Baerveldt (BGI) Valve Versus Ahmed(AGV) Valve in Management of Difficult Glaucoma Cases

NCT ID: NCT04215575

Last Updated: 2020-01-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

81 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-01-01

Study Completion Date

2016-12-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Refractory glaucoma is a difficult subject as many glaucoma devices attempt to reduce IOP. Baerveldt implant is considered as a large implant, and, on the contrary, Ahmed implant is considered a small implant as many comparisons have showed. Investigators have previously used two models S2 and FP7 Ahmed implant. Currently, investigators use Baerveldt implant in refractory glaucoma cases in order to compare it with the Ahmed implant.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Eighty-one participants with glaucoma after ocular surgery or secondary glaucoma with persistent and uncontrolled IOP \> 21 mmHg were randomized for placement of Baerveldt implant or Ahmed implant models using a standardized surgical technique.

The primary outcome was failure, which was defined as IOP \>16 mmHg with glaucoma medication on 2 consecutive study visits. Secondary outcomes were IOP, medication use, visual acuity, complications, and interventions.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Glaucoma, Open-Angle Glaucoma Secondary Glaucoma, Neovascular Glaucoma, Angle-Closure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Participants were randomized to BGI model 101-350 placement (BGI group) or an AGV model FP7or S2 placement (AGV group). Follow-up visits were scheduled 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year postoperatively. The primary outcome measure was failure that defined as IOP \>16 mmHg or less than a 20% reduction below baseline on 2 consecutive study visits.The IOP, the use of glaucoma medications, visual acuity (VA), visual fields, bleb morphology and rates of surgical complications were secondary outcome measures.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators
A clinical trial design strategy in which parties involved in the trial, the investigator and participants, do not know which participants have been assigned which interventions. Type of masking include: double-blind masking.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

BGI model 101-350 placement (BGI group)

A 350 mm2 Baerveldt glaucoma implant was placed. Follow-up visits were scheduled 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year postoperatively. The primary outcome measure was failure that defined as IOP \>16 mmHg or less than a 20% reduction below baseline on 2 consecutive study visits.The IOP, the use of glaucoma medications, visual acuity (VA), visual fields, bleb morphology and rates of surgical complications were secondary outcome measures.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

glaucoma implant procedure (Baerveldt)

Intervention Type DEVICE

A 350 mm2 Baerveldt glaucoma implant was placed in the superotemporal quadrant in 25 patients randomized to BGI group. A limbus-based conjunctival flap was dissected, and the implant was sutured to sclera 10 mm posterior to the limbus. A scleral graft was used to cover the limbal portion of the tube, and the conjunctiva was closed.

AGV model FP7 or S2 placement (AGV group)

A 184 mm2 Ahmed glaucoma implant was placed. Follow-up visits were scheduled 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year postoperatively. The primary outcome measure was failure that defined as IOP \>16 mmHg or less than a 20% reduction below baseline on 2 consecutive study visits. The IOP, the use of glaucoma medications, visual acuity (VA), visual fields, bleb morphology and rates of surgical complications were secondary outcome measures

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

glaucoma implant procedure (Ahmed)

Intervention Type DEVICE

A 184 mm2 Ahmed glaucoma implant was placed in the superotemporal quadrant in 56 patients randomized to AGV group. A fornix-based conjunctival flap was dissected, and the implant was sutured to sclera 10 mm posterior to the limbus. The Ahmed tube left patent and viscoelastic substance injected into anterior chamber. A scleral graft was used to cover the limbal portion of the tube, and the conjunctiva was closed.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

glaucoma implant procedure (Baerveldt)

A 350 mm2 Baerveldt glaucoma implant was placed in the superotemporal quadrant in 25 patients randomized to BGI group. A limbus-based conjunctival flap was dissected, and the implant was sutured to sclera 10 mm posterior to the limbus. A scleral graft was used to cover the limbal portion of the tube, and the conjunctiva was closed.

Intervention Type DEVICE

glaucoma implant procedure (Ahmed)

A 184 mm2 Ahmed glaucoma implant was placed in the superotemporal quadrant in 56 patients randomized to AGV group. A fornix-based conjunctival flap was dissected, and the implant was sutured to sclera 10 mm posterior to the limbus. The Ahmed tube left patent and viscoelastic substance injected into anterior chamber. A scleral graft was used to cover the limbal portion of the tube, and the conjunctiva was closed.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

glaucoma valve surgery glaucoma valve surgery

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1 - patients with glaucoma who underwent a previous failed trabeculectomy or other intraocular surgery.

2- patients who had secondary glaucoma and are known to have a high failure rate with trabeculectomy such as neovascular, uveitis, or iridocorneal endothelial syndrome-associated glaucoma, were included in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

1 - patients lacked light perception, unwilling or unable to give informed consent, were expected to be unavailable for follow-up visits.

2-had previous aqueous shunt implanted in the same eye, other external impediment to supero-temporal drainage device implantation.

3- presence of silicone oil, vitreous in the anterior chamber sufficient to require a vitrectomy.

4-uveitis associated with a systemic condition like juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, nanophthalmos, Sturge-Weber syndrome or other conditions associated with elevated episcleral venous pressure.
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ain Shams University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

khaled hamdi elbaklish

principal investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Elbaklish KH, Saleh SM, Gomaa WA. Baerveldt Glaucoma Implant versus Ahmed Glaucoma Implant in a One-Year Follow Up, Comparative Study. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020 Jan 8;14:29-39. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S224654. eCollection 2020.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32021066 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FWA000017585 FMASU21/2017

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.