Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
NA
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-03-31
2024-12-19
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Most chemotherapy suppresses bone marrow function and causes a low white cell count (neutropenia) which is a major cause of sepsis, a potentially fatal medical emergency. Best outcomes in sepsis result from early admission to hospital with the rapid start of antibiotics and supportive care. Currently, patients starting chemotherapy are told the importance of making contact with the hospital if they feel unwell or develop a high temperature. Despite this it is common for patients to delay telephoning the Cancer Centre "hot line" until after enduring many hours of symptoms and ultimately being admitted to hospital very unwell and sometimes in life threatening septic shock.
This proposal (REACT) seeks to invert the current model of care with the aim of improving patient outcomes whilst reducing costs. In this proof of concept pilot study the investigators aim to assess the feasibility of using remote wearable biosensors to record key physiological parameters (including respiratory rate, heart rate and temperature) and transmit this data centrally to The Christie. The investigators will also assess retrospectively whether perturbations in biosensor collected data correlate with clinical episodes of sepsis and if so develop bespoke clinical algorithms to identify patients displaying "red flags" for sepsis and guide response. Data collected by the sensors is at this stage only being reviewed retrospectively. Subsequent phases would involve recruiting larger number of patients to develop and test these algorithms with patients exhibiting 'red flags' for sepsis being contacted by the clinical team and taking appropriate action to facilitate assessment and treatment. The results of this study will determine whether working towards a randomised phase III trial comparing REACT with standard of care is an appropriate next step.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This is a single centre trial based in a large tertiary cancer centre that treats patients across all solid tumour and haematological malignancies. Patients will be recruited from lymphoma, haematology, lung and upper gastrointestinal disease groups.
All study procedures will be performed by a researcher who is appropriately trained and who has been delegated by the PI to undertake this activity (and this is clearly documented on the delegation log). No study specific procedures will take place prior to written informed consent being provided. Study Schedule (Main Study)
The main study will consist of the following visits:
Screening Visit 1 on day one of a cycle of planned standard of care chemotherapy. This visit will include application of the wearable biosensors and training in how to use the devices including cautions and safety advice. Participants will be provided with a diary to document any issues with the device or periods where the sensors are removed. This visit will include a standard of care review by the participant's direct care team. Visit 2 on day 1 of the next cycle of chemotherapy(3 weeks after Visit 1). This visit will include a review of any device related issues by the study team and completion of the relevant event checklist (version 1.0). The study diary will be reviewed. Used sensors will be collected and replacement sensors provided. The participant will be asked to complete an interim tolerability questionnaire. This visit will include a standard of care review by the participant's direct care team. Visit 3 on day 22 of either cycle 2, 3, or 4 (3 weeks after Visit 2). This visit will include a review of any device related issues by the study team and completion of the relevant event checklist (version 1.0). The study diary will be reviewed.
Used sensors will be collected. The participant will be asked to complete an end of study tolerability questionnaire.
This visit will include a standard of care review by the participant's direct care team.
Structured interview 1-4 weeks post Visit 3 with between 10 and 20 selected participants. This visit will take place either at the Christie in a private non-clinical space or via telephone, according to the participant's preference. The IRAS Form Reference: IRAS Version 5.13 Date: 9 DRAFT interview is expected to take approximately 30 minutes. This is a semi-structured interview which will follow the interview schema (version 1.0) Sub-study: This study will consist of one visit where the participant will be shown the sensors and explained how the investigators are intending to use them. They will then be asked to complete a questionnaire about how they feel about the sensors.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Lifetemp/Lifetouch sensors
Participants will be asked to wear the sensors for six weeks. Data will be collected from the devices but will only be reviewed retrospectively and will not be used to alter participants care in any way.
Lifetemp/Lifetouch sensors
Wearing the devices for six weeks. Data only reviewed retrospectively.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Lifetemp/Lifetouch sensors
Wearing the devices for six weeks. Data only reviewed retrospectively.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Male or female aged 18 or over
3. Diagnosis of malignancy including:
* Lung cancer (including both small and non-small cell lung cancers)
* Upper gastrointestinal malignancy
* Haematological malignancy (lymphoma, leukaemia and myeloma)
4. Planned to commence chemotherapy OR undergoing chemotherapy in an outpatient setting as standard of care treatment with at least two cycles of treatment remaining.
5. Able to complete tolerability questionnaires.
6. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status \<4
7. Life expectancy of greater than three months.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Pregnant patients
3. Patients unable to give informed consent
4. Presence of ulceration or pre-existing skin rash at site of device application (left precordium and axillae). If only one axilla affected this is not an exclusion criterion if patient is happy to apply temperature sensor to the other axilla.
6. History of allergy or contact dermatitis to medical adhesives e.g sticking plasters, ECG electrodes.
7. Patients with pacemakers, implantable defibrillators or neurostimulators.
8. Patients who are currently receiving treatment as part of a clinical study or have had their end of treatment visit for another clinical study less than 30 days prior to Visit 1 are ineligible.
9. Patients who have planned foreign travel during the study period.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Isansys Lifecare LTD
UNKNOWN
University of Manchester
OTHER
The Christie NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Christie NHS Foundation Trust
Manchester, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CFTSp172
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id