Efficacy and Safety of ab Interno Trabeculectomy With the Kahook Dual Blade

NCT ID: NCT04202562

Last Updated: 2019-12-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

42 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-02-02

Study Completion Date

2018-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The Kahook Dual Blade is a single-use device specially designed to create a clean cut in the trabecular meshwork. This ablation in the trabecular meshwork allows a better outflow of the aqueous humor, thus reducing the intraocular pressure (IOP), theoretically beyond the IOP reduction achieved by other minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) devices.

Studies already published showed good results in terms of the reduction of the number of glaucoma medications and the reduction in the IOP, but not a single study has been performed prospectively comparing the efficacy of the technique, not even with the cataract surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This new device, the Kahook Dual Blade, has been specially designed to create a gentle cut compared to other cutting-devices that also remove the trabecular meshwork. Preclinical investigation showed no harm in the surrounding tissues. Only two prospective studies have been published, showing good results in terms of IOP reduction and a significant cut-off in the glaucoma medications. However, to better assess the real effect, a prospective comparison with cataract surgery or any other trabecular technique should be performed. We also aimed to determine the safety of the procedure.

Study design A prospective, randomized controlled, interventional study was conducted to determine the efficacy and safety of the Kahook Dual Blade. Patients with cataract and open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension (OHT) were included.

Subjects Patients were consecutively recruited from the Department of Glaucoma. Eligible patients were asked to participate if cataract surgery was indicated due to best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) bellow 0.5 (in decimal scale), and moderate IOP reduction and a cut-off of the glaucoma medications was also aimed. Patients included in the study had been previously diagnosed with primary open-angle (POAG), pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (PSX) or OHT, and mild-to-moderate glaucoma according to the Hodapp-Parrish-Anderson classification, preoperative IOP ≤ 24 mmHg on at least one hypotensive medication, and coexistence of cataract without narrowing the angle (visible scleral spur at least in 2 quadrants). Both eyes from the same patient could be eligible if they both met the inclusion criteria.

Subjects who did not fulfill the inclusion criteria were excluded: patients with other glaucoma subtypes (elevated episcleral venous pressure, orbital occupancy, Sturge-Weber syndrome or any type of angle-closure glaucoma). Patients who underwent any intraocular surgery in the previous six months, including any laser or surgical intervention for glaucoma, or patients with any ophthalmic diseases that may interfere with tests were excluded. Severe or end-stage glaucoma or those with an indication of filtering or glaucoma drainage implant surgeries due to a high IOP with the maximum tolerated medication or glaucoma progression were also exclude.

All subjects were thoroughly examined before clinical intervention. This included a medical history review, slit-lamp examination, IOP determination with hand-held applanation tonometer, gonioscopy, dilated fundus examination, endothelial cell count (ECC) including cell and size automated detection with specular microscopy (EM-3000, Tomey Corporation, Nagoya, Japan), simulated keratometry (simK) determined by topography (Pentacam®, Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany), and standard automated perimetry (VF) (G1-Tendency Oriented Perimeter, Octopus® 1-2-3, Haag-Streit, USA).

Assignation and surgical technique For safety reasons, patients did not discontinue any topical hypotensive medications before surgery.

A randomized, controlled study was designed. Eyes were randomly assigned to each treatment group (www.random.org). If both eyes of the same patient were eligible to participate in the study, they could be allocated in different treatment groups due to randomization. All surgeries were performed by two experienced glaucoma surgeons. Standard cataract surgery with phacoemulsification using a 1.8 mm clear corneal incision (CCI) and intraocular lens (IOL) capsular bag placement was performed under topical anesthesia and 1% intracameral lidocaine. The surgeons were blinded to randomization until the end of the cataract surgery. At this point, if the patient was assigned to the treatment group the surgeon instilled acetylcholine 1% to reduce the pupillary size and facilitate visualization of the angle structures. To help maintain width, the anterior chamber was filled with a viscoelastic agent. Since the ab interno trabeculectomy is performed in the nasal quadrant, the surgeons then situated temporal, the patient's head was rotated 45 degrees in the opposite direction of the surgical site, and the microscope was tilted 30 to 45 degrees towards the surgeon. To guarantee better access to the nasal area of the angle, a 1.8 mm keratome was employed to widen the paracentesis. Further details of the surgical technique are described elsewhere.

Postoperative medications and follow-up Hypotensive medication was not administered intra- or post-operatively unless an IOP spike was detected. Postoperative topical treatment included a fixed combination of antibiotic plus steroid (tobramycin 0.3% and dexamethasone 0.1%) six times a day for seven days; this was tapered over the next four weeks.

