectal Cancer Poor Video First
n=103 Participants
Participants see videos of a conversation around screening for colorectal cancer. Patients see poor video first and good video second.
Good colon cancer screening video: The short video illustrated key components of a high quality shared decision making conversation between a doctor and patient actor around screening for colorectal cancer.
Poor colon cancer screening video: The short video illustrated a typical conversation between a doctor and patient actor that did not cover key aspects of share decision making around screening for colorectal cancer.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Shared Decision Making Process Score
Poor video score
|
2.62 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.02
|
1.82 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.30
|
2.55 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
|
2.06 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.1
|
|
Shared Decision Making Process Score
Good video score
|
3.36 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.61
|
3.08 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.75
|
3.10 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.79
|
3.29 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.66
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Immediately after viewing each video (typically within 15 minutes of watching the video)Population: Participants who completed the 9-item SDM-Q9 measure. 388/388 participants provided sufficient information to calculate an SDMQ9 score.
The SDM-Q9 is a 9-item patient reported measure of the amount of shared decision making that occurs in an interaction. Items are scored on a six-point Likert scale from 0 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree); items are summed up to a total raw score between 0-45. The score is then transformed to range from 0-100 where higher values indicate a better shared decision making process occurred.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
High Cholesterol Good Video First
n=95 Participants
Participants see videos of a conversation around taking medications (statins) for high cholesterol. Patients see good video first and poor video second.
Good high cholesterol video: The short video illustrated key components of a high quality shared decision making conversation between a doctor and patient actor around treatment of high cholesterol.
Poor high cholesterol video: The short video illustrated a typical conversation between a doctor and patient actor that did not cover key aspects of share decision making around treatment of high cholesterol.
|
Colorectal Cancer Good Video First
n=91 Participants
Participants see videos of a conversation around screening for colorectal cancer. Patients see good video first and poor video second.
Good colon cancer screening video: The short video illustrated key components of a high quality shared decision making conversation between a doctor and patient actor around screening for colorectal cancer.
Poor colon cancer screening video: The short video illustrated a typical conversation between a doctor and patient actor that did not cover key aspects of share decision making around screening for colorectal cancer.
|
High Cholesterol Poor Video First
n=99 Participants
Participants see videos of a conversation around taking medications (statins) for high cholesterol. Patients see poor video first and good video second.
Good high cholesterol video: The short video illustrated key components of a high quality shared decision making conversation between a doctor and patient actor around treatment of high cholesterol.
Poor high cholesterol video: The short video illustrated a typical conversation between a doctor and patient actor that did not cover key aspects of share decision making around treatment of high cholesterol.
|
Colorectal Cancer Poor Video First
n=103 Participants
Participants see videos of a conversation around screening for colorectal cancer. Patients see poor video first and good video second.
Good colon cancer screening video: The short video illustrated key components of a high quality shared decision making conversation between a doctor and patient actor around screening for colorectal cancer.
Poor colon cancer screening video: The short video illustrated a typical conversation between a doctor and patient actor that did not cover key aspects of share decision making around screening for colorectal cancer.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9)
Poor video score
|
70.72 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.72
|
49.69 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.06
|
65.13 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.48
|
55.73 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.85
|
|
Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9)
Good video score
|
82.11 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.42
|
80.31 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.33
|
80.89 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.47
|
84.96 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.22
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Immediately after viewing each video (typically within 15 minutes of watching the video)Population: Participants who answered the healthcare provider recommendation question. 388/388 provided sufficient information for this outcome.
Single item asking what the healthcare provider recommended the patient do in the video
Outcome measures
| Measure |
High Cholesterol Good Video First
n=95 Participants
Participants see videos of a conversation around taking medications (statins) for high cholesterol. Patients see good video first and poor video second.
Good high cholesterol video: The short video illustrated key components of a high quality shared decision making conversation between a doctor and patient actor around treatment of high cholesterol.
Poor high cholesterol video: The short video illustrated a typical conversation between a doctor and patient actor that did not cover key aspects of share decision making around treatment of high cholesterol.
|
Colorectal Cancer Good Video First
n=91 Participants
Participants see videos of a conversation around screening for colorectal cancer. Patients see good video first and poor video second.
Good colon cancer screening video: The short video illustrated key components of a high quality shared decision making conversation between a doctor and patient actor around screening for colorectal cancer.
Poor colon cancer screening video: The short video illustrated a typical conversation between a doctor and patient actor that did not cover key aspects of share decision making around screening for colorectal cancer.
|
High Cholesterol Poor Video First
n=99 Participants
Participants see videos of a conversation around taking medications (statins) for high cholesterol. Patients see poor video first and good video second.
Good high cholesterol video: The short video illustrated key components of a high quality shared decision making conversation between a doctor and patient actor around treatment of high cholesterol.
Poor high cholesterol video: The short video illustrated a typical conversation between a doctor and patient actor that did not cover key aspects of share decision making around treatment of high cholesterol.
|
Colorectal Cancer Poor Video First
n=103 Participants
Participants see videos of a conversation around screening for colorectal cancer. Patients see poor video first and good video second.
