Early Identification of SEPsis SIGNs in Emergency Department

NCT ID: NCT04261621

Last Updated: 2023-06-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

815 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-07-06

Study Completion Date

2022-05-02

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Objective of SepSIGN project is to validate biomarkers able to predict the clinical worsening of patients freshly admitted at Emergency Department. Targeted population is adult patients, freshly admitted at ED, with a suspected or confirmed infection.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Sepsis is an important health issue with considerable socio-economic consequences. In 2017, the World Health Association made sepsis a global health priority, and has adopted a resolution to improve the prevention, diagnosis, and management of sepsis.

Over the last decade, a decrease in the mortality rate has been observed; in particular thanks to improved management, more appropriate intervention approaches in the Emergency Department (ED) and better recognition of organ failure. This statement is based on qSOFA and SOFA scores from the international Sepsis-3 definition. Sepsis-3 can help front-line clinicians detect severe patients with a higher risk of mortality but does not predict the clinical deterioration especially in patients without initial organ dysfunction. Furthermore, studies still demonstrate that 20% of patients with infection or uncomplicated sepsis experience disease worsening within 72 hours after ED admission.

Symptoms and signs of sepsis are variable and this makes clinical recognition and assessment very difficult in particular on Emergency Department (ED) patients due to their infectious illness background and the frequent comorbidities.

Unfortunately, as of today, no biological marker has yet been validated to appropriately predict early deterioration in unselected patients admitted to the ED with acute infection, irrespective of their clinical presentation. Physiology of sepsis is complex and some underlying dysfunction could already exist in the early phase of sepsis before patients meet diagnostic criteria. Thus, patients may be clinically asymptomatic at the origin of organ failure. As a result, doubtful patients are often over-hospitalized while they could be treated at home, leading to overcrowding and extra costs for hospitals In these conditions, the main challenge of ED clinicians is differentiating mild infections from life-threatening ones in the heavy workload of ED environment. Objective of SepSIGN project is to validate biomarkers able to predict the clinical worsening of patients freshly admitted at Emergency Department. Targeted population is adult patients freshly admitted at ED, whom blood samples will serve to validate candidate markers.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Infection Sepsis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

All of the following criteria:

* Delay between ED presentation and inclusion must not exceed 12h
* Age 18 years or greater
* Acute infection suspected or confirmed
* That fulfills at least two of the following systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria:

* Temperature \> 38°C (100.4°F) or \< 36°C (96.8°F)
* Heart rate \> 90 bpm
* Respiratory rate \> 20 cycles/min or PaCO2 \< 32 mmHg
* Leukocyte \> 12000/mm3 or \< 4000/mm3 or 10% bands
* With a delta SOFA \< 2 from baseline
* At Risk for deterioration defined as:

1. any patient that the emergency department physician has admitted or intends to admit as an inpatient\* to the hospital.
2. patients discharged home (outpatient\*\*) who are either i) \>65 years old or ii) diagnosed with pneumonia

Exclusion Criteria

* Unable to obtain a valid and written consent from a patient or their legally authorized representative in accordance with the local regulatory instances (this include in FR: Person not affiliated to a health insurance scheme, or not a beneficiary of such a scheme. Persons who are the subject of a legal protection order. Person with restricted freedom following a legal or administrative decision and a person admitted without their consent pursuant to Articles L.3212-1 and 3213-1, which are not included in Article L.1122-8 of the French Public Health Code.)
* Known pregnancy, in labor or breastfeeding
* Patients with isolated uncomplicated pharyngitis, sinusitis, or otitis media
* Infectious symptoms present for \> 5 days prior to presentation
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Centre d'Investigation Clinique - Limoges

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

BioMérieux

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Colorado School of Medicine

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

University of Washington Medical Center

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

CH Henri Mondor Aurillac

Aurillac, , France

Site Status

CHU Grenoble alpes

La Tronche, , France

Site Status

CHU Dupuytren

Limoges, , France

Site Status

Hopital Edouard Herriot, HCL

Lyon, , France

Site Status

CH de Montauban

Montauban, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Saint-Antoine AP-HP

Paris, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Trousseau CHRU

Tours, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Princesse Grace

Monaco, , Monaco

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States France Monaco

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SepSIGN

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Comparison of Sepsis Prediction Algorithms
NCT05943938 NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Molecular Biomarkers for Sepsis
NCT04280354 TERMINATED
Endothelium in Severe Sepsis
NCT00793442 COMPLETED