Trial Outcomes & Findings for Low Pressure Pneumoperitoneum and Deep Neuromuscular Block vs. Standard During RARP to Improve Quality of Recovery; a Randomized Controlled Study. (NCT NCT04250883)

NCT ID: NCT04250883

Last Updated: 2025-02-05

Results Overview

40 points (minimum: extremely poor quality of recovery) to 200 points (maximum: excellent quality of recovery)

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

97 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

at postoperative day 1

Results posted on

2025-02-05

Participant Flow

This blinded, randomized controlled trial was performed at the Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital in Nijmegen. Patients with at least stage T1c prostate cancer scheduled for RARP were randomized to the experimental group with low IAP (8 mmHg) facilitated by deep NMB (PTC 1-2) or the control group with standard IAP (14 mmHg) with moderate NMB (TOF 1-2). From December 2020 to December 2021, 236 patients were assessed for eligibility and 97 were included for randomization.

139 patients were excluded of which; 29 did not meet inclusion criteria, 99 declined to participate and 11 did not response on invitation.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Experimental Group: Low Impact Laparoscopy
the use of low intra-abdominal pressure (8 mmHg), and deep neuromuscular blockade (PTC1-2)
Control Group: Standard Laparoscopy
The use of standard intra-abdominal pressure (14 mmHg) and moderate neuromuscular blockade (TOF 1-2)
Overall Study
STARTED
47
50
Overall Study
Quality of Recovery Questionnaire at 3 Months
46
50
Overall Study
COMPLETED
46
50
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
1
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Experimental Group: Low Impact Laparoscopy
the use of low intra-abdominal pressure (8 mmHg), and deep neuromuscular blockade (PTC1-2)
Control Group: Standard Laparoscopy
The use of standard intra-abdominal pressure (14 mmHg) and moderate neuromuscular blockade (TOF 1-2)
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
1
0

