Trial Outcomes & Findings for Safety and Efficacy Study of VIS649 for IgA Nephropathy (NCT NCT04287985)
NCT ID: NCT04287985
Last Updated: 2024-11-21
Results Overview
The number of participants who experienced adverse events, graded by maximum severity, are presented.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
155 participants
Baseline to End of Study (16 months)
2024-11-21
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
VIS649 2 mg/kg
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 4 mg/kg
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 8 mg/kg
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
Placebo
Placebo administered intravenously
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
38
|
41
|
38
|
38
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
35
|
39
|
37
|
35
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
VIS649 2 mg/kg
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 4 mg/kg
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 8 mg/kg
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
Placebo
Placebo administered intravenously
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
Safety and Efficacy Study of VIS649 for IgA Nephropathy
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
VIS649 2 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 4 mg/kg
n=41 Participants
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 8 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
Placebo
n=38 Participants
Placebo administered intravenously
|
Total
n=155 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
41.0 Years
n=5 Participants
|
39.0 Years
n=7 Participants
|
41.5 Years
n=5 Participants
|
36.5 Years
n=4 Participants
|
39.0 Years
n=21 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
24 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
67 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
22 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
88 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
36 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
38 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
35 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
35 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
144 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
115 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
36 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Japan
|
5 participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 participants
n=4 Participants
|
19 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Australia
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 participants
n=4 Participants
|
6 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Canada
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=4 Participants
|
2 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Hong Kong
|
3 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=4 Participants
|
5 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
India
|
5 participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 participants
n=7 Participants
|
10 participants
n=5 Participants
|
14 participants
n=4 Participants
|
39 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
South Korea
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 participants
n=4 Participants
|
15 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Malaysia
|
3 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=4 Participants
|
8 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Philippines
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=4 Participants
|
4 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Singapore
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=4 Participants
|
6 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Spain
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 participants
n=4 Participants
|
9 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Sri Lanka
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 participants
n=4 Participants
|
5 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Taiwan
|
0 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Thailand
|
4 participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=4 Participants
|
10 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=4 Participants
|
5 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
8 participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=4 Participants
|
21 participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Height
|
165.87 Centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.919 • n=5 Participants
|
167.50 Centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.933 • n=7 Participants
|
165.48 Centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.277 • n=5 Participants
|
161.84 Centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.794 • n=4 Participants
|
165.22 Centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.120 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Weight
|
74.97 Kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.031 • n=5 Participants
|
79.18 Kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.216 • n=7 Participants
|
75.54 Kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.237 • n=5 Participants
|
72.40 Kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.124 • n=4 Participants
|
75.59 Kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.323 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI)
|
27.15 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.529 • n=5 Participants
|
28.10 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.424 • n=7 Participants
|
27.57 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.778 • n=5 Participants
|
27.35 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.749 • n=4 Participants
|
27.56 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.894 • n=21 Participants
|
|
History of Hypertension
|
29 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
24 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
112 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Time since biopsy
|
781.0 Days
n=5 Participants
|
288.0 Days
n=7 Participants
|
364.0 Days
n=5 Participants
|
933.0 Days
n=4 Participants
|
565.0 Days
n=21 Participants
|
|
ACEI or ARB Therapy
|
37 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
40 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
37 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
38 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
152 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
SGLT2i use at baseline
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Previous use of systemic immunosuppressive therapy
