Ultrasonography Versus Capnography in Detecting Endotracheal Tube Placement During Intubation in a Tertiary Hospital.

NCT ID: NCT04316988

Last Updated: 2020-03-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

95 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-01-17

Study Completion Date

2017-08-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

After endotracheal intubation verifying the location of endotracheal tube is of utmost importance. Many methods have been applied but none is perfect. The standard practice in the investigator's center has been to use auscultation of chest with capnography.

Ultrasound machines are now gaining popularity and their access extends from operation theatres, emergency rooms and even many primary health centres. Both capnography and ultrasonography are safe.

This study found out that Ultrasonography and waveform capnography are both reliable methods of confirming endotracheal tube position. The use of ultrasound could help reduce time and increase precision of confirming endotracheal tube position. Ultrasound can confirm endotracheal tube position before manual bag ventilations, and thus may prevent aspiration of gastric contents into patient's lungs.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This was a prospective, observational study conducted at the Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital (TUTH) and Manmohan Cardiothoracic Vascular and Transplant Center (MCVTC) operating rooms from January 2017 to July 2017. Ethical approval from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Institute of Medicine (IOM) and the Department of Anaesthesiology, Maharajgunj Medical College (MMC) was taken. Written informed consent was taken.

ASA I and II patients over 16 years of age were included in this study. Patients with difficult airway and anticipated difficult intubation, respiratory diseases, poor functional status, emergency case, and patients at risk of aspiration were excluded.

The diagnostic characteristics of real-time, suprasternal, transtracheal ultrasonography and capnography were tested by calculating their respective sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values (PPV), negative predictive values (NPV), accuracies and likelihood ratios. Comparison of time taken for confirmation of endotracheal tube position from the beginning of laryngoscopy, by ultrasonography versus capnography was done using t-statistics.

The degree of agreement of result between ultrasonography and capnography was tested with kappa statistics.

Out of the 95 patients studied, 11 had oesophageal intubation (Incidence of 11.57%). The overall accuracy of both ultrasonography and capnography was 96.84%. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) for ultrasonography were 97.62% (91.66% - 99.71%), 90.91% (58.72% - 99.77%), 98.80% (92.67% - 99.81%), 83.33% (55.66% - 95.22%) respectively; and that for capnography were 96.43% (89.92% - 99.26%), 100% (71.51% - 100%), 100% (100% - 100%) and 78.57% (54.69% - 91.76%) respectively.

The likelihood ratio of a positive and a negative result for ultrasonography were 10.74 and 0.03 respectively, and that for capnography were infinity and 0.04 respectively.

The kappa value was 0.749 (95% CI: 0.567 - 0.931) which meant a good degree of agreement of result between these two methods.

The average time taken for confirmation of endotracheal tube by ultrasonography and capnography were 26.79 ± 7.64 seconds and 43.03 ± 8.71 seconds (mean ± standard deviation) respectively. The median time for confirmation was 26 seconds with interquartile range \[15 - 37\] seconds for ultrasonography and 42 seconds with interquartile range \[29 - 55\] seconds for capnography. Ultrasonography was found to be faster than capnography by 16.36 ± 3.23 seconds (mean ± standard deviation) and the difference in time was significant (p = 0.011).

During the study, one patient had unanticipated difficult intubation, and four had hypotension after induction of anaesthesia. These patients were excluded from the study and no sequalae of hypotension was seen in the patients, or no hypoxemia occured in the patient with unanticipated difficult intubation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intubation Ultrasound Imaging Capnography

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Ultrasonography

Ultrasonography group in whom after endotracheal intubation, the endotracheal tube position was confirmed by ultrasound machine over the trachea.

Ultrasonography

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

A real time 2D ultrasound evaluation was done over the trachea of the patient.

Capnography

Capnography group in whom after endotracheal intubation, the endotracheal tube position was confirmed by capnograph, evaluationg the graph character and end tidal CO2 value.

