Trial Outcomes & Findings for Treatment Phenotypes for Adolescents With Asthma (NCT NCT04228107)
NCT ID: NCT04228107
Last Updated: 2025-11-06
Results Overview
The Investigators will calculate the number of participants that fall into the following treatment phenotypes: "Well controlled-good adherence", "Well controlled-poor adherence", "Poorly controlled-good adherence", "Poorly controlled-poor adherence". We had initially planned to report only these 4 groups, however there was a very clear breakdown into 9 groups-as we needed to consider a moderately controlled group and a moderately adherent group. Therefore the groups are reported as follows: Poor Adhrence, Poor control Poor adherence, moderate control poor adherence, good control Moderate adherence, poor control moderate adherence, moderate control moderate adherence, good control good adherence, poor control good adherence, moderate control good adherence, good control The investigators will use group based trajectory modeling to evaluate adherence and control phenotypes
COMPLETED
NA
80 participants
12 months
2025-11-06
Participant Flow
70 adolescent participants were enrolled for the primary aim. 10 healthcare providers were enrolled to participate in focus groups.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Adolescents With Medication Monitoring
Participants will be enrolled in medication use monitoring. Their medication use patterns will be available to themselves and their guardians via a smartphone application, and to their asthma care providers via a portal. There will be no interventions to change medication use patterns.
|
Healthcare Provider Focus Groups
Healthcare providers will be enrolled in focus groups to discuss medication adherence in teens. Healthcare provider demographics were not collected as part of focus group participation.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
70
|
10
|
|
Overall Study
Completed a Qualitative Semistructured Interview (Subset)
|
21
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
43
|
10
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
27
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Adolescents With Medication Monitoring
Participants will be enrolled in medication use monitoring. Their medication use patterns will be available to themselves and their guardians via a smartphone application, and to their asthma care providers via a portal. There will be no interventions to change medication use patterns.
|
Healthcare Provider Focus Groups
Healthcare providers will be enrolled in focus groups to discuss medication adherence in teens. Healthcare provider demographics were not collected as part of focus group participation.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
6
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
18
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
No controller use data
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
No medication data collected
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Only participants with greater than 11 months (47 weeks) of synced data were included in the final analysis. Those not included had less than 47 weeks of data synced from the sensors.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Adolescents
n=43 Participants
Teens enrolled for electronic medication monitoring. 43 participants completed at least 11 months of medication monitoring and were included in the final analysis
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
13.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.34 • n=49 Participants • Only participants with greater than 11 months (47 weeks) of synced data were included in the final analysis. Those not included had less than 47 weeks of data synced from the sensors.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
14 Participants
n=49 Participants • Only participants with greater than 11 months (47 weeks) of synced data were included in the final analysis. Those not included had less than 47 weeks of data synced from the sensors.
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
29 Participants
n=49 Participants • Only participants with greater than 11 months (47 weeks) of synced data were included in the final analysis. Those not included had less than 47 weeks of data synced from the sensors.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
21 Participants
n=49 Participants • Only participants with greater than 11 months (47 weeks) of synced data were included in the final analysis. Those not included had less than 47 weeks of data synced from the sensors.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
21 Participants
n=49 Participants • Only participants with greater than 11 months (47 weeks) of synced data were included in the final analysis. Those not included had less than 47 weeks of data synced from the sensors.
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=49 Participants • Only participants with greater than 11 months (47 weeks) of synced data were included in the final analysis. Those not included had less than 47 weeks of data synced from the sensors.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
1 Participants
n=49 Participants • Only participants with greater than 11 months (47 weeks) of synced data were included in the final analysis. Those not included had less than 47 weeks of data synced from the sensors.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
1 Participants
n=49 Participants • Only participants with greater than 11 months (47 weeks) of synced data were included in the final analysis. Those not included had less than 47 weeks of data synced from the sensors.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=49 Participants • Only participants with greater than 11 months (47 weeks) of synced data were included in the final analysis. Those not included had less than 47 weeks of data synced from the sensors.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
5 Participants
n=49 Participants • Only participants with greater than 11 months (47 weeks) of synced data were included in the final analysis. Those not included had less than 47 weeks of data synced from the sensors.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
25 Participants
n=49 Participants • Only participants with greater than 11 months (47 weeks) of synced data were included in the final analysis. Those not included had less than 47 weeks of data synced from the sensors.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
2 Participants
n=49 Participants • Only participants with greater than 11 months (47 weeks) of synced data were included in the final analysis. Those not included had less than 47 weeks of data synced from the sensors.
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
9 Participants
n=49 Participants • Only participants with greater than 11 months (47 weeks) of synced data were included in the final analysis. Those not included had less than 47 weeks of data synced from the sensors.
|
|
FEV1 Z score
|
0.18 Z score
n=49 Participants • Only participants with greater than 11 months (47 weeks) of synced data were included in the final analysis. Those not included had less than 47 weeks of data synced from the sensors.