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
36 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Baseline urinary protein excretion (mg/day)
|
1470.50 mg per day
n=5 Participants
|
1927.00 mg per day
n=7 Participants
|
1900.00 mg per day
n=5 Participants
|
2133.50 mg per day
n=4 Participants
|
1900 mg per day
n=21 Participants
|
|
Baseline 24-hour uPCR
|
1.46 urinary protein/creatinine ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.123 • n=5 Participants
|
1.53 urinary protein/creatinine ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.123 • n=7 Participants
|
1.44 urinary protein/creatinine ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.137 • n=5 Participants
|
1.68 urinary protein/creatinine ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.175 • n=4 Participants
|
1.52 urinary protein/creatinine ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.069 • n=21 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to End of Study (16 months)Population: Safety Population
The number of participants who experienced adverse events, graded by maximum severity, are presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
VIS649 2 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 4 mg/kg
n=41 Participants
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 8 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
Placebo
n=38 Participants
Placebo administered intravenously
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Graded by Severity
TEAE with a maximum severity of mild
|
19 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
23 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Graded by Severity
TEAE with a maximum severity of moderate
|
7 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Graded by Severity
TEAE with a maximum severity of severe
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Graded by Severity
TEAE related to trial drug
|
7 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Graded by Severity
TEAE related to trial drug with a maximum severity of Mild
|
7 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Graded by Severity
TEAE related to trial drug with a maximum severity of Moderate
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Graded by Severity
TEAE related to trial drug with a maximum severity of Severe
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Graded by Severity
Serious TEAE
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Graded by Severity
Serious TEAE related to trial drug
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Graded by Severity
TEAE leading to trial drug interrupted
|
5 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Graded by Severity
TEAE leading discontinuation of trial drug
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Graded by Severity
TEAE leading to death
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to End of Study (16 months)Population: Safety population
The number of participants who experience a shift from normal at baseline to Grade 3/4 (moderate/sever) at a postbaseline time point are presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
VIS649 2 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 4 mg/kg
n=41 Participants
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 8 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
Placebo
n=38 Participants
Placebo administered intravenously
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Changes From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Tests
Calcium
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Changes From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Tests
Potassium
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Changes From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Tests
Phosphate
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Changes From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Tests
Sodium
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Changes From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Tests
Triglycerides
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Changes From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Tests
Hemoglobin
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to End of Study (16 months)Population: Safety population
The number of participants who experienced clinically meaningful changes from baseline in vital signs (body mass index, diastolic blood pressure, height, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, respiratory rate, systolic blood pressure, temperature, and weight) are presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
VIS649 2 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 4 mg/kg
n=41 Participants
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 8 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
Placebo
n=48 Participants
Placebo administered intravenously
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to End of Study (16 months)Population: Safety population
Clinically significant physical examination findings are presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
VIS649 2 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 4 mg/kg
n=41 Participants
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 8 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
Placebo
n=38 Participants
Placebo administered intravenously
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Clinically Significant Physical Examinations
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsPopulation: modified intent-to-treat (mITT) Population
Natural Log 24-Hour uPCR (Schedule A Urine Collection) Change from Baseline at Month 12: mixed model with repeated measurements
Outcome measures
| Measure |
VIS649 2 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 4 mg/kg
n=41 Participants
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 8 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
Placebo
n=38 Participants
Placebo administered intravenously
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in uPCR: Month 12
|
-0.64 g/g
Standard Error 0.2
|
-0.89 g/g
Standard Error 0.1
|
-0.97 g/g
Standard Error 0.2
|
-0.22 g/g
Standard Error 0.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 9 months and 16 months (16 months total)Population: modified intent-to-treat (mITT) Population
Change from baseline in uPCR (Urine protein/creatinine ratio)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
VIS649 2 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 4 mg/kg
n=41 Participants
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 8 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
Placebo
n=38 Participants