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ultrasonography

A real time 2D ultrasound evaluation was done over the trachea of the patient.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ASA I and II patients of both sexes above 16 years of age undergoing general anaesthesia with endotracheal tube placement.

Exclusion Criteria

* \- Patient refusal
* ASA physical status III and above
* History of prior difficult bag and mask ventilation or difficult intubation
* History of prior oro-nasal or neck injuries, burns or scars
* Active oral, pharyngeal or tracheal infection or inflammatory changes
* Anticipated difficult airway or difficult intubation during preanaesthetic examination, with Mallampati grades II and above
* Lung parenchymal and pleural diseases. Examples: asthma, COPD, bronchiectasis, reactive lung diseases, pneumonia, tuberculosis, pleural effusion, pneumothorax, lung or pleural malignancy etc.
* Emergency surgery
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Tribhuvan University, Nepal

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Shirish Shakti Maskay

Dr

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

BISHWAS PRADHAN, MD, FCTA

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Manmohan Cardiothoracic Vascular and Transplant Center, IOM

NINADINI SHRESTHA, MD, FIPM

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

TU Teaching Hospital, IOM

PRISKA BASTOLA, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Manmohan Cardiothoracic Vascular and Transplant Center, IOM

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Rudraraju P, Eisen LA. Confirmation of endotracheal tube position: a narrative review. J Intensive Care Med. 2009 Sep-Oct;24(5):283-92. doi: 10.1177/0885066609340501. Epub 2009 Aug 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19654121 (View on PubMed)

Wojtczak JA, Cattano D. Laryngo-tracheal ultrasonography to confirm correct endotracheal tube and laryngeal mask airway placement. J Ultrason. 2014 Dec;14(59):362-6. doi: 10.15557/JoU.2014.0037. Epub 2014 Dec 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26672974 (View on PubMed)

Kundra P, Mishra SK, Ramesh A. Ultrasound of the airway. Indian J Anaesth. 2011 Sep;55(5):456-62. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.89868.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22174461 (View on PubMed)

Hajian-Tilaki K. Sample size estimation in diagnostic test studies of biomedical informatics. J Biomed Inform. 2014 Apr;48:193-204. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.02.013. Epub 2014 Feb 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24582925 (View on PubMed)

Hagberg CA, Artime CA. Airway Management in the Adult. In: Miller RD, Cohen NH, Eriksson LI, Fleisher LA, Wiener-Kronish JP, Young WL, editors. Miller's Anesthesia. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2015. p. 1665-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Dorsch JA, Dorsch SE. Airway Equipment. In: Dorsch JA, Dorsch SE, editors. Understanding Anesthesia Equipment. 5th ed: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2012. p. 593-8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Rosenbalt WH, Sukhupragarn W. Airway Management. In: Barash PG, Cullen BF, Stoeltin RK, Cahalan MK, Stock MC, Ortega R, editors. Clinical Anesthesia. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Lipincott Williams and Wilkins; 2013. p. 774-8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Connor CW. Commonly Used Monitoring Techniques. In: Barash PG, Cullen BF, Stoeltin RK, Cahalan MK, Stock MC, Ortega R, editors. Clinical Anesthesia. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2013. p. 704-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Chitilian HV, Kaczka DW, Melo MFV. Respiratory Monitoring. In: Miller RD, Cohen NH, Eriksson LI, Fleisher LA, Wiener-Kronish JP, Young WL, editors. Miller's Anesthesia. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2015. p. 1551-5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Chou HC, Tseng WP, Wang CH, Ma MH, Wang HP, Huang PC, Sim SS, Liao YC, Chen SY, Hsu CY, Yen ZS, Chang WT, Huang CH, Lien WC, Chen SC. Tracheal rapid ultrasound exam (T.R.U.E.) for confirming endotracheal tube placement during emergency intubation. Resuscitation. 2011 Oct;82(10):1279-84. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.05.016. Epub 2011 Jun 1.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21684668 (View on PubMed)