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsThe Investigators will calculate the number of participants that fall into the following treatment phenotypes: "Well controlled-good adherence", "Well controlled-poor adherence", "Poorly controlled-good adherence", "Poorly controlled-poor adherence". We had initially planned to report only these 4 groups, however there was a very clear breakdown into 9 groups-as we needed to consider a moderately controlled group and a moderately adherent group. Therefore the groups are reported as follows: Poor Adhrence, Poor control Poor adherence, moderate control poor adherence, good control Moderate adherence, poor control moderate adherence, moderate control moderate adherence, good control good adherence, poor control good adherence, moderate control good adherence, good control The investigators will use group based trajectory modeling to evaluate adherence and control phenotypes
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Adolescents
n=43 Participants
Adolescents enrolled in 1 year of electronic medication monitoring. During the study, participants had less than 1 year of data completed from the sensors for a number of reasons (most often that their device stopped syncing with the app and we were unable to re-establish a connection). Only participants with greater than 11 months of data collected were included in the final analysis. N=25 participants were excluded from the final analysis for not having a full 11+ months worth of data. Therefore the final analytic population was 45 participants.
|
|---|---|
|
Treatment Phenotypes
Poor adherence, good control
|
7 Participants
|
|
Treatment Phenotypes
poor adherence, poor control
|
2 Participants
|
|
Treatment Phenotypes
Moderate adherence, good control
|
10 Participants
|
|
Treatment Phenotypes
moderate adherence, poor control
|
5 Participants
|
|
Treatment Phenotypes
high adherence, good control
|
16 Participants
|
|
Treatment Phenotypes
high adherence, poor control
|
3 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsQualitative data (semistructured interviews with patients regarding barriers to medication use.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Adolescents
n=21 Participants
Adolescents enrolled in 1 year of electronic medication monitoring. During the study, participants had less than 1 year of data completed from the sensors for a number of reasons (most often that their device stopped syncing with the app and we were unable to re-establish a connection). Only participants with greater than 11 months of data collected were included in the final analysis. N=25 participants were excluded from the final analysis for not having a full 11+ months worth of data. Therefore the final analytic population was 45 participants.
|
|---|---|
|
Qualitative Information Regarding Barriers for Medication Use
Theme: poor routine
|
8 Participants
|
|
Qualitative Information Regarding Barriers for Medication Use
Theme: forget
|
3 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsQualitative data (semistructured interviews with adolescents) regarding barriers to medication use.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Adolescents
n=21 Participants
Adolescents enrolled in 1 year of electronic medication monitoring. During the study, participants had less than 1 year of data completed from the sensors for a number of reasons (most often that their device stopped syncing with the app and we were unable to re-establish a connection). Only participants with greater than 11 months of data collected were included in the final analysis. N=25 participants were excluded from the final analysis for not having a full 11+ months worth of data. Therefore the final analytic population was 45 participants.
|
|---|---|
|
Qualitative Information Regarding Facilitators for Medication Use
Theme: habit
|
7 Participants
|
|
Qualitative Information Regarding Facilitators for Medication Use
Theme: parental reminders
|
8 Participants
|
|
Qualitative Information Regarding Facilitators for Medication Use
Theme: good routine
|
12 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsQualitative data (focus groups with healthcare providers) to determine facilitators to medication use.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Adolescents
n=10 Participants
Adolescents enrolled in 1 year of electronic medication monitoring. During the study, participants had less than 1 year of data completed from the sensors for a number of reasons (most often that their device stopped syncing with the app and we were unable to re-establish a connection). Only participants with greater than 11 months of data collected were included in the final analysis. N=25 participants were excluded from the final analysis for not having a full 11+ months worth of data. Therefore the final analytic population was 45 participants.
|
|---|---|
|
Qualitative Information Regarding Facilitators for Medication Use
Theme: tailored approach
|
7 Participants
|
|
Qualitative Information Regarding Facilitators for Medication Use
Theme: buy in from patient/family
|
5 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 monthsQualitative data (focus groups with healthcare providers) to determine facilitators to medication use.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Adolescents
n=10 Participants
Adolescents enrolled in 1 year of electronic medication monitoring. During the study, participants had less than 1 year of data completed from the sensors for a number of reasons (most often that their device stopped syncing with the app and we were unable to re-establish a connection). Only participants with greater than 11 months of data collected were included in the final analysis. N=25 participants were excluded from the final analysis for not having a full 11+ months worth of data. Therefore the final analytic population was 45 participants.
|
|---|---|
|
Qualitative Information Regarding Barriers for Medication Use
Theme: insurance/cost barriers
|
5 Participants
|
|
Qualitative Information Regarding Barriers for Medication Use
Theme: lack of adolescent understanding or prioritization
|
7 Participants
|
|
Qualitative Information Regarding Barriers for Medication Use
Theme: lack of parental involvement or parenting challenges
|
5 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Adolescents
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place