Good colon cancer screening video: The short video illustrated key components of a high quality shared decision making conversation between a doctor and patient actor around screening for colorectal cancer.
Poor colon cancer screening video: The short video illustrated a typical conversation between a doctor and patient actor that did not cover key aspects of share decision making around screening for colorectal cancer.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Healthcare Provider Treatment Recommendation
Poor Video responses · Take medicine
|
80 Participants
|
NA Participants
response option only administered to high cholesterol group
|
74 Participants
|
NA Participants
response option only administered to high cholesterol group
|
|
Healthcare Provider Treatment Recommendation
Poor Video responses · Have a colonoscopy
|
NA Participants
response option only administered to colorectal cancer screening group
|
60 Participants
|
NA Participants
response option only administered to colorectal cancer screening group
|
77 Participants
|
|
Healthcare Provider Treatment Recommendation
Poor Video responses · Do a stool-based test
|
NA Participants
response option only administered to colorectal cancer screening group
|
13 Participants
|
NA Participants
response option only administered to colorectal cancer screening group
|
6 Participants
|
|
Healthcare Provider Treatment Recommendation
Poor Video responses · Not take medicine/Not be screened
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Healthcare Provider Treatment Recommendation
Poor Video responses · Do something else
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Healthcare Provider Treatment Recommendation
Poor Video responses · Did not express an opinion
|
12 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
18 Participants
|
|
Healthcare Provider Treatment Recommendation
Good video responses · Take medicine
|
61 Participants
|
NA Participants
response option only administered to high cholesterol group
|
64 Participants
|
NA Participants
response option only administered to high cholesterol group
|
|
Healthcare Provider Treatment Recommendation
Good video responses · Have a colonoscopy
|
NA Participants
response option only administered to colorectal cancer screening group
|
22 Participants
|
NA Participants
response option only administered to colorectal cancer screening group
|
22 Participants
|
|
Healthcare Provider Treatment Recommendation
Good video responses · Do a stool-based test
|
NA Participants
response option only administered to colorectal cancer screening group
|
41 Participants
|
NA Participants
response option only administered to colorectal cancer screening group
|
57 Participants
|
|
Healthcare Provider Treatment Recommendation
Good video responses · Not take medicine/Not be screened
|
3 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Healthcare Provider Treatment Recommendation
Good video responses · Do something else
|
7 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Healthcare Provider Treatment Recommendation
Good video responses · Did not express an opinion
|
24 Participants
|
28 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Immediately after viewing each video (typically within 15 minutes of watching the video)Population: Participants who answered the patient treatment preference question. Only 385/388 provided sufficient information for this outcome.
Single item asking what the patient in the video wanted to do
Outcome measures
| Measure |
High Cholesterol Good Video First
n=95 Participants
Participants see videos of a conversation around taking medications (statins) for high cholesterol. Patients see good video first and poor video second.
Good high cholesterol video: The short video illustrated key components of a high quality shared decision making conversation between a doctor and patient actor around treatment of high cholesterol.
Poor high cholesterol video: The short video illustrated a typical conversation between a doctor and patient actor that did not cover key aspects of share decision making around treatment of high cholesterol.
|
Colorectal Cancer Good Video First
n=90 Participants
Participants see videos of a conversation around screening for colorectal cancer. Patients see good video first and poor video second.
Good colon cancer screening video: The short video illustrated key components of a high quality shared decision making conversation between a doctor and patient actor around screening for colorectal cancer.
Poor colon cancer screening video: The short video illustrated a typical conversation between a doctor and patient actor that did not cover key aspects of share decision making around screening for colorectal cancer.
|
High Cholesterol Poor Video First
n=99 Participants
Participants see videos of a conversation around taking medications (statins) for high cholesterol. Patients see poor video first and good video second.
Good high cholesterol video: The short video illustrated key components of a high quality shared decision making conversation between a doctor and patient actor around treatment of high cholesterol.
Poor high cholesterol video: The short video illustrated a typical conversation between a doctor and patient actor that did not cover key aspects of share decision making around treatment of high cholesterol.
|
Colorectal Cancer Poor Video First
n=101 Participants
Participants see videos of a conversation around screening for colorectal cancer. Patients see poor video first and good video second.
Good colon cancer screening video: The short video illustrated key components of a high quality shared decision making conversation between a doctor and patient actor around screening for colorectal cancer.