Karacabey S, Sanri E, Gencer EG, Guneysel O. Tracheal ultrasonography and ultrasonographic lung sliding for confirming endotracheal tube placement: Speed and Reliability. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Jun;34(6):953-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.01.027. Epub 2016 Jan 26.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26994679 (View on PubMed)

Pfeiffer P, Rudolph SS, Borglum J, Isbye DL. Temporal comparison of ultrasound vs. auscultation and capnography in verification of endotracheal tube placement. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2011 Nov;55(10):1190-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02501.x. Epub 2011 Sep 8.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22092123 (View on PubMed)

Das SK, Choupoo NS, Haldar R, Lahkar A. Transtracheal ultrasound for verification of endotracheal tube placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth. 2015 Apr;62(4):413-23. doi: 10.1007/s12630-014-0301-z. Epub 2014 Dec 24.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25537734 (View on PubMed)

Chou EH, Dickman E, Tsou PY, Tessaro M, Tsai YM, Ma MH, Lee CC, Marshall J. Ultrasonography for confirmation of endotracheal tube placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation. 2015 May;90:97-103. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.02.013. Epub 2015 Feb 21.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25711517 (View on PubMed)

Milling TJ, Jones M, Khan T, Tad-y D, Melniker LA, Bove J, Yarmush J, SchianodiCola J. Transtracheal 2-d ultrasound for identification of esophageal intubation. J Emerg Med. 2007 May;32(4):409-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2006.08.022. Epub 2007 Apr 16.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 17499696 (View on PubMed)

Brun PM, Bessereau J, Cazes N, Querellou E, Chenaitia H. Lung ultrasound associated to capnography to verify correct endotracheal tube positioning in prehospital. Am J Emerg Med. 2012 Nov;30(9):2080.e5-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2011.10.023. Epub 2011 Dec 26.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22205008 (View on PubMed)

Adi O, Chuan TW, Rishya M. A feasibility study on bedside upper airway ultrasonography compared to waveform capnography for verifying endotracheal tube location after intubation. Crit Ultrasound J. 2013 Jul 4;5(1):7. doi: 10.1186/2036-7902-5-7.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23826756 (View on PubMed)

Li J. Capnography alone is imperfect for endotracheal tube placement confirmation during emergency intubation. J Emerg Med. 2001 Apr;20(3):223-9. doi: 10.1016/s0736-4679(00)00318-8.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 11267809 (View on PubMed)

Knapp S, Kofler J, Stoiser B, Thalhammer F, Burgmann H, Posch M, Hofbauer R, Stanzel M, Frass M. The assessment of four different methods to verify tracheal tube placement in the critical care setting. Anesth Analg. 1999 Apr;88(4):766-70. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199904000-00016.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 10195521 (View on PubMed)

Grmec S. Comparison of three different methods to confirm tracheal tube placement in emergency intubation. Intensive Care Med. 2002 Jun;28(6):701-4. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1290-x. Epub 2002 Apr 30.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 12107674 (View on PubMed)

Gottlieb M, Bailitz JM, Christian E, Russell FM, Ehrman RR, Khishfe B, Kogan A, Ross C. Accuracy of a novel ultrasound technique for confirmation of endotracheal intubation by expert and novice emergency physicians. West J Emerg Med. 2014 Nov;15(7):834-9. doi: 10.5811/westjem.22550.9.22550. Epub 2014 Nov 24.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25493129 (View on PubMed)

Chou HC, Chong KM, Sim SS, Ma MH, Liu SH, Chen NC, Wu MC, Fu CM, Wang CH, Lee CC, Lien WC, Chen SC. Real-time tracheal ultrasonography for confirmation of endotracheal tube placement during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2013 Dec;84(12):1708-12. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.06.018. Epub 2013 Jul 9.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23851048 (View on PubMed)

Abhishek C, Munta K, Rao SM, Chandrasekhar CN. End-tidal capnography and upper airway ultrasonography in the rapid confirmation of endotracheal tube placement in patients requiring intubation for general anaesthesia. Indian J Anaesth. 2017 Jun;61(6):486-489. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_544_16.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28655954 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, and Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IOM

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.