Trial Outcomes & Findings for The UnProcessed Pantry Project (UP3) (NCT NCT04241133)
NCT ID: NCT04241133
Last Updated: 2022-05-02
Results Overview
The Healthy Eating Index-2015 scale was calculated from collected 24-hour dietary recall data collected using the ASA24 (Automated-Self Administered Recall System) a computerized dietary assessment tool. ata collected through Automated Self-Administered 24-hour dietary recall to calculate HEI-2015 scores. The scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting greater adherence with dietary recommendations from the Dietary Guidelines for Americans. A score of 100 reflects high adherence and a score of 0 reflects no adherence.
COMPLETED
NA
78 participants
Change from baseline dietary quality at 12 weeks
2022-05-02
Participant Flow
UP3 participants who accessed one of the two food pantry sites were asked to participate in UP3 through flyers and on-site recruitment from December 2019 to January 2020. First participant enrolled on January 24, 2020. Control group participants were recruited through flyers and on-site recruitment in March 2020 from another food pantry site.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Experimental Group
For a 12 week pilot trial, 44 adults enrolled in the UP3 intervention and within-participant changes were measured over time. The UnProcessed Pantry Project (UP3): UP3 uses the Social-Ecological Model to target multiple levels, including the food supply in the rural study location (community level), the food environment at the food pantry (environmental level), and participant dietary intake (individual level). It was hypothesized that UP3 will improve access to minimally processed foods and decrease access to ultra-processed foods at the food pantry, which will improve overall dietary quality of individuals as measured by the Healthy Eating Index-2015 compared to baseline and to the control group.
|
Control Group
34 participants enrolled from a different food pantry were enrolled into a control group. The post assessment was cancelled due to COVID-19 precautions.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
44
|
34
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
30
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
14
|
34
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Experimental Group
For a 12 week pilot trial, 44 adults enrolled in the UP3 intervention and within-participant changes were measured over time. The UnProcessed Pantry Project (UP3): UP3 uses the Social-Ecological Model to target multiple levels, including the food supply in the rural study location (community level), the food environment at the food pantry (environmental level), and participant dietary intake (individual level). It was hypothesized that UP3 will improve access to minimally processed foods and decrease access to ultra-processed foods at the food pantry, which will improve overall dietary quality of individuals as measured by the Healthy Eating Index-2015 compared to baseline and to the control group.
|
Control Group
34 participants enrolled from a different food pantry were enrolled into a control group. The post assessment was cancelled due to COVID-19 precautions.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
COVID19 Precautions
|
14
|
34
|
Baseline Characteristics
The UnProcessed Pantry Project (UP3)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Experimental Group
n=44 Participants
A 12 week pilot trial was conducted at two rural food pantries in Montana with low-income adults to measure within-participant changes over time. The UnProcessed Pantry Project (UP3): UP3 used the Social-Ecological Model to target multiple levels, including the food supply in the rural study location (community level), the food environment at the food pantry (environmental level), and participant dietary intake (individual level). It was hypothesized that UP3 will improve access to minimally processed foods and decrease access to ultra-processed foods at the food pantry, which would improve overall dietary quality of individuals as measured by the Healthy Eating Index-2015 compared to baseline and to the control group.
|
Control Group
n=34 Participants
Participants from a different food pantry were be enrolled into a control group with no intervention.
|
Total
n=78 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
36 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
64 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
53 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
43 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
32 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
75 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
40 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
69 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
44 participants
n=5 Participants
|
34 participants
n=7 Participants
|
78 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Healthy Eating Index 2015 Scale
|
47.14 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.41 • n=5 Participants
|
52.01 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.45 • n=7 Participants
|
49.58 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.93 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Change from baseline dietary quality at 12 weeksPopulation: Due to the onset of COVID19 at the same time of the post measure (simultaneous with stay at home orders), 14 participants did not complete the experimental group and the control group data was not collected.
The Healthy Eating Index-2015 scale was calculated from collected 24-hour dietary recall data collected using the ASA24 (Automated-Self Administered Recall System) a computerized dietary assessment tool. ata collected through Automated Self-Administered 24-hour dietary recall to calculate HEI-2015 scores. The scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting greater adherence with dietary recommendations from the Dietary Guidelines for Americans. A score of 100 reflects high adherence and a score of 0 reflects no adherence.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Experimental Group
n=30 Participants
A 12 week pilot trial will be conducted at two rural food pantries in Montana with low-income adults to measure within-participant changes over time. The study will provide the initial investigation of the extent to which UP3 will improve overall dietary quality as measured by the Healthy Eating Index-2015 (HEI) compared to baseline. It is hypothesized that UP3 will improve access to minimally processed foods and decrease access to ultra-processed foods at the food pantry, which will improve overall dietary quality of individuals as measured by the Healthy Eating Index-2015 compared to baseline and to the control group.
|
Control Group
Participants from a different food pantry will be enrolled into a control group. The primary outcome measure will be dietary intake. No intervention will be applied.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Dietary Quality Change
|
57.01 Change in HEI-2015 baseline to 12 weeks
Standard Deviation 13.94
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Experimental Group
Control Group
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place