Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-11-05
2020-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
ERAS Protocols in Breast Conserving Surgery
NCT06938581
Individualized Prehabilitation for Enhancing Recovery and Surgical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy and Surgery for Soft Tissue Sarcoma
NCT05526417
Efficacy of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pathway for Total Mastectomy
NCT03181139
A Pilot Tele-rehabilitation Trial for Breast Cancer Survivors
NCT04269967
RCT Implant Based Breast Reconstruction
NCT04558138
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1.2 Background and rationale Over 26,000 Canadian women are diagnosed with breast cancer every year. While the 5-year survival of breast cancer has improved to 87% in Canada, 1 in 3 breast cancer patients that receive mastectomy experience a negative impact in quality of life. Breast reconstruction can improve the physical, psychosocial and sexual well-being of patients after mastectomy. With an upward of 40% of breast cancer patients who undergo post-mastectomy breast reconstruction, there is a significant opportunity to improve the quality of surgical care for breast reconstruction patients.
Breast reconstruction can be classified into alloplastic (implant-based) and autologous (tissue-based) reconstruction. While alloplastic reconstruction is the most common form of breast reconstruction in North America, autologous reconstruction using the patient's own tissue confers superior long-term satisfaction and quality of life. The gold standard of autologous reconstruction is the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap which uses the patients' abdominal tissue to reconstruct the breast using microvascular techniques, while preserving the abdominal musculature. The DIEP reconstruction is surgically more complex than the alloplastic approach, involving surgery at the breasts, abdominal donor site, and reattachment of the abdominal tissue to blood vessels in the chest using microsurgery. Consequently, patients undergoing DIEP reconstruction have an increased length of hospital stay and increased use of opioid analgesics. According to the Canadian Institute for Health Information, the average hospital cost for a patient undergoing breast reconstruction is $3,715 per day. Reducing postsurgical opioid use and containing healthcare costs is important to the Canadian public and resource-constrained healthcare system.
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a multidisciplinary, multimodal, and evidence-based approach to perioperative care that safely reduces hospital length of stay and opioid use following some surgical procedures.16-18 ERAS is the standard of care in colorectal surgery and its advantages are supported by a meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials (RCT). Although ERAS guidelines have been developed for other surgical procedures, the evidence supporting the efficacy of ERAS for non-colorectal surgery is limited. An ERAS guideline for perioperative care of alloplastic and autologous breast reconstruction patients has been established. Main recommendations include minimizing preoperative fasting, postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis, multimodal opioid-sparing analgesia, early feeding and early mobilization. Despite this, the evidence that these recommendations improve care in breast reconstruction is limited. A recent meta-analysis of ERAS in breast reconstruction found that ERAS reduces hospital length of stay by a mean 1.58 days and opioid consumption by 248mg of oral morphine equivalent without an increase in complications. However and to emphasize, none of these studies were RCTs and thus all were subject to the numerous biases associated with observational studies. Currently there is no level-1 evidence to support ERAS in autologous breast reconstruction despite the previously mentioned consensus guideline. A properly designed and executed RCT of ERAS in breast reconstruction would contribute evidence on ERAS in the perioperative care of breast reconstruction patients.
1.3 Objective of the study To conduct a pilot RCT comparing ERAS to conventional perioperative care for patients undergoing autologous DIEP breast reconstruction. As a pilot trial, the primary objective of the study is to assess feasibility outcomes: 1) patient eligibility, 2) recruitment, 3) retention and 4) adherence to the ERAS protocol. The design and conduct of the proposed pilot study will mirror the methodology of the definitive trial including randomization, interventions, and clinical outcomes.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathway
Preop
1. Diet: Solids until midnight before surgery with a carbohydrate rich drink before midnight and 3-hours prior to surgery.
2. Analgesia: Acetaminophen 975mg \& Celecoxib 400mg administered PO 1-hour before surgery.
Intraop
1. Hypothermia prevention: Forced-air warming units and core temperature monitoring.
2. Fluid management: Euvolemic fluid management with balanced crystalloid solution.
3. Analgesia: 0.25% bupivacaine block of intercostal nerves and rectus sheath by the surgical team. Additional IV analgesia by anesthesiologist with the goal to minimize opioids.
4. PONV prophylaxis: Ondansetron 4-8mg IV during emergence.
Postop
1. Diet: Clear fluids immediately post-op. Saline lock and advance to DAT on POD#1.
2. Analgesia: Routine administration of Acetaminophen 975mg PO q6h \& Celecoxib 200mg PO q12h. Opioids used as breakthrough analgesia only. No PCA.
3. Early mobilization: Mobilization within the first 24 hours after surgery with assistance.
ERAS pathway
See ERAS pathway arm description.
Standard Perioperative Care
Patients in the control arm received routine perioperative care as determined by respective surgeons participating in the study.
Standard Perioperative Care
See control arm description.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ERAS pathway
See ERAS pathway arm description.
Standard Perioperative Care
See control arm description.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Able to understand and communicate in English
3. Diagnosis of breast cancer or BRCA gene
4. Undergoing (or previously had) unilateral or bilateral mastectomy
5. Undergoing immediate or delayed DIEP breast reconstruction (unilateral or bilateral).
Patients undergoing repeat breast reconstruction (secondary reconstruction) after a previously failed alloplastic or autologous reconstruction will be eligible to participate.
Patients undergoing both DIEP and alloplastic reconstruction (e.g. DIEP reconstruction for one breast, alloplastic reconstruction for the other breast) will also be eligible to participate.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Pregnant
3. Unable to provide informed consent or unable to complete quality of life questionnaires due to mental capacity, cognitive impairment, or language barrier.
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton
OTHER
Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Brian Hyosuk Chin
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Hyosuk Chin, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
McMaster University
Marko Simunovic, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Juravinski Hospital
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
St. Joseph's Healthcare
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ERAS-ABR
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.