Trial Outcomes & Findings for Clinical Performance of Chairside CAD/CAM Restorations (NCT NCT04279574)
NCT ID: NCT04279574
Last Updated: 2025-03-24
Results Overview
Retention. Evaluations according to FDI World Dental Federation criteria (Hickel et al., 2010) \[5b.1 Restoration in place; 5b.5 Complete loss of restoration\] Functional property (retention) assessed by visual and/or tactile assessment by two independent examiners.\]
Recruitment status
COMPLETED
Study phase
NA
Target enrollment
58 participants
Primary outcome timeframe
3 years with assessment visits at baseline, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years
Results posted on
2025-03-24
Participant Flow
The patient population was selected from current patients under clinical treatment at the University of Michigan Dental Clinics. Patients were over 18 years of age, of either gender, and of any ethnic background. Each patient had at least one carious lesion or defective restoration to be restored on a maxillary or mandibular premolar or molar tooth.
Each lesion or defective restoration exhibited sufficient size to extend at least one-half the intercuspal width of the tooth requiring an onlay or full crown restoration. The onlays covered between one and three cusps on the selected tooth and maintained an occlusal margin. All teeth tested vital and were asymptomatic at the beginning of treatment. No more than two restorations were placed per patient; molar teeth were included prior to premolar teeth.
Unit of analysis: Restorations
Participant milestones
| Measure |
CAD/CAM Onlays
Lithium disilicate chairside CAD/CAM onlays (IPS emaxCAD/Ivoclar) will be adhesively bonded using a selective enamel etch technique with an adhesive (3M) and cement (3M).
|
CAD/CAM Crowns
Full contour zirconia crowns (3M Chairside Zirconia/3M) will be cemented using a self-adhesive cement (3M).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
35 40
|
33 40
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
33 38
|
32 39
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
2 2
|
1 1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
CAD/CAM Onlays
Lithium disilicate chairside CAD/CAM onlays (IPS emaxCAD/Ivoclar) will be adhesively bonded using a selective enamel etch technique with an adhesive (3M) and cement (3M).
|
CAD/CAM Crowns
Full contour zirconia crowns (3M Chairside Zirconia/3M) will be cemented using a self-adhesive cement (3M).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
lost restoration, tooth fracture
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Up to two restorations of either type (onlays and/or crowns) were allowed per subject. Actual overall number of participants treated was 58.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
CAD/CAM Onlays
n=40 Number of Teeth Treated
Lithium disilicate chairside CAD/CAM onlays (IPS emaxCAD/Ivoclar) will be adhesively bonded using a selective enamel etch technique with an adhesive (3M) and cement (3M).
|
CAD/CAM Crowns
n=40 Number of Teeth Treated
Full contour zirconia crowns (3M Chairside Zirconia/3M) will be cemented using a self-adhesive cement (3M).
|
Total
n=80 Number of Teeth Treated
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
59 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9 • n=35 Participants • Up to two restorations of either type (onlays and/or crowns) were allowed per subject. Actual overall number of participants treated was 58.
|
63 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8 • n=33 Participants • Up to two restorations of either type (onlays and/or crowns) were allowed per subject. Actual overall number of participants treated was 58.
|
61 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9 • n=58 Participants • Up to two restorations of either type (onlays and/or crowns) were allowed per subject. Actual overall number of participants treated was 58.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
25 Participants
n=35 Participants • Up to two restorations of either type (onlays and/or crowns) were allowed per subject. Actual overall number of participants treated was 58.
|
25 Participants
n=33 Participants • Up to two restorations of either type (onlays and/or crowns) were allowed per subject. Actual overall number of participants treated was 58.
|
50 Participants
n=58 Participants • Up to two restorations of either type (onlays and/or crowns) were allowed per subject. Actual overall number of participants treated was 58.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
10 Participants
n=35 Participants • Up to two restorations of either type (onlays and/or crowns) were allowed per subject. Actual overall number of participants treated was 58.
|
8 Participants
n=33 Participants • Up to two restorations of either type (onlays and/or crowns) were allowed per subject. Actual overall number of participants treated was 58.
|
18 Participants
n=58 Participants • Up to two restorations of either type (onlays and/or crowns) were allowed per subject. Actual overall number of participants treated was 58.
|
|
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
|
—
|
—
|
0 Participants
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
|
|
Type of restoration
Premolars
|
10 Number of Teeth Treated
n=40 Number of Teeth Treated • Up to two restorations of either type (onlays and/or crowns) were allowed per subject. Actual overall number of participants treated was 58.
|
6 Number of Teeth Treated
n=40 Number of Teeth Treated • Up to two restorations of either type (onlays and/or crowns) were allowed per subject. Actual overall number of participants treated was 58.
|
16 Number of Teeth Treated
n=80 Number of Teeth Treated • Up to two restorations of either type (onlays and/or crowns) were allowed per subject. Actual overall number of participants treated was 58.
|
|
Type of restoration
Molars
|
30 Number of Teeth Treated
n=40 Number of Teeth Treated • Up to two restorations of either type (onlays and/or crowns) were allowed per subject. Actual overall number of participants treated was 58.
|
34 Number of Teeth Treated
n=40 Number of Teeth Treated • Up to two restorations of either type (onlays and/or crowns) were allowed per subject. Actual overall number of participants treated was 58.
|
64 Number of Teeth Treated
n=80 Number of Teeth Treated • Up to two restorations of either type (onlays and/or crowns) were allowed per subject. Actual overall number of participants treated was 58.
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 years with assessment visits at baseline, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 yearsPopulation: Up to two restorations of either type (onlays and/or crowns) were allowed per subject. Actual overall number of participants treated was 58.
Retention. Evaluations according to FDI World Dental Federation criteria (Hickel et al., 2010) \[5b.1 Restoration in place; 5b.5 Complete loss of restoration\] Functional property (retention) assessed by visual and/or tactile assessment by two independent examiners.\]
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CAD/CAM Onlays
n=40 Restorations
Lithium disilicate chairside CAD/CAM onlays (IPS emaxCAD/Ivoclar) will be adhesively bonded using a selective enamel etch technique with an adhesive (3M) and cement (3M).
|
CAD/CAM Crowns
n=40 Restorations
Full contour zirconia crowns (3M Chairside Zirconia/3M) will be cemented using a self-adhesive cement (3M).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Retention Scores]
Baseline · 5b.1 Restoration in place
|
40 Restorations
|
40 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Retention Scores]
Baseline · 5b.5 Complete loss of restoration
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Retention Scores]
Baseline · Missed visit / no data
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Retention Scores]
Baseline · Failed Onlay / Crown
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Retention Scores]
6 months post-restoration · 5b.1 Restoration in place
|
40 Restorations
|
40 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Retention Scores]
6 months post-restoration · 5b.5 Complete loss of restoration
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Retention Scores]
6 months post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Retention Scores]
6 months post-restoration · Failed Onlay / Crown
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Retention Scores]
1 year post-restoration · 5b.1 Restoration in place
|
39 Restorations
|
39 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Retention Scores]
1 year post-restoration · 5b.5 Complete loss of restoration
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Retention Scores]
1 year post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
1 Restorations
|
1 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Retention Scores]
1 year post-restoration · Failed Onlay / Crown
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Retention Scores]
2 years post-restoration · 5b.1 Restoration in place
|
37 Restorations
|
39 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Retention Scores]
2 years post-restoration · 5b.5 Complete loss of restoration
|
2 Restorations
|
1 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Retention Scores]
2 years post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Retention Scores]
2 years post-restoration · Failed Onlay / Crown
|
1 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Retention Scores]
3 years post-restoration · 5b.1 Restoration in place
|
36 Restorations
|
38 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Retention Scores]
3 years post-restoration · 5b.5 Complete loss of restoration
|
2 Restorations
|
1 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Retention Scores]
3 years post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
1 Restorations
|
1 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Retention Scores]
3 years post-restoration · Failed Onlay / Crown
|
1 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 years with assessment visits at baseline, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 yearsPopulation: Up to two restorations of either type (onlays and/or crowns) were allowed per subject. Actual overall number of participants treated was 58.
