Overcoming Obstacles in Epigenetic Analysis of Human Twins

NCT ID: NCT04279704

Last Updated: 2020-10-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-09-30

Study Completion Date

2020-03-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in the U.S., however scientists have failed to learn fully what are the causes of this disease. A promising lead in understanding the origins of cardiovascular disease may be in gene expression changes occurring in utero in response to environmental (non-genetic) factors. Such changes govern whether a gene is turned on or turned off during an individual's lifetime. Twin pregnancies and twin infants help researchers to have a better understanding of whether the gene expression changes are genetic or environmental in origin. Therefore, the purpose of this project is to examine which body tissues (such as hair, fingernails, urine or blood) are needed to accurately study how gene activity is affected by prenatal factors.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in the US, emphasizing an incomplete understanding of its pathology and translation into effective interventions. The fetal origins hypothesis posits that the risk of CVD is partially set in utero. Individual differences in epigenetic DNA methylation are a leading candidate mechanism to explain the association between CVD risk and the fetal environment. Indeed, differences in DNA methylation have been implicated in the pathogenesis of CVD and its risk factors. Previous studies in rats have been characterizing a specific class of epigenetic loci known as metastable epialleles (MEs). Methylation of DNA in utero can be in response to non-genetic factors and the degree of hypo- or hyper- methylation remains stable throughout the lifespan. Studies in mice further have shown that methylation has dramatic and permanent phenotypic effects. In recent studies over 100 human MEs have been identified. Several of these loci have been associated with phenotypes related to CVD risk.

Investigators now need to determine the phenotypic consequences of interindividual variation in DNA methylation at human MEs. Studies in inbred mice have been instrumental in showing that there are non-genetic influences on the establishment of methylation at MEs. Twin studies, typically using saliva or peripheral blood cells (PBCs), have been used to assess whether individual epigenetic variation in humans is influenced by non-genetic factors. Indeed, in translating epigenetic findings from mice to humans, monozygotic (MZ; genetically-identical) twins are commonly viewed as the human equivalent of isogenic mice. However, there is an important difference between MZ twins and isogenic mice. Whereas each inbred mouse littermate has its own placenta, about 75% of MZ twins share a single placenta (monochorionicity) and therefore have intermingled circulation during fetal development. It is therefore essential to determine whether the resulting "cross pollination" of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) results in peripheral blood (and salivary) DNA of two monochorionic MZ twins being more epigenetically similar than that of other somatic tissues. Accurately quantifying epigenetic effects of periconceptional nutrition in twin studies, and thereby providing future intervention targets to reduce CVD risk in offspring, will likely require analyses of DNA methylation in tissues other than saliva or peripheral blood cells.

Investigators need to examine whether Monozygotic:Dizygotic twin comparisons, without regard to placental sharing in utero (chorionicity), are a suitable model for future work which will characterize ME loci and establish their associations with phenotypic consequences. Infancy is the ideal time to examine the association between MEs and CVD factors, since it provides the earliest time for risk prediction and intervention. Therefore, for this study investigators plan to recruit 40 twins pairs under 4 months of age to identify more easily available tissues for epigenetic analyses than hair follicles (which has been previously used as an alternative to PBCs or saliva). The plucking of hair follicles from infants is too burdensome on participants to accrue the large samples intended for future analyses.

Summary: Studies in rats provide evidence that maternal nutrition around the time of conception can alter epigenetic mechanisms affecting obesity, and obesity itself is a strong CVD risk factor. This relationship is mediated by the early embryonic methylation at metastable alleles. Following the identification of over 100 MEs in humans many of which are associated with obesity or other CVD risk factors, investigators are now ready to implement studies to examine whether periconceptional nutrition influences CVD risk via methylation. Investigators seek to translate this work on MEs into human populations since it suggests an important CVD risk. Further, investigators want to establish the importance of chorionicity as a factor in epigenetic analyses of MZ twins, and to validate a new tissue for such studies.

Aim 1: Validate nail clippings as an acceptable DNA source for the study for human MEs Hypothesis 1: At MEs, DNA methylation in infant nail clippings (which can be easily collected) is highly correlated with that in hair follicles, urine and buccal swabs.

Aim 2: Compare epigenetic discordance at MEs in monochorionic vs. dichorionic MZ twins Hypothesis 2: At MEs, dichorionic MZ twin pairs (with separate placentae) will show greater epigenetic dissimilarity in PBCs than monochorionic MZ twin pairs (which share a placenta), but not in other tissues.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cardiovascular Risk Factor

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Monozygotic (preterm or full term) twin infants.

Exclusion Criteria

* Infants with major congenital anomalies. Infants from higher birth order (e.g. triplets etc.)
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Month

Maximum Eligible Age

6 Months

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institutes of Health (NIH)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Baylor College of Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Alexis Wood

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Alexis C Wood, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Baylor College of Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Alexis C Wood

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

H 37359

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id