Placebo administered intravenously
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in uPCR: Months 9 and 16
Month 9
|
-0.70 g/g
Standard Error 0.2
|
-0.85 g/g
Standard Error 0.1
|
-0.99 g/g
Standard Error 0.1
|
-0.17 g/g
Standard Error 0.2
|
|
Change From Baseline in uPCR: Months 9 and 16
Month 16
|
-0.45 g/g
Standard Error 0.2
|
-0.87 g/g
Standard Error 0.2
|
-1.04 g/g
Standard Error 0.2
|
-0.11 g/g
Standard Error 0.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 16 monthsPopulation: modified intent-to-treat (mITT) Population
Change in 24-hour urine protein excretion from baseline to Months 12 and 16
Outcome measures
| Measure |
VIS649 2 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 4 mg/kg
n=41 Participants
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 8 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
Placebo
n=38 Participants
Placebo administered intravenously
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in 24-hour Urine Protein Excretion: Months 12 and 16
Month 12
|
49.47 mg/day
Interval 30.6 to 63.2
|
57.80 mg/day
Interval 43.0 to 68.8
|
65.49 mg/day
Interval 53.1 to 74.6
|
18.74 mg/day
Interval -11.5 to 40.8
|
|
Change in 24-hour Urine Protein Excretion: Months 12 and 16
Month 16
|
36.24 mg/day
Interval 10.7 to 54.5
|
55.19 mg/day
Interval 38.5 to 67.4
|
68.47 mg/day
Interval 56.3 to 77.2
|
8.30 mg/day
Interval -28.1 to 34.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 9,12, and 16 months (16 months total)Population: modified intent-to-treat (mITT) Population
Number of participants in each group achieving a greater than or equal to 30% decline from baseline in urinary protein/creatinine ratio (uPCR) at Months 9, 12, and 16
Outcome measures
| Measure |
VIS649 2 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 4 mg/kg
n=41 Participants
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 8 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
Placebo
n=38 Participants
Placebo administered intravenously
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Participants Achieving a Greater Than or Equal to 30% Decline From Baseline in uPCR at Months 9, 12, and 16
Month 9
|
19 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
|
Participants Achieving a Greater Than or Equal to 30% Decline From Baseline in uPCR at Months 9, 12, and 16
Month 12
|
19 Participants
|
24 Participants
|
23 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
|
Participants Achieving a Greater Than or Equal to 30% Decline From Baseline in uPCR at Months 9, 12, and 16
Month 16
|
18 Participants
|
21 Participants
|
24 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to End of Study (16 months)Population: modified intent-to-treat (mITT) Population
Number of participants in each group achieving clinical remission. Clinical remission was defined as reduction in 24-hour urine protein excretion to less than 300 mg/day for at least 3 consecutive months.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
VIS649 2 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 4 mg/kg
n=41 Participants
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 8 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
Placebo
n=38 Participants
Placebo administered intravenously
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Participants in Each Group Achieving Clinical Remission
Month 9
|
4 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Participants in Each Group Achieving Clinical Remission
Month 12
|
3 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Participants in Each Group Achieving Clinical Remission
Month 16
|
3 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 and 16 monthsPopulation: modified intent-to-treat (mITT) Population
Change from baseline in (eGFR) at Months 9, 12, and 16
Outcome measures
| Measure |
VIS649 2 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 4 mg/kg
n=41 Participants
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 8 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
Placebo
n=38 Participants
Placebo administered intravenously
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in eGFR at Months 9, 12, and 16
Month 9 (Day 270)
|
-0.26 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 9.201
|
0.24 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 7.519
|
0.16 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 7.830
|
-3.83 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 14.062
|
|
Change From Baseline in eGFR at Months 9, 12, and 16
Month 12 (Day 360)
|
-2.35 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 10.591
|
0.64 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 9.212
|
-1.25 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 8.507
|
-7.31 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 14.318
|
|
Change From Baseline in eGFR at Months 9, 12, and 16
Month 16 (Day 485)
|
-3.63 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 10.132
|
-0.18 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 9.418
|
-3.49 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 9.503
|
-8.54 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 14.360
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline to 12 and 16 monthsPopulation: Pharmacodynamic Population
Percent change from baseline in total serum immunoglobin (Ig)A, IgG, and IgM concentrations at Months 12 and 16 in PD population
Outcome measures
| Measure |
VIS649 2 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 4 mg/kg
n=41 Participants
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 8 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
Placebo
n=38 Participants
Placebo administered intravenously
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Serum IgA, IgG, and IgM Concentrations at Months 12 and 16
IgA : Month 12 (Day 360)
|
48.35 percentage change
Standard Deviation 12.431
|
32.35 percentage change
Standard Deviation 10.403
|
31.07 percentage change
Standard Deviation 7.946
|
102.23 percentage change
Standard Deviation 10.584
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Serum IgA, IgG, and IgM Concentrations at Months 12 and 16
IgA : Month 16 (Day 485)
|
79.49 percentage change
Standard Deviation 12.167
|
69.62 percentage change
Standard Deviation 14.790
|
57.28 percentage change
Standard Deviation 14.645
|
101.22 percentage change
Standard Deviation 10.612
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Serum IgA, IgG, and IgM Concentrations at Months 12 and 16
IgG : Month 12 (Day 360)
|
72.88 percentage change
Standard Deviation 9.816
|
66.91 percentage change
Standard Deviation 12.613
|
65.40 percentage change
Standard Deviation 15.693
|
68.31 percentage change
Standard Deviation 13.218