Material Fracture. Evaluations according to FDI World Dental Federation criteria (Hickel et al., 2010) \[1: Clinically excellent, 2: Clinically good, 3: Clinically sufficient, 4: Clinically unsatisfactory, 5: Clinically poor\] Functional properties assessed by visual and/or tactile assessment by two independent examiners.\]
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CAD/CAM Onlays
n=40 Restorations
Lithium disilicate chairside CAD/CAM onlays (IPS emaxCAD/Ivoclar) will be adhesively bonded using a selective enamel etch technique with an adhesive (3M) and cement (3M).
|
CAD/CAM Crowns
n=40 Restorations
Full contour zirconia crowns (3M Chairside Zirconia/3M) will be cemented using a self-adhesive cement (3M).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Material Fracture Scores]
Baseline · 1: Clinically excellent
|
40 Restorations
|
40 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Material Fracture Scores]
Baseline · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Material Fracture Scores]
Baseline · Missed visit / no data
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Material Fracture Scores]
Baseline · Failed Onlay / Crown
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Material Fracture Scores]
6 months post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
40 Restorations
|
40 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Material Fracture Scores]
6 months post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Material Fracture Scores]
6 months post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Material Fracture Scores]
6 months post-restoration · Failed Onlay / Crown
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Material Fracture Scores]
1 year post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
39 Restorations
|
39 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Material Fracture Scores]
1 year post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Material Fracture Scores]
1 year post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
1 Restorations
|
1 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Material Fracture Scores]
1 year post-restoration · Failed Onlay / Crown
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Material Fracture Scores]
2 years post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
39 Restorations
|
40 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Material Fracture Scores]
2 years post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Material Fracture Scores]
2 years post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Material Fracture Scores]
2 years post-restoration · Failed Onlay / Crown
|
1 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Material Fracture Scores]
3 years post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
38 Restorations
|
39 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Material Fracture Scores]
3 years post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Material Fracture Scores]
3 years post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
1 Restorations
|
1 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Material Fracture Scores]
3 years post-restoration · Failed Onlay / Crown
|
1 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 years with assessment visits at baseline, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 yearsPopulation: Up to two restorations of either type (onlays and/or crowns) were allowed per subject. Actual overall number of participants treated was 58.
Approximal anatomical contact form - mesial. Evaluations according to FDI World Dental Federation criteria (Hickel et al., 2010) \[1: Clinically excellent, 2: Clinically good, 3: Clinically sufficient, 4: Clinically unsatisfactory, 5: Clinically poor\] Functional property assessed by visual and/or tactile assessment by two independent examiners.\]
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CAD/CAM Onlays
n=40 Restorations
Lithium disilicate chairside CAD/CAM onlays (IPS emaxCAD/Ivoclar) will be adhesively bonded using a selective enamel etch technique with an adhesive (3M) and cement (3M).
|
CAD/CAM Crowns
n=40 Restorations
Full contour zirconia crowns (3M Chairside Zirconia/3M) will be cemented using a self-adhesive cement (3M).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Form - Mesial]
Baseline · 1: Clinically excellent
|
38 Restorations
|
40 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Form - Mesial]
Baseline · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Form - Mesial]
Baseline · Missed visit / no data
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Form - Mesial]
Baseline · Not applicable
|
2 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Form - Mesial]
Baseline · Failed onlay / crown
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Form - Mesial]
6 months post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
36 Restorations
|
40 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Form - Mesial]
6 months post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Form - Mesial]
6 months post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Form - Mesial]
6 months post-restoration · Not applicable
|
4 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Form - Mesial]
6 months post-restoration · Failed onlay / crown
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Form - Mesial]
1 year post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
34 Restorations
|
39 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Form - Mesial]
1 year post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Form - Mesial]
1 year post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
1 Restorations
|
1 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Form - Mesial]
1 year post-restoration · Not applicable
|
5 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Form - Mesial]
1 year post-restoration · Failed onlay / crown
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Form - Mesial]
2 years post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
34 Restorations
|
40 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Form - Mesial]
2 years post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Form - Mesial]
2 years post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Form - Mesial]
2 years post-restoration · Not applicable
|
5 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Form - Mesial]
2 years post-restoration · Failed onlay / crown
|
1 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Form - Mesial]
3 years post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
33 Restorations
|
39 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Form - Mesial]
3 years post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Form - Mesial]
3 years post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
1 Restorations
|
1 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Form - Mesial]
3 years post-restoration · Not applicable
|
5 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Form - Mesial]
3 years post-restoration · Failed onlay / crown
|
1 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 years with assessment visits at baseline, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 yearsPopulation: Up to two restorations of either type (onlays and/or crowns) were allowed per subject. Actual overall number of participants treated was 58.
Approximal anatomical contact point - mesial. Evaluations according to FDI World Dental Federation criteria (Hickel et al., 2010) \[1: Clinically excellent, 2: Clinically good, 3: Clinically sufficient, 4: Clinically unsatisfactory, 5: Clinically poor\] Functional property assessed by visual and/or tactile assessment by two independent examiners.\]
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CAD/CAM Onlays
n=40 Restorations
Lithium disilicate chairside CAD/CAM onlays (IPS emaxCAD/Ivoclar) will be adhesively bonded using a selective enamel etch technique with an adhesive (3M) and cement (3M).
