Evaluation of the ACS-NSQIP Risk Calculator for Emergent Surgery in a Spanish Population

NCT ID: NCT04211532

Last Updated: 2019-12-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

400 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-06-01

Study Completion Date

2020-06-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Nowadays, quality of life and individualised medicine are becoming more important in the everyday medical practice and surgery it is not an exception. In recent years, the interest in the improvement of the quality of surgical procedures and outcomes has increased. This quality can be improved by assessing the surgical or operative risk by evaluating the postoperative mortality and morbidity.

Most of the risk stratification tools are used in elective surgery. Only few have been specifically validated for immediate or urgent. However, there are different situations. In elective interventions, the patient and the surgeon can discuss the advantages and drawbacks and postpone the decision. Moreover, an improvement in the physical status of the patient can be performed whereas in immediate or urgent surgery there is no time to neither of them.

POSSUM is used as the main tool for the prediction of mortality and morbidity and for assessing the quality care of the General Surgery Unit of Corporació Sanitària Parc Taulí. Nevertheless, this system has its limitations. It overestimates mortality in low risk patients and it does not take into account the specific surgical procedure.

That is why, it is believed that the ACS-NSQIP risk calculator -created in 2013- is a potential good tool to stratify surgical risks. In contrast with POSSUM, it considers any surgical procedure -according to the Current Procedural Terminology.

The calculator has been externally validated in population of North-America which requires emergent surgery with a somewhat underestimation of the risk. As populations have different profiles and there are different levels of care, it is needed the external validation in other countries.

In essence, there is a need of validation of risk calculators in different populations and emergency surgery (immediate and urgent) is distinct from the elective operation, therefore they should be considered separately when risk is calculated.

Therefore, there is a need of validation of the ACS NSQIP risk calculator in Spanish population which requires emergency (immediate and urgent) surgery. On the other hand, it is suggested that ACS NSQIP risk calculator performs better than POSSUM . Hence, its prediction performance is compared with POSSUM.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A prospective validation cohort study is proposed. The surgical risk of the patients recruited in the study was calculated by the ACS NSQIP risk calculator and by POSSUM.

In order to compare the performance of ACS NSQIP risk calculator with POSSUM, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was calculated for each tool. The statistical differences between the two AUC curves were compared using P value. Calibration of the agreement between observed and predicted outcomes was tested using the Brier score. The Brier score ranges from 0 to 1. The closer the score is to 0, the more accurate is the risk prediction model.

There is a need of validation of the ACS NSQIP risk calculator in Spanish population which requires emergency (immediate and urgent) surgery. Besides, it is suggested that ACS NSQIP risk calculator performs better than POSSUM. Hence, its prediction performance is compared with POSSUM.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Postoperative Complications

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Surgical risk ACS NSQIP

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Surgery

Surgical risk is calculated according to the surgery performed.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients recruited were aged 18 years and older.
* Those who underwent emergency (immediate and urgent) surgery in Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí from June 2019 to June 2020.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who activated of the polytraumatic code.
* Patients with proctologic disease.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Corporacion Parc Tauli

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mireia Pascua-Solé

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mireia Pascua Solé

Sabadell, , Spain

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Mireia Pascua Solé

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Did we prioritize quality improvement in general surgery: Time for a focus on outcomes and enhanced recovery care plans. Am J Surg. 2019 Mar;217(3):539-540. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.12.049. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30777277 (View on PubMed)

Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters M. POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit. Br J Surg. 1991 Mar;78(3):355-60. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800780327.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2021856 (View on PubMed)

Havens JM, Columbus AB, Seshadri AJ, Brown CVR, Tominaga GT, Mowery NT, Crandall M. Risk stratification tools in emergency general surgery. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2018 Apr 29;3(1):e000160. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2017-000160. eCollection 2018.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29766138 (View on PubMed)

Bilimoria KY, Liu Y, Paruch JL, Zhou L, Kmiecik TE, Ko CY, Cohen ME. Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons. J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Nov;217(5):833-42.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.07.385. Epub 2013 Sep 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24055383 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CSPT-CIR-MP-ACSCalc

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id