Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair as Bridge Therapy to Heart Transplantation
NCT ID: NCT04293575
Last Updated: 2020-03-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
150 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-06-01
2021-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
MitraClip in Patients With Heart Failure
NCT06633159
Multicentre Study of MITRACLIP® Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair in Patients With Severe Primary Mitral Regurgitation Eligible for High-risk Surgery
NCT03271762
High and Intermediate Risk Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation Treatment: A Trial Comparing MitraClip® to Surgical Therapy
NCT02534155
Observational Study of the Heart Repair Technologies Mitral Bridge in Treating Mitral Valve Regurgitation
NCT03511716
Evaluation of Outcomes of CRT and MitraClip for Treatment of Low Ejection Fraction and Functional Mitral Regurgitation in HF
NCT02985268
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Methods: The MitraBridge registry is an observational, multicenter, international registry including all consecutive patients with chronic end-stage HF \[New York Heart Association (NYHA) III or IV and/or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%\] and concomitant moderate-severe or severe MR who were potential candidates for HTx, that were treated with MitraClip in the contest of a pre-specified bridge strategy.
According to the clinical conditions present at the time of the MitraClip procedure, patients are classified in:
1. patients on active HTx list (In list group, "pure bridge") with a rapidly progressive disease and a low likelihood to receive a donation shortly;
2. patients waiting for clinical decision (Bridge to decision "BTD" group), also including unstable patients during the screening for HTx;
3. patients who could not be listed for HTx (Not in list group, MitraClip as "bridge to candidacy") because of concomitant, potentially reversible, contraindications (e.g. severe pulmonary hypertension, elevated pulmonary-vascular-resistance).
The registry was initiated in June 2018 without the support of any external funding and was designed to involve centers across the world that have experience with transcatheter MitraClip device (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California).
Study endpoints. The primary endpoint: 1-year composite adverse events rate of all-cause of death, urgent/unplanned HTx or LVAD implantation and first re-hospitalization for HF.
As exploratory outcomes: individual components of the primary endpoint.
Moreover, the investigators described the clinical status of patients at the time of last available follow-up, in order to report the rates of patients going for elective HTx, entering (or remaining) in the waiting list and having no more indication to HTx (delisting) because of significant echocardiographic and/or clinical improvements during the entire observational period.
Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium (MVARC) criteria are used to define procedural success and composite events 12.
Follow-up data will be collected for patients at 1 month and 1-year and then according to the time frame elapsed from the index procedure to data lock for present analysis.
Patients that did not implant any clip during the index procedure were not included in the follow-up. For patients who underwent HTx or LVAD implantation, the follow-up time was stopped at the date of transplant or mechanical device placement.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
In list group
patients on active heart transplantation (HTx) list with a low likelihood to receive a donation shortly (e.g. for body weight or blood group)
MitraClip
transcatheter MitraClip device (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California)
Bridge to decision "BTD" group
patients suitable for HTx, but that were still waiting for clinical decision
MitraClip
transcatheter MitraClip device (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California)
(Bridge to candidacy "BTC" group)
patients who could not be yet in list for HTx because of concomitant, potentially reversible, contraindications such as severe pulmonary hypertension, elevated pulmonary-vascular-resistance, unsatisfactory response to vasodilator challenge or other causes resulting in a prohibitive peri-procedural risk (as pre-transplant body mass index \[BMI\] \>35 kg/m2, severe renal dysfunction with creatinine clearance \<30 mL/min) and other reasons (current alcohol, tobacco or drug abuse, poor social support, non-residents)
MitraClip
transcatheter MitraClip device (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
MitraClip
transcatheter MitraClip device (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* patients on active HTx list (In list group, "pure bridge") with a low likelihood to receive a donation shortly (e.g. for body weight or blood group);
* patients suitable for HTx, but that were still waiting for clinical decision (Bridge to decision, "BTD" group);
* patients who could not be yet in list for HTx (Bridge to candidacy, "BTC" group) because of concomitant, potentially reversible, contraindications such as severe pulmonary hypertension, elevated pulmonary-vascular-resistance, unsatisfactory response to vasodilator challenge or other causes resulting in a prohibitive peri-procedural risk (as pre-transplant body mass index \[BMI\] \>35 kg/m2, severe renal dysfunction with creatinine clearance \<30 mL/min) and other reasons (current alcohol, tobacco or drug abuse, poor social support, non-residents)
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Scientific Institute San Raffaele
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Cosmo Godino
Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cosmo Godino
Milan, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MITRABRIDGE280220
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.