Are Alterations in Shoulder Rotations and Core Stability Effective for Water Polo Shoulder Problems?
NCT ID: NCT04202744
Last Updated: 2019-12-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
82 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-03-12
2020-01-12
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Water Polo Group
Participants were active water polo players who train regularly with ages in between 10-30 years.
Five main parameters of the shoulder were assessed: the flexibility of pectoralis minor muscle, tightness of the posterior shoulder capsule, glenohumeral range of motion of internal and external rotation (sum of internal and external rotation: total range of motion), the strength of rotator cuff muscles and scapula position. As core parameters, trunk muscle endurance (flexor, extensor, and laterals) and core stability were evaluated.
Shoulder and core evaluations
Five main parameters of the shoulder were assessed: the flexibility of pectoralis minor muscle, tightness of the posterior shoulder capsule, glenohumeral range of motion of internal and external rotation (sum of internal and external rotation: total range of motion), the strength of rotator cuff muscles and scapula position. As core parameters, trunk muscle endurance (flexor, extensor, and laterals) and core stability were evaluated.
Non-Water Polo Group
Participants who do not engage in overhead sports with ages in between 10-30 years.
Five main parameters of the shoulder were assessed: the flexibility of pectoralis minor muscle, tightness of the posterior shoulder capsule, glenohumeral range of motion of internal and external rotation (sum of internal and external rotation: total range of motion), the strength of rotator cuff muscles and scapula position. As core parameters, trunk muscle endurance (flexor, extensor, and laterals) and core stability were evaluated.
Shoulder and core evaluations
Five main parameters of the shoulder were assessed: the flexibility of pectoralis minor muscle, tightness of the posterior shoulder capsule, glenohumeral range of motion of internal and external rotation (sum of internal and external rotation: total range of motion), the strength of rotator cuff muscles and scapula position. As core parameters, trunk muscle endurance (flexor, extensor, and laterals) and core stability were evaluated.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Shoulder and core evaluations
Five main parameters of the shoulder were assessed: the flexibility of pectoralis minor muscle, tightness of the posterior shoulder capsule, glenohumeral range of motion of internal and external rotation (sum of internal and external rotation: total range of motion), the strength of rotator cuff muscles and scapula position. As core parameters, trunk muscle endurance (flexor, extensor, and laterals) and core stability were evaluated.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Participant in ages between 10-30 years of age.
* Parent permission for participants younger than 18
* Giving consent for older than 18
Exclusion Criteria
* Having a history of fracture within the shoulder girdle complex
* Having a shoulder problem within the last 6 months continuing more than 3 months
* Having a history of pathology in lumbar area within the last 6 months
10 Years
30 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Yeditepe University Hospital
OTHER
Yeditepe University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Yeditepe University
Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Mosler A, Whiteley R. Keeping the water polo player out of the clinic and in the water. Sport Med. 2000:434-439.
Snyder P. Water polo for players: teachers of aquatics. USA: LA84 Foundation; 2008.
Egan T. Water polo: rules, tips, strategy, and safety. New York, NY: The Rosen Publishing Group; 2004.
Giannouris Y. 150 years of Water Polo. https://www.fina.org/ Accessed May 5, 2019.
Miller AH, Evans K, Adams R, Waddington G, Witchalls J. Shoulder injury in water polo: A systematic review of incidence and intrinsic risk factors. J Sci Med Sport. 2018 Apr;21(4):368-377. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.08.015. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
Benjamin N. The injury and posture profiles of male high school of male high school water polo players in Johannesburg. African J Phys Heal Educ Recreat Danc. 2014;20(1): 179-188.
Spittler J, Keeling J. Water Polo Injuries and Training Methods. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2016 Nov/Dec;15(6):410-416. doi: 10.1249/JSR.0000000000000305.
Sanders RH. Analysis of the eggbeater kick used to maintain height in water polo. J Appl Biomech. 1999;15(3):284-291.
Webster MJ, Morris ME, Galna B. Shoulder pain in water polo: a systematic review of the literature. J Sci Med Sport. 2009 Jan;12(1):3-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2007.05.014. Epub 2007 Sep 21.
Colville JM, Markman BS. Competitive water polo. Upper extremity injuries. Clin Sports Med. 1999 Apr;18(2):305-12, vi. doi: 10.1016/s0278-5919(05)70146-0.
Pogetti LS, Nakagawa TH, Contecote GP, Camargo PR. Core stability, shoulder peak torque and function in throwing athletes with and without shoulder pain. Phys Ther Sport. 2018 Nov;34:36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2018.08.008. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
Kibler WB, Press J, Sciascia A. The role of core stability in athletic function. Sports Med. 2006;36(3):189-98. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200636030-00001.
Huxel Bliven KC, Anderson BE. Core stability training for injury prevention. Sports Health. 2013 Nov;5(6):514-22. doi: 10.1177/1941738113481200.
Hibbs AE, Thompson KG, French D, Wrigley A, Spears I. Optimizing performance by improving core stability and core strength. Sports Med. 2008;38(12):995-1008. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200838120-00004.
Marcondes FB, de Jesus JF, Bryk FF, de Vasconcelos RA, Fukuda TY. Posterior shoulder tightness and rotator cuff strength assessments in painful shoulders of amateur tennis players. Braz J Phys Ther. 2013 Mar-Apr;17(2):185-94. doi: 10.1590/S1413-35552012005000079.
Werner BC, Holzgrefe RE, Griffin JW, Lyons ML, Cosgrove CT, Hart JM, Brockmeier SF. Validation of an innovative method of shoulder range-of-motion measurement using a smartphone clinometer application. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Nov;23(11):e275-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.02.030. Epub 2014 Jun 9.
Shin SH, Ro du H, Lee OS, Oh JH, Kim SH. Within-day reliability of shoulder range of motion measurement with a smartphone. Man Ther. 2012 Aug;17(4):298-304. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2012.02.010. Epub 2012 Mar 13.
Ortiz A, Val S, Delgado D. Reliability and concurrent validity of the goniometer-pro app vs a universal goniometer in determining passive flexion of knee. Int J Comput Appl. 2017;173; 2017.
Awan R, Smith J, Boon AJ. Measuring shoulder internal rotation range of motion: a comparison of 3 techniques. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Sep;83(9):1229-34. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2002.34815.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Yeditepe
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id