Baseline Characteristics

Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Experimental Group: Low Impact Laparoscopy
n=46 Participants
Using low intra-abdominal pressure (8 mmHg) and deep neuromuscular blockade (PTC1-2)
Control Group: Standard Laparoscopy
n=50 Participants
Using standard intra-abdominal pressure (14 mmHg) and moderate neuromuscular blockade (TOF 1-2)
Total
n=96 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
64.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6 • n=46 Participants
67.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1 • n=50 Participants
66.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.1 • n=96 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
n=46 Participants
0 Participants
n=50 Participants
0 Participants
n=96 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
46 Participants
n=46 Participants
50 Participants
n=50 Participants
96 Participants
n=96 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
0 Participants
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
46 participants
n=46 Participants
50 participants
n=50 Participants
96 participants
n=96 Participants
Body Mass Index (kg/m2)
26.6 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.9 • n=46 Participants
27.4 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.2 • n=50 Participants
27.0 kg/m2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.0 • n=96 Participants
American Society of Anesthesiologist classification
ASA 1
22 Participants
n=46 Participants
15 Participants
n=50 Participants
37 Participants
n=96 Participants
American Society of Anesthesiologist classification
ASA 2
23 Participants
n=46 Participants
31 Participants
n=50 Participants
54 Participants
n=96 Participants
American Society of Anesthesiologist classification
ASA 3
1 Participants
n=46 Participants
4 Participants
n=50 Participants
5 Participants
n=96 Participants
Comorbidity
Cardiovascular · Yes
22 Participants
n=46 Participants
32 Participants
n=50 Participants
54 Participants
n=96 Participants
Comorbidity
Cardiovascular · No
24 Participants
n=46 Participants
18 Participants
n=50 Participants
42 Participants
n=96 Participants
Comorbidity
Pulmonal · Yes
2 Participants
n=46 Participants
9 Participants
n=50 Participants
11 Participants
n=96 Participants
Comorbidity
Pulmonal · No
44 Participants
n=46 Participants
41 Participants
n=50 Participants
85 Participants
n=96 Participants
Comorbidity
Neurologic · Yes
1 Participants
n=46 Participants
2 Participants
n=50 Participants
3 Participants
n=96 Participants
Comorbidity
Neurologic · No
45 Participants
n=46 Participants
48 Participants
n=50 Participants
93 Participants
n=96 Participants
Comorbidity
Diabetic · Yes
5 Participants
n=46 Participants
3 Participants
n=50 Participants
8 Participants
n=96 Participants
Comorbidity
Diabetic · No
41 Participants
n=46 Participants
47 Participants
n=50 Participants
88 Participants
n=96 Participants
Comorbidity
Renal impairment · Yes
0 Participants
n=46 Participants
0 Participants
n=50 Participants
0 Participants
n=96 Participants
Comorbidity
Renal impairment · No
46 Participants
n=46 Participants
50 Participants
n=50 Participants
96 Participants
n=96 Participants
Comorbidity
Liver impairment · Yes
0 Participants
n=46 Participants
1 Participants
n=50 Participants
1 Participants
n=96 Participants
Comorbidity
Liver impairment · No
46 Participants
n=46 Participants
49 Participants
n=50 Participants
95 Participants
n=96 Participants
Tumor characteristics - Risk stratification
Low
9 Participants
n=46 Participants
9 Participants
n=50 Participants
18 Participants
n=96 Participants
Tumor characteristics - Risk stratification
Intermediate
28 Participants
n=46 Participants
30 Participants
n=50 Participants
58 Participants
n=96 Participants
Tumor characteristics - Risk stratification
High
9 Participants
n=46 Participants
11 Participants
n=50 Participants
20 Participants
n=96 Participants
Tumor characteristics - Prostate cancer classification
T1c
21 Participants
n=46 Participants
23 Participants
n=50 Participants
44 Participants
n=96 Participants
Tumor characteristics - Prostate cancer classification
T2a-c
19 Participants
n=46 Participants
20 Participants
n=50 Participants
39 Participants
n=96 Participants
Tumor characteristics - Prostate cancer classification
T3a-c
5 Participants
n=46 Participants
4 Participants
n=50 Participants
9 Participants
n=96 Participants
Tumor characteristics - Prostate cancer classification
Unknown
1 Participants
n=46 Participants
3 Participants
n=50 Participants
4 Participants
n=96 Participants
Tumor characteristics -Gleason score
Score 6
10 Participants
n=46 Participants
11 Participants
n=50 Participants
21 Participants
n=96 Participants
Tumor characteristics -Gleason score
Score 7
30 Participants
n=46 Participants
32 Participants
n=50 Participants
62 Participants
n=96 Participants
Tumor characteristics -Gleason score
Score 8
3 Participants
n=46 Participants
4 Participants
n=50 Participants
7 Participants
n=96 Participants
Tumor characteristics -Gleason score
Score 9
3 Participants
n=46 Participants
3 Participants
n=50 Participants
6 Participants
n=96 Participants
Tumor characteristics - ISUP score
1
10 Participants
n=46 Participants
11 Participants
n=50 Participants
21 Participants
n=96 Participants
Tumor characteristics - ISUP score
2
23 Participants
n=46 Participants
25 Participants
n=50 Participants
48 Participants
n=96 Participants
Tumor characteristics - ISUP score
3
8 Participants
n=46 Participants
7 Participants
n=50 Participants
15 Participants
n=96 Participants
Tumor characteristics - ISUP score
4
3 Participants
n=46 Participants
4 Participants
n=50 Participants
7 Participants
n=96 Participants
Tumor characteristics - ISUP score
5
3 Participants
n=46 Participants
3 Participants
n=50 Participants
6 Participants
n=96 Participants
Tumor characteristic - Prostate Cancer specific antigen levels (ng/ml)
55.13 ng/ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 40.4 • n=46 Participants
61.74 ng/ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 47.1 • n=50 Participants
58.5 ng/ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 43.9 • n=96 Participants
Operation - Pelvic lymph node dissection
Yes
21 Participants
n=46 Participants
21 Participants
n=50 Participants
42 Participants
n=96 Participants
Operation - Pelvic lymph node dissection
No
25 Participants
n=46 Participants
29 Participants
n=50 Participants
54 Participants
n=96 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: at postoperative day 1

40 points (minimum: extremely poor quality of recovery) to 200 points (maximum: excellent quality of recovery)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Experimental Group: Low Impact Laparoscopy
n=46 Participants
Using low intra-abdominal pressure (8 mmHg) and deep neuromuscular blockade (PTC1-2)
Control Group: Standard Laparoscopy
n=50 Participants
Using standard intra-abdominal pressure (14 mmHg) and moderate neuromuscular blockade (TOF 1-2)
Quality of Recovery - 40 Items Questionnaire Score (QoR-40)
162.7 score on a scale of 200
Standard Deviation 21.5
167.6 score on a scale of 200
Standard Deviation 23.0

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: day 12 after surgery

40 points (minimum: extremely poor quality of recovery) to 200 points (maximum: excellent quality of recovery)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Experimental Group: Low Impact Laparoscopy
n=46 Participants
Using low intra-abdominal pressure (8 mmHg) and deep neuromuscular blockade (PTC1-2)
Control Group: Standard Laparoscopy
n=50 Participants
Using standard intra-abdominal pressure (14 mmHg) and moderate neuromuscular blockade (TOF 1-2)
Quality of Recovery - 40 Items Questionnaire Score (QoR-40)
179.1 score on a scale of 200
Standard Deviation 15.8
180.0 score on a scale of 200
Standard Deviation 15.1

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Pre-operative

40 points (minimum: extremely poor quality of recovery) to 200 points (maximum: excellent quality of recovery)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Experimental Group: Low Impact Laparoscopy
n=46 Participants
Using low intra-abdominal pressure (8 mmHg) and deep neuromuscular blockade (PTC1-2)
Control Group: Standard Laparoscopy
n=50 Participants
Using standard intra-abdominal pressure (14 mmHg) and moderate neuromuscular blockade (TOF 1-2)
Quality of Recovery - 40 Items Questionnaire Score (QoR-40)
186.6 score on a scale of 200
Standard Deviation 8.7
186.8 score on a scale of 200
Standard Deviation 11.5

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Measure pre-operative, on day 12 and at 3 months after surgery

Total score on a scale of 0-100 points. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Experimental Group: Low Impact Laparoscopy
n=46 Participants
Using low intra-abdominal pressure (8 mmHg) and deep neuromuscular blockade (PTC1-2)
Control Group: Standard Laparoscopy
n=50 Participants
Using standard intra-abdominal pressure (14 mmHg) and moderate neuromuscular blockade (TOF 1-2)
Health Status With Short Form Survey (SF-36)
Pre-operative
81.1 score on a scale (0-100)
Standard Deviation 12.1
81.8 score on a scale (0-100)
Standard Deviation 11.5
Health Status With Short Form Survey (SF-36)
12 days postoperative
61.5 score on a scale (0-100)
Standard Deviation 14.1
64.3 score on a scale (0-100)
Standard Deviation 18.7
Health Status With Short Form Survey (SF-36)
3 months postoperative
73.7 score on a scale (0-100)
Standard Deviation 15.9
77.9 score on a scale (0-100)
Standard Deviation 15.5

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 months after surgery

Population: 43 participants in de experimental group, and 45 participants in the control group fulfilled the questionnaire. Only 6 participants per group had pain at 3 months after surgery.

Pain Rating index with a range from 0 (no pain) to 78 (severe pain)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Experimental Group: Low Impact Laparoscopy
n=6 Participants
Using low intra-abdominal pressure (8 mmHg) and deep neuromuscular blockade (PTC1-2)
Control Group: Standard Laparoscopy
n=6 Participants
Using standard intra-abdominal pressure (14 mmHg) and moderate neuromuscular blockade (TOF 1-2)
Chronic Pain With McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ)
7.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.0
5.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.9

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: During operation for up to 8 hours

surgical conditions with L-SRS 0 (extremely poor work field) to 5 (excellent work field)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Experimental Group: Low Impact Laparoscopy
n=46 Participants
Using low intra-abdominal pressure (8 mmHg) and deep neuromuscular blockade (PTC1-2)
Control Group: Standard Laparoscopy
n=50 Participants
Using standard intra-abdominal pressure (14 mmHg) and moderate neuromuscular blockade (TOF 1-2)
Operating Conditions
4.9 score on a scale of 0-5
Standard Deviation 0.3
4.9 score on a scale of 0-5
Standard Deviation 0.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Preset timepoints during hospital stay (1hr, 6hrs, 12hrs, day1), up to 3 days maximum. No measurements after discharge to home.

Population: Patients where in most cases discharged from the hospital on postoperative day 1

pain scores with NRS 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Experimental Group: Low Impact Laparoscopy
n=46 Participants
Using low intra-abdominal pressure (8 mmHg) and deep neuromuscular blockade (PTC1-2)
Control Group: Standard Laparoscopy
n=50 Participants
Using standard intra-abdominal pressure (14 mmHg) and moderate neuromuscular blockade (TOF 1-2)
Pain Score With NRS
1hour postoperative
4.1 score on a scale of 10
Standard Deviation 2.3
3.9 score on a scale of 10
Standard Deviation 2.2
Pain Score With NRS
6hours postoperative
2.3 score on a scale of 10
Standard Deviation 1.1
2.3 score on a scale of 10
Standard Deviation 1.4
Pain Score With NRS
12hours postoperative
2.3 score on a scale of 10
Standard Deviation 1.3
2.2 score on a scale of 10
Standard Deviation 1.4
Pain Score With NRS
Postoperative day 1
1.9 score on a scale of 10
Standard Deviation 1.5
2.0 score on a scale of 10
Standard Deviation 1.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: During hospital stay up to 3 days

Presence of symptoms yes/no

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Experimental Group: Low Impact Laparoscopy
n=46 Participants
Using low intra-abdominal pressure (8 mmHg) and deep neuromuscular blockade (PTC1-2)
Control Group: Standard Laparoscopy
n=50 Participants
Using standard intra-abdominal pressure (14 mmHg) and moderate neuromuscular blockade (TOF 1-2)
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV)
1hour postoperative · Yes
1 Participants
0 Participants
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV)
1hour postoperative · No
45 Participants
50 Participants
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV)
Postoperative day 1 · Yes
8 Participants
4 Participants
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV)
Postoperative day 1 · No
38 Participants
46 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: During hospital stay up to 3 days

Cumulative opioid use in morphine equivalent (in mg)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Experimental Group: Low Impact Laparoscopy
n=46 Participants
Using low intra-abdominal pressure (8 mmHg) and deep neuromuscular blockade (PTC1-2)
Control Group: Standard Laparoscopy
n=50 Participants
Using standard intra-abdominal pressure (14 mmHg) and moderate neuromuscular blockade (TOF 1-2)
Analgesia Use
1hour postoperative
6.2 mg 'Morphine equivalent'
Standard Deviation 5.9
5.9 mg 'Morphine equivalent'
Standard Deviation 4.8
Analgesia Use
Postoperative day 1
1.3 mg 'Morphine equivalent'
Standard Deviation 3.4
0.9 mg 'Morphine equivalent'
Standard Deviation 2.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: from admission up to 3 days

length of hospital stay in days

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Experimental Group: Low Impact Laparoscopy
n=46 Participants
Using low intra-abdominal pressure (8 mmHg) and deep neuromuscular blockade (PTC1-2)
Control Group: Standard Laparoscopy
n=50 Participants
Using standard intra-abdominal pressure (14 mmHg) and moderate neuromuscular blockade (TOF 1-2)
Hospital Stay
1.3 Days
Standard Deviation 0.7
1.24 Days
Standard Deviation 0.48

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Day of surgery untill 30days after surgery

Postoperative complications scored by Clavien Dindo classification; grade 0 (no deviation from ideal) grade 5 (death of patient)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Experimental Group: Low Impact Laparoscopy
n=46 Participants
Using low intra-abdominal pressure (8 mmHg) and deep neuromuscular blockade (PTC1-2)
Control Group: Standard Laparoscopy
n=50 Participants
Using standard intra-abdominal pressure (14 mmHg) and moderate neuromuscular blockade (TOF 1-2)
Complications
Total · Yes
8 Participants
10 Participants
Complications
Total · No
38 Participants
40 Participants
Complications
Grade 1 · Yes
4 Participants
1 Participants
Complications
Grade 1 · No
42 Participants
49 Participants
Complications
Grade 2 · Yes
4 Participants
6 Participants
Complications
Grade 2 · No
42 Participants
44 Participants
Complications
Grade 3 · Yes
0 Participants
2 Participants
Complications
Grade 3 · No
46 Participants
48 Participants
Complications
Grade 4 · Yes
0 Participants
1 Participants
Complications
Grade 4 · No
46 Participants
49 Participants
Complications
Grade 5 · Yes
0 Participants
0 Participants
Complications
Grade 5 · No
46 Participants
50 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From ICG injection, up to 20 seconds

time to maximal intensity in seconds. (extracted from video registration).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Experimental Group: Low Impact Laparoscopy
n=39 Participants
Using low intra-abdominal pressure (8 mmHg) and deep neuromuscular blockade (PTC1-2)
Control Group: Standard Laparoscopy
n=40 Participants
Using standard intra-abdominal pressure (14 mmHg) and moderate neuromuscular blockade (TOF 1-2)
Perfusion Index of the Parietal Peritoneum
time to maximal intensity
48.9 seconds
Standard Deviation 8.5
53.2 seconds
Standard Deviation 10.2
Perfusion Index of the Parietal Peritoneum
Delta minimal and maximal intensity
194.4 seconds
Standard Deviation 41.2
169.7 seconds
Standard Deviation 62.8

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Pre-operative, postoperative day 1 and 12

IL-10 response upon whole blood LPS stimulation

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Experimental Group: Low Impact Laparoscopy
n=47 Participants
Using low intra-abdominal pressure (8 mmHg) and deep neuromuscular blockade (PTC1-2)
Control Group: Standard Laparoscopy
n=50 Participants
Using standard intra-abdominal pressure (14 mmHg) and moderate neuromuscular blockade (TOF 1-2)
Immune Response Represented by IL-10
preoperative
6.43 pg/ml
Standard Deviation 15.76
7.25 pg/ml
Standard Deviation 12.45
Immune Response Represented by IL-10
postoperative day 1
11.72 pg/ml
Standard Deviation 15.45
13.94 pg/ml
Standard Deviation 17.01
Immune Response Represented by IL-10
postoperative day 12
7.24 pg/ml
Standard Deviation 15.55
8.89 pg/ml
Standard Deviation 13.98

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Pre-operative, postoperative day 1 and 12

IL-6 response upon whole blood LPS stimulation

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Experimental Group: Low Impact Laparoscopy
n=47 Participants
Using low intra-abdominal pressure (8 mmHg) and deep neuromuscular blockade (PTC1-2)
Control Group: Standard Laparoscopy
n=50 Participants
Using standard intra-abdominal pressure (14 mmHg) and moderate neuromuscular blockade (TOF 1-2)
Immune Response Represented by IL-6
preoperative
6.60 pg/ml
Standard Deviation 22.83
8.67 pg/ml
Standard Deviation 19.45
Immune Response Represented by IL-6
postoperative day 1
20.07 pg/ml
Standard Deviation 27.37
24.38 pg/ml
Standard Deviation 26.67
Immune Response Represented by IL-6
postoperative day 12
8.26 pg/ml
Standard Deviation 22.9
11.95 pg/ml
Standard Deviation 20.98

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 3 months after surgery

Population: 43 participants in de experimental group, and 45 participants in the control group fulfilled the questionnaire. Only 6 participants per group had pain at 3 months after surgery.

Number of words Chosen according the user manual of the questionnaire

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Experimental Group: Low Impact Laparoscopy
n=6 Participants
Using low intra-abdominal pressure (8 mmHg) and deep neuromuscular blockade (PTC1-2)
Control Group: Standard Laparoscopy
n=6 Participants
Using standard intra-abdominal pressure (14 mmHg) and moderate neuromuscular blockade (TOF 1-2)
Chronic Pain With McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ)
3.2 number of words describing the pain
Standard Deviation 3.9
4.2 number of words describing the pain
Standard Deviation 2.5

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From ICG injection, up to 20 seconds

Angle minimal to maximal, calculated from the slope of ICG fluorescence intensity (extracted from video registration).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Experimental Group: Low Impact Laparoscopy
n=39 Participants
Using low intra-abdominal pressure (8 mmHg) and deep neuromuscular blockade (PTC1-2)
Control Group: Standard Laparoscopy
n=40 Participants
Using standard intra-abdominal pressure (14 mmHg) and moderate neuromuscular blockade (TOF 1-2)
Perfusion Index of the Parietal Peritoneum
82.2 Degrees
Standard Deviation 2.6
78.5 Degrees
Standard Deviation 7.9

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 0-350minutes

in minutes

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Experimental Group: Low Impact Laparoscopy
n=46 Participants
Using low intra-abdominal pressure (8 mmHg) and deep neuromuscular blockade (PTC1-2)
Control Group: Standard Laparoscopy
n=50 Participants
Using standard intra-abdominal pressure (14 mmHg) and moderate neuromuscular blockade (TOF 1-2)
Duration of Surgery
198.6 minutes
Standard Deviation 51.5
183.9 minutes
Standard Deviation 58.7

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 0-350 minutes

in minutes

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Experimental Group: Low Impact Laparoscopy
n=46 Participants
Using low intra-abdominal pressure (8 mmHg) and deep neuromuscular blockade (PTC1-2)
Control Group: Standard Laparoscopy
n=50 Participants
Using standard intra-abdominal pressure (14 mmHg) and moderate neuromuscular blockade (TOF 1-2)
Duration of Pneumoperitoneum
176.9 minutes
Standard Deviation 48.3
159.8 minutes
Standard Deviation 56.4

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: During operation

during operation time in ml

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Experimental Group: Low Impact Laparoscopy
n=46 Participants
Using low intra-abdominal pressure (8 mmHg) and deep neuromuscular blockade (PTC1-2)
Control Group: Standard Laparoscopy
n=50 Participants
Using standard intra-abdominal pressure (14 mmHg) and moderate neuromuscular blockade (TOF 1-2)
Estimated Blood Loss
312.8 ml
Standard Deviation 333.6
214.4 ml
Standard Deviation 229.1

POST_HOC outcome

Timeframe: 0-50 patients

patient count

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Experimental Group: Low Impact Laparoscopy
n=8 Participants
Using low intra-abdominal pressure (8 mmHg) and deep neuromuscular blockade (PTC1-2)
Control Group: Standard Laparoscopy
n=10 Participants
Using standard intra-abdominal pressure (14 mmHg) and moderate neuromuscular blockade (TOF 1-2)
Complications Based on Infection
Yes
5 Participants
10 Participants
Complications Based on Infection
No
3 Participants
0 Participants

Adverse Events

Experimental Group: Low Impact Laparoscopy

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Control Group: Standard Laparoscopy

Serious events: 2 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Experimental Group: Low Impact Laparoscopy
n=47 participants at risk
Using low intra-abdominal pressure (8 mmHg) and deep neuromuscular blockade (PTC1-2)
Control Group: Standard Laparoscopy
n=50 participants at risk
Using standard intra-abdominal pressure (14 mmHg) and moderate neuromuscular blockade (TOF 1-2)
Infections and infestations
Small abces in smal pelvic with paralytic ileus
0.00%
0/47 • From operation up to 3 months postoperative
according definitions of clinicaltrials.gov
2.0%
1/50 • Number of events 1 • From operation up to 3 months postoperative
according definitions of clinicaltrials.gov
Renal and urinary disorders
Blow out kidney
0.00%
0/47 • From operation up to 3 months postoperative
according definitions of clinicaltrials.gov
2.0%
1/50 • Number of events 1 • From operation up to 3 months postoperative
according definitions of clinicaltrials.gov

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Dr. Michiel Warle

Radboud umc

Phone: 024-3613808

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place