Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
15 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-05-16
2022-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The aim of the technical phase is to develop and test MR sequences using a diagnostic scanner for use in the chest.
This will be carried out on a humanoid phantom and subsequently healthy volunteers.
The second phase will be a clinical phase to assess the accuracy of visualising all thoracic structures and the tumour in lung cancer patients using the defined MR sequences. It will compromise of 2 parts; the first part will involve 3 lung cancer patients as a pilot to enable the fine tuning of the sequences. The 2nd part will involve the evaluation of MRI in relation to planning CT in 12 lung cancer patients.
The hypothesis is that the use of 4D MRI will be more accurate in defining the tumour and intrathoracic structures thanachieved with the current standard of 4DCT to improve the accuracy and potentially the outcome of radical radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Lung HeXeRT: Helium, Xenon MRI for NSCLC Patients
NCT01859650
MRI Development for Radiotherapy Planning and Delivery in Non-Patient Volunteers
NCT04749134
Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy of Stereotactic MRI-Guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy (SMART) for Central Lung Tumors
NCT05609331
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for the Delineation of Organs At Risk (OAR) and Target Volumes in Lung Cancer Patients
NCT03048760
Hyperpolarized Xenon Gas MR Imaging in NSCLC Radiotherapy
NCT02151604
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Then a further 12 patients will be imaged, each for two MRI sessions taking place during the radiotherapy schedule and separated by at least a week. Each MR session will consist of the following sequence: 15 seconds of TWIST, 15 seconds of HASTE, 90 seconds off, 15 seconds of TWIST and 15 seconds of HASTE. For each patient an on-treatment 4D cone-beam CT will also be collected (standard process), alongside the diagnostic quality planning 4DCT. Patient breathing coaching will be consistent between CT and MR, as will patient positioning; that is, patients will be imaged with their arms above their heads. The images will be analyzed to determine -
1. Do extents of tumour movement seen in TWIST 4D-MR images differ from those seen in planning 4D-CT scans, judging the movement extent according to differences in internal target and gross tumour volumes (ITVs and GTVs) defined from the two sets of images, and in the range of motion of the tumour centre of mass? This may well be the case, since the 4D-MR scans catalogue movement over several breathing cycles, whereas 4D-CTs describe a single composite cycle, synthesised from slices collected at various times over multiple cycles.
2. How reproducible is the movement seen at the two MR imaging sessions? Additionally, how reproducible is the movement seen within each MR imaging session?
3. How similar according to volume, Dice similarity index (percentage of overlap) and Haussdorf distance (maximum distance between the contours of two structures) are GTVs outlined on single phases of 4D-CT and TWIST 4D-MR images, after rigidly registering the centres-of-mass of the two GTVs to allow for movement?
4. How consonant are tumour contours defined on single slice HASTE MR images with those defined on a phase of the 4D TWIST images? Answering question 1 will allow us to determine the utility of gauging tumour movement over extended 4D-MR imaging sessions, rather than from 4D-CT sessions which have to be short to avoid excessively irradiating patients. Question 2 will cast further light on the same issue, allowing us to determine the stability over the course of RT schedules of motion assessed over the course of around 1 minute during an individual TWIST scan.
Answering question 3 will allow us to understand how fully 4D-MR images can be used within the treatment planning process. If outlined GTVs differ greatly between MRI and CT, then 4D-MRI might only provide more complete movement data; whereas if CT and MRI-based GTVs are similar the 4D-MRI may have more uses in treatment planning, particularly if some tumour regions are more clearly visible on MRI than on CT.
Question 4 will allow us to gauge the accuracy and precision of tumour definition on real-time single MRI slices, compared to definition on 4D-MR and 4D-CT. Answering this question is an essential precursor to the development of automatic algorithms
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Study participants cohort I
3 stage III NSCLC patients receiving radiotherapy will be imaged, each for a single MRI session using TWIST and HASTE sequences.
MRI scan
MRI analysis using TWIST and HASTE
4D MRI
4D MRI alongside 4D CT in lung cancer
Study participants cohort II
12 patients will be imaged, each for two MRI sessions taking place during the radiotherapy schedule and separated by at least a week.
MRI scan
MRI analysis using TWIST and HASTE
4D MRI
4D MRI alongside 4D CT in lung cancer
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
MRI scan
MRI analysis using TWIST and HASTE
4D MRI
4D MRI alongside 4D CT in lung cancer
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
The criteria specified in the institutional protocol are:
* Histologically verified NSCLC or presumed not histologically verified but MDT reviewed and agreed if obtaining biopsy is considered too risky
* Stage II, IIIA \& IIIB (AJCC, 7th Edition TNM), fully staged with CT, PET-CT +/-EBUS for mediastinal staging
* WHO performance status ≤ 2
* Adequate respiratory function
* Absence of malignant effusion
* Aged 18 and over
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients not able to have radical radiotherapy
* Pregnant or lactating women
* Unable to give informed consent
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael Brada, PhD, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Clatterbridge Cancer Centre
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust
Bebington, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CO996
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.