Establishing Clinical Utility of a New Diagnostic Test for Patients Suffering From Pain: A CPV® Randomized Controlled Trial

NCT ID: NCT04266821

Last Updated: 2020-09-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

154 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-02-01

Study Completion Date

2020-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will collect high-quality data on how practicing primary care physicians across the U.S. currently manage patients experiencing chronic pain and how the results of Ethos Laboratories' test change clinical decision making. To do so, this study leverages simulated patient cases called Clinical Performance and Value vignettes (CPVs) in a proven methodology to rapidly measure physician care decisions.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study will collect high-quality randomized controlled data from a nationally representative sample of practicing physicians, specifically primary care physicians and pain specialists, to determine how they currently manage patients with pain and how the results of Ethos' test change their clinical decision making. Data from this study will better illuminate the clinical use cases in which the Ethos test has the most significant impact on clinical decision making (and thus the largest clinical utility) and the physician characteristics (e.g., age, practice setting, training) associated with practice change.

The study is a prospective cohort trial with six steps:

1. Enrollment: The study will enroll an estimated 166 practicing primary care physicians who practice in the U.S. and are determined to be eligible by an eligibility screener.
2. Provider survey: Once providers are enrolled in the study, they will be asked to complete a questionnaire describing their practice and professional background.
3. Randomization: The 166 physicians will be randomized into equally-sized control and intervention arms.
4. CPVs (First Round): Physicians will complete three randomly-assigned CPV patient simulations. Cases will be identical across the intervention and control arms. All interactive cases are presented on an online platform, and are accessible via unique weblinks and any internet-connected computer.
5. Intervention education: Intervention-arm physicians will receive educational materials describing the clinical validation and use cases of the Ethos test. This material will replicate what physicians would receive as part of an actual marketing push introducing them to the Ethos test. These materials may be comprised of a slide deck, fact sheet, webinar, and/or case studies.
6. CPVs (Second Round): All participating physicians will then be asked to complete three additional CPV patient simulations. The cases are given to the doctors in a random order. Cases will be identical across the intervention and control arms, except that the intervention arm will receive Ethos test results at an appropriate point in each simulated case in the post-intervention round. Control arm physicians will continue to have access to standard of care diagnostic tools, but not the Ethos test results.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain Pain, Chronic

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

The study will enroll practicing primary care physicians in the US. Physicians are randomly assigned to either a control or intervention arm upon enrollment.

All eligible and consented participants will complete two rounds of three patient simulations.

The intervention arm only will receive educational material about the Ethos test in between these two rounds, and be provided simulated Ethos test results in the second round of simulated cases.
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Experimental

Experimental-arm providers will complete two rounds of three simulated patient cases (CPVs) with two additions described in the next column:

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Experimental Arm

Intervention Type OTHER

First, these providers will receive educational materials (e.g. a slide deck, mock test result and FAQ handout) meant to mimic what physicians will receive in the real-world market as they learn about the Ethos technology.

Second, within each of their second-round cases, intervention-arm physicians only will receive simulated test results from the Ethos test at the clinically-appropriate point in each case.

Control

These providers will complete two rounds of three simulated patient cases (CPVs) only.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Experimental Arm

First, these providers will receive educational materials (e.g. a slide deck, mock test result and FAQ handout) meant to mimic what physicians will receive in the real-world market as they learn about the Ethos technology.

Second, within each of their second-round cases, intervention-arm physicians only will receive simulated test results from the Ethos test at the clinically-appropriate point in each case.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Board-certified physician for at least two years
2. Averaging at least 20 hours per week of clinical and patient care duties over the last six months
3. At least 15% of patient panel with chronic pain
4. Prescribes opioids
5. Practicing in the U.S.
6. English speaking
7. Access to the internet
8. Informed, signed and voluntarily consented to be in the study

Exclusion Criteria

1. Non-English speaking
2. Practicing in an academic setting
3. Unable to access the internet
4. Not practicing in the U.S.
5. Not averaging at least 20 hours per week of clinical or patient care duties over the last six months
6. Less than 15% of panel with chronic pain
7. Does not prescribe opioids
8. Do not voluntarily consent to be in the study
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ethos Laboratories

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Qure Healthcare, LLC

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

John Peabody, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

President, QURE Healthcare

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

QURE Healthcare

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Burgon TB, Cox-Chapman J, Czarnecki C, Kropp R, Guerriere R, Paculdo D, Peabody JW. Engaging Primary Care Providers to Reduce Unwanted Clinical Variation and Support ACO Cost and Quality Goals: A Unique Provider-Payer Collaboration. Popul Health Manag. 2019 Aug;22(4):321-329. doi: 10.1089/pop.2018.0111. Epub 2018 Oct 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30328782 (View on PubMed)

Peabody J, Martin M, DeMaria L, Florentino J, Paculdo D, Paul M, Vanzo R, Wassman ER, Burgon T. Clinical Utility of a Comprehensive, Whole Genome CMA Testing Platform in Pediatrics: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Simulated Patients in Physician Practices. PLoS One. 2016 Dec 30;11(12):e0169064. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169064. eCollection 2016.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28036350 (View on PubMed)

Peabody JW, Strand V, Shimkhada R, Lee R, Chernoff D. Impact of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity test on clinical practice. PLoS One. 2013 May 7;8(5):e63215. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063215. Print 2013.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23667587 (View on PubMed)

Solon O, Woo K, Quimbo SA, Shimkhada R, Florentino J, Peabody JW. A novel method for measuring health care system performance: experience from QIDS in the Philippines. Health Policy Plan. 2009 May;24(3):167-74. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czp003. Epub 2009 Feb 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19224955 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

01ETH2020

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Retrospective-Prospective PNS Study
NCT06845631 RECRUITING NA
Analgecine for Treatment of Low Back Pain
NCT02168010 COMPLETED PHASE3