|
CAD/CAM Crowns
n=40 Restorations
Full contour zirconia crowns (3M Chairside Zirconia/3M) will be cemented using a self-adhesive cement (3M).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Mesial Scores]
Baseline · 1: Clinically excellent
|
38 Restorations
|
40 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Mesial Scores]
Baseline · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Mesial Scores]
Baseline · 3: Clinically sufficient
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Mesial Scores]
Baseline · Missed visit / no data
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Mesial Scores]
Baseline · Failed Onlay / Crown
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Mesial Scores]
Baseline · Not Applicable
|
2 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Mesial Scores]
6 months post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
35 Restorations
|
39 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Mesial Scores]
6 months post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Mesial Scores]
6 months post-restoration · 3: Clinically sufficient
|
1 Restorations
|
1 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Mesial Scores]
6 months post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Mesial Scores]
6 months post-restoration · Failed Onlay / Crown
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Mesial Scores]
6 months post-restoration · Not Applicable
|
4 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Mesial Scores]
1 year post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
33 Restorations
|
37 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Mesial Scores]
1 year post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Mesial Scores]
1 year post-restoration · 3: Clinically sufficient
|
1 Restorations
|
2 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Mesial Scores]
1 year post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
1 Restorations
|
1 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Mesial Scores]
1 year post-restoration · Failed Onlay / Crown
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Mesial Scores]
1 year post-restoration · Not Applicable
|
5 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Mesial Scores]
2 years post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
34 Restorations
|
39 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Mesial Scores]
2 years post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Mesial Scores]
2 years post-restoration · 3: Clinically sufficient
|
0 Restorations
|
1 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Mesial Scores]
2 years post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Mesial Scores]
2 years post-restoration · Failed Onlay / Crown
|
1 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Mesial Scores]
2 years post-restoration · Not Applicable
|
5 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Mesial Scores]
3 years post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
33 Restorations
|
39 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Mesial Scores]
3 years post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Mesial Scores]
3 years post-restoration · 3: Clinically sufficient
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Mesial Scores]
3 years post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
1 Restorations
|
1 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Mesial Scores]
3 years post-restoration · Failed Onlay / Crown
|
1 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Mesial Scores]
3 years post-restoration · Not Applicable
|
5 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 years with assessment visits at baseline, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 yearsPopulation: Up to two restorations of either type (onlays and/or crowns) were allowed per subject. Actual overall number of participants treated was 58.
Approximal Anatomical Contact Form - Distal. Evaluations according to FDI World Dental Federation criteria (Hickel et al., 2010) \[1: Clinically excellent, 2: Clinically good, 3: Clinically sufficient, 4: Clinically unsatisfactory, 5: Clinically poor\] Functional property assessed by visual and/or tactile assessment by two independent examiners.\]
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CAD/CAM Onlays
n=40 Restorations
Lithium disilicate chairside CAD/CAM onlays (IPS emaxCAD/Ivoclar) will be adhesively bonded using a selective enamel etch technique with an adhesive (3M) and cement (3M).
|
CAD/CAM Crowns
n=40 Restorations
Full contour zirconia crowns (3M Chairside Zirconia/3M) will be cemented using a self-adhesive cement (3M).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Form - Distal Scores]
6 months post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Form - Distal Scores]
6 months post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Form - Distal Scores]
6 months post-restoration · Failed Onlay / Crown
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Form - Distal Scores]
6 months post-restoration · Not Applicable
|
13 Restorations
|
16 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Form - Distal Scores]
1 year post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
27 Restorations
|
22 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Form - Distal Scores]
1 year post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Form - Distal Scores]
1 year post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
1 Restorations
|
1 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Form - Distal Scores]
1 year post-restoration · Failed Onlay / Crown
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Form - Distal Scores]
1 year post-restoration · Not Applicable
|
12 Restorations
|
17 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Form - Distal Scores]
2 years post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
26 Restorations
|
24 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Form - Distal Scores]
2 years post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Form - Distal Scores]
2 years post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Form - Distal Scores]
2 years post-restoration · Failed Onlay / Crown
|
1 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Form - Distal Scores]
2 years post-restoration · Not Applicable
|
13 Restorations
|
16 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Form - Distal Scores]
3 years post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
24 Restorations
|
22 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Form - Distal Scores]
3 years post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Form - Distal Scores]
3 years post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
1 Restorations
|
1 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Form - Distal Scores]
3 years post-restoration · Failed Onlay / Crown
|
1 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Form - Distal Scores]
3 years post-restoration · Not Applicable
|
14 Restorations
|
17 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Form - Distal Scores]
Baseline · 1: Clinically excellent
|
29 Restorations
|
25 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Form - Distal Scores]
Baseline · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Form - Distal Scores]
Baseline · Missed visit / no data
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Form - Distal Scores]
Baseline · Failed Onlay / Crown
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Form - Distal Scores]
Baseline · Not Applicable
|
11 Restorations
|
15 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Form - Distal Scores]
6 months post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
27 Restorations
|
24 Restorations
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 years with assessment visits at baseline, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 yearsPopulation: Up to two restorations of either type (onlays and/or crowns) were allowed per subject. Actual overall number of participants treated was 58.
Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Distal. Evaluations according to FDI World Dental Federation criteria (Hickel et al., 2010) \[1: Clinically excellent, 2: Clinically good, 3: Clinically sufficient, 4: Clinically unsatisfactory, 5: Clinically poor\] Functional property assessed by visual and/or tactile assessment by two independent examiners.\]
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CAD/CAM Onlays
n=40 Restorations
Lithium disilicate chairside CAD/CAM onlays (IPS emaxCAD/Ivoclar) will be adhesively bonded using a selective enamel etch technique with an adhesive (3M) and cement (3M).
|
CAD/CAM Crowns
n=40 Restorations
Full contour zirconia crowns (3M Chairside Zirconia/3M) will be cemented using a self-adhesive cement (3M).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Distal Scores]
Baseline · 1: Clinically excellent
|
29 Restorations
|
25 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Distal Scores]
Baseline · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Distal Scores]
Baseline · 3: Clinically sufficient
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Distal Scores]
Baseline · Missed visit / no data
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Distal Scores]
Baseline · Failed Onlay / Crown
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Distal Scores]
Baseline · Not Applicabl
|
11 Restorations
|
15 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Distal Scores]
6 months post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
27 Restorations
|
24 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Distal Scores]
6 months post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Distal Scores]
6 months post-restoration · 3: Clinically sufficient
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Distal Scores]
6 months post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Distal Scores]
6 months post-restoration · Failed Onlay / Crown
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Distal Scores]
6 months post-restoration · Not Applicabl
|
13 Restorations
|
16 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Distal Scores]
1 year post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
27 Restorations
|
22 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Distal Scores]
1 year post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Distal Scores]
1 year post-restoration · 3: Clinically sufficient
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Distal Scores]
1 year post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
1 Restorations
|
1 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Distal Scores]
1 year post-restoration · Failed Onlay / Crown
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Distal Scores]
1 year post-restoration · Not Applicabl
|
12 Restorations
|
17 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Distal Scores]
2 years post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
26 Restorations
|
23 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Distal Scores]
2 years post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Distal Scores]
2 years post-restoration · 3: Clinically sufficient
|
0 Restorations
|
1 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Distal Scores]
2 years post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Distal Scores]
2 years post-restoration · Failed Onlay / Crown
|
1 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Distal Scores]
2 years post-restoration · Not Applicabl
|
13 Restorations
|
16 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Distal Scores]
3 years post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
24 Restorations
|
21 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Distal Scores]
3 years post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Distal Scores]
3 years post-restoration · 3: Clinically sufficient
|
0 Restorations
|
1 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Distal Scores]
3 years post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
1 Restorations
|
1 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Distal Scores]
3 years post-restoration · Failed Onlay / Crown
|
1 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Approximal Anatomical Contact Point - Distal Scores]
3 years post-restoration · Not Applicabl
|
14 Restorations
|
17 Restorations
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 years with assessment visits at baseline, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 yearsPopulation: Up to two restorations of either type (onlays and/or crowns) were allowed per subject. Actual overall number of participants treated was 58.
