TTNS Versus Sham Therapy for Children With iOAB (TaPaS Part I)

NCT ID: NCT04256876

Last Updated: 2023-01-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

6 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-11-07

Study Completion Date

2020-07-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Part I of the TaPaS trial forms part of a twofold clinical RCT:

Part 1) A prospective RCT comparing the efficacy of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) with TTNS sham therapy for children with idiopathic overactive bladder on clinical and patient reported outcomes (PROMS).

Part 2) A prospective RCT comparing TTNS versus Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) on clinical outcomes and PROMS.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Non invasive neuromodulation therapy for children with the overactive bladder syndrome is a highly under investigated topic in medical literature.

Only 2 studies ( Patidar et al. and Boudaouid et al.) investigated the use of tibial nerve stimulation with adhesive electrodes.

1\) In the first trial the superiority of TTNS vs.Sham therapy for the therapeutic management of children with OAB naive to any pharmacological treatment will be examined.

Clinical outcomes will be assessed by the use of daytime and nighttime bladder diaries.

Assessment of outcomes at baseline, after 6 weeks and 12 weeks of treatment, and investigation of mean time to partial or complete relapse following 6 weeks observation.

After a wash-out period of 6 weeks, patients from the part I Sham group will be able to be included for TaPaS part II.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Overactive Bladder Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Prospective randomized-controlled superiority trial:

TTNS(Active treatment) vs. Sham TTNS (placebo)
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
Participants are blinded for the given treatment ( Active TTNS vs. Sham TTNS) by the care provider ( Physiotherapist).

The outcomes assessor (the pediatric urologist) isn't aware of the treatment neither.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Active TTNS

Children treated by transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation. TENS device connected to adhesive electrodes. Stimulation settings: 200 µS, 20 Hz, 1-20 V ( depending of sensory response) Home-therapy: Daily stimulation during 60 minutes.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

TTNS

Intervention Type DEVICE

See section 'arms' Stimulation settings: 200 µS, 20 Hz, 1-20 V ( depending of sensory response) Home-therapy: Daily stimulation during 60 minutes.

TTNS sham intervention

Children treated by TTNS with same positioning as the active TTNS treatment. Stimulation settings: 200 µS, 20 Hz, 0-1 V. Patients and parents will be told that electric currence is given, but that no sensation will be feld.

Home therapy: Daily stimulation during 60 minutes.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

TTNS Sham

Intervention Type DEVICE

See section 'arms'

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

TTNS

See section 'arms' Stimulation settings: 200 µS, 20 Hz, 1-20 V ( depending of sensory response) Home-therapy: Daily stimulation during 60 minutes.

Intervention Type DEVICE

TTNS Sham

See section 'arms'

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation Sham therapy

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Children between 5 and 12 years old, clinically diagnosed with the idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome with urinary incontinence (daytime and/or nighttime)
* Untreated, except from urotherapy.

Exclusion Criteria

* Enuresis nocturna due to nocturnal polyuria
* Dysfunctional voiding
* Neurogenic bladder
* Psychiatric disorders, behavioural disturbances or mental disabilities
* Treated before with pharmacotherapy or invasive therapies for OAB
* Children with parents unable to record reliably micturition diaries.
Minimum Eligible Age

5 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

12 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Ghent

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Anne-Françoise Spinoit, Professor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Ghent

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospital Ghent

Ghent, East-Flanders, Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Boudaoud N, Binet A, Line A, Chaouadi D, Jolly C, Fiquet CF, Ripert T, Merol ML. Management of refractory overactive bladder in children by transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation: A controlled study. J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Jun;11(3):138.e1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.09.013. Epub 2015 Mar 31.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25979217 (View on PubMed)

Patidar N, Mittal V, Kumar M, Sureka SK, Arora S, Ansari MS. Transcutaneous posterior tibial nerve stimulation in pediatric overactive bladder: A preliminary report. J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Dec;11(6):351.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.04.040. Epub 2015 Jul 29.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26279104 (View on PubMed)

Ghijselings L, Renson C, Van de Walle J, Everaert K, Spinoit AF. Clinical efficacy of transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS) versus sham therapy (part I) and TTNS versus percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) (part II) on the short term in children with the idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome: protocol for part I of the twofold double-blinded randomized controlled TaPaS trial. Trials. 2021 Apr 2;22(1):247. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05117-8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33810804 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EC/2018/1267

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.