Trial Outcomes & Findings for Community Paramedic Coaching Program for Caregivers and People With Dementia (NCT NCT04239924)
NCT ID: NCT04239924
Last Updated: 2023-08-01
Results Overview
As determined by abstracting the medical records, the investigators are testing the hypothesis that the number of visits to the Emergency Department is lower than commonly reported in the literature for persons with dementia.
COMPLETED
NA
20 participants
up to 24 months
2023-08-01
Participant Flow
20 participant enrolled are 10 caregivers and 10 patients with dementia
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Paramedic Coaching of Caregivers
The intervention is an adaptation of the evidence-based REACH program
Paramedic Coaching: The intervention is an adaptation of the evidence-based REACH program, specific coaching content is delivered by paramedics in 1-2 hour in-home sessions and over the phone throughout a 12-month period.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
20
|
|
Overall Study
Caregivers
|
10
|
|
Overall Study
Patient With Dementia
|
10
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
18
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Paramedic Coaching of Caregivers
The intervention is an adaptation of the evidence-based REACH program
Paramedic Coaching: The intervention is an adaptation of the evidence-based REACH program, specific coaching content is delivered by paramedics in 1-2 hour in-home sessions and over the phone throughout a 12-month period.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
Community Paramedic Coaching Program for Caregivers and People With Dementia
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Paramedic Coaching
n=20 Participants
The intervention is an adaptation of the evidence-based REACH program
Paramedic Coaching: The intervention is an adaptation of the evidence-based REACH program, specific coaching content is delivered by paramedics in 1-2 hour in-home sessions and over the phone throughout a 12-month period.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
77.1 years
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
20 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 24 monthsAs determined by abstracting the medical records, the investigators are testing the hypothesis that the number of visits to the Emergency Department is lower than commonly reported in the literature for persons with dementia.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Paramedic Coaching
n=10 Participants
The intervention is an adaptation of the evidence-based REACH program, specific coaching content is delivered by paramedics in 1-2 hour in-home sessions and over the phone throughout a 12-month period.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Visits to the Emergency Department by the Person With Dementia
|
15 visits to the Emergency Department
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 24 monthsAs determined by abstracting the medical records, the investigators are testing the hypothesis that the number of visits to the Emergency Department is lower than commonly reported in the literature for average older adults.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Paramedic Coaching
n=10 Participants
The intervention is an adaptation of the evidence-based REACH program, specific coaching content is delivered by paramedics in 1-2 hour in-home sessions and over the phone throughout a 12-month period.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Visits to the Emergency Department by the Caregiver of the Person With Dementia
|
1 visits to the Emergency Department
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 12 monthsPopulation: The coaching phone calls are relevant to and only conducted with caregivers, which makes up for 10 of our 20 participants.
The intervention will be deemed feasible if at least 75% of the intended coaching phone calls are completed. The minimum number of coaching calls is 3, additional calls will be scheduled opposite weeks of home visits as needed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Paramedic Coaching
n=30 Number of Phone Calls Made
The intervention is an adaptation of the evidence-based REACH program, specific coaching content is delivered by paramedics in 1-2 hour in-home sessions and over the phone throughout a 12-month period.
|
|---|---|
|
Feasibility: Proportion of Coaching Phone Calls Completed
|
27 Number of Phone Calls Completed
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 12 monthsPopulation: The coaching phone calls are relevant to and only conducted with caregivers, which makes up for 10 of our 20 participants.
The intervention will be deemed feasible if at least 75% of the intended home visits are completed. The minimum number of intended home visits is 9.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Paramedic Coaching
n=90 Number of Home Visits Planned
The intervention is an adaptation of the evidence-based REACH program, specific coaching content is delivered by paramedics in 1-2 hour in-home sessions and over the phone throughout a 12-month period.
|
|---|---|
|
Feasibility: Proportion of Coaching Home Visits Completed
|
82 number of completed coaching visits
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: First home visit (~ week 1), week 13, week 25, and last home visit (~up to week 50)Population: This interview is relevant to and only conducted on caregivers, which makes up for 10 of our 20 participants.
