Trial Outcomes & Findings for Adaptive Implementation Intervention for VA Suicide Risk Identification Strategy (NCT NCT04243330)
NCT ID: NCT04243330
Last Updated: 2025-05-20
Results Overview
C-SSRS uptake is a site level adherence measure of the percentage of patients in ambulatory care who received a timely annual suicide risk screen (i.e., during the first encounter/visit after the annual suicide risk screen reminder was due). Adherence ranges from 0 to 100, higher scores reflect higher adherence. The outcome measure is reported as the change in facility adherence from baseline to month 8 of intervention Phase 1. Higher numbers reflect greater change in adherence from baseline to month 8 of intervention Phase 1.
COMPLETED
NA
138 participants
Change from baseline and intervention Phase 1 month 8
2025-05-20
Participant Flow
138 VHA facilities were recruited and enrolled. Sites were allocated to different implementation strategies based on performance.
All sites started with implementation as usual during run-in phase.
Unit of analysis: Sites/Facilities
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Implementation As Usual
This arm included sites that responded to implementation as usual during run-in and continued with implementation as usual throughout the trial period. There were no sites in Arm 1 as none of the facilities implemented adequately after the run-in phase.
|
Audit & Feedback Responders Continue
This arm included sites that did not implement adequately after the run-in phase, received audit \& feedback (A\&F) in Phase 1, responded to A\&F, and continued A\&F in Phase 2.
|
Audit & Feedback Responders Switch
This arm included sites that did not implement adequately after the run-in phase, received A\&F in Phase 1, responded to A\&F and switched to A\&F Light in Phase 2. (Note. IAU became A\&F Light during Phase 2).
|
Audit & Feedback Non-Responders Continue
This arm included sites that did not implement adequately after the run-in phase, received A\&F in Phase 1, did not respond to A\&F, and continued A\&F in Phase 2.
|
Audit & Feedback Non-Responders Add Facilitation
This arm included sites that did not implement adequately after the run-in phase, received A\&F in Phase 1, did not respond to A\&F, and accepted and received A\&F + External Facilitation in Phase 2. (Note. Only included sites that accepted EF).
|
Implementation As Usual to Audit & Feedback Light
This arm included sites that did not implement adequately after the run-in phase, continued with IAU in Phase 1, and received A\&F Light in Phase 2. (Note. IAU became A\&F Light during Phase 2)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Phase 1 Intervention
STARTED
|
0 0
|
0 6
|
0 6
|
0 40
|
0 17
|
0 69
|
|
Phase 1 Intervention
COMPLETED
|
0 0
|
0 6
|
0 6
|
0 40
|
0 17
|
0 69
|
|
Phase 1 Intervention
NOT COMPLETED
|
0 0
|
0 0
|
0 0
|
0 0
|
0 0
|
0 0
|
|
Phase 2 Intervention
STARTED
|
0 0
|
0 6
|
0 6
|
0 40
|
0 17
|
0 69
|
|
Phase 2 Intervention
COMPLETED
|
0 0
|
0 6
|
0 6
|
0 38
|
0 17
|
0 66
|
|
Phase 2 Intervention
NOT COMPLETED
|
0 0
|
0 0
|
0 0
|
0 2
|
0 0
|
0 3
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Adaptive Implementation Intervention for VA Suicide Risk Identification Strategy
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Implementation As Usual
This group included sites that responded to implementation as usual during run-in and continued with implementation as usual throughout the trial period. There were no sites in Arm 1 as none of the facilities implemented adequately after the run-in phase.
|
Audit & Feedback Responders Continue
n=6 Site/Facilities
This group included sites that did not implement adequately after the run-in phase, received audit \& feedback (A\&F) in Phase 1, responded to A\&F, and continued A\&F in Phase 2.
Phase 1: randomized to A\&F arm
Phase 2: randomized A\&F arm again
|
Audit & Feedback Responders Switch
n=6 Site/Facilities
This group included sites that did not implement adequately after the run-in phase, received A\&F in Phase 1, responded to A\&F and switched to A\&F Light in Phase 2. (Note. IAU became A\&F Light during Phase 2).