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Serum IgA, IgG, and IgM Concentrations at Months 12 and 16
IgG : Month 16 (Day 485)
|
97.20 percentage change
Standard Deviation 10.006
|
96.00 percentage change
Standard Deviation 12.913
|
84.98 percentage change
Standard Deviation 20.144
|
101.48 percentage change
Standard Deviation 12.840
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Serum IgA, IgG, and IgM Concentrations at Months 12 and 16
IgM : Month 12 (Day 360)
|
37.33 percentage change
Standard Deviation 13.279
|
30.55 percentage change
Standard Deviation 11.959
|
30.03 percentage change
Standard Deviation 8.017
|
98.21 percentage change
Standard Deviation 13.656
|
|
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Serum IgA, IgG, and IgM Concentrations at Months 12 and 16
IgM : Month 16 (Day 485)
|
85.67 percentage change
Standard Deviation 10.729
|
84.74 percentage change
Standard Deviation 20.481
|
62.51 percentage change
Standard Deviation 16.864
|
97.45 percentage change
Standard Deviation 13.239
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Months 0 and 11Population: Intensive Pharmacokinetic Population
Serum PK parameters: maximum serum concentration (Cmax)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
VIS649 2 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 4 mg/kg
n=41 Participants
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 8 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
Placebo
Placebo administered intravenously
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Serum PK Parameters at Month 0 and Month 11: Cmax
Month 0
|
78.78 μg/mL
Standard Deviation 16.69
|
128.88 μg/mL
Standard Deviation 38.52
|
245.75 μg/mL
Standard Deviation 46.35
|
—
|
|
Mean Serum PK Parameters at Month 0 and Month 11: Cmax
Month 11
|
65.45 μg/mL
Standard Deviation 21.83
|
185.63 μg/mL
Standard Deviation 54.29
|
939.13 μg/mL
Standard Deviation 1140.10
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 0 and Month 11Population: Intensive Pharmacokinetic Population
Serum PK parameters: time of maximum serum concentration (Tmax)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
VIS649 2 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 4 mg/kg
n=41 Participants
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 8 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
Placebo
Placebo administered intravenously
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Median Serum PK Parameters at Month 0 and Month 11: Tmax
Tmax: Month 0
|
0.052 days
Interval 0.05 to 0.14
|
0.052 days
Interval 0.04 to 0.13
|
0.125 days
Interval 0.05 to 0.13
|
—
|
|
Median Serum PK Parameters at Month 0 and Month 11: Tmax
Tmax: Month 11
|
0.089 days
Interval 0.05 to 0.13
|
0.127 days
Interval 0.05 to 8.0
|
0.123 days
Interval 0.05 to 19.99
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 0Population: Intensive pharmacokinetic population
Serum PK parameters of area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC0-inf) and area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to Day 30 (AUC0-30)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
VIS649 2 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 4 mg/kg
n=41 Participants
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 8 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
Placebo
Placebo administered intravenously
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Serum PK Parameters at Month 0: AUC0-inf and AUC0-30
AUC0-inf
|
544.49 day∙μg/mL
Standard Deviation 191.80
|
1189.68 day∙μg/mL
Standard Deviation 184.72
|
—
|
—
|
|
Mean Serum PK Parameters at Month 0: AUC0-inf and AUC0-30
AUC0-30
|
542.69 day∙μg/mL
Standard Deviation 167.88
|
1245.02 day∙μg/mL
Standard Deviation 311.85
|
3019.78 day∙μg/mL
Standard Deviation 473.59
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 0 and Month 11Population: Intensive Pharmacokinetic Population
Serum PK parameters: terminal elimination half-life(t1/2z)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
VIS649 2 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 4 mg/kg
n=41 Participants
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 8 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
Placebo
Placebo administered intravenously
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Serum PK Parameters at Month 0 and Month 11: t1/2z
Month 0
|
5.78 days
Standard Deviation 1.25
|
10.87 days
Standard Deviation 3.23
|
18.64 days
Standard Deviation 5.26
|
—
|
|
Mean Serum PK Parameters at Month 0 and Month 11: t1/2z
Month 11
|
8.82 days
Standard Deviation 2.89
|
10.67 days
Standard Deviation 2.66
|
14.85 days
Standard Deviation 8.32
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 0Population: Intensive pharmacokinetic population
Serum PK parameters of clearance. 8 mg/kg was not reported for this outcome measure. Other arms were not provided due to participants meeting exclusion criteria: %AUCext \> 20% and R2 Adjusted \< 0.8. Affected parameters at participant visits meeting this criteria were excluded.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
VIS649 2 mg/kg
n=5 Participants
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 4 mg/kg
n=6 Participants
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 8 mg/kg
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
Placebo
Placebo administered intravenously
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Median Serum PK Parameters at Month 0: CL
|
257.89 mL/day
Standard Deviation 71.77
|
315.94 mL/day
Standard Deviation 95.36
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 0Population: Intensive pharmacokinetic population
Serum PK parameters of apparent volume of distribution (Vz). 8 mg/kg was not reported for this outcome measure. Other arms were not provided due to participants meeting exclusion criteria: %AUCext \> 20% and R2 Adjusted \< 0.8. Affected parameters at participant visits meeting this criteria were excluded.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
VIS649 2 mg/kg
n=5 Participants
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 4 mg/kg
n=6 Participants
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 8 mg/kg
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
Placebo
Placebo administered intravenously
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Serum PK Parameters at Month 0: Vz
|
2056.05 mL
Standard Deviation 726.38
|
4075.62 mL
Standard Deviation 1184.26
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 11Population: Intensive Pharmacokinetic Population
Serum PK parameters: area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to the end of the dosing period (AUCτ)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