The Zarit Burden Interview measures caregiver burden. This is a 12-item survey with a total possible range of scores from 0-48, where higher scores indicate increased burden. The investigators hypothesize the score will decrease as a result of the intervention.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Paramedic Coaching
n=10 Participants
The intervention is an adaptation of the evidence-based REACH program, specific coaching content is delivered by paramedics in 1-2 hour in-home sessions and over the phone throughout a 12-month period.
|
|---|---|
|
Change in Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI-12) Score
First home visit
|
13 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.7
|
|
Change in Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI-12) Score
Week 13
|
18.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.7
|
|
Change in Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI-12) Score
Week 25
|
15.75 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.8
|
|
Change in Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI-12) Score
Week 50
|
19 score on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Unable to obtain standard deviation with sample size of 1. By week 50, we were only able to obtain 1 participant's feedback.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, week 13, week 25, week 50Population: This interview is relevant to and only conducted on caregivers, which makes up for 10 of our 20 participants.
The GAD-7 is a 7-item survey that measures anxiety symptom severity. The total possible range of scores is 0-21, where higher scores indicate increased symptom severity. The investigators hypothesize the score will decrease as a result of the intervention.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Paramedic Coaching
n=10 Participants
The intervention is an adaptation of the evidence-based REACH program, specific coaching content is delivered by paramedics in 1-2 hour in-home sessions and over the phone throughout a 12-month period.
|
|---|---|
|
Change in Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) Score
Baseline
|
7.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.7
|
|
Change in Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) Score
Week 13
|
5.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.3
|
|
Change in Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) Score
Week 25
|
5.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.0
|
|
Change in Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) Score
Week 50
|
4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Unable to obtain standard deviation with sample size of 1. By week 50, we were only able to obtain 1 participant's feedback.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: First home visit (~ week 1), week 13, week 25, and last home visit (~up to week 50)Population: This interview is relevant to and only conducted on caregivers, which makes up for 10 of our 20 participants.
The CESD-10 is a general measure of depression frequently used in caregiver studies. It is a 10-item survey with a total possible range of scores of 0-30 where higher scores indicate increased depression. The investigators hypothesize the score will decrease as a result of the intervention.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Paramedic Coaching
n=10 Participants
The intervention is an adaptation of the evidence-based REACH program, specific coaching content is delivered by paramedics in 1-2 hour in-home sessions and over the phone throughout a 12-month period.
|
|---|---|
|
Change in Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD-10)
Week 25
|
7.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.4
|
|
Change in Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD-10)
Week 50
|
10 score on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Unable to obtain standard deviation with sample size of 1. By week 50, we were only able to obtain 1 participant's feedback.
|
|
Change in Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD-10)
First home visit
|
7.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.7
|
|
Change in Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD-10)
Week 13
|
8.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, week 13, week 25, week 50Population: This interview is relevant to and only conducted on caregivers, which makes up for 10 of our 20 participants.
The RCSS is a 6-item survey used to measure the positive aspects of caring. The range of total possible scores is 6-30 where higher scores indicate increased caregiver satisfaction. The investigators hypothesize the score will increase as a result of the intervention.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Paramedic Coaching
n=10 Participants
The intervention is an adaptation of the evidence-based REACH program, specific coaching content is delivered by paramedics in 1-2 hour in-home sessions and over the phone throughout a 12-month period.
|
|---|---|
|
Change in Revised Caregiving Satisfaction Scale (RCSS)
Baseline
|
24.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.6
|
|
Change in Revised Caregiving Satisfaction Scale (RCSS)
Week 13
|
20.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.1
|
|
Change in Revised Caregiving Satisfaction Scale (RCSS)
Week 25
|
22 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.9
|
|
Change in Revised Caregiving Satisfaction Scale (RCSS)
Week 50
|
24 score on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Unable to obtain standard deviation with sample size of 1. By week 50, we were only able to obtain 1 participant's feedback.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: First home visit (~ week 1) and last home visit (~up to week 50)Population: This interview is relevant to and only conducted on caregivers, which makes up for 10 of our 20 participants.