Phase 1: randomized to A\&F arm
Phase 2: randomized A\&F Light arm
|
Audit & Feedback Non-Responders Continue
n=38 Site/Facilities
This group included sites that did not implement adequately after the run-in phase, received A\&F in Phase 1, did not respond to A\&F, and continued A\&F in Phase 2.
Phase 1: randomized to A\&F arm
Phase 2: randomized A\&F arm again
|
Audit & Feedback Non-Responders Add Facilitation
n=17 Site/Facilities
This group included sites that did not implement adequately after the run-in phase, received A\&F in Phase 1, did not respond to A\&F, and accepted and received A\&F + External Facilitation in Phase 2. (Note. Only included sites that accepted EF).
Phase 1: randomized to A\&F arm
Phase 2: randomized to A\&F plus External Facilitation arm
|
Implementation As Usual to Audit & Feedback Light
n=66 Site/Facilities
This group included sites that did not implement adequately after the run-in phase, continued with IAU in Phase 1, and received A\&F Light in Phase 2. (Note. IAU became A\&F Light during Phase 2)
Phase 1: randomized to Implementation as Usual arm
Phase 2: received implementation as usual which became A\&F Light
|
Total
n=133 Site/Facilities
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
—
|
NA years
STANDARD_DEVIATION NA • n=6 Site/Facilities
|
NA years
STANDARD_DEVIATION NA • n=6 Site/Facilities
|
NA years
STANDARD_DEVIATION NA • n=38 Site/Facilities
|
NA years
STANDARD_DEVIATION NA • n=17 Site/Facilities
|
NA years
STANDARD_DEVIATION NA • n=66 Site/Facilities
|
NA years
STANDARD_DEVIATION NA • n=133 Site/Facilities
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
—
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=38 Site/Facilities
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=17 Site/Facilities
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=66 Site/Facilities
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=133 Site/Facilities
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
—
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=38 Site/Facilities
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=17 Site/Facilities
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=66 Site/Facilities
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=133 Site/Facilities
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
—
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=38 Site/Facilities
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=17 Site/Facilities
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=66 Site/Facilities
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=133 Site/Facilities
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
—
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=38 Site/Facilities
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=17 Site/Facilities
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=66 Site/Facilities
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=133 Site/Facilities
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
—
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=38 Site/Facilities
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=17 Site/Facilities
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=66 Site/Facilities
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=133 Site/Facilities
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
—
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=38 Site/Facilities
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=17 Site/Facilities
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=66 Site/Facilities
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=133 Site/Facilities
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
—
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=38 Site/Facilities
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=17 Site/Facilities
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=66 Site/Facilities
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=133 Site/Facilities
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
—
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=38 Site/Facilities
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=17 Site/Facilities
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=66 Site/Facilities
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=133 Site/Facilities
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
—
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=38 Site/Facilities
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=17 Site/Facilities
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=66 Site/Facilities
|
NA Site/Facilities
n=133 Site/Facilities
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
—
|
6 Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
|
6 Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
|
38 Site/Facilities
n=38 Site/Facilities
|
17 Site/Facilities
n=17 Site/Facilities
|
66 Site/Facilities
n=66 Site/Facilities
|
133 Site/Facilities
n=133 Site/Facilities
|
|
Facility Complexity
Facility Complexity Level 1a-1c
|
—
|
2 Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
|
1 Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
|
26 Site/Facilities
n=38 Site/Facilities
|
13 Site/Facilities
n=17 Site/Facilities
|
41 Site/Facilities
n=66 Site/Facilities
|
83 Site/Facilities
n=133 Site/Facilities
|
|
Facility Complexity
Facility Complexity Level 2
|
—
|
1 Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
|
1 Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
|
4 Site/Facilities
n=38 Site/Facilities
|
4 Site/Facilities
n=17 Site/Facilities
|
12 Site/Facilities
n=66 Site/Facilities
|
22 Site/Facilities
n=133 Site/Facilities
|
|
Facility Complexity
Facility Complexity Level 3
|
—
|
3 Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
|
4 Site/Facilities
n=6 Site/Facilities
|
8 Site/Facilities
n=38 Site/Facilities
|
0 Site/Facilities
n=17 Site/Facilities
|
13 Site/Facilities
n=66 Site/Facilities
|
28 Site/Facilities
n=133 Site/Facilities
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Change from baseline and intervention Phase 1 month 8Population: All sites that completed Phase 1 are included in the analysis. Sites that received Audit \& Feedback in addition to Implementation as Usual during Phase 1 are compared to sites that only received Implementation as Usual during Phase 1.