VIS649 2 mg/kg
n=3 Participants
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 4 mg/kg
n=8 Participants
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 8 mg/kg
n=8 Participants
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
Placebo
Placebo administered intravenously
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Serum PK Parameters at Month 11: AUCτ
|
555.17 day∙μg/mL
Standard Deviation 116.13
|
2403.14 day∙μg/mL
Standard Deviation 929.12
|
13057.23 day∙μg/mL
Standard Deviation 8432.07
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 11Population: Intensive Pharmacokinetic Population
Serum PK parameters: volume of distribution at steady-state (Vss)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
VIS649 2 mg/kg
n=2 Participants
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 4 mg/kg
n=7 Participants
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 8 mg/kg
n=7 Participants
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
Placebo
Placebo administered intravenously
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Serum PK Parameters at Month 11: Vss
|
2998.81 mL/kg
Standard Deviation 1437.79
|
2670.87 mL/kg
Standard Deviation 854.09
|
2517.15 mL/kg
Standard Deviation 1529.85
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 11Population: Intensive Pharmacokinetic Population
Serum PK parameters: clearance at steady-state (CLss)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
VIS649 2 mg/kg
n=3 Participants
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 4 mg/kg
n=8 Participants
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 8 mg/kg
n=8 Participants
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
Placebo
Placebo administered intravenously
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Serum PK Parameters at Month 11: CLss
|
227.66 mL/day
Standard Deviation 50.99
|
176.22 mL/day
Standard Deviation 69.07
|
60.55 mL/day
Standard Deviation 25.82
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Month 11Population: Intensive Pharmacokinetic Population
Serum PK parameters: accumulation ratio of area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (Rac\[AUC0-30\])
Outcome measures
| Measure |
VIS649 2 mg/kg
n=3 Participants
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 4 mg/kg
n=8 Participants
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 8 mg/kg
n=8 Participants
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
Placebo
Placebo administered intravenously
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean Serum PK Parameters at Month 11: Rac[AUC0-30]
|
1.27 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.02
|
2.01 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.63
|
4.41 ratio
Standard Deviation 3.08
|
—
|
Adverse Events
VIS649 2 mg/kg
VIS649 4 mg/kg
VIS649 8 mg/kg
Placebo
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
VIS649 2 mg/kg
n=38 participants at risk
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 4 mg/kg
n=41 participants at risk
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 8 mg/kg
n=38 participants at risk
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
Placebo
n=38 participants at risk
Placebo administered intravenously
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Portal vein thrombosis
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure congestive
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Immune system disorders
Anaphylactic reaction
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Infections and infestations
COVID-19
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Infections and infestations
Coronavirus infection
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Migraine
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic respiratory failure
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Henoch-Schonlein tissue disorder
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
VIS649 2 mg/kg
n=38 participants at risk
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 4 mg/kg
n=41 participants at risk
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
VIS649 8 mg/kg
n=38 participants at risk
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
|
Placebo
n=38 participants at risk
Placebo administered intravenously
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal distension
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
5.3%
2/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dental caries
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
9.8%
4/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
5.3%
2/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diverticulum
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
5.3%
2/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Enterocolitis
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Iron deficiency anaemia
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphadenopathy
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Polycythaemia
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina pectoris
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Bradycardia
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cor pulmonale
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Sinus bradycardia
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Ear discomfort
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Ear pain
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
4.9%
2/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Otorrhoea
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Sudden hearing loss
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Eye disorders
Blepharospasm
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Eye disorders
Cataract nuclear
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctival haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Eye disorders
Episcleritis
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Eye disorders
Eyelids pruritus
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Eye disorders
Glaucoma
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Eye disorders
Ocular hyperaemia
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Eye disorders
Retinal vein occlusion
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Eye disorders
Vision blurred
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Eye disorders
Vitreous detachment
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal discomfort
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Food poisoning
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis erosive
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal inflammation