Occlusal contour and wear. Evaluations according to FDI World Dental Federation critera (Hickel et al., 2010) \[1: Clinically excellent, 2: Clinically good, 3: Clinically sufficient, 4: Clinically unsatisfactory, 5: Clinically poor\] Functional property assessed by visual and/or tactile assessment by two independent examiners.\]
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CAD/CAM Onlays
n=40 Restorations
Lithium disilicate chairside CAD/CAM onlays (IPS emaxCAD/Ivoclar) will be adhesively bonded using a selective enamel etch technique with an adhesive (3M) and cement (3M).
|
CAD/CAM Crowns
n=40 Restorations
Full contour zirconia crowns (3M Chairside Zirconia/3M) will be cemented using a self-adhesive cement (3M).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Occlusal Contour and Wear Scores]
Baseline · Failed onlay / crown
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Occlusal Contour and Wear Scores]
Baseline · 1: Clinically excellent
|
40 Restorations
|
40 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Occlusal Contour and Wear Scores]
Baseline · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Occlusal Contour and Wear Scores]
Baseline · Missed visit / no data
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Occlusal Contour and Wear Scores]
6 months post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
40 Restorations
|
40 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Occlusal Contour and Wear Scores]
6 months post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Occlusal Contour and Wear Scores]
6 months post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Occlusal Contour and Wear Scores]
6 months post-restoration · Failed onlay / crown
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Occlusal Contour and Wear Scores]
1 year post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
39 Restorations
|
39 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Occlusal Contour and Wear Scores]
1 year post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Occlusal Contour and Wear Scores]
1 year post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
1 Restorations
|
1 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Occlusal Contour and Wear Scores]
1 year post-restoration · Failed onlay / crown
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Occlusal Contour and Wear Scores]
2 years post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
39 Restorations
|
40 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Occlusal Contour and Wear Scores]
2 years post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Occlusal Contour and Wear Scores]
2 years post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Occlusal Contour and Wear Scores]
2 years post-restoration · Failed onlay / crown
|
1 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Occlusal Contour and Wear Scores]
3 years post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
38 Restorations
|
37 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Occlusal Contour and Wear Scores]
3 years post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
2 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Occlusal Contour and Wear Scores]
3 years post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
1 Restorations
|
1 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Occlusal Contour and Wear Scores]
3 years post-restoration · Failed onlay / crown
|
1 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 years with assessments at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 yearsPopulation: Up to two restorations of either type (onlays and/or crowns) were allowed per subject. Actual overall number of participants treated was 58.
Recurrence of caries, erosion, abfraction. Evaluations according to FDI World Dental Federation criteria (Hickel et al., 2010) \[1: Clinically excellent, 2: Clinically good, 3: Clinically sufficient, 4: Clinically unsatisfactory, 5: Clinically poor\] Biological properties assessed by visual and/or tactile assessment by two independent examiners.\]
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CAD/CAM Onlays
n=40 Restorations
Lithium disilicate chairside CAD/CAM onlays (IPS emaxCAD/Ivoclar) will be adhesively bonded using a selective enamel etch technique with an adhesive (3M) and cement (3M).
|
CAD/CAM Crowns
n=40 Restorations
Full contour zirconia crowns (3M Chairside Zirconia/3M) will be cemented using a self-adhesive cement (3M).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Biologic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Recurrence of Caries, Erosion, Abfraction Scores]
6 months post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
40 Restorations
|
40 Restorations
|
|
Biologic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Recurrence of Caries, Erosion, Abfraction Scores]
6 months post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Biologic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Recurrence of Caries, Erosion, Abfraction Scores]
6 months post-restoration · 3: Clinically sufficient
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Biologic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Recurrence of Caries, Erosion, Abfraction Scores]
6 months post-restoration · 4: Clinically unsatisfactory
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Biologic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Recurrence of Caries, Erosion, Abfraction Scores]
6 months post-restoration · 5: Clinically poor
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Biologic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Recurrence of Caries, Erosion, Abfraction Scores]
6 months post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Biologic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Recurrence of Caries, Erosion, Abfraction Scores]
6 months post-restoration · Failed onlay / crown
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Biologic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Recurrence of Caries, Erosion, Abfraction Scores]
1 year post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
39 Restorations
|
39 Restorations
|
|
Biologic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Recurrence of Caries, Erosion, Abfraction Scores]
1 year post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Biologic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Recurrence of Caries, Erosion, Abfraction Scores]
1 year post-restoration · 3: Clinically sufficient
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Biologic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Recurrence of Caries, Erosion, Abfraction Scores]
1 year post-restoration · 4: Clinically unsatisfactory
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Biologic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Recurrence of Caries, Erosion, Abfraction Scores]
1 year post-restoration · 5: Clinically poor
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Biologic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Recurrence of Caries, Erosion, Abfraction Scores]
1 year post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
1 Restorations
|
1 Restorations
|
|
Biologic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Recurrence of Caries, Erosion, Abfraction Scores]
1 year post-restoration · Failed onlay / crown
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Biologic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Recurrence of Caries, Erosion, Abfraction Scores]
2 years post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
39 Restorations
|
40 Restorations
|
|
Biologic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Recurrence of Caries, Erosion, Abfraction Scores]
2 years post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Biologic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Recurrence of Caries, Erosion, Abfraction Scores]
2 years post-restoration · 3: Clinically sufficient
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Biologic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Recurrence of Caries, Erosion, Abfraction Scores]
2 years post-restoration · 4: Clinically unsatisfactory
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Biologic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Recurrence of Caries, Erosion, Abfraction Scores]
2 years post-restoration · 5: Clinically poor
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Biologic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Recurrence of Caries, Erosion, Abfraction Scores]
2 years post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Biologic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Recurrence of Caries, Erosion, Abfraction Scores]
2 years post-restoration · Failed onlay / crown
|
1 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Biologic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Recurrence of Caries, Erosion, Abfraction Scores]
3 years post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
37 Restorations
|
39 Restorations
|
|
Biologic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Recurrence of Caries, Erosion, Abfraction Scores]
3 years post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Biologic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Recurrence of Caries, Erosion, Abfraction Scores]
3 years post-restoration · 3: Clinically sufficient
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Biologic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Recurrence of Caries, Erosion, Abfraction Scores]
3 years post-restoration · 4: Clinically unsatisfactory
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Biologic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Recurrence of Caries, Erosion, Abfraction Scores]
3 years post-restoration · 5: Clinically poor
|
1 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Biologic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Recurrence of Caries, Erosion, Abfraction Scores]
3 years post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
1 Restorations
|
1 Restorations
|
|
Biologic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Recurrence of Caries, Erosion, Abfraction Scores]
3 years post-restoration · Failed onlay / crown
|
1 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 years with assessment visits at baseline, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 yearsPopulation: Up to two restorations of either type (onlays and/or crowns) were allowed per subject. Actual overall number of participants treated was 58.
Marginal Adaptation. Evaluations according to FDI World Dental Federation criteria (Hickel et al., 2010) \[1: Clinically excellent, 2: Clinically good, 3: Clinically sufficient, 4: Clinically unsatisfactory, 5: Clinically poor\] Functional property assessed by visual and/or tactile assessment by two independent examiners.\]
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CAD/CAM Onlays
n=40 Restorations
Lithium disilicate chairside CAD/CAM onlays (IPS emaxCAD/Ivoclar) will be adhesively bonded using a selective enamel etch technique with an adhesive (3M) and cement (3M).
|
CAD/CAM Crowns
n=40 Restorations
Full contour zirconia crowns (3M Chairside Zirconia/3M) will be cemented using a self-adhesive cement (3M).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Marginal Adaptation Scores]
Baseline · 1: Clinically excellent
|
40 Restorations
|
40 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Marginal Adaptation Scores]
Baseline · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Marginal Adaptation Scores]
Baseline · Missed visit / no data
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Marginal Adaptation Scores]
Baseline · Failed onlay / crown
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Marginal Adaptation Scores]
6 months post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
31 Restorations
|
31 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Marginal Adaptation Scores]
6 months post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
9 Restorations
|
9 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Marginal Adaptation Scores]
6 months post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Marginal Adaptation Scores]
6 months post-restoration · Failed onlay / crown
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Marginal Adaptation Scores]
1 year post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
20 Restorations
|
14 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Marginal Adaptation Scores]
1 year post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
19 Restorations
|
25 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Marginal Adaptation Scores]
1 year post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
1 Restorations
|
1 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Marginal Adaptation Scores]
1 year post-restoration · Failed onlay / crown
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Marginal Adaptation Scores]
2 years post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
12 Restorations
|
9 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Marginal Adaptation Scores]
2 years post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
27 Restorations
|
31 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Marginal Adaptation Scores]
2 years post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Marginal Adaptation Scores]
2 years post-restoration · Failed onlay / crown
|
1 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Marginal Adaptation Scores]
3 years post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
1 Restorations
|
11 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Marginal Adaptation Scores]
3 years post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
37 Restorations
|
28 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Marginal Adaptation Scores]
3 years post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
1 Restorations
|
1 Restorations
|
|
Functional Long-term Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Marginal Adaptation Scores]
3 years post-restoration · Failed onlay / crown
|
1 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 years with assessment visits at baseline, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 yearsPopulation: Up to two restorations of either type (onlays and/or crowns) were allowed per subject. Actual overall number of participants treated was 58.
Surface Luster: Evaluations according to FDI World Dental Federation criteria (Hickel et al., 2010) \[1: Clinically excellent, 2: Clinically good, 3: Clinically sufficient, 4: Clinically unsatisfactory, 5: Clinically poor\]
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CAD/CAM Onlays
n=40 Restorations
Lithium disilicate chairside CAD/CAM onlays (IPS emaxCAD/Ivoclar) will be adhesively bonded using a selective enamel etch technique with an adhesive (3M) and cement (3M).
|
CAD/CAM Crowns
n=40 Restorations
Full contour zirconia crowns (3M Chairside Zirconia/3M) will be cemented using a self-adhesive cement (3M).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Surface Luster Scores]
Baseline · 1: Clinically excellent
|
40 Restorations
|
40 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Surface Luster Scores]
Baseline · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Surface Luster Scores]
Baseline · Missed visit / no data
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Surface Luster Scores]
Baseline · Failed onlay / crown
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Surface Luster Scores]
6 months post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
40 Restorations
|
40 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Surface Luster Scores]
6 months post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Surface Luster Scores]
6 months post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Surface Luster Scores]
6 months post-restoration · Failed onlay / crown
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Surface Luster Scores]
1 year post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
39 Restorations
|
39 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Surface Luster Scores]
1 year post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Surface Luster Scores]
1 year post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
1 Restorations
|
1 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Surface Luster Scores]
1 year post-restoration · Failed onlay / crown
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Surface Luster Scores]
2 years post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
39 Restorations
|
40 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Surface Luster Scores]
2 years post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Surface Luster Scores]
2 years post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Surface Luster Scores]
2 years post-restoration · Failed onlay / crown
|
1 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Surface Luster Scores]
3 years post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
38 Restorations
|
39 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Surface Luster Scores]
3 years post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Surface Luster Scores]
3 years post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
1 Restorations
|
1 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Surface Luster Scores]
3 years post-restoration · Failed onlay / crown
|
1 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 4 weeks after baseline with weekly assessments or until the restoration is reported asymptomaticPopulation: Up to two restorations of either type (onlays and/or crowns) were allowed per subject. Actual overall number of participants treated was 58.
Evaluations according to FDI World Dental Federation criteria (Hickel et al., 2010) \[Rating Scale 1: Clinically excellent, 2: Clinically good, 3: Clinically sufficient, 4: Clinically unsatisfactory, 5: Clinically poor\] Biological properties assessed by patient interview.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CAD/CAM Onlays
n=40 Restorations
Lithium disilicate chairside CAD/CAM onlays (IPS emaxCAD/Ivoclar) will be adhesively bonded using a selective enamel etch technique with an adhesive (3M) and cement (3M).
|
CAD/CAM Crowns
n=40 Restorations
Full contour zirconia crowns (3M Chairside Zirconia/3M) will be cemented using a self-adhesive cement (3M).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Short-term Post-operative Sensitivity (Onlays and Crowns)
1 week post-restoration · Clinically excellent
|
37 Restorations
|
34 Restorations
|
|
Short-term Post-operative Sensitivity (Onlays and Crowns)
1 week post-restoration · Clinically good
|
3 Restorations
|
4 Restorations
|
|
Short-term Post-operative Sensitivity (Onlays and Crowns)
1 week post-restoration · Clinically sufficient
|
0 Restorations
|
2 Restorations
|
|
Short-term Post-operative Sensitivity (Onlays and Crowns)
1 week post-restoration · Not assessed
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Short-term Post-operative Sensitivity (Onlays and Crowns)
2 weeks post-restoration · Clinically excellent
|
40 Restorations
|
37 Restorations
|
|
Short-term Post-operative Sensitivity (Onlays and Crowns)
2 weeks post-restoration · Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
2 Restorations
|
|
Short-term Post-operative Sensitivity (Onlays and Crowns)
2 weeks post-restoration · Clinically sufficient
|
0 Restorations
|
1 Restorations
|
|
Short-term Post-operative Sensitivity (Onlays and Crowns)
2 weeks post-restoration · Not assessed
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Short-term Post-operative Sensitivity (Onlays and Crowns)
3 weeks post-restoration · Clinically excellent
|
0 Restorations
|
40 Restorations
|
|
Short-term Post-operative Sensitivity (Onlays and Crowns)
3 weeks post-restoration · Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Short-term Post-operative Sensitivity (Onlays and Crowns)
3 weeks post-restoration · Clinically sufficient
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Short-term Post-operative Sensitivity (Onlays and Crowns)
3 weeks post-restoration · Not assessed
|
40 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 years with assessments at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 yearsPopulation: Up to two restorations of either type (onlays and/or crowns) were allowed per subject. Actual overall number of participants treated was 58.
Loe \& Silness Index, 1963 \[0: normal gingiva, 1: mild inflammation and no bleeding, 2: moderate inflammation and bleeding, 3: severe inflammation\]
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CAD/CAM Onlays
n=40 Restorations
Lithium disilicate chairside CAD/CAM onlays (IPS emaxCAD/Ivoclar) will be adhesively bonded using a selective enamel etch technique with an adhesive (3M) and cement (3M).
|
CAD/CAM Crowns
n=40 Restorations
Full contour zirconia crowns (3M Chairside Zirconia/3M) will be cemented using a self-adhesive cement (3M).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gingival Index (Onlays and Crowns)
3 years post-restoration · Failed onlay / crown
|
1 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Gingival Index (Onlays and Crowns)
6 months post-restporation · 1. Normal gingiva
|
40 Restorations
|
40 Restorations
|
|
Gingival Index (Onlays and Crowns)
6 months post-restporation · 2: Moderate inflammation and bleeding
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Gingival Index (Onlays and Crowns)
6 months post-restporation · Missed visit / no data
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Gingival Index (Onlays and Crowns)
6 months post-restporation · Failed onlay / crown
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Gingival Index (Onlays and Crowns)
1 year post-restoration · 1. Normal gingiva
|
38 Restorations
|
38 Restorations
|
|
Gingival Index (Onlays and Crowns)
1 year post-restoration · 2: Moderate inflammation and bleeding
|
1 Restorations
|
1 Restorations
|
|
Gingival Index (Onlays and Crowns)
1 year post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
1 Restorations
|
1 Restorations
|
|
Gingival Index (Onlays and Crowns)
1 year post-restoration · Failed onlay / crown
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Gingival Index (Onlays and Crowns)
2 years post-restoration · 1. Normal gingiva
|
39 Restorations
|
39 Restorations
|
|
Gingival Index (Onlays and Crowns)
2 years post-restoration · 2: Moderate inflammation and bleeding
|
0 Restorations
|
1 Restorations
|
|
Gingival Index (Onlays and Crowns)
2 years post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Gingival Index (Onlays and Crowns)
2 years post-restoration · Failed onlay / crown
|
1 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Gingival Index (Onlays and Crowns)
3 years post-restoration · 1. Normal gingiva
|
37 Restorations
|
37 Restorations
|
|
Gingival Index (Onlays and Crowns)
3 years post-restoration · 2: Moderate inflammation and bleeding
|
1 Restorations
|
2 Restorations
|
|
Gingival Index (Onlays and Crowns)
3 years post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
1 Restorations
|
1 Restorations
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 years with assessments at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 yearsPopulation: Up to two restorations of either type (onlays and/or crowns) were allowed per subject. Actual overall number of participants treated was 58.
Silness \& Loe Index, 1964 \[0: plaque detectable in the gingival area, 1: plaque recognized only by running tip of probe across tooth surface at gingival crest, 2: moderate accumulation of plaque visible along gingival margin and adjacent tooth, 3: abundance of plaque visible along gingival margin and adjacent tooth\]
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CAD/CAM Onlays
n=40 Restorations
Lithium disilicate chairside CAD/CAM onlays (IPS emaxCAD/Ivoclar) will be adhesively bonded using a selective enamel etch technique with an adhesive (3M) and cement (3M).
|
CAD/CAM Crowns
n=40 Restorations
Full contour zirconia crowns (3M Chairside Zirconia/3M) will be cemented using a self-adhesive cement (3M).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Plaque Index (Onlays and Crowns)
6 months post-retoration · 2: moderate accumulation of plaque
|
0 Restorations
|
3 Restorations
|
|
Plaque Index (Onlays and Crowns)
6 months post-retoration · 1: plaque recognized
|
40 Restorations
|
37 Restorations
|
|
Plaque Index (Onlays and Crowns)
6 months post-retoration · Missed visit / no data
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Plaque Index (Onlays and Crowns)
6 months post-retoration · Failed onlay / crown
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Plaque Index (Onlays and Crowns)
1 year post-restoration · 1: plaque recognized
|
36 Restorations
|
35 Restorations
|
|
Plaque Index (Onlays and Crowns)
1 year post-restoration · 2: moderate accumulation of plaque
|
3 Restorations
|
4 Restorations
|
|
Plaque Index (Onlays and Crowns)
1 year post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
1 Restorations
|
1 Restorations
|
|
Plaque Index (Onlays and Crowns)
1 year post-restoration · Failed onlay / crown
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Plaque Index (Onlays and Crowns)
2 years post-restoration · 1: plaque recognized
|
39 Restorations
|
36 Restorations
|
|
Plaque Index (Onlays and Crowns)
2 years post-restoration · 2: moderate accumulation of plaque
|
0 Restorations
|
4 Restorations
|
|
Plaque Index (Onlays and Crowns)
2 years post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Plaque Index (Onlays and Crowns)
2 years post-restoration · Failed onlay / crown
|
1 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Plaque Index (Onlays and Crowns)
3 years post-restoration · 1: plaque recognized
|
37 Restorations
|
33 Restorations
|
|
Plaque Index (Onlays and Crowns)
3 years post-restoration · 2: moderate accumulation of plaque
|
1 Restorations
|
6 Restorations
|
|
Plaque Index (Onlays and Crowns)
3 years post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
1 Restorations
|
1 Restorations
|
|
Plaque Index (Onlays and Crowns)
3 years post-restoration · Failed onlay / crown
|
1 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 years with assessment visits at baseline, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 yearsPopulation: Up to two restorations of either type (onlays and/or crowns) were allowed per subject. Actual overall number of participants treated was 58.
Aesthetic Anatomical Form. Evaluations according to FDI World Dental Federation criteria (Hickel et al., 2010) \[1: Clinically excellent, 2: Clinically good, 3: Clinically sufficient, 4: Clinically unsatisfactory, 5: Clinically poor\] Functional property assessed by visual and/or tactile assessment by two independent examiners\]
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CAD/CAM Onlays
n=40 Restorations
Lithium disilicate chairside CAD/CAM onlays (IPS emaxCAD/Ivoclar) will be adhesively bonded using a selective enamel etch technique with an adhesive (3M) and cement (3M).
|
CAD/CAM Crowns
n=40 Restorations
Full contour zirconia crowns (3M Chairside Zirconia/3M) will be cemented using a self-adhesive cement (3M).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Esthetic Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Aesthetic Anatomical Form]
Baseline · 1: Clinically excellent
|
40 Restorations
|
40 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Aesthetic Anatomical Form]
Baseline · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Aesthetic Anatomical Form]
Baseline · Missed visit / no data
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Aesthetic Anatomical Form]
Baseline · Failed onlay / crown
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Aesthetic Anatomical Form]
6 months post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
40 Restorations
|
40 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Aesthetic Anatomical Form]
6 months post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Aesthetic Anatomical Form]
6 months post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Aesthetic Anatomical Form]
6 months post-restoration · Failed onlay / crown
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Aesthetic Anatomical Form]
1 year post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
39 Restorations
|
39 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Aesthetic Anatomical Form]
1 year post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Aesthetic Anatomical Form]
1 year post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
1 Restorations
|
1 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Aesthetic Anatomical Form]
1 year post-restoration · Failed onlay / crown
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Aesthetic Anatomical Form]
2 years post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
39 Restorations
|
40 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Aesthetic Anatomical Form]
2 years post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Aesthetic Anatomical Form]
2 years post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Aesthetic Anatomical Form]
2 years post-restoration · Failed onlay / crown
|
1 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Aesthetic Anatomical Form]
3 years post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
38 Restorations
|
39 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Aesthetic Anatomical Form]
3 years post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Aesthetic Anatomical Form]
3 years post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
1 Restorations
|
1 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties Clinical Performance of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Aesthetic Anatomical Form]
3 years post-restoration · Failed onlay / crown
|
1 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 years with assessments at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 yearsPopulation: Up to two restorations of either type (onlays and/or crowns) were allowed per subject. Actual overall number of participants treated was 58.
Post-operative sensitivity. Evaluations according to FDI World Dental Federation criteria (Hickel et al., 2010) \[1: Clinically excellent, 2: Clinically good, 3: Clinically sufficient, 4: Clinically unsatisfactory, 5: Clinically poor\] Biological properties assessed by patient interview.\]
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CAD/CAM Onlays
n=40 Restorations
Lithium disilicate chairside CAD/CAM onlays (IPS emaxCAD/Ivoclar) will be adhesively bonded using a selective enamel etch technique with an adhesive (3M) and cement (3M).
|
CAD/CAM Crowns
n=40 Restorations
Full contour zirconia crowns (3M Chairside Zirconia/3M) will be cemented using a self-adhesive cement (3M).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Biologic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Post-operative Sensitivity]
6 months post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
40 Restorations
|
39 Restorations
|
|
Biologic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Post-operative Sensitivity]
6 months post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
1 Restorations
|
|
Biologic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Post-operative Sensitivity]
6 months post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Biologic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Post-operative Sensitivity]
6 months post-restoration · Failed onlay / crown
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Biologic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Post-operative Sensitivity]
1 year post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
39 Restorations
|
37 Restorations
|
|
Biologic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Post-operative Sensitivity]
1 year post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
2 Restorations
|
|
Biologic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Post-operative Sensitivity]
1 year post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
1 Restorations
|
1 Restorations
|
|
Biologic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Post-operative Sensitivity]
1 year post-restoration · Failed onlay / crown
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Biologic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Post-operative Sensitivity]
2 years post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
39 Restorations
|
40 Restorations
|
|
Biologic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Post-operative Sensitivity]
2 years post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Biologic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Post-operative Sensitivity]
2 years post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Biologic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Post-operative Sensitivity]
2 years post-restoration · Failed onlay / crown
|
1 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Biologic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Post-operative Sensitivity]
3 years post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
38 Restorations
|
39 Restorations
|
|
Biologic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Post-operative Sensitivity]
3 years post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Biologic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Post-operative Sensitivity]
3 years post-restoration · Missed visit / no data
|
1 Restorations
|
1 Restorations
|
|
Biologic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Post-operative Sensitivity]
3 years post-restoration · Failed onlay / crown
|
1 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 years with assessment visits at baseline, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 yearsPopulation: Up to two restorations of either type (onlays and/or crowns) were allowed per subject. Actual overall number of participants treated was 58.
Surface Staining: Evaluations according to FDI World Dental Federation criteria (Hickel et al., 2010) \[1: Clinically excellent, 2: Clinically good, 3: Clinically sufficient, 4: Clinically unsatisfactory, 5: Clinically poor\]
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CAD/CAM Onlays
n=40 Restorations
Lithium disilicate chairside CAD/CAM onlays (IPS emaxCAD/Ivoclar) will be adhesively bonded using a selective enamel etch technique with an adhesive (3M) and cement (3M).
|
CAD/CAM Crowns
n=40 Restorations
Full contour zirconia crowns (3M Chairside Zirconia/3M) will be cemented using a self-adhesive cement (3M).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Surface Staining Scores]
Baseline · 1: Clinically excellent
|
40 Restorations
|
40 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Surface Staining Scores]
Baseline · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Surface Staining Scores]
Baseline · Missed visit, no data
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Surface Staining Scores]
Baseline · Failed onlay / crown
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Surface Staining Scores]
6 months post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
40 Restorations
|
40 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Surface Staining Scores]
6 months post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Surface Staining Scores]
6 months post-restoration · Missed visit, no data
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Surface Staining Scores]
6 months post-restoration · Failed onlay / crown
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Surface Staining Scores]
1 year post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
39 Restorations
|
39 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Surface Staining Scores]
1 year post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Surface Staining Scores]
1 year post-restoration · Missed visit, no data
|
1 Restorations
|
1 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Surface Staining Scores]
1 year post-restoration · Failed onlay / crown
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Surface Staining Scores]
2 years post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
39 Restorations
|
40 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Surface Staining Scores]
2 years post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Surface Staining Scores]
2 years post-restoration · Missed visit, no data
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Surface Staining Scores]
2 years post-restoration · Failed onlay / crown
|
1 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Surface Staining Scores]
3 years post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
38 Restorations
|
39 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Surface Staining Scores]
3 years post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Surface Staining Scores]
3 years post-restoration · Missed visit, no data
|
1 Restorations
|
1 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Surface Staining Scores]
3 years post-restoration · Failed onlay / crown
|
1 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 years with assessment visits at baseline, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 yearsPopulation: Up to two restorations of either type (onlays and/or crowns) were allowed per subject. Actual overall number of participants treated was 58.
Margin Staining: Evaluations according to FDI World Dental Federation criteria (Hickel et al., 2010) \[1: Clinically excellent, 2: Clinically good, 3: Clinically sufficient, 4: Clinically unsatisfactory, 5: Clinically poor\]
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CAD/CAM Onlays
n=40 Restorations
Lithium disilicate chairside CAD/CAM onlays (IPS emaxCAD/Ivoclar) will be adhesively bonded using a selective enamel etch technique with an adhesive (3M) and cement (3M).
|
CAD/CAM Crowns
n=40 Restorations
Full contour zirconia crowns (3M Chairside Zirconia/3M) will be cemented using a self-adhesive cement (3M).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Margin Staining Scores]
Baseline · 1: Clinically excellent
|
40 Restorations
|
40 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Margin Staining Scores]
Baseline · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Margin Staining Scores]
Baseline · Missed visit, no data
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Margin Staining Scores]
Baseline · Failed onlay / crown
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Margin Staining Scores]
6 months post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
40 Restorations
|
40 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Margin Staining Scores]
6 months post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Margin Staining Scores]
6 months post-restoration · Missed visit, no data
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Margin Staining Scores]
6 months post-restoration · Failed onlay / crown
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Margin Staining Scores]
1 year post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
39 Restorations
|
39 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Margin Staining Scores]
1 year post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Margin Staining Scores]
1 year post-restoration · Missed visit, no data
|
1 Restorations
|
1 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Margin Staining Scores]
1 year post-restoration · Failed onlay / crown
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Margin Staining Scores]
2 years post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
39 Restorations
|
40 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Margin Staining Scores]
2 years post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Margin Staining Scores]
2 years post-restoration · Missed visit, no data
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Margin Staining Scores]
2 years post-restoration · Failed onlay / crown
|
1 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Margin Staining Scores]
3 years post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
38 Restorations
|
39 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Margin Staining Scores]
3 years post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Margin Staining Scores]
3 years post-restoration · Missed visit, no data
|
1 Restorations
|
1 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Margin Staining Scores]
3 years post-restoration · Failed onlay / crown
|
1 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 years with assessment visits at baseline, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 yearsPopulation: Up to two restorations of either type (onlays and/or crowns) were allowed per subject. Actual overall number of participants treated was 58.
Color Match and Translucency: Evaluations according to FDI World Dental Federation criteria (Hickel et al., 2010) \[1: Clinically excellent, 2: Clinically good, 3: Clinically sufficient, 4: Clinically unsatisfactory, 5: Clinically poor\]
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CAD/CAM Onlays
n=40 Restorations
Lithium disilicate chairside CAD/CAM onlays (IPS emaxCAD/Ivoclar) will be adhesively bonded using a selective enamel etch technique with an adhesive (3M) and cement (3M).
|
CAD/CAM Crowns
n=40 Restorations
Full contour zirconia crowns (3M Chairside Zirconia/3M) will be cemented using a self-adhesive cement (3M).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Color Match and Translucency Scores]
Baseline · 1: Clinically excellent
|
40 Restorations
|
40 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Color Match and Translucency Scores]
Baseline · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Color Match and Translucency Scores]
Baseline · Missed visit, no data
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Color Match and Translucency Scores]
Baseline · Failed onlay / crown
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Color Match and Translucency Scores]
6 months post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
39 Restorations
|
40 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Color Match and Translucency Scores]
6 months post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
1 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Color Match and Translucency Scores]
6 months post-restoration · Missed visit, no data
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Color Match and Translucency Scores]
6 months post-restoration · Failed onlay / crown
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Color Match and Translucency Scores]
1 year post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
39 Restorations
|
39 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Color Match and Translucency Scores]
1 year post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Color Match and Translucency Scores]
1 year post-restoration · Missed visit, no data
|
1 Restorations
|
1 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Color Match and Translucency Scores]
1 year post-restoration · Failed onlay / crown
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Color Match and Translucency Scores]
2 years post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
39 Restorations
|
40 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Color Match and Translucency Scores]
2 years post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Color Match and Translucency Scores]
2 years post-restoration · Missed visit, no data
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Color Match and Translucency Scores]
2 years post-restoration · Failed onlay / crown
|
1 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Color Match and Translucency Scores]
3 years post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
38 Restorations
|
39 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Color Match and Translucency Scores]
3 years post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Color Match and Translucency Scores]
3 years post-restoration · Missed visit, no data
|
1 Restorations
|
1 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Color Match and Translucency Scores]
3 years post-restoration · Failed onlay / crown
|
1 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 years with assessment visits at baseline, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 yearsPopulation: Up to two restorations of either type (onlays and/or crowns) were allowed per subject. Actual overall number of participants treated was 58.
Aesthetic anatomical form: Evaluations according to FDI World Dental Federation criteria (Hickel et al., 2010) \[1: Clinically excellent, 2: Clinically good, 3: Clinically sufficient, 4: Clinically unsatisfactory, 5: Clinically poor\]
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CAD/CAM Onlays
n=40 Restorations
Lithium disilicate chairside CAD/CAM onlays (IPS emaxCAD/Ivoclar) will be adhesively bonded using a selective enamel etch technique with an adhesive (3M) and cement (3M).
|
CAD/CAM Crowns
n=40 Restorations
Full contour zirconia crowns (3M Chairside Zirconia/3M) will be cemented using a self-adhesive cement (3M).
|
|---|---|---|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Aesthetic Anatomical Form Scores]
2 years post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
39 Restorations
|
40 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Aesthetic Anatomical Form Scores]
Baseline · 1: Clinically excellent
|
40 Restorations
|
40 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Aesthetic Anatomical Form Scores]
Baseline · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Aesthetic Anatomical Form Scores]
Baseline · Missed visit, no data
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Aesthetic Anatomical Form Scores]
Baseline · Failed onlay / crown
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Aesthetic Anatomical Form Scores]
6 months post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
40 Restorations
|
40 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Aesthetic Anatomical Form Scores]
6 months post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Aesthetic Anatomical Form Scores]
6 months post-restoration · Missed visit, no data
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Aesthetic Anatomical Form Scores]
6 months post-restoration · Failed onlay / crown
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Aesthetic Anatomical Form Scores]
1 year post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
39 Restorations
|
39 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Aesthetic Anatomical Form Scores]
1 year post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Aesthetic Anatomical Form Scores]
1 year post-restoration · Missed visit, no data
|
1 Restorations
|
1 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Aesthetic Anatomical Form Scores]
1 year post-restoration · Failed onlay / crown
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Aesthetic Anatomical Form Scores]
2 years post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Aesthetic Anatomical Form Scores]
2 years post-restoration · Missed visit, no data
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Aesthetic Anatomical Form Scores]
2 years post-restoration · Failed onlay / crown
|
1 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Aesthetic Anatomical Form Scores]
3 years post-restoration · 1: Clinically excellent
|
38 Restorations
|
39 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Aesthetic Anatomical Form Scores]
3 years post-restoration · 2: Clinically good
|
0 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Aesthetic Anatomical Form Scores]
3 years post-restoration · Missed visit, no data
|
1 Restorations
|
1 Restorations
|
|
Esthetic Properties of Restorations (Onlays and Crowns) [Aesthetic Anatomical Form Scores]
3 years post-restoration · Failed onlay / crown
|
1 Restorations
|
0 Restorations
|
Adverse Events
CAD/CAM Onlays
Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 1 deaths
CAD/CAM Crowns
Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
CAD/CAM Onlays
n=35 participants at risk
Lithium disilicate chairside CAD/CAM onlays (IPS emaxCAD/Ivoclar) will be adhesively bonded using a selective enamel etch technique with an adhesive (3M) and cement (3M).
Lithium disilicate onlays (IPS emaxCAD/Ivoclar): Restoration of posterior teeth
|
CAD/CAM Crowns
n=33 participants at risk
Full contour zirconia crowns (3M Chairside Zirconia/3M) will be cemented using a self-adhesive cement (3M).
Chairside zirconia crowns (3M): Restoration of posterior teeth
|
|---|---|---|
|
General disorders
Death
|
2.9%
1/35 • Number of events 1 • From participant's first treatment restoration to subject's completion of the study, an average of 3 years..
Non-device related adverse event reporting was not required beyond the 6-month follow-up visit. Reporting of all device-related and serious adverse events was required throughout the study (3 years).
|
0.00%
0/33 • From participant's first treatment restoration to subject's completion of the study, an average of 3 years..
Non-device related adverse event reporting was not required beyond the 6-month follow-up visit. Reporting of all device-related and serious adverse events was required throughout the study (3 years).
|
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: GT60