C-SSRS uptake is a site level adherence measure of the percentage of patients in ambulatory care who received a timely annual suicide risk screen (i.e., during the first encounter/visit after the annual suicide risk screen reminder was due). Adherence ranges from 0 to 100, higher scores reflect higher adherence. The outcome measure is reported as the change in facility adherence from baseline to month 8 of intervention Phase 1. Higher numbers reflect greater change in adherence from baseline to month 8 of intervention Phase 1.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 1: Audit & Feedback
n=67 Sites/Facilities
This arm included sites that received audit and feedback in additional to implementation as usual during Phase 1.
|
Phase 1: Implementation As Usual
n=66 Sites/Facilities
This arm included all sites that received implementation as usual during Phase 1.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale Screener (C-SSRS) Uptake- Phase 1
|
13.0 change in percent adherence
Interval 11.9 to 14.0
|
11.9 change in percent adherence
Interval 10.9 to 13.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Change from baseline and intervention Phase 1 month 8Population: All sites that completed Phase 1 are included in the analysis. Sites that received Audit \& Feedback in addition to Implementation as Usual during Phase 1 are compared to sites that only received Implementation as Usual during Phase 1.
CSRE uptake is a site level adherence measure of the percentage of patients in ambulatory care who had a positive C-SSRS screener and received the CSRE as intended (same day and by the appropriate provider). The score is a facility adherence score. Adherence ranges from 0 to 100, higher scores reflect higher adherence. The outcome measure is reported as the change in facility adherence from baseline to month 8 of intervention Phase 1. Higher numbers reflect greater change in adherence from baseline to month 8 of intervention Phase 1.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 1: Audit & Feedback
n=67 Sites/Facilities
This arm included sites that received audit and feedback in additional to implementation as usual during Phase 1.
|
Phase 1: Implementation As Usual
n=66 Sites/Facilities
This arm included all sites that received implementation as usual during Phase 1.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Comprehensive Suicide Risk Evaluation (CSRE) Uptake- Phase 1
|
11.0 change in percent adherence
Interval 8.43 to 13.6
|
7.45 change in percent adherence
Interval 4.82 to 10.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Change from month 9 of intervention phase 1 and month 9 of intervention phase 2Population: Responding sites that continued to received audit \& feedback during Phase 2 are compared to responding sites that switched to audit \& feedback light during Phase 2. For Phase 2, it was pre-specified to compare only Audit \& Feedback Light to Audit and Feedback for the group of sites that responded to Audit \& Feedback during Phase 1.
C-SSRS uptake is a site level adherence measure of the percentage of patients in ambulatory care who received a timely annual suicide risk screen (i.e., during the first encounter/visit after the annual suicide risk screen reminder was due). The score is a facility adherence score. Adherence ranges from 0 to 100, higher scores reflect higher adherence. The outcome measure is reported as the change in facility adherence from month 9 of intervention phase 1 to month 9 of intervention phase 2. Higher numbers reflect greater change in adherence from month 9 of intervention phase 1 to month 9 of intervention phase 2.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 1: Audit & Feedback
n=6 Sites/Facilities
This arm included sites that received audit and feedback in additional to implementation as usual during Phase 1.
|
Phase 1: Implementation As Usual
n=6 Sites/Facilities
This arm included all sites that received implementation as usual during Phase 1.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale Screener (C-SSRS) Uptake- Phase 2a
|
13.3 change in percent adherence
Interval 9.0 to 17.7
|
11.7 change in percent adherence
Interval 7.3 to 16.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Change from month 9 of intervention phase 1 and month 9 of intervention phase 2Population: Responding sites that continued to received audit \& feedback during Phase 2 are compared to responding sites that switched to audit \& feedback light during Phase 2. For Phase 2, it was pre-specified to compare only Audit \& Feedback Light to Audit and Feedback for the group of sites that responded to Audit \& Feedback during Phase 1.