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haemorrhoids
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
4.9%
2/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Tooth impacted
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Toothache
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Varices oesophageal
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
4.9%
2/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
General disorders
Chills
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
4.9%
2/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
General disorders
Induration
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
General disorders
Infusion site discomfort
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
General disorders
Infusion site pain
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
General disorders
Infusion site thrombosis
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
General disorders
Injection site pain
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
General disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
10.5%
4/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
5.3%
2/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
5.3%
2/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
General disorders
Peripheral swelling
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
General disorders
Puncture site pain
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vaginal discharge
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
13.2%
5/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
12.2%
5/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
15.8%
6/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
15.8%
6/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
General disorders
Swelling face
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
General disorders
Vaccination site discomfort
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholelithiasis
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic cirrhosis
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Immune system disorders
Dust allergy
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Immune system disorders
Seasonal allergy
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Infections and infestations
Abscess limb
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bacteraemia
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bacteriuria
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
5.3%
2/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Infections and infestations
COVID-19
|
26.3%
10/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
26.8%
11/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
34.2%
13/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
42.1%
16/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Infections and infestations
Conjunctivitis
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Infections and infestations
Conjunctivitis bacterial
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Infections and infestations
Diarrhoea infectious
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Infections and infestations
Diverticulitis
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastrointestinal infection
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gingivitis
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Infections and infestations
Helminthic infection
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lower respiratory tract infection
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
10.5%
4/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
12.2%
5/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
15.8%
6/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
7.9%
3/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Infections and infestations
Otitis externa
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Infections and infestations
Respiratory tract infection
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Infections and infestations
Rhinitis
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
4.9%
2/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Infections and infestations
Skin bacterial infection
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Infections and infestations
Systemic viral infection
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tonsillitis
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tooth abscess
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
7.9%
3/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
12.2%
5/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
5.3%
2/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
5.3%
2/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral infection
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Animal bite
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Arthropod bite
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
5.3%
2/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Foot fracture
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Human bite
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Immunisation reaction
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Infusion related reaction
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Limb injury
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Meniscus injury
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Muscle strain
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post procedural hypotension
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post vaccination fever
|
5.3%
2/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural pain
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Radius fracture
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Road traffic accident
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skin abrasion
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Vaccination complication
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Investigations
Antithrombin III decreased
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Investigations
Blood bicarbonate abnormal
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Investigations
Blood bicarbonate decreased
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Investigations
Blood cholesterol increased
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatinine increased
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Investigations
Blood potassium increased
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Investigations
Blood pressure increased
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Investigations
