Establishing Clinical Utility of a New Diagnostic Test for Patients Suffering From Pain: A CPV® Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT ID: NCT04266821
Last Updated: 2020-09-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
154 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-02-01
2020-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pilot Study: Impact of Biomarker-Guided Dietary Supplementation on Quality-of-Life Measures in Subjects With Chronic Pain
NCT06247813
AMG0103 in Subjects With Chronic Discogenic Lumbar Back Pain
NCT03263611
Compounded Pain Creams and Patient Perception
NCT02024802
Chronic Pain Master Protocol (CPMP): A Study of LY3016859 in Participants With Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT04529096
A Chronic Pain Master Protocol (CPMP): A Study of LY3857210 in Participants With Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT05630196
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The study is a prospective cohort trial with six steps:
1. Enrollment: The study will enroll an estimated 166 practicing primary care physicians who practice in the U.S. and are determined to be eligible by an eligibility screener.
2. Provider survey: Once providers are enrolled in the study, they will be asked to complete a questionnaire describing their practice and professional background.
3. Randomization: The 166 physicians will be randomized into equally-sized control and intervention arms.
4. CPVs (First Round): Physicians will complete three randomly-assigned CPV patient simulations. Cases will be identical across the intervention and control arms. All interactive cases are presented on an online platform, and are accessible via unique weblinks and any internet-connected computer.
5. Intervention education: Intervention-arm physicians will receive educational materials describing the clinical validation and use cases of the Ethos test. This material will replicate what physicians would receive as part of an actual marketing push introducing them to the Ethos test. These materials may be comprised of a slide deck, fact sheet, webinar, and/or case studies.
6. CPVs (Second Round): All participating physicians will then be asked to complete three additional CPV patient simulations. The cases are given to the doctors in a random order. Cases will be identical across the intervention and control arms, except that the intervention arm will receive Ethos test results at an appropriate point in each simulated case in the post-intervention round. Control arm physicians will continue to have access to standard of care diagnostic tools, but not the Ethos test results.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
All eligible and consented participants will complete two rounds of three patient simulations.
The intervention arm only will receive educational material about the Ethos test in between these two rounds, and be provided simulated Ethos test results in the second round of simulated cases.
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental
Experimental-arm providers will complete two rounds of three simulated patient cases (CPVs) with two additions described in the next column:
Experimental Arm
First, these providers will receive educational materials (e.g. a slide deck, mock test result and FAQ handout) meant to mimic what physicians will receive in the real-world market as they learn about the Ethos technology.
Second, within each of their second-round cases, intervention-arm physicians only will receive simulated test results from the Ethos test at the clinically-appropriate point in each case.
Control
These providers will complete two rounds of three simulated patient cases (CPVs) only.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Experimental Arm
First, these providers will receive educational materials (e.g. a slide deck, mock test result and FAQ handout) meant to mimic what physicians will receive in the real-world market as they learn about the Ethos technology.
Second, within each of their second-round cases, intervention-arm physicians only will receive simulated test results from the Ethos test at the clinically-appropriate point in each case.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Averaging at least 20 hours per week of clinical and patient care duties over the last six months
3. At least 15% of patient panel with chronic pain
4. Prescribes opioids
5. Practicing in the U.S.
6. English speaking
7. Access to the internet
8. Informed, signed and voluntarily consented to be in the study
Exclusion Criteria
2. Practicing in an academic setting
3. Unable to access the internet
4. Not practicing in the U.S.
5. Not averaging at least 20 hours per week of clinical or patient care duties over the last six months
6. Less than 15% of panel with chronic pain
7. Does not prescribe opioids
8. Do not voluntarily consent to be in the study
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ethos Laboratories
UNKNOWN
Qure Healthcare, LLC
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
John Peabody, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
President, QURE Healthcare
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
QURE Healthcare
San Francisco, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Burgon TB, Cox-Chapman J, Czarnecki C, Kropp R, Guerriere R, Paculdo D, Peabody JW. Engaging Primary Care Providers to Reduce Unwanted Clinical Variation and Support ACO Cost and Quality Goals: A Unique Provider-Payer Collaboration. Popul Health Manag. 2019 Aug;22(4):321-329. doi: 10.1089/pop.2018.0111. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
Peabody J, Martin M, DeMaria L, Florentino J, Paculdo D, Paul M, Vanzo R, Wassman ER, Burgon T. Clinical Utility of a Comprehensive, Whole Genome CMA Testing Platform in Pediatrics: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Simulated Patients in Physician Practices. PLoS One. 2016 Dec 30;11(12):e0169064. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169064. eCollection 2016.
Peabody JW, Strand V, Shimkhada R, Lee R, Chernoff D. Impact of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity test on clinical practice. PLoS One. 2013 May 7;8(5):e63215. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063215. Print 2013.
Solon O, Woo K, Quimbo SA, Shimkhada R, Florentino J, Peabody JW. A novel method for measuring health care system performance: experience from QIDS in the Philippines. Health Policy Plan. 2009 May;24(3):167-74. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czp003. Epub 2009 Feb 18.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
01ETH2020
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.