Early Glycaemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes Patients After Bariatric Surgery; ECODABS

NCT ID: NCT04314427

Last Updated: 2020-03-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

33 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-09-30

Study Completion Date

2018-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Describe and characterize the time-course for improvement in glucose control after bariatric surgery in obese patients with type 2 diabetes

Compare these changes in glycemic control after different techniques for bariatric surgery

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Obesity and its ensuing metabolic complications such as type 2 diabetes mellitus, are exponentially increasing worldwide. \* \* The most effective treatment for obesity is bariatric surgery. \* Different bariatric procedures are available. In the 1960's, the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) was developed, in which the stomach is divided with staplers to create a small gastric pouch, while the jejunum is divided 30 to 50 cm distal to the ligament of Treitz. The distal limb is then anastomosed to the small gastric pouch and a jejunojejunostomy is performed 50 to 150 cm distal from the gastrojejunostomy. Sleeve gastrectomy on the other hand, reduces the stomach size by vertical stapling. In the 1990's, gastric banding was developed, reducing the volume of the stomach by annular banding. The amount of excess body weight reduction varies among the different techniques, with 60% to 70% reported for RYGB\*, 55% for sleeve gastrectomy\* and up to 65% for gastric banding\*. Worldwide, it is estimated that a total of 344000 procedures were performed in 2008. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass was the most common (47%) followed by gastric banding (42%) and sleeve gastrectomy (5%).\*

In 1987, Pories et al. published data on the stunning observation that 99% of obese patients with type 2 diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance that had undergone Roux-en-Y gastric bypass became and remained euglycemic after surgery.\* Since then, all commonly used bariatric procedures have been shown to restore a normal glucose profile in many diabetes patients. Current data suggest that the bypass procedures are more effective in doing so, with success rates up to 80%,\* than the purely restrictive procedures such as sleeve gastrectomy and gastric banding, with success rates varying between 30% and 70%.\* The improvement in glycaemic control is already seen a few days after surgery, long before any substantial weight loss occurs.

Although different reasons for the rapid amelioration in glycaemic control are discussed in literature, the exact underlying mechanisms are still not understood. In the restrictive procedures, the effect is thought to be mainly mediated by caloric restriction and the ensuing reduction in body weight and improvement in insulin resistance.\* The malabsorptive procedures, such as RYGB, offer different explanatory possibilities. In the so-called 'fore-gut hypothesis', it is suggested that the exclusion of the duodenum and proximal jejunum may reduce insulin resistance. \* The 'hind-gut hypothesis' on the other hand, suggests that it is the altered delivery of nutrients to the distal small bowel that causes exaggerated responses of the gut hormones. These gut hormones act as anorectic agents and as incretins that stimulate the beta cells in the pancreas to restore normal first phase insulin response. \*

Most studies to investigate the alterations in glucose metabolism are performed weeks to months after surgery. There are limited data on the evolution of blood glucose in the first days and weeks after RYGB.\* However, to our knowledge, no such data exist on the glycaemic control immediately after sleeve gastrectomy and gastric banding. With the present study we document the evolution in glycaemic control immediately after RYGB, sleeve gastrectomy and gastric banding in type 2 diabetic subjects.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 in Obese

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Gastric by-pass

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB); the stomach is divided with staplers to create a small gastric pouch, while the jejunum is divided 30 to 50 cm distal to the ligament of Treitz. The distal limb is then anastomosed to the small gastric pouch and a jejunojejunostomy is performed 50 to 150 cm distal from the gastrojejunostomy.

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Sleeve gastrectomy

Sleeve gastrectomy reduces the stomach size by vertical stapling

Sleeve gastrectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Sleeve gastrectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male and female type 2 diabetic patients
* Patients aged 18-65 years
* Diabetes treatment consisting of dietary measures or any of the following:
* Metformin
* Sulfonylurea
* Glinides
* Glitazones
* Acarbose
* Any type of insulin
* BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2

Exclusion Criteria

* Active alcohol abuse
* Active psychiatric illness
* MODY (maturity onset diabetes of the young)
* Type 1 diabetes
* Diabetes treatment consisting of DPP IV-inhibitors or incretin mimetics
* Pregnancy and gestational diabetes
* Prior bariatric surgery
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Antwerp

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Karolinska Institutet

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hospital San Carlos, Madrid

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital, Ghent

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Imperial College London

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Sahlgrenska University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ville Wallenius

Ass.Prof.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ville Wallenius, Ass. Prof.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Sahlgrenska University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Antwerp University Hospital

Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium

Site Status

Universitair Ziekenhuis

Brussels, Jette, Belgium

Site Status

Gent University Hospital

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Hospital Clinico San Carlos

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Sahlgrenska University Hospital

Gothenburg, , Sweden

Site Status

Sahlgrenska University Hospital

Gothenburg, , Sweden

Site Status

Karolinska Institutet

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

South kensington campus

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium Spain Sweden United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

016/12

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.