CSRE uptake is a site level adherence measure of the percentage of patients in ambulatory care who had a positive C-SSRS screener and received the CSRE as intended (same day and by the appropriate provider). The score is a facility adherence score. Adherence ranges from 0 to 100, higher scores reflect higher adherence. The outcome measure is reported as the change in facility adherence from month 9 of intervention phase 1 to month 9 of intervention phase 2. Higher numbers reflect greater change in adherence from month 9 of intervention phase 1 to month 9 of intervention phase 2.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 1: Audit & Feedback
n=6 Sites/Facilities
This arm included sites that received audit and feedback in additional to implementation as usual during Phase 1.
|
Phase 1: Implementation As Usual
n=6 Sites/Facilities
This arm included all sites that received implementation as usual during Phase 1.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Comprehensive Suicide Risk Evaluation (CSRE) Uptake-Phase 2a
|
6.2 change in percent adherence
Interval 0.02 to 12.3
|
10.2 change in percent adherence
Interval 4.0 to 16.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Change from month 9 of intervention phase 1 and month 9 of intervention phase 2Population: Nonresponding sites that received audit and feedback in Phase 2 are compared to nonresponding sites that received audit \& feedback plus external facilitation during Phase 2.
C-SSRS uptake is a site level adherence measure of the percentage of patients in ambulatory care who received a timely annual suicide risk screen (i.e., during the first encounter/visit after the annual suicide risk screen reminder was due). The score is a facility adherence score. Adherence ranges from 0 to 100, higher scores reflect higher adherence. The outcome measure is reported as the change in facility adherence from month 9 of intervention phase 1 to month 9 of intervention phase 2. Higher numbers reflect greater change in adherence from month 9 of intervention phase 1 to month 9 of intervention phase 2.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 1: Audit & Feedback
n=38 Sites/Facilities
This arm included sites that received audit and feedback in additional to implementation as usual during Phase 1.
|
Phase 1: Implementation As Usual
n=17 Sites/Facilities
This arm included all sites that received implementation as usual during Phase 1.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale Screener (C-SSRS) Uptake- Phase 2b
|
18.9 change in percent adherence
Interval 16.8 to 21.0
|
23.4 change in percent adherence
Interval 20.2 to 26.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Change from month 9 of intervention phase 1 and month 9 of intervention phase 2Population: Nonresponding sites that received audit and feedback in Phase 2 are compared to nonresponding sites that received audit \& feedback plus external facilitation during Phase 2.
CSRE uptake is a site level adherence measure of the percentage of patients in ambulatory care who had a positive C-SSRS screener and received the CSRE as intended (same day and by the appropriate provider). The score is a facility adherence score. Adherence ranges from 0 to 100, higher scores reflect higher adherence. The outcome measure is reported as the change in facility adherence from month 9 of intervention phase 1 to month 9 of intervention phase 2. Higher numbers reflect greater change in adherence from month 9 of intervention phase 1 to month 9 of intervention phase 2.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 1: Audit & Feedback
n=38 Sites/Facilities
This arm included sites that received audit and feedback in additional to implementation as usual during Phase 1.
|
Phase 1: Implementation As Usual
n=17 Sites/Facilities
This arm included all sites that received implementation as usual during Phase 1.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Comprehensive Suicide Risk Evaluation (CSRE) Uptake-Phase 2b
|
13.0 change in percent adherence
Interval 10.3 to 15.7
|
13.6 change in percent adherence
Interval 9.5 to 17.7
|
Adverse Events
Implementation As Usual
Audit & Feedback Responders Continue
Audit & Feedback Responders Switch
Audit & Feedback Non-Responders Continue
Audit & Feedback Non-Responders Add Facilitation
Implementation As Usual to Audit & Feedback Light
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place