The revised scale for caregiving self-efficacy measures three domains: obtaining respite, responding to disruptive patient behaviors, and controlling upsetting thoughts. It is a 15-item scale with a total possible range of scores between 0-100, where higher scores are better. The investigators hypothesize the score will increase as a result of the intervention.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Paramedic Coaching
n=10 Participants
The intervention is an adaptation of the evidence-based REACH program, specific coaching content is delivered by paramedics in 1-2 hour in-home sessions and over the phone throughout a 12-month period.
|
|---|---|
|
Change in Revised Scale for Caregiving Self-Efficacy
Controlling Upsetting Thoughts - last home visit
|
78.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.6
|
|
Change in Revised Scale for Caregiving Self-Efficacy
Obtaining Respite - first home visit
|
65.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.2
|
|
Change in Revised Scale for Caregiving Self-Efficacy
Obtaining Respite - last home visit
|
71.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.9
|
|
Change in Revised Scale for Caregiving Self-Efficacy
Responding to Disruptive Behavior - first home visit
|
70.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.8
|
|
Change in Revised Scale for Caregiving Self-Efficacy
Responding to Disruptive Behavior - last home visit
|
77.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.7
|
|
Change in Revised Scale for Caregiving Self-Efficacy
Controlling Upsetting Thoughts - first home visit
|
76.22 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: First home visit (~ week 1) and last home visit (~up to week 50)Population: Survey only relevant to caregivers who are working. Unable to obtain participant feedback for last home visit.
WFC is measured for the caregiver. It is a 6-item survey with a total possible range of scores between 6-30 with higher scores indicating lesser work-family conflict. The investigators hypothesize the score will increase as a result of the intervention.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Paramedic Coaching
n=4 Participants
The intervention is an adaptation of the evidence-based REACH program, specific coaching content is delivered by paramedics in 1-2 hour in-home sessions and over the phone throughout a 12-month period.
|
|---|---|
|
Change in Work-Family Conflict Scale (WFC)
First Home Visit
|
15 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: First home visit (~ week 1), week 13, week 25, and last home visit (~up to week 50)Population: This interview is relevant to and only conducted on caregivers, which makes up for 10 of our 20 participants.
C-DEMQOL is measured for the caregiver. The investigators will be asking 18 of the questions from the scale to understand the quality of life the caregivers experience. Scores can range from 18-90, with a higher score reflecting a higher quality of life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Paramedic Coaching
n=10 Participants
The intervention is an adaptation of the evidence-based REACH program, specific coaching content is delivered by paramedics in 1-2 hour in-home sessions and over the phone throughout a 12-month period.
|
|---|---|
|
Change in Caregiver Quality of Life (C-DEMQOL) Score
First home visit
|
20.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.4
|
|
Change in Caregiver Quality of Life (C-DEMQOL) Score
Week 13
|
20.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.4
|
|
Change in Caregiver Quality of Life (C-DEMQOL) Score
Week 25
|
20.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.7
|
|
Change in Caregiver Quality of Life (C-DEMQOL) Score
Week 50
|
19.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: First home visit (~ week 1) and week 13Population: This interview is relevant to and only conducted on caregivers
DKAS is measured for the caregiver. It is a 25 item true-false survey of facts about dementia. Scoring is by measuring the proportion of questions answered correctly. The range for score values is 0 to 50, the higher the score the better the outcome (a.k.a. the more knowledgeable about dementia).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Paramedic Coaching
n=8 Participants
The intervention is an adaptation of the evidence-based REACH program, specific coaching content is delivered by paramedics in 1-2 hour in-home sessions and over the phone throughout a 12-month period.
|
|---|---|
|
Change in Knowledge of Dementia (DKAS) Score
First home visit
|
34.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.5
|
|
Change in Knowledge of Dementia (DKAS) Score
Week 13
|
35 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 24 monthsPopulation: No data was collected. As the outcomes were not relevant to the primary goal of the project, medical records were not abstracted for this data due to study staff changes and time constraints.