Poor colon cancer screening video: The short video illustrated a typical conversation between a doctor and patient actor that did not cover key aspects of share decision making around screening for colorectal cancer.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Patient Treatment Preference
Poor video scores · Take medicine
|
25 Participants
|
NA Participants
response option only administered to high cholesterol group
|
25 Participants
|
NA Participants
response option only administered to high cholesterol group
|
|
Patient Treatment Preference
Poor video scores · Have a colonoscopy
|
NA Participants
response option only administered to colorectal cancer screening group
|
15 Participants
|
NA Participants
response option only administered to colorectal cancer screening group
|
8 Participants
|
|
Patient Treatment Preference
Poor video scores · Do a stool-based test
|
NA Participants
response option only administered to colorectal cancer screening group
|
19 Participants
|
NA Participants
response option only administered to colorectal cancer screening group
|
20 Participants
|
|
Patient Treatment Preference
Poor video scores · Not take medicine/Not be screened
|
55 Participants
|
53 Participants
|
44 Participants
|
67 Participants
|
|
Patient Treatment Preference
Poor video scores · Do something else
|
15 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
30 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Patient Treatment Preference
Poor video scores · Missing
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Patient Treatment Preference
Good video scores · Take medicine
|
31 Participants
|
NA Participants
response option only administered to high cholesterol group
|
54 Participants
|
NA Participants
response option only administered to high cholesterol group
|
|
Patient Treatment Preference
Good video scores · Have a colonoscopy
|
NA Participants
response option only administered to colorectal cancer screening group
|
19 Participants
|
NA Participants
response option only administered to colorectal cancer screening group
|
8 Participants
|
|
Patient Treatment Preference
Good video scores · Do a stool-based test
|
NA Participants
response option only administered to colorectal cancer screening group
|
60 Participants
|
NA Participants
response option only administered to colorectal cancer screening group
|
87 Participants
|
|
Patient Treatment Preference
Good video scores · Not take medicine/Not be screened
|
45 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Patient Treatment Preference
Good video scores · Do something else
|
19 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
23 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Patient Treatment Preference
Good video scores · Missing
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Immediately after viewing each video (typically within 15 minutes of watching the video)Population: Participants who completed the adapted controlled preference question. 388/388 participants provided sufficient information for this outcome.
Single item asking the participant who made the ultimate decision in the video. The categorical response options are 1) the patient made the decision, 2)the provider made the decision, or 3) both patient and provider made the decision together.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
High Cholesterol Good Video First
n=95 Participants
Participants see videos of a conversation around taking medications (statins) for high cholesterol. Patients see good video first and poor video second.
Good high cholesterol video: The short video illustrated key components of a high quality shared decision making conversation between a doctor and patient actor around treatment of high cholesterol.
Poor high cholesterol video: The short video illustrated a typical conversation between a doctor and patient actor that did not cover key aspects of share decision making around treatment of high cholesterol.
|
Colorectal Cancer Good Video First
n=91 Participants
Participants see videos of a conversation around screening for colorectal cancer. Patients see good video first and poor video second.
Good colon cancer screening video: The short video illustrated key components of a high quality shared decision making conversation between a doctor and patient actor around screening for colorectal cancer.
Poor colon cancer screening video: The short video illustrated a typical conversation between a doctor and patient actor that did not cover key aspects of share decision making around screening for colorectal cancer.
|
High Cholesterol Poor Video First
n=99 Participants
Participants see videos of a conversation around taking medications (statins) for high cholesterol. Patients see poor video first and good video second.
Good high cholesterol video: The short video illustrated key components of a high quality shared decision making conversation between a doctor and patient actor around treatment of high cholesterol.
Poor high cholesterol video: The short video illustrated a typical conversation between a doctor and patient actor that did not cover key aspects of share decision making around treatment of high cholesterol.
|
Colorectal Cancer Poor Video First
n=103 Participants
Participants see videos of a conversation around screening for colorectal cancer. Patients see poor video first and good video second.
Good colon cancer screening video: The short video illustrated key components of a high quality shared decision making conversation between a doctor and patient actor around screening for colorectal cancer.
Poor colon cancer screening video: The short video illustrated a typical conversation between a doctor and patient actor that did not cover key aspects of share decision making around screening for colorectal cancer.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adapted Controlled Preference Item
Poor video responses · The doctor and the patient made the decision together
|
34 Participants
|
24 Participants
|
31 Participants
|
33 Participants
|
|
Adapted Controlled Preference Item
Poor video responses · Mainly the doctor
|
50 Participants
|
49 Participants
|
51 Participants
|
59 Participants
|
|
Adapted Controlled Preference Item
Poor video responses · Mainly the patient
|
11 Participants
|
18 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
|
Adapted Controlled Preference Item
Poor video responses · Missing
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Adapted Controlled Preference Item
Good video responses · Mainly the doctor
|
16 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
|
Adapted Controlled Preference Item
Good video responses · Mainly the patient
|
24 Participants
|
35 Participants
|
28 Participants
|
37 Participants
|
|
Adapted Controlled Preference Item
Good video responses · The doctor and the patient made the decision together
|
54 Participants
|
40 Participants
|
55 Participants
|
55 Participants
|
|
Adapted Controlled Preference Item
Good video responses · Missing
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
Adverse Events
High Cholesterol Good Video First
Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths
Colorectal Cancer Good Video First
Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths
High Cholesterol Poor Video First
Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths
Colorectal Cancer Poor Video First
Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place