Comparison of Tacrolimus Extended-Release (Envarsus XR) to Tacrolimus Immediate-Release in Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) Sensitized Kidney Transplant Recipients
NCT ID: NCT04225988
Last Updated: 2024-07-10
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-01-09
2023-07-11
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Anti-rejection Drug, Tacrolimus, in African-Americans With Kidney Transplant
NCT04665310
Cognitive Outcomes in Stable Renal Transplant Patients Switched FromTacrolimus to Envarsus XR™
NCT04838288
Envarsus XR Compared to Immediate Release Tacrolimus
NCT03979365
Envarsus on the Effect of Total Tacrolimus Dose/Trough Level Ratio on Renal Function (eGFR) in Kidney Transplantation
NCT03511560
Expanded Access Study for Renal Transplant Patients With Envarsus XR ™
NCT02411604
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Both phase 3 trials involved mostly low immunologic risk recipients with follow-up to one year. It has been previously shown that the incidence of de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSA) in the first year after kidney transplant in low-immunologic patients is low, developing in only 2%-11% of unsensitized de novo kidney transplant recipients (3-6). Donor-specific antibodies (DSA) are the primary mediator of antibody-mediated rejection and their development after transplant is a major risk factor for late allograft failure (7). It is now believed that antibody-mediated rejection is the most common cause of late allograft failure (8,9). However, neither of the two phase 3 trials were able to adequately assess the effect of Envarsus XR on the development of donor specific antibodies and therefore, the efficacy of Envarsus XR in higher immunologic risk recipients is not known. Therefore, a comparative study of extended- and immediate-release tacrolimus in highly-sensitized recipients is warranted.
This is a randomized, open-label, controlled clinical trial designed to compare clinical outcomes after kidney transplantation using extended-release tacrolimus (Envarsus XR) versus immediate tacrolimus among highly-sensitized kidney transplant recipients. Twenty patients will be enrolled, with ten assigned to each study arm. Outcomes to be assessed include the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection at 12 months, the presence of de novo and pre-existing donor-specific HLA antibodies, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and the level of donor-derived cell-free DNA.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Extended-release tacrolimus
Kidney transplant recipients will receive extended-release tacrolimus in addition to standard-dose mycophenolate and prednisone for maintenance immunosuppression.
Extended-release tacrolimus
Patients will receive the extended-release formulation of tacrolimus for maintenance immunosuppression.
Immediate-release tacrolimus
Kidney transplant recipients will receive immediate-release tacrolimus in addition to standard-dose mycophenolate and prednisone for maintenance immunosuppression.
Immediate-release tacrolimus
Patients will receive the immediate-release formulation of tacrolimus for maintenance immunosuppression.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Extended-release tacrolimus
Patients will receive the extended-release formulation of tacrolimus for maintenance immunosuppression.
Immediate-release tacrolimus
Patients will receive the immediate-release formulation of tacrolimus for maintenance immunosuppression.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients must have undergone desensitization with Intravenous Immunoglobulin (IVIG) and rituximab with or without plasma exchange prior to transplant or be administered IVIG and rituximab peri-operatively (within seven days of transplant) post-transplant
3. Age 18 and over
4. Able to understand and provide informed consent
5. At transplant, patient must have an acceptable crossmatch \[as defined by a T- or B-flow crossmatch ≤ 225 median channel shift (MCS)\] from a non-HLA identical donor. A negative crossmatch is defined as a T pronase flow crossmatch \< 70 MCS or a T- flow crossmatch \< 50 MCS and a B pronase flow crossmatch \<130 MCS or a B-flow crossmatch \<100 MCS.
Exclusion Criteria
2. History of hypersensitivity to any of the study drug or to drugs of similar chemical classes.
3. Patients with a clinically significant systemic infection within 30 days prior to transplant.
4. Patients who have any history of a surgical or medical condition that may affect absorption of drug, such as severe diarrhea, active peptic ulcer disease, or uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, which in the opinion of the investigator at the time of enrollment, might significantly alter the absorption, distribution, metabolism and/or excretion of study medication.
5. Women of childbearing potential who are either pregnant, lactating, planning to become pregnant during this trial, or with a positive serum or urine pregnancy test. Women of childbearing potential must be willing to agree to contraceptive practices.
6. Patients who are Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) positive for hepatitis B, hepatitis C, or HIV.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Veloxis Pharmaceuticals
INDUSTRY
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Edmund Huang
Staff Physician II
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Budde K, Bunnapradist S, Grinyo JM, Ciechanowski K, Denny JE, Silva HT, Rostaing L; Envarsus study group. Novel once-daily extended-release tacrolimus (LCPT) versus twice-daily tacrolimus in de novo kidney transplants: one-year results of Phase III, double-blind, randomized trial. Am J Transplant. 2014 Dec;14(12):2796-806. doi: 10.1111/ajt.12955. Epub 2014 Oct 2.
Bunnapradist S, Ciechanowski K, West-Thielke P, Mulgaonkar S, Rostaing L, Vasudev B, Budde K; MELT investigators. Conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus to once-daily extended release tacrolimus (LCPT): the phase III randomized MELT trial. Am J Transplant. 2013 Mar;13(3):760-9. doi: 10.1111/ajt.12035. Epub 2012 Dec 21.
Everly MJ, Rebellato LM, Haisch CE, Ozawa M, Parker K, Briley KP, Catrou PG, Bolin P, Kendrick WT, Kendrick SA, Harland RC, Terasaki PI. Incidence and impact of de novo donor-specific alloantibody in primary renal allografts. Transplantation. 2013 Feb 15;95(3):410-7. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31827d62e3.
Hidalgo LG, Campbell PM, Sis B, Einecke G, Mengel M, Chang J, Sellares J, Reeve J, Halloran PF. De novo donor-specific antibody at the time of kidney transplant biopsy associates with microvascular pathology and late graft failure. Am J Transplant. 2009 Nov;9(11):2532-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02800.x.
Schinstock CA, Cosio F, Cheungpasitporn W, Dadhania DM, Everly MJ, Samaniego-Picota MD, Cornell L, Stegall MD. The Value of Protocol Biopsies to Identify Patients With De Novo Donor-Specific Antibody at High Risk for Allograft Loss. Am J Transplant. 2017 Jun;17(6):1574-1584. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14161. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
Wiebe C, Gibson IW, Blydt-Hansen TD, Pochinco D, Birk PE, Ho J, Karpinski M, Goldberg A, Storsley L, Rush DN, Nickerson PW. Rates and determinants of progression to graft failure in kidney allograft recipients with de novo donor-specific antibody. Am J Transplant. 2015 Nov;15(11):2921-30. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13347. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
Loupy A, Hill GS, Jordan SC. The impact of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies on late kidney allograft failure. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2012 Apr 17;8(6):348-57. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2012.81.
Sellares J, de Freitas DG, Mengel M, Reeve J, Einecke G, Sis B, Hidalgo LG, Famulski K, Matas A, Halloran PF. Understanding the causes of kidney transplant failure: the dominant role of antibody-mediated rejection and nonadherence. Am J Transplant. 2012 Feb;12(2):388-99. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03840.x. Epub 2011 Nov 14.
Einecke G, Sis B, Reeve J, Mengel M, Campbell PM, Hidalgo LG, Kaplan B, Halloran PF. Antibody-mediated microcirculation injury is the major cause of late kidney transplant failure. Am J Transplant. 2009 Nov;9(11):2520-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02799.x.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Pro00054474
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.