Blood triglycerides increased
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
4.9%
2/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Investigations
Coronavirus test positive
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Investigations
Eosinophil count increased
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Investigations
Glomerular filtration rate decreased
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Investigations
Prostatic specific antigen increased
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Investigations
SARS-CoV-2 test positive
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
7.9%
3/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Investigations
Vitamin D decreased
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Investigations
Weight decreased
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Acidosis
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetes mellitus
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dyslipidaemia
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Gout
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperammonaemia
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperkalaemia
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypertriglyceridaemia
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypervolaemia
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypomagnesaemia
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Increased appetite
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Iron deficiency
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
4.9%
2/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Metabolic acidosis
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
4.9%
2/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthropathy
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
4.9%
2/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Flank pain
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Gouty arthritis
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle contracture
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
9.8%
4/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal chest pain
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
9.8%
4/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Scoliosis
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Spinal osteoarthritis
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Temporomandibular joint syndrome
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Uterine leiomyoma
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Asterixis
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Burning sensation
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
9.8%
4/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
5.3%
2/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
12.2%
5/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
7.9%
3/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
10.5%
4/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hepatic encephalopathy
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hypoaesthesia
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Intercostal neuralgia
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Lethargy
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Migraine
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Neuropathy peripheral
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Paraesthesia
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
4.9%
2/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Presyncope
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
4.9%
2/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Calculus urinary
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Dysuria
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
IgA nephropathy
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal colic
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal impairment
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Abnormal uterine bleeding
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Prostatitis
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Prostatomegaly
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vaginal haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
5.3%
2/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
4.9%
2/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough variant asthma
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal congestion
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal pruritus
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal septum deviation
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
4.9%
2/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
5.3%
2/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
5.3%
2/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pharyngeal ulceration
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleurisy
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Productive cough
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinitis allergic
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinorrhoea
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Sleep apnoea syndrome
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Sneezing
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Throat irritation
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Upper respiratory tract congestion
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Alopecia
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis allergic
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis contact
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dry skin
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Eczema
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
4.9%
2/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash erythematous
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash maculo-papular
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin ulcer
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Vascular disorders
Blood pressure inadequately controlled
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Vascular disorders
Haematoma
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
10.5%
4/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
7.3%
3/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
4.9%
2/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
|
Vascular disorders
Phlebitis
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Agreements are in place that restrict investigators from publishing the results of the trial.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER