Trial Outcomes & Findings for Safety and Efficacy Study of VIS649 for IgA Nephropathy (NCT NCT04287985)

NCT ID: NCT04287985

Last Updated: 2024-11-21

Results Overview

The number of participants who experienced adverse events, graded by maximum severity, are presented.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE2

Target enrollment

155 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline to End of Study (16 months)

Results posted on

2024-11-21

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
VIS649 2 mg/kg
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 4 mg/kg
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 8 mg/kg
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
Placebo
Placebo administered intravenously
Overall Study
STARTED
38
41
38
38
Overall Study
COMPLETED
35
39
37
35
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
3
2
1
3

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
VIS649 2 mg/kg
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 4 mg/kg
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 8 mg/kg
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
Placebo
Placebo administered intravenously
Overall Study
Adverse Event
1
0
0
0
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
0
1
0
0
Overall Study
Physician Decision
0
0
0
1
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
2
1
1
2

Baseline Characteristics

Safety and Efficacy Study of VIS649 for IgA Nephropathy

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
VIS649 2 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 4 mg/kg
n=41 Participants
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 8 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
Placebo
n=38 Participants
Placebo administered intravenously
Total
n=155 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
41.0 Years
n=5 Participants
39.0 Years
n=7 Participants
41.5 Years
n=5 Participants
36.5 Years
n=4 Participants
39.0 Years
n=21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
15 Participants
n=7 Participants
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
24 Participants
n=4 Participants
67 Participants
n=21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
22 Participants
n=5 Participants
26 Participants
n=7 Participants
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
14 Participants
n=4 Participants
88 Participants
n=21 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
9 Participants
n=21 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
36 Participants
n=5 Participants
38 Participants
n=7 Participants
35 Participants
n=5 Participants
35 Participants
n=4 Participants
144 Participants
n=21 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
2 Participants
n=21 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
1 Participants
n=21 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
31 Participants
n=7 Participants
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
28 Participants
n=4 Participants
115 Participants
n=21 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=21 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
1 Participants
n=21 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
10 Participants
n=4 Participants
36 Participants
n=21 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
1 Participants
n=21 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
1 Participants
n=21 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Japan
5 participants
n=5 Participants
5 participants
n=7 Participants
5 participants
n=5 Participants
4 participants
n=4 Participants
19 participants
n=21 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
1 participants
n=5 Participants
2 participants
n=7 Participants
0 participants
n=5 Participants
3 participants
n=4 Participants
6 participants
n=21 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
0 participants
n=5 Participants
1 participants
n=7 Participants
1 participants
n=5 Participants
0 participants
n=4 Participants
2 participants
n=21 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Hong Kong
3 participants
n=5 Participants
0 participants
n=7 Participants
0 participants
n=5 Participants
2 participants
n=4 Participants
5 participants
n=21 Participants
Region of Enrollment
India
5 participants
n=5 Participants
10 participants
n=7 Participants
10 participants
n=5 Participants
14 participants
n=4 Participants
39 participants
n=21 Participants
Region of Enrollment
South Korea
2 participants
n=5 Participants
4 participants
n=7 Participants
5 participants
n=5 Participants
4 participants
n=4 Participants
15 participants
n=21 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Malaysia
3 participants
n=5 Participants
2 participants
n=7 Participants
2 participants
n=5 Participants
1 participants
n=4 Participants
8 participants
n=21 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Philippines
1 participants
n=5 Participants
2 participants
n=7 Participants
1 participants
n=5 Participants
0 participants
n=4 Participants
4 participants
n=21 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Singapore
1 participants
n=5 Participants
3 participants
n=7 Participants
2 participants
n=5 Participants
0 participants
n=4 Participants
6 participants
n=21 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
2 participants
n=5 Participants
3 participants
n=7 Participants
1 participants
n=5 Participants
3 participants
n=4 Participants
9 participants
n=21 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Sri Lanka
2 participants
n=5 Participants
1 participants
n=7 Participants
1 participants
n=5 Participants
1 participants
n=4 Participants
5 participants
n=21 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Taiwan
0 participants
n=5 Participants
0 participants
n=7 Participants
1 participants
n=5 Participants
0 participants
n=4 Participants
1 participants
n=21 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Thailand
4 participants
n=5 Participants
3 participants
n=7 Participants
1 participants
n=5 Participants
2 participants
n=4 Participants
10 participants
n=21 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
1 participants
n=5 Participants
0 participants
n=7 Participants
2 participants
n=5 Participants
2 participants
n=4 Participants
5 participants
n=21 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
8 participants
n=5 Participants
5 participants
n=7 Participants
6 participants
n=5 Participants
2 participants
n=4 Participants
21 participants
n=21 Participants
Height
165.87 Centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.919 • n=5 Participants
167.50 Centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.933 • n=7 Participants
165.48 Centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.277 • n=5 Participants
161.84 Centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.794 • n=4 Participants
165.22 Centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.120 • n=21 Participants
Weight
74.97 Kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.031 • n=5 Participants
79.18 Kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.216 • n=7 Participants
75.54 Kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.237 • n=5 Participants
72.40 Kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.124 • n=4 Participants
75.59 Kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.323 • n=21 Participants
Body Mass Index (BMI)
27.15 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.529 • n=5 Participants
28.10 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.424 • n=7 Participants
27.57 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.778 • n=5 Participants
27.35 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.749 • n=4 Participants
27.56 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.894 • n=21 Participants
History of Hypertension
29 Participants
n=5 Participants
31 Participants
n=7 Participants
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
24 Participants
n=4 Participants
112 Participants
n=21 Participants
Time since biopsy
781.0 Days
n=5 Participants
288.0 Days
n=7 Participants
364.0 Days
n=5 Participants
933.0 Days
n=4 Participants
565.0 Days
n=21 Participants
ACEI or ARB Therapy
37 Participants
n=5 Participants
40 Participants
n=7 Participants
37 Participants
n=5 Participants
38 Participants
n=4 Participants
152 Participants
n=21 Participants
SGLT2i use at baseline
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
9 Participants
n=21 Participants
Previous use of systemic immunosuppressive therapy
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
7 Participants
n=4 Participants
36 Participants
n=21 Participants
Baseline urinary protein excretion (mg/day)
1470.50 mg per day
n=5 Participants
1927.00 mg per day
n=7 Participants
1900.00 mg per day
n=5 Participants
2133.50 mg per day
n=4 Participants
1900 mg per day
n=21 Participants
Baseline 24-hour uPCR
1.46 urinary protein/creatinine ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.123 • n=5 Participants
1.53 urinary protein/creatinine ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.123 • n=7 Participants
1.44 urinary protein/creatinine ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.137 • n=5 Participants
1.68 urinary protein/creatinine ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.175 • n=4 Participants
1.52 urinary protein/creatinine ratio
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.069 • n=21 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to End of Study (16 months)

Population: Safety Population

The number of participants who experienced adverse events, graded by maximum severity, are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
VIS649 2 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 4 mg/kg
n=41 Participants
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 8 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
Placebo
n=38 Participants
Placebo administered intravenously
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Graded by Severity
TEAE with a maximum severity of mild
19 Participants
22 Participants
22 Participants
23 Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Graded by Severity
TEAE with a maximum severity of moderate
7 Participants
9 Participants
8 Participants
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Graded by Severity
TEAE with a maximum severity of severe
2 Participants
2 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Graded by Severity
TEAE related to trial drug
7 Participants
7 Participants
4 Participants
5 Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Graded by Severity
TEAE related to trial drug with a maximum severity of Mild
7 Participants
7 Participants
3 Participants
5 Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Graded by Severity
TEAE related to trial drug with a maximum severity of Moderate
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Graded by Severity
TEAE related to trial drug with a maximum severity of Severe
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Graded by Severity
Serious TEAE
2 Participants
2 Participants
1 Participants
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Graded by Severity
Serious TEAE related to trial drug
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Graded by Severity
TEAE leading to trial drug interrupted
5 Participants
1 Participants
3 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Graded by Severity
TEAE leading discontinuation of trial drug
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Graded by Severity
TEAE leading to death
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to End of Study (16 months)

Population: Safety population

The number of participants who experience a shift from normal at baseline to Grade 3/4 (moderate/sever) at a postbaseline time point are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
VIS649 2 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 4 mg/kg
n=41 Participants
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 8 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
Placebo
n=38 Participants
Placebo administered intravenously
Changes From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Tests
Calcium
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Changes From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Tests
Potassium
2 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
Changes From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Tests
Phosphate
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
Changes From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Tests
Sodium
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Changes From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Tests
Triglycerides
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Changes From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Tests
Hemoglobin
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to End of Study (16 months)

Population: Safety population

The number of participants who experienced clinically meaningful changes from baseline in vital signs (body mass index, diastolic blood pressure, height, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, respiratory rate, systolic blood pressure, temperature, and weight) are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
VIS649 2 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 4 mg/kg
n=41 Participants
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 8 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
Placebo
n=48 Participants
Placebo administered intravenously
Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
2 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to End of Study (16 months)

Population: Safety population

Clinically significant physical examination findings are presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
VIS649 2 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 4 mg/kg
n=41 Participants
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 8 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
Placebo
n=38 Participants
Placebo administered intravenously
Clinically Significant Physical Examinations
1 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 months

Population: modified intent-to-treat (mITT) Population

Natural Log 24-Hour uPCR (Schedule A Urine Collection) Change from Baseline at Month 12: mixed model with repeated measurements

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
VIS649 2 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 4 mg/kg
n=41 Participants
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 8 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
Placebo
n=38 Participants
Placebo administered intravenously
Change From Baseline in uPCR: Month 12
-0.64 g/g
Standard Error 0.2
-0.89 g/g
Standard Error 0.1
-0.97 g/g
Standard Error 0.2
-0.22 g/g
Standard Error 0.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 9 months and 16 months (16 months total)

Population: modified intent-to-treat (mITT) Population

Change from baseline in uPCR (Urine protein/creatinine ratio)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
VIS649 2 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 4 mg/kg
n=41 Participants
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 8 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
Placebo
n=38 Participants
Placebo administered intravenously
Change From Baseline in uPCR: Months 9 and 16
Month 9
-0.70 g/g
Standard Error 0.2
-0.85 g/g
Standard Error 0.1
-0.99 g/g
Standard Error 0.1
-0.17 g/g
Standard Error 0.2
Change From Baseline in uPCR: Months 9 and 16
Month 16
-0.45 g/g
Standard Error 0.2
-0.87 g/g
Standard Error 0.2
-1.04 g/g
Standard Error 0.2
-0.11 g/g
Standard Error 0.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 16 months

Population: modified intent-to-treat (mITT) Population

Change in 24-hour urine protein excretion from baseline to Months 12 and 16

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
VIS649 2 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 4 mg/kg
n=41 Participants
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 8 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
Placebo
n=38 Participants
Placebo administered intravenously
Change in 24-hour Urine Protein Excretion: Months 12 and 16
Month 12
49.47 mg/day
Interval 30.6 to 63.2
57.80 mg/day
Interval 43.0 to 68.8
65.49 mg/day
Interval 53.1 to 74.6
18.74 mg/day
Interval -11.5 to 40.8
Change in 24-hour Urine Protein Excretion: Months 12 and 16
Month 16
36.24 mg/day
Interval 10.7 to 54.5
55.19 mg/day
Interval 38.5 to 67.4
68.47 mg/day
Interval 56.3 to 77.2
8.30 mg/day
Interval -28.1 to 34.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 9,12, and 16 months (16 months total)

Population: modified intent-to-treat (mITT) Population

Number of participants in each group achieving a greater than or equal to 30% decline from baseline in urinary protein/creatinine ratio (uPCR) at Months 9, 12, and 16

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
VIS649 2 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 4 mg/kg
n=41 Participants
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 8 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
Placebo
n=38 Participants
Placebo administered intravenously
Participants Achieving a Greater Than or Equal to 30% Decline From Baseline in uPCR at Months 9, 12, and 16
Month 9
19 Participants
20 Participants
21 Participants
7 Participants
Participants Achieving a Greater Than or Equal to 30% Decline From Baseline in uPCR at Months 9, 12, and 16
Month 12
19 Participants
24 Participants
23 Participants
11 Participants
Participants Achieving a Greater Than or Equal to 30% Decline From Baseline in uPCR at Months 9, 12, and 16
Month 16
18 Participants
21 Participants
24 Participants
8 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to End of Study (16 months)

Population: modified intent-to-treat (mITT) Population

Number of participants in each group achieving clinical remission. Clinical remission was defined as reduction in 24-hour urine protein excretion to less than 300 mg/day for at least 3 consecutive months.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
VIS649 2 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 4 mg/kg
n=41 Participants
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 8 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
Placebo
n=38 Participants
Placebo administered intravenously
Participants in Each Group Achieving Clinical Remission
Month 9
4 Participants
5 Participants
7 Participants
1 Participants
Participants in Each Group Achieving Clinical Remission
Month 12
3 Participants
5 Participants
10 Participants
1 Participants
Participants in Each Group Achieving Clinical Remission
Month 16
3 Participants
7 Participants
9 Participants
1 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 12 and 16 months

Population: modified intent-to-treat (mITT) Population

Change from baseline in (eGFR) at Months 9, 12, and 16

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
VIS649 2 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 4 mg/kg
n=41 Participants
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 8 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
Placebo
n=38 Participants
Placebo administered intravenously
Change From Baseline in eGFR at Months 9, 12, and 16
Month 9 (Day 270)
-0.26 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 9.201
0.24 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 7.519
0.16 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 7.830
-3.83 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 14.062
Change From Baseline in eGFR at Months 9, 12, and 16
Month 12 (Day 360)
-2.35 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 10.591
0.64 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 9.212
-1.25 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 8.507
-7.31 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 14.318
Change From Baseline in eGFR at Months 9, 12, and 16
Month 16 (Day 485)
-3.63 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 10.132
-0.18 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 9.418
-3.49 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 9.503
-8.54 mL/min/1.73 m^2
Standard Deviation 14.360

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to 12 and 16 months

Population: Pharmacodynamic Population

Percent change from baseline in total serum immunoglobin (Ig)A, IgG, and IgM concentrations at Months 12 and 16 in PD population

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
VIS649 2 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 4 mg/kg
n=41 Participants
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 8 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
Placebo
n=38 Participants
Placebo administered intravenously
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Serum IgA, IgG, and IgM Concentrations at Months 12 and 16
IgA : Month 12 (Day 360)
48.35 percentage change
Standard Deviation 12.431
32.35 percentage change
Standard Deviation 10.403
31.07 percentage change
Standard Deviation 7.946
102.23 percentage change
Standard Deviation 10.584
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Serum IgA, IgG, and IgM Concentrations at Months 12 and 16
IgA : Month 16 (Day 485)
79.49 percentage change
Standard Deviation 12.167
69.62 percentage change
Standard Deviation 14.790
57.28 percentage change
Standard Deviation 14.645
101.22 percentage change
Standard Deviation 10.612
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Serum IgA, IgG, and IgM Concentrations at Months 12 and 16
IgG : Month 12 (Day 360)
72.88 percentage change
Standard Deviation 9.816
66.91 percentage change
Standard Deviation 12.613
65.40 percentage change
Standard Deviation 15.693
68.31 percentage change
Standard Deviation 13.218
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Serum IgA, IgG, and IgM Concentrations at Months 12 and 16
IgG : Month 16 (Day 485)
97.20 percentage change
Standard Deviation 10.006
96.00 percentage change
Standard Deviation 12.913
84.98 percentage change
Standard Deviation 20.144
101.48 percentage change
Standard Deviation 12.840
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Serum IgA, IgG, and IgM Concentrations at Months 12 and 16
IgM : Month 12 (Day 360)
37.33 percentage change
Standard Deviation 13.279
30.55 percentage change
Standard Deviation 11.959
30.03 percentage change
Standard Deviation 8.017
98.21 percentage change
Standard Deviation 13.656
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Serum IgA, IgG, and IgM Concentrations at Months 12 and 16
IgM : Month 16 (Day 485)
85.67 percentage change
Standard Deviation 10.729
84.74 percentage change
Standard Deviation 20.481
62.51 percentage change
Standard Deviation 16.864
97.45 percentage change
Standard Deviation 13.239

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Months 0 and 11

Population: Intensive Pharmacokinetic Population

Serum PK parameters: maximum serum concentration (Cmax)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
VIS649 2 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 4 mg/kg
n=41 Participants
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 8 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
Placebo
Placebo administered intravenously
Mean Serum PK Parameters at Month 0 and Month 11: Cmax
Month 0
78.78 μg/mL
Standard Deviation 16.69
128.88 μg/mL
Standard Deviation 38.52
245.75 μg/mL
Standard Deviation 46.35
Mean Serum PK Parameters at Month 0 and Month 11: Cmax
Month 11
65.45 μg/mL
Standard Deviation 21.83
185.63 μg/mL
Standard Deviation 54.29
939.13 μg/mL
Standard Deviation 1140.10

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Month 0 and Month 11

Population: Intensive Pharmacokinetic Population

Serum PK parameters: time of maximum serum concentration (Tmax)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
VIS649 2 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 4 mg/kg
n=41 Participants
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 8 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
Placebo
Placebo administered intravenously
Median Serum PK Parameters at Month 0 and Month 11: Tmax
Tmax: Month 0
0.052 days
Interval 0.05 to 0.14
0.052 days
Interval 0.04 to 0.13
0.125 days
Interval 0.05 to 0.13
Median Serum PK Parameters at Month 0 and Month 11: Tmax
Tmax: Month 11
0.089 days
Interval 0.05 to 0.13
0.127 days
Interval 0.05 to 8.0
0.123 days
Interval 0.05 to 19.99

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Month 0

Population: Intensive pharmacokinetic population

Serum PK parameters of area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC0-inf) and area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to Day 30 (AUC0-30)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
VIS649 2 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 4 mg/kg
n=41 Participants
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 8 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
Placebo
Placebo administered intravenously
Mean Serum PK Parameters at Month 0: AUC0-inf and AUC0-30
AUC0-inf
544.49 day∙μg/mL
Standard Deviation 191.80
1189.68 day∙μg/mL
Standard Deviation 184.72
Mean Serum PK Parameters at Month 0: AUC0-inf and AUC0-30
AUC0-30
542.69 day∙μg/mL
Standard Deviation 167.88
1245.02 day∙μg/mL
Standard Deviation 311.85
3019.78 day∙μg/mL
Standard Deviation 473.59

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Month 0 and Month 11

Population: Intensive Pharmacokinetic Population

Serum PK parameters: terminal elimination half-life(t1/2z)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
VIS649 2 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 4 mg/kg
n=41 Participants
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 8 mg/kg
n=38 Participants
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
Placebo
Placebo administered intravenously
Mean Serum PK Parameters at Month 0 and Month 11: t1/2z
Month 0
5.78 days
Standard Deviation 1.25
10.87 days
Standard Deviation 3.23
18.64 days
Standard Deviation 5.26
Mean Serum PK Parameters at Month 0 and Month 11: t1/2z
Month 11
8.82 days
Standard Deviation 2.89
10.67 days
Standard Deviation 2.66
14.85 days
Standard Deviation 8.32

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Month 0

Population: Intensive pharmacokinetic population

Serum PK parameters of clearance. 8 mg/kg was not reported for this outcome measure. Other arms were not provided due to participants meeting exclusion criteria: %AUCext \> 20% and R2 Adjusted \< 0.8. Affected parameters at participant visits meeting this criteria were excluded.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
VIS649 2 mg/kg
n=5 Participants
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 4 mg/kg
n=6 Participants
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 8 mg/kg
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
Placebo
Placebo administered intravenously
Median Serum PK Parameters at Month 0: CL
257.89 mL/day
Standard Deviation 71.77
315.94 mL/day
Standard Deviation 95.36

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Month 0

Population: Intensive pharmacokinetic population

Serum PK parameters of apparent volume of distribution (Vz). 8 mg/kg was not reported for this outcome measure. Other arms were not provided due to participants meeting exclusion criteria: %AUCext \> 20% and R2 Adjusted \< 0.8. Affected parameters at participant visits meeting this criteria were excluded.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
VIS649 2 mg/kg
n=5 Participants
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 4 mg/kg
n=6 Participants
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 8 mg/kg
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
Placebo
Placebo administered intravenously
Mean Serum PK Parameters at Month 0: Vz
2056.05 mL
Standard Deviation 726.38
4075.62 mL
Standard Deviation 1184.26

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Month 11

Population: Intensive Pharmacokinetic Population

Serum PK parameters: area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to the end of the dosing period (AUCτ)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
VIS649 2 mg/kg
n=3 Participants
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 4 mg/kg
n=8 Participants
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 8 mg/kg
n=8 Participants
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
Placebo
Placebo administered intravenously
Mean Serum PK Parameters at Month 11: AUCτ
555.17 day∙μg/mL
Standard Deviation 116.13
2403.14 day∙μg/mL
Standard Deviation 929.12
13057.23 day∙μg/mL
Standard Deviation 8432.07

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Month 11

Population: Intensive Pharmacokinetic Population

Serum PK parameters: volume of distribution at steady-state (Vss)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
VIS649 2 mg/kg
n=2 Participants
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 4 mg/kg
n=7 Participants
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 8 mg/kg
n=7 Participants
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
Placebo
Placebo administered intravenously
Mean Serum PK Parameters at Month 11: Vss
2998.81 mL/kg
Standard Deviation 1437.79
2670.87 mL/kg
Standard Deviation 854.09
2517.15 mL/kg
Standard Deviation 1529.85

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Month 11

Population: Intensive Pharmacokinetic Population

Serum PK parameters: clearance at steady-state (CLss)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
VIS649 2 mg/kg
n=3 Participants
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 4 mg/kg
n=8 Participants
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 8 mg/kg
n=8 Participants
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
Placebo
Placebo administered intravenously
Mean Serum PK Parameters at Month 11: CLss
227.66 mL/day
Standard Deviation 50.99
176.22 mL/day
Standard Deviation 69.07
60.55 mL/day
Standard Deviation 25.82

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Month 11

Population: Intensive Pharmacokinetic Population

Serum PK parameters: accumulation ratio of area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (Rac\[AUC0-30\])

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
VIS649 2 mg/kg
n=3 Participants
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 4 mg/kg
n=8 Participants
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 8 mg/kg
n=8 Participants
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
Placebo
Placebo administered intravenously
Mean Serum PK Parameters at Month 11: Rac[AUC0-30]
1.27 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.02
2.01 ratio
Standard Deviation 0.63
4.41 ratio
Standard Deviation 3.08

Adverse Events

VIS649 2 mg/kg

Serious events: 2 serious events
Other events: 28 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

VIS649 4 mg/kg

Serious events: 2 serious events
Other events: 33 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

VIS649 8 mg/kg

Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 31 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Placebo

Serious events: 2 serious events
Other events: 27 other events
Deaths: 1 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
VIS649 2 mg/kg
n=38 participants at risk
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 4 mg/kg
n=41 participants at risk
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 8 mg/kg
n=38 participants at risk
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
Placebo
n=38 participants at risk
Placebo administered intravenously
Hepatobiliary disorders
Portal vein thrombosis
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure congestive
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Immune system disorders
Anaphylactic reaction
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Infections and infestations
COVID-19
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Infections and infestations
Coronavirus infection
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Nervous system disorders
Migraine
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic respiratory failure
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Henoch-Schonlein tissue disorder
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
VIS649 2 mg/kg
n=38 participants at risk
2 mg/kg VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 4 mg/kg
n=41 participants at risk
4 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
VIS649 8 mg/kg
n=38 participants at risk
8 mg/kg of VIS649 administered intravenously
Placebo
n=38 participants at risk
Placebo administered intravenously
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal distension
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
5.3%
2/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dental caries
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
9.8%
4/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
5.3%
2/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diverticulum
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
5.3%
2/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Gastrointestinal disorders
Enterocolitis
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Iron deficiency anaemia
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphadenopathy
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Polycythaemia
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Cardiac disorders
Angina pectoris
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Cardiac disorders
Bradycardia
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Cardiac disorders
Cor pulmonale
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Cardiac disorders
Sinus bradycardia
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Ear discomfort
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Ear pain
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
4.9%
2/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Otorrhoea
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Sudden hearing loss
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Eye disorders
Blepharospasm
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Eye disorders
Cataract nuclear
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Eye disorders
Conjunctival haemorrhage
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Eye disorders
Episcleritis
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Eye disorders
Eyelids pruritus
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Eye disorders
Glaucoma
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Eye disorders
Ocular hyperaemia
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Eye disorders
Retinal vein occlusion
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Eye disorders
Vision blurred
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Eye disorders
Vitreous detachment
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal discomfort
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Gastrointestinal disorders
Food poisoning
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis erosive
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal inflammation
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haemorrhoids
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
4.9%
2/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Gastrointestinal disorders
Tooth impacted
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Gastrointestinal disorders
Toothache
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Gastrointestinal disorders
Varices oesophageal
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
4.9%
2/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
General disorders
Chills
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
General disorders
Fatigue
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
4.9%
2/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
General disorders
Induration
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
General disorders
Infusion site discomfort
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
General disorders
Infusion site pain
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
General disorders
Infusion site thrombosis
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
General disorders
Injection site pain
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
General disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
10.5%
4/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
General disorders
Pain
5.3%
2/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
5.3%
2/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
General disorders
Peripheral swelling
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
General disorders
Puncture site pain
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vaginal discharge
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
General disorders
Pyrexia
13.2%
5/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
12.2%
5/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
15.8%
6/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
15.8%
6/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
General disorders
Swelling face
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
General disorders
Vaccination site discomfort
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholelithiasis
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic cirrhosis
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Immune system disorders
Dust allergy
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Immune system disorders
Seasonal allergy
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Infections and infestations
Abscess limb
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Infections and infestations
Bacteraemia
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Infections and infestations
Bacteriuria
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
5.3%
2/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Infections and infestations
COVID-19
26.3%
10/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
26.8%
11/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
34.2%
13/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
42.1%
16/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Infections and infestations
Conjunctivitis
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Infections and infestations
Conjunctivitis bacterial
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Infections and infestations
Diarrhoea infectious
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Infections and infestations
Diverticulitis
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Infections and infestations
Gastrointestinal infection
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Infections and infestations
Gingivitis
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Infections and infestations
Helminthic infection
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Infections and infestations
Influenza
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Infections and infestations
Lower respiratory tract infection
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
10.5%
4/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
12.2%
5/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
15.8%
6/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
7.9%
3/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Infections and infestations
Otitis externa
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Infections and infestations
Respiratory tract infection
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Infections and infestations
Rhinitis
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
4.9%
2/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Infections and infestations
Skin bacterial infection
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Infections and infestations
Systemic viral infection
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Infections and infestations
Tonsillitis
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Infections and infestations
Tooth abscess
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
7.9%
3/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
12.2%
5/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
5.3%
2/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
5.3%
2/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Infections and infestations
Viral infection
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Animal bite
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Arthropod bite
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
5.3%
2/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Foot fracture
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Human bite
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Immunisation reaction
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Infusion related reaction
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Limb injury
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Meniscus injury
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Muscle strain
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post procedural hypotension
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post vaccination fever
5.3%
2/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural pain
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Radius fracture
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Road traffic accident
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skin abrasion
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Vaccination complication
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Investigations
Antithrombin III decreased
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Investigations
Blood bicarbonate abnormal
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Investigations
Blood bicarbonate decreased
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Investigations
Blood cholesterol increased
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Investigations
Blood creatinine increased
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Investigations
Blood potassium increased
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Investigations
Blood pressure increased
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Investigations
Blood triglycerides increased
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
4.9%
2/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Investigations
Coronavirus test positive
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Investigations
Eosinophil count increased
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Investigations
Glomerular filtration rate decreased
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Investigations
Prostatic specific antigen increased
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Investigations
SARS-CoV-2 test positive
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
7.9%
3/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Investigations
Vitamin D decreased
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Investigations
Weight decreased
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Acidosis
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetes mellitus
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dyslipidaemia
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Gout
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperammonaemia
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperkalaemia
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypertriglyceridaemia
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypervolaemia
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypomagnesaemia
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Increased appetite
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Iron deficiency
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
4.9%
2/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Metabolic acidosis
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
4.9%
2/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthropathy
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
4.9%
2/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Flank pain
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Gouty arthritis
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle contracture
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
9.8%
4/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal chest pain
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
9.8%
4/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Scoliosis
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Spinal osteoarthritis
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Temporomandibular joint syndrome
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Uterine leiomyoma
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Nervous system disorders
Asterixis
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Nervous system disorders
Burning sensation
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
9.8%
4/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
5.3%
2/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Nervous system disorders
Headache
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
12.2%
5/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
7.9%
3/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
10.5%
4/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Nervous system disorders
Hepatic encephalopathy
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Nervous system disorders
Hypoaesthesia
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Nervous system disorders
Intercostal neuralgia
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Nervous system disorders
Lethargy
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Nervous system disorders
Migraine
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Nervous system disorders
Neuropathy peripheral
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Nervous system disorders
Paraesthesia
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
4.9%
2/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Nervous system disorders
Presyncope
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
4.9%
2/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Renal and urinary disorders
Calculus urinary
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Renal and urinary disorders
Dysuria
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Renal and urinary disorders
IgA nephropathy
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal colic
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal impairment
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Abnormal uterine bleeding
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Prostatitis
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Prostatomegaly
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vaginal haemorrhage
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
5.3%
2/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
4.9%
2/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough variant asthma
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal congestion
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal pruritus
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal septum deviation
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
4.9%
2/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
5.3%
2/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
5.3%
2/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pharyngeal ulceration
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleurisy
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Productive cough
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinitis allergic
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinorrhoea
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Sleep apnoea syndrome
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Sneezing
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Throat irritation
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Upper respiratory tract congestion
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Alopecia
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis allergic
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis contact
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dry skin
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Eczema
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
4.9%
2/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash erythematous
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash maculo-papular
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin ulcer
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Vascular disorders
Blood pressure inadequately controlled
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Vascular disorders
Haematoma
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
10.5%
4/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
7.3%
3/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
4.9%
2/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.6%
1/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
Vascular disorders
Phlebitis
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
2.4%
1/41 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."
0.00%
0/38 • Baseline to End of Study (16 months).
Adverse events were collected from screening through the M16 (or EOS) visit, up to 485 days. Collection methods were both systematic (at clinical visits) and non-systematic (reported by the patient). The protocol used standard terminology for determining adverse events and serious adverse events. The intensity of the events was assessed by the Investigator as either "mild," "moderate," or "severe."

Additional Information

Mohit Mathur, MD

Visterra, Inc.

Phone: +1-617-498-1070

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Agreements are in place that restrict investigators from publishing the results of the trial.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER