Trial Outcomes & Findings for Adaptive Implementation Intervention for VA Suicide Risk Identification Strategy (NCT NCT04243330)

NCT ID: NCT04243330

Last Updated: 2025-05-20

Results Overview

C-SSRS uptake is a site level adherence measure of the percentage of patients in ambulatory care who received a timely annual suicide risk screen (i.e., during the first encounter/visit after the annual suicide risk screen reminder was due). Adherence ranges from 0 to 100, higher scores reflect higher adherence. The outcome measure is reported as the change in facility adherence from baseline to month 8 of intervention Phase 1. Higher numbers reflect greater change in adherence from baseline to month 8 of intervention Phase 1.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

138 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Change from baseline and intervention Phase 1 month 8

Results posted on

2025-05-20

Participant Flow

138 VHA facilities were recruited and enrolled. Sites were allocated to different implementation strategies based on performance.

All sites started with implementation as usual during run-in phase.

Unit of analysis: Sites/Facilities

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Implementation As Usual
This arm included sites that responded to implementation as usual during run-in and continued with implementation as usual throughout the trial period. There were no sites in Arm 1 as none of the facilities implemented adequately after the run-in phase.
Audit & Feedback Responders Continue
This arm included sites that did not implement adequately after the run-in phase, received audit \& feedback (A\&F) in Phase 1, responded to A\&F, and continued A\&F in Phase 2.
Audit & Feedback Responders Switch
This arm included sites that did not implement adequately after the run-in phase, received A\&F in Phase 1, responded to A\&F and switched to A\&F Light in Phase 2. (Note. IAU became A\&F Light during Phase 2).
Audit & Feedback Non-Responders Continue
This arm included sites that did not implement adequately after the run-in phase, received A\&F in Phase 1, did not respond to A\&F, and continued A\&F in Phase 2.
Audit & Feedback Non-Responders Add Facilitation
This arm included sites that did not implement adequately after the run-in phase, received A\&F in Phase 1, did not respond to A\&F, and accepted and received A\&F + External Facilitation in Phase 2. (Note. Only included sites that accepted EF).
Implementation As Usual to Audit & Feedback Light
This arm included sites that did not implement adequately after the run-in phase, continued with IAU in Phase 1, and received A\&F Light in Phase 2. (Note. IAU became A\&F Light during Phase 2)
Phase 1 Intervention
STARTED
0 0
0 6
0 6
0 40
0 17
0 69
Phase 1 Intervention
COMPLETED
0 0
0 6
0 6
0 40
0 17
0 69
Phase 1 Intervention
NOT COMPLETED
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
Phase 2 Intervention
STARTED
0 0
0 6
0 6
0 40
0 17
0 69
Phase 2 Intervention
COMPLETED
0 0
0 6
0 6
0 38
0 17
0 66
Phase 2 Intervention
NOT COMPLETED
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 2
0 0
0 3

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Adaptive Implementation Intervention for VA Suicide Risk Identification Strategy

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Implementation As Usual
This group included sites that responded to implementation as usual during run-in and continued with implementation as usual throughout the trial period. There were no sites in Arm 1 as none of the facilities implemented adequately after the run-in phase.
Audit & Feedback Responders Continue
n=6 Site/Facilities
This group included sites that did not implement adequately after the run-in phase, received audit \& feedback (A\&F) in Phase 1, responded to A\&F, and continued A\&F in Phase 2. Phase 1: randomized to A\&F arm Phase 2: randomized A\&F arm again
Audit & Feedback Responders Switch
n=6 Site/Facilities
This group included sites that did not implement adequately after the run-in phase, received A\&F in Phase 1, responded to A\&F and switched to A\&F Light in Phase 2. (Note. IAU became A\&F Light during Phase 2). Phase 1: randomized to A\&F arm Phase 2: randomized A\&F Light arm
Audit & Feedback Non-Responders Continue
n=38 Site/Facilities
This group included sites that did not implement adequately after the run-in phase, received A\&F in Phase 1, did not respond to A\&F, and continued A\&F in Phase 2. Phase 1: randomized to A\&F arm Phase 2: randomized A\&F arm again
Audit & Feedback Non-Responders Add Facilitation
n=17 Site/Facilities
This group included sites that did not implement adequately after the run-in phase, received A\&F in Phase 1, did not respond to A\&F, and accepted and received A\&F + External Facilitation in Phase 2. (Note. Only included sites that accepted EF). Phase 1: randomized to A\&F arm Phase 2: randomized to A\&F plus External Facilitation arm
Implementation As Usual to Audit & Feedback Light
n=66 Site/Facilities
This group included sites that did not implement adequately after the run-in phase, continued with IAU in Phase 1, and received A\&F Light in Phase 2. (Note. IAU became A\&F Light during Phase 2) Phase 1: randomized to Implementation as Usual arm Phase 2: received implementation as usual which became A\&F Light
Total
n=133 Site/Facilities
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
NA years
STANDARD_DEVIATION NA • n=6 Site/Facilities
NA years
STANDARD_DEVIATION NA • n=6 Site/Facilities
NA years
STANDARD_DEVIATION NA • n=38 Site/Facilities
NA years
STANDARD_DEVIATION NA • n=17 Site/Facilities
NA years
STANDARD_DEVIATION NA • n=66 Site/Facilities
NA years
STANDARD_DEVIATION NA • n=133 Site/Facilities
Sex: Female, Male
Female
NA Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
NA Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
NA Site/Facilities
n=38 Site/Facilities
NA Site/Facilities
n=17 Site/Facilities
NA Site/Facilities
n=66 Site/Facilities
NA Site/Facilities
n=133 Site/Facilities
Sex: Female, Male
Male
NA Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
NA Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
NA Site/Facilities
n=38 Site/Facilities
NA Site/Facilities
n=17 Site/Facilities
NA Site/Facilities
n=66 Site/Facilities
NA Site/Facilities
n=133 Site/Facilities
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
NA Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
NA Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
NA Site/Facilities
n=38 Site/Facilities
NA Site/Facilities
n=17 Site/Facilities
NA Site/Facilities
n=66 Site/Facilities
NA Site/Facilities
n=133 Site/Facilities
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
NA Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
NA Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
NA Site/Facilities
n=38 Site/Facilities
NA Site/Facilities
n=17 Site/Facilities
NA Site/Facilities
n=66 Site/Facilities
NA Site/Facilities
n=133 Site/Facilities
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
NA Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
NA Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
NA Site/Facilities
n=38 Site/Facilities
NA Site/Facilities
n=17 Site/Facilities
NA Site/Facilities
n=66 Site/Facilities
NA Site/Facilities
n=133 Site/Facilities
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
NA Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
NA Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
NA Site/Facilities
n=38 Site/Facilities
NA Site/Facilities
n=17 Site/Facilities
NA Site/Facilities
n=66 Site/Facilities
NA Site/Facilities
n=133 Site/Facilities
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
NA Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
NA Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
NA Site/Facilities
n=38 Site/Facilities
NA Site/Facilities
n=17 Site/Facilities
NA Site/Facilities
n=66 Site/Facilities
NA Site/Facilities
n=133 Site/Facilities
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
NA Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
NA Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
NA Site/Facilities
n=38 Site/Facilities
NA Site/Facilities
n=17 Site/Facilities
NA Site/Facilities
n=66 Site/Facilities
NA Site/Facilities
n=133 Site/Facilities
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
NA Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
NA Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
NA Site/Facilities
n=38 Site/Facilities
NA Site/Facilities
n=17 Site/Facilities
NA Site/Facilities
n=66 Site/Facilities
NA Site/Facilities
n=133 Site/Facilities
Region of Enrollment
United States
6 Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
6 Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
38 Site/Facilities
n=38 Site/Facilities
17 Site/Facilities
n=17 Site/Facilities
66 Site/Facilities
n=66 Site/Facilities
133 Site/Facilities
n=133 Site/Facilities
Facility Complexity
Facility Complexity Level 1a-1c
2 Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
1 Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
26 Site/Facilities
n=38 Site/Facilities
13 Site/Facilities
n=17 Site/Facilities
41 Site/Facilities
n=66 Site/Facilities
83 Site/Facilities
n=133 Site/Facilities
Facility Complexity
Facility Complexity Level 2
1 Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
1 Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
4 Site/Facilities
n=38 Site/Facilities
4 Site/Facilities
n=17 Site/Facilities
12 Site/Facilities
n=66 Site/Facilities
22 Site/Facilities
n=133 Site/Facilities
Facility Complexity
Facility Complexity Level 3
3 Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
4 Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
8 Site/Facilities
n=38 Site/Facilities
0 Site/Facilities
n=17 Site/Facilities
13 Site/Facilities
n=66 Site/Facilities
28 Site/Facilities
n=133 Site/Facilities

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Change from baseline and intervention Phase 1 month 8

Population: All sites that completed Phase 1 are included in the analysis. Sites that received Audit \& Feedback in addition to Implementation as Usual during Phase 1 are compared to sites that only received Implementation as Usual during Phase 1.

C-SSRS uptake is a site level adherence measure of the percentage of patients in ambulatory care who received a timely annual suicide risk screen (i.e., during the first encounter/visit after the annual suicide risk screen reminder was due). Adherence ranges from 0 to 100, higher scores reflect higher adherence. The outcome measure is reported as the change in facility adherence from baseline to month 8 of intervention Phase 1. Higher numbers reflect greater change in adherence from baseline to month 8 of intervention Phase 1.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Phase 1: Audit & Feedback
n=67 Sites/Facilities
This arm included sites that received audit and feedback in additional to implementation as usual during Phase 1.
Phase 1: Implementation As Usual
n=66 Sites/Facilities
This arm included all sites that received implementation as usual during Phase 1.
Change in Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale Screener (C-SSRS) Uptake- Phase 1
13.0 change in percent adherence
Interval 11.9 to 14.0
11.9 change in percent adherence
Interval 10.9 to 13.0

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Change from baseline and intervention Phase 1 month 8

Population: All sites that completed Phase 1 are included in the analysis. Sites that received Audit \& Feedback in addition to Implementation as Usual during Phase 1 are compared to sites that only received Implementation as Usual during Phase 1.

CSRE uptake is a site level adherence measure of the percentage of patients in ambulatory care who had a positive C-SSRS screener and received the CSRE as intended (same day and by the appropriate provider). The score is a facility adherence score. Adherence ranges from 0 to 100, higher scores reflect higher adherence. The outcome measure is reported as the change in facility adherence from baseline to month 8 of intervention Phase 1. Higher numbers reflect greater change in adherence from baseline to month 8 of intervention Phase 1.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Phase 1: Audit & Feedback
n=67 Sites/Facilities
This arm included sites that received audit and feedback in additional to implementation as usual during Phase 1.
Phase 1: Implementation As Usual
n=66 Sites/Facilities
This arm included all sites that received implementation as usual during Phase 1.
Change in Comprehensive Suicide Risk Evaluation (CSRE) Uptake- Phase 1
11.0 change in percent adherence
Interval 8.43 to 13.6
7.45 change in percent adherence
Interval 4.82 to 10.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Change from month 9 of intervention phase 1 and month 9 of intervention phase 2

Population: Responding sites that continued to received audit \& feedback during Phase 2 are compared to responding sites that switched to audit \& feedback light during Phase 2. For Phase 2, it was pre-specified to compare only Audit \& Feedback Light to Audit and Feedback for the group of sites that responded to Audit \& Feedback during Phase 1.

C-SSRS uptake is a site level adherence measure of the percentage of patients in ambulatory care who received a timely annual suicide risk screen (i.e., during the first encounter/visit after the annual suicide risk screen reminder was due). The score is a facility adherence score. Adherence ranges from 0 to 100, higher scores reflect higher adherence. The outcome measure is reported as the change in facility adherence from month 9 of intervention phase 1 to month 9 of intervention phase 2. Higher numbers reflect greater change in adherence from month 9 of intervention phase 1 to month 9 of intervention phase 2.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Phase 1: Audit & Feedback
n=6 Sites/Facilities
This arm included sites that received audit and feedback in additional to implementation as usual during Phase 1.
Phase 1: Implementation As Usual
n=6 Sites/Facilities
This arm included all sites that received implementation as usual during Phase 1.
Change in Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale Screener (C-SSRS) Uptake- Phase 2a
13.3 change in percent adherence
Interval 9.0 to 17.7
11.7 change in percent adherence
Interval 7.3 to 16.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Change from month 9 of intervention phase 1 and month 9 of intervention phase 2

Population: Responding sites that continued to received audit \& feedback during Phase 2 are compared to responding sites that switched to audit \& feedback light during Phase 2. For Phase 2, it was pre-specified to compare only Audit \& Feedback Light to Audit and Feedback for the group of sites that responded to Audit \& Feedback during Phase 1.

CSRE uptake is a site level adherence measure of the percentage of patients in ambulatory care who had a positive C-SSRS screener and received the CSRE as intended (same day and by the appropriate provider). The score is a facility adherence score. Adherence ranges from 0 to 100, higher scores reflect higher adherence. The outcome measure is reported as the change in facility adherence from month 9 of intervention phase 1 to month 9 of intervention phase 2. Higher numbers reflect greater change in adherence from month 9 of intervention phase 1 to month 9 of intervention phase 2.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Phase 1: Audit & Feedback
n=6 Sites/Facilities
This arm included sites that received audit and feedback in additional to implementation as usual during Phase 1.
Phase 1: Implementation As Usual
n=6 Sites/Facilities
This arm included all sites that received implementation as usual during Phase 1.
Change in Comprehensive Suicide Risk Evaluation (CSRE) Uptake-Phase 2a
6.2 change in percent adherence
Interval 0.02 to 12.3
10.2 change in percent adherence
Interval 4.0 to 16.5

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Change from month 9 of intervention phase 1 and month 9 of intervention phase 2

Population: Nonresponding sites that received audit and feedback in Phase 2 are compared to nonresponding sites that received audit \& feedback plus external facilitation during Phase 2.

C-SSRS uptake is a site level adherence measure of the percentage of patients in ambulatory care who received a timely annual suicide risk screen (i.e., during the first encounter/visit after the annual suicide risk screen reminder was due). The score is a facility adherence score. Adherence ranges from 0 to 100, higher scores reflect higher adherence. The outcome measure is reported as the change in facility adherence from month 9 of intervention phase 1 to month 9 of intervention phase 2. Higher numbers reflect greater change in adherence from month 9 of intervention phase 1 to month 9 of intervention phase 2.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Phase 1: Audit & Feedback
n=38 Sites/Facilities
This arm included sites that received audit and feedback in additional to implementation as usual during Phase 1.
Phase 1: Implementation As Usual
n=17 Sites/Facilities
This arm included all sites that received implementation as usual during Phase 1.
Change in Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale Screener (C-SSRS) Uptake- Phase 2b
18.9 change in percent adherence
Interval 16.8 to 21.0
23.4 change in percent adherence
Interval 20.2 to 26.5

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Change from month 9 of intervention phase 1 and month 9 of intervention phase 2

Population: Nonresponding sites that received audit and feedback in Phase 2 are compared to nonresponding sites that received audit \& feedback plus external facilitation during Phase 2.

CSRE uptake is a site level adherence measure of the percentage of patients in ambulatory care who had a positive C-SSRS screener and received the CSRE as intended (same day and by the appropriate provider). The score is a facility adherence score. Adherence ranges from 0 to 100, higher scores reflect higher adherence. The outcome measure is reported as the change in facility adherence from month 9 of intervention phase 1 to month 9 of intervention phase 2. Higher numbers reflect greater change in adherence from month 9 of intervention phase 1 to month 9 of intervention phase 2.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Phase 1: Audit & Feedback
n=38 Sites/Facilities
This arm included sites that received audit and feedback in additional to implementation as usual during Phase 1.
Phase 1: Implementation As Usual
n=17 Sites/Facilities
This arm included all sites that received implementation as usual during Phase 1.
Change in Comprehensive Suicide Risk Evaluation (CSRE) Uptake-Phase 2b
13.0 change in percent adherence
Interval 10.3 to 15.7
13.6 change in percent adherence
Interval 9.5 to 17.7

Adverse Events

Implementation As Usual

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Audit & Feedback Responders Continue

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Audit & Feedback Responders Switch

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Audit & Feedback Non-Responders Continue

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Audit & Feedback Non-Responders Add Facilitation

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Implementation As Usual to Audit & Feedback Light

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Nazanin Bahraini, PhD

VA Rocky Mountain MIRECC

Phone: 720-723-6490

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place