As determined by abstracting the medical records, the investigators are characterizing the number of contacts with outpatient clinics for persons with dementia.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: up to 24 monthsPopulation: No data was collected. As the outcomes were not relevant to the primary goal of the project, medical records were not abstracted for this data due to study staff changes and time constraints.
As determined by abstracting the medical records, the investigators are characterizing the number of contacts with outpatient clinics for caregivers of persons with dementia.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: First home visit (~ week 1) and week 13Population: This interview is relevant to and only conducted on caregivers, which makes up for 10 of our 20 participants.
Assesses caregivers perception of communication with health care team and extent to which the team considers their capacity and preferences in decision making. This measure consists of 12 questions, with scores ranging from 12-60, where higher scores indicate increased communication with the health care team.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Paramedic Coaching
n=10 Participants
The intervention is an adaptation of the evidence-based REACH program, specific coaching content is delivered by paramedics in 1-2 hour in-home sessions and over the phone throughout a 12-month period.
|
|---|---|
|
Change in Caregiver Perceptions About Communication With Clinical Team Members (CAPACITY) Measure
First home visit
|
32.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 8.8
|
|
Change in Caregiver Perceptions About Communication With Clinical Team Members (CAPACITY) Measure
Week 13
|
36.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 2.4
|
Adverse Events
Paramedic Coaching
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Paramedic Coaching
n=20 participants at risk
The intervention is an adaptation of the evidence-based REACH program
Paramedic Coaching: The intervention is an adaptation of the evidence-based REACH program, specific coaching content is delivered by paramedics in 1-2 hour in-home sessions and over the phone throughout a 12-month period.
|
|---|---|
|
Vascular disorders
Serious Adverse Events
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected from the time a participant was enrolled to 6 months after the completion of their participation. Typically, 1 year and 6 months.
Adverse events for caregivers and for patients with dementia were not monitored/assessed separately.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Serious Adverse Event
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from the time a participant was enrolled to 6 months after the completion of their participation. Typically, 1 year and 6 months.
Adverse events for caregivers and for patients with dementia were not monitored/assessed separately.
|
|
General disorders
Serious Adverse Event
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from the time a participant was enrolled to 6 months after the completion of their participation. Typically, 1 year and 6 months.
Adverse events for caregivers and for patients with dementia were not monitored/assessed separately.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Paramedic Coaching
n=20 participants at risk
The intervention is an adaptation of the evidence-based REACH program
Paramedic Coaching: The intervention is an adaptation of the evidence-based REACH program, specific coaching content is delivered by paramedics in 1-2 hour in-home sessions and over the phone throughout a 12-month period.
|
|---|---|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
ED Use
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were collected from the time a participant was enrolled to 6 months after the completion of their participation. Typically, 1 year and 6 months.
Adverse events for caregivers and for patients with dementia were not monitored/assessed separately.
|
|
Vascular disorders
ED Use
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from the time a participant was enrolled to 6 months after the completion of their participation. Typically, 1 year and 6 months.
Adverse events for caregivers and for patients with dementia were not monitored/assessed separately.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
ED Use
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from the time a participant was enrolled to 6 months after the completion of their participation. Typically, 1 year and 6 months.
Adverse events for caregivers and for patients with dementia were not monitored/assessed separately.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
ED Use
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected from the time a participant was enrolled to 6 months after the completion of their participation. Typically, 1 year and 6 months.
Adverse events for caregivers and for patients with dementia were not monitored/assessed separately.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
ED Use
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from the time a participant was enrolled to 6 months after the completion of their participation. Typically, 1 year and 6 months.
Adverse events for caregivers and for patients with dementia were not monitored/assessed separately.
|
|
General disorders
ED Use
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected from the time a participant was enrolled to 6 months after the completion of their participation. Typically, 1 year and 6 months.
Adverse events for caregivers and for patients with dementia were not monitored/assessed separately.
|
Additional Information
Dr. Manish Shah
BerbeeWalsh Department of Emergency Medicine
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place