Trial of IV vs Oral Iron Treatment of Iron Deficiency Anemia in the Post-Operative Bariatric Surgical Patient

NCT ID: NCT04268849

Last Updated: 2025-10-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

104 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-02-27

Study Completion Date

2026-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Given the limited long-term effectiveness of traditional weight loss methods, bariatric surgery is increasingly becoming the preferred option for sustained weight loss. With the ascendancy of the laparoscopic approach, the two most common procedures are the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and the vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG).

Because bariatric surgery decreases nutrient intake through restriction, malabsorption, or both, and given that obese patients are often malnourished even before surgery, postoperative micronutrient deficiency, particularly of iron, can be a serious complication and difficult to treat. Iron deficiency anemia has been reported to be as high as 49% in the post-bariatric surgical patient.

The current standard for correcting iron deficiency anemia in the post-operative bariatric surgical patient is oral iron supplements. However, oral iron therapy is known for its caustic effects on the gastric mucosa causing gastric irritation, nausea, epigastric discomfort and constipation. These debilitating symptoms lead to poor adherence and lower long and short-term efficacy. Furthermore, iron absorption from oral iron supplements when taken with food in patients with low iron stores ranges from 2 to 13% and without food 5 to 28%. An alternative and more effective method of iron replenishment is the use of intravenous iron. A litany of published trials, without contradiction, show marked superiority of intravenous iron in improving hemoglobin concentrations and iron parameters when compared to historical controls. Nonetheless, the current recommendations of the American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery nutritional guidelines, state that oral iron supplementation for IDA is the recommended first line of treatment. Studies are lacking that compare the efficacy of oral versus intravenous (IV) iron therapy for the treatment of IDA in the post-bariatric surgical patient.

The aim of our study is to compare two accepted treatments for iron deficiency anemia (oral ferrous sulfate and intravenous ferumoxytol) for efficacy and speed of response in the treatment of IDA in the post-operative bariatric surgical patient. In this study, 104 bariatric surgical post-operative patients will be randomly assigned 52 each to oral or 52 to a single dose IV iron treatment using double-blind procedures.

The primary outcome will be determined at 6 weeks of treatment with a follow-up at 12 months after treatment. Non-responders at 6 weeks after treatment may, if they qualify (based on inclusion/exclusion criteria), have an open-label IV iron treatment and will be followed with the same evaluations used after the first IV iron treatments.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Iron Deficiency Anemia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Double blind, double dummy of oral versus intravenous iron for iron deficiency patients after bariatric surgery. All subjects will get either oral iron and intravenous saline, or oral vitamin C and intravenous iron.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors
Patients will wear sleep masks to blind intravenous intervention

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Oral Iron

The subject will receive one IV infusion of ferumoxytol administered as 1020 mg over 30 minutes or an equivalent volume of normal saline. At the time of the infusion, the patient will also be given an opaque bottle, containing either vitamin C tablets or ferrous sulfate 325 mg.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ferumoxytol

Intervention Type DRUG

Ferumoxytol (30 mg/mL) intravenous injection in single use vials.

Saline

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo for Ferumoxytol

Ferrous sulfate tablets

Intervention Type DRUG

ferrous sulfate tablets containing 60 mg elemental iron

Vitamin C

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo: Vitamin C, 250 mg, given in the same bottle as the oral iron

IV Iron

The subject will receive one IV infusion of ferumoxytol administered as 1020 mg over 30 minutes or an equivalent volume of normal saline. At the time of the infusion, the patient will also be given an opaque bottle, containing either vitamin C tablets or ferrous sulfate 325 mg.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ferumoxytol

Intervention Type DRUG

Ferumoxytol (30 mg/mL) intravenous injection in single use vials.

Saline

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo for Ferumoxytol

Ferrous sulfate tablets

Intervention Type DRUG

ferrous sulfate tablets containing 60 mg elemental iron

Vitamin C

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo: Vitamin C, 250 mg, given in the same bottle as the oral iron

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ferumoxytol

Ferumoxytol (30 mg/mL) intravenous injection in single use vials.

Intervention Type DRUG

Saline

Placebo for Ferumoxytol

Intervention Type DRUG

Ferrous sulfate tablets

ferrous sulfate tablets containing 60 mg elemental iron

Intervention Type DRUG

Vitamin C

Placebo: Vitamin C, 250 mg, given in the same bottle as the oral iron

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Aged ≥ 18 years
2. Patients who have undergone a Roux-en Y Gastric Bypass or Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy and are at least 3 months or more out from surgery.
3. Iron deficiency anemia defined as iron deficient with either ferritin\<30 mcg/l, TSAT\<20%, or anemia with Hgb\<13 g/dL for both males and females.
4. Willingness to participate and signing the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Iron overload or disturbances in utilization of iron (e.g. hemochromatosis and hemosiderosis)
2. Decompensated liver cirrhosis or active hepatitis (ALAT \> 3 times upper limit of normal)
3. Serum ferritin \> 400 ng/mL or transferrin saturation \>40 %
4. Active acute or chronic infections (assessed by clinical judgment that may be indicated by White Blood Cells (WBC) and C-Reactive Protein (CRP) when these are available)
5. Rheumatoid arthritis with symptoms or signs of active inflammation
6. Pregnant and nursing women
7. History of multiple allergies (two or more)
8. Known hypersensitivity to ferumoxytol or oral iron or any excipients in the drug products
9. Previous IV iron treatment for IDA
10. Other iron treatment or blood transfusion within 4 weeks prior to the screening or treatment visit
11. Planned elective surgery during the study
12. Any other medical condition that, in the opinion of Investigator, may cause the subject to be unsuitable for the completion of the study or place the subject at potential risk from being in the study, e.g. a malignancy, uncontrolled hypertension, unstable ischemic heart disease, or uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

AMAG Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Auerbach Hematology Oncology Associates P C

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Michael Auerbach MD

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Auerbach Hematology and Oncology

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Michael Auerbach, MD

Role: CONTACT

4107804050

Stella Rineer, RN

Role: CONTACT

410 7804050

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Michael Auerbach, MD

Role: primary

410-780-4050

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BariatricsProtocol100719

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.