Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
EARLY_PHASE1
1 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-10-15
2022-03-25
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Safety Testing of Adding Nivolumab to Chemotherapy in Patients With Intermediate and High-Risk Local-Regionally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer
NCT02764593
A Study to Evaluate Immune Biomarker Modulation in Response to VTX-2337 in Combination With an Anti- PD-1 Inhibitor in Head and Neck Cancer
NCT03906526
Cetuximab & Nivolumab in Patients With Recurrent/Metastatic Head & Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
NCT03370276
An Immuno-therapy Study of Nivolumab in Combination With Experimental Medication BMS-986205 Compared to Standard of Care EXTREME Regimen in First-line Recurrent/Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck
NCT03386838
Nivolumab in Recurrent and/or Metastatic SCCHN
NCT03226756
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The CIVO device penetrates solid tumors and delivers subtherapeutic microdoses of up to eight anti-cancer agents or combinations of anti-cancer agents co-injected with CIVO GLO into discrete regions of the tumor. At the time of the planned surgical intervention (at least four hours to up to four days after the CIVO microdose injection), the injected tumor tissue is then excised and tumor responses are assessed via histological staining of tumor cross-sections sampled perpendicular to each injection column. Co-injection with CIVO GLO enables identification of each injection site during resection as well as in tissues stained for analysis. Because the platform delivers microdose amounts of each test agent or combination directly into the patient's tumor tissue, hypotheses can be tested earlier in the drug development process, consistent with the goals of the 2006 FDA Exploratory IND Guidance for Industry.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
BASIC_SCIENCE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
CIVO Microdose Injection of Motolimod and Nivolumab
Patients who are scheduled for surgical biopsy or tumor resection surgery will be injected at least four hours to up to four days prior to surgery using the CIVO device. Each needle of the CIVO device will deliver up to 8.3 microliters of solution, including a vehicle control (sterile saline) or subtherapeutic microdoses of motolimod, nivolumab, or motolimod combined with nivolumab. Each microdose is simultaneously injected in a columnar fashion through each of 8, 5, or 3 needles (in a device configuration determined by tumor dimensions) into a single solid tumor or effaced metastatic lymph node.
Motolimod
Intratumoral microdose injection by the CIVO device.
Nivolumab
Intratumoral microdose injection by the CIVO device.
Motolimod + Nivolumab
Intratumoral microdose injection by the CIVO device.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Motolimod
Intratumoral microdose injection by the CIVO device.
Nivolumab
Intratumoral microdose injection by the CIVO device.
Motolimod + Nivolumab
Intratumoral microdose injection by the CIVO device.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Male or female ≥ 18 years of age at Visit 1 (Screening).
3. Pathologic diagnosis of HNSCC.
4. Ability and willingness to provide written informed consent. Voluntary written consent must be given before performance of any study related procedure not part of standard medical care, with the understanding that consent may be withdrawn by the patient at any time without prejudice to future medical care.
5. At least one lesion (primary or recurrent tumor) ≥ 2 cm in the shortest diameter that is accessible for ultrasound-guided percutaneous CIVO injection and for which there is a planned surgical intervention. An effaced metastatic lymph node may only be selected with prior Sponsor approval. Treatment plan may include adjuvant radiation or chemotherapy, and subjects should have no medical contraindication to surgery.
6. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2.
7. Female patients who :
* Are postmenopausal for at least 24 consecutive months (i.e., have not had menses at any time during the preceding 24 consecutive months), OR
* Are surgically sterile, OR
* Are of childbearing potential (FCBP) who agree to true abstinence from heterosexual intercourse (which must be source documented) or to use a highly effective contraceptive method (e.g., combined \[containing estrogen and progestogen\] or progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation \[oral, injectable, intravaginal, patch, or implantable\]; bilateral tubal ligation; intrauterine device; intrauterine hormone-releasing system; or vasectomized partner sterilization \[note that vasectomized partner is a highly effective birth control method provided that partner is the sole sexual partner of the FCBP trial participant and that the vasectomized partner has received medical assessment of the surgical success\]) from the time of signing the Informed Consent Form (ICF) and during study participation.
* Agree to refrain from donating ova during study participation.
Male patients who:
* Agree to practice true abstinence from heterosexual intercourse or agree to use a condom (a latex condom is recommended) during sexual contact with a pregnant female or a FCBP from the time of signing the ICF and while participating in the study, even if he has undergone a successful vasectomy.
* Agree to refrain from donating sperm during study participation.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Tumors near or involving critical structures for which, in the opinion of the treating clinician, injection would pose undue risk to the patient.
3. Patients with a diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
4. Female patients who are:
* Both lactating and breastfeeding, OR
* Have a positive urine β-subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) pregnancy test at screening verified by the Investigator.
5. Any uncontrolled intercurrent illness, condition, serious medical or psychiatric illness, or circumstance that, in the opinion of the Investigator, could interfere with adherence to the study's procedures or requirements, or otherwise compromise the study's objectives.
6. Patients with a history of concurrent second cancers requiring active, ongoing systemic treatment.
7. Patients with active autoimmune diseases requiring treatment.
8. Patients with known human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immune deficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS) with uncontrolled viral load and CD4 less than 200, or known chronic hepatitis B/C.
9. Patients that have received a live vaccine within 4 weeks of the baseline/screening visit.
10. Use of any of the following ≤ 2 weeks prior to CIVO injection :
1. Chronic systemic immunosuppressive therapy or corticosteroids (e.g., prednisone or equivalent exceeding a total dose of 140 mg over the last 14 days). Intranasal, inhaled, topical, or local corticosteroid injections (e.g., intra-articular injection), or steroids as premedication for hypersensitivity reactions (e.g., computed tomography \[CT\] scan premedication) are exceptions to this criterion.
2. Biological response modifiers for treatment of active autoimmune disease.
3. Hematopoietic growth factors.
4. Anticoagulants such as warfarin or low-molecular-weight heparin.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Celgene
INDUSTRY
Bristol-Myers Squibb
INDUSTRY
Presage Biosciences
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Medical Director
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Presage Biosciences
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, United States
University of Illinois at Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Wake Forest Baptist Health
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU)
Portland, Oregon, United States
Portland VA
Portland, Oregon, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Klinghoffer RA, Bahrami SB, Hatton BA, Frazier JP, Moreno-Gonzalez A, Strand AD, Kerwin WS, Casalini JR, Thirstrup DJ, You S, Morris SM, Watts KL, Veiseh M, Grenley MO, Tretyak I, Dey J, Carleton M, Beirne E, Pedro KD, Ditzler SH, Girard EJ, Deckwerth TL, Bertout JA, Meleo KA, Filvaroff EH, Chopra R, Press OW, Olson JM. A technology platform to assess multiple cancer agents simultaneously within a patient's tumor. Sci Transl Med. 2015 Apr 22;7(284):284ra58. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa7489.
Frazier JP, Bertout JA, Kerwin WS, Moreno-Gonzalez A, Casalini JR, Grenley MO, Beirne E, Watts KL, Keener A, Thirstrup DJ, Tretyak I, Ditzler SH, Tripp CD, Choy K, Gillings S, Breit MN, Meleo KA, Rizzo V, Herrera CL, Perry JA, Amaravadi RK, Olson JM, Klinghoffer RA. Multidrug Analyses in Patients Distinguish Efficacious Cancer Agents Based on Both Tumor Cell Killing and Immunomodulation. Cancer Res. 2017 Jun 1;77(11):2869-2880. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0084. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
Dey J, Kerwin WS, Grenley MO, Casalini JR, Tretyak I, Ditzler SH, Thirstrup DJ, Frazier JP, Pierce DW, Carleton M, Klinghoffer RA. A Platform for Rapid, Quantitative Assessment of Multiple Drug Combinations Simultaneously in Solid Tumors In Vivo. PLoS One. 2016 Jun 30;11(6):e0158617. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158617. eCollection 2016.
Moreno-Gonzalez A, Olson JM, Klinghoffer RA. Predicting responses to chemotherapy in the context that matters - the patient. Mol Cell Oncol. 2015 Jun 10;3(1):e1057315. doi: 10.1080/23723556.2015.1057315. eCollection 2016 Jan.
Gundle KR, Deutsch GB, Goodman HJ, Pollack SM, Thompson MJ, Davis JL, Lee MY, Ramirez DC, Kerwin W, Bertout JA, Grenley MO, Sottero KHW, Beirne E, Frazier J, Dey J, Ellison M, Klinghoffer RA, Maki RG. Multiplexed Evaluation of Microdosed Antineoplastic Agents In Situ in the Tumor Microenvironment of Patients with Soft Tissue Sarcoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Aug 1;26(15):3958-3968. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-0614. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Presage Website
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PBI-CEL-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.