Visits were undertaken at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. During follow-up, results of the slit-lamp examination, applanation tonometer IOP, and the number of medications were recorded at all visits. The VF and the ECC were also re-tested at 6 and 12 months. All the postoperative visits were conducted by the same examiner (NVA). Topical glaucoma medication was re-introduced if the target IOP according to the severity of the visual field was not achieved, o a higher than preoperative IOP was found.

Outcome measures - Data analysis Data obtained from each group were evaluated to determine the efficacy and safety of both interventions. The primary study outcomes were IOP and the number of glaucoma treatments. VF, ECC, BCVA and simK were secondary outcomes used to define the safety of both procedures. Success was defined as an IOP reduction of ≥ 20% from baseline; this cut-off was based on that reported in other glaucoma surgeries and is used for evaluation of this trabecular technique. The Saphiro-Wilk test was used to assess the sample distribution. Independent and dependent sample t-tests, when possible, were used to compare the results between groups and over time for each group. As both eyes of the same patient could be included in any of the treatment groups, generalized estimating equations (GEE) for repeated measures (IOP and number of medications) were also performed. A random-effect logistic regression was employed to analyse baseline characteristics associated with the success endpoint (IOP reduction of ≥20% from baseline). Statistical significance was set at a two-sided p-value ≤ 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata® version 14.1 (StataCorp, College Station, Texas, USA).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Glaucoma, Open-Angle Ocular Hypertension Eye Diseases Hypertension Intraocular Pressure Cataract

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Glaucoma Ocular hypertension Glaucoma, Open-Angle Ab interno trabeculectomy Phacoemulsification Combined surgery Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

One group received combined surgery, while the other cataract surgery alone
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Combined surgery

Participants intervened of combined ab interno trabeculectomy and cataract surgery at the same time

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ab interno trabeculectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Ab interno trabeculectomy performed after pupil contraction and 90 degrees ablation of the nasal trabecular meshwork

Cataract

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Cataract surgery with minimal clear cornea incision and phacoemulsification

Cataract surgery

Participants intervened of cataract surgery alone

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Cataract

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Cataract surgery with minimal clear cornea incision and phacoemulsification

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ab interno trabeculectomy

Ab interno trabeculectomy performed after pupil contraction and 90 degrees ablation of the nasal trabecular meshwork

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Cataract

Cataract surgery with minimal clear cornea incision and phacoemulsification

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Participants aged 18 - 85 years
* Full comprehension and signing of the informed consent
* Preoperative intraocular pressure below 24 mmHg and at least one glaucoma medication
* Previous diagnose of open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension, including pseudoexfoliative glaucoma or pigment dispersion syndrome
* Mild to moderate glaucoma, according to the Hodapp-Parrish-Anderson classification

Exclusion Criteria

* Not signing of the informed consent
* Not being able to attend to all the follow-up visits
* Young females during pregnancy or lactation
* Any other form of glaucoma not previously mentioned
* Glaucoma secondary to elevated episcleral venous pressure
* Preoperative best-corrected visual acuity lower than 0.1
* Clear lens extraction
* Severe or end-stage glaucoma
* Previous glaucoma surgery, cataract surgery or retinal surgery
* Patients taking anticoagulant medication that could not be discontinued during the perioperative period
* Oral anhydrase carbonic inhibitors
* Severe or uncontrolled systemic disease
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hospital San Carlos, Madrid

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Néstor Ventura Abreu

Medical Doctor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Julian Garcia Feijoo, Professor

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Hospital San Carlos

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital San Carlos

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Greenwood MD, Seibold LK, Radcliffe NM, Dorairaj SK, Aref AA, Roman JJ, Lazcano-Gomez GS, Darlington JK, Abdullah S, Jasek MC, Bahjri KA, Berdahl JP. Goniotomy with a single-use dual blade: Short-term results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017 Sep;43(9):1197-1201. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.06.046.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28991617 (View on PubMed)

Dorairaj SK, Seibold LK, Radcliffe NM, Aref AA, Jimenez-Roman J, Lazcano-Gomez GS, Darlington JK, Mansouri K, Berdahl JP. 12-Month Outcomes of Goniotomy Performed Using the Kahook Dual Blade Combined with Cataract Surgery in Eyes with Medically Treated Glaucoma. Adv Ther. 2018 Sep;35(9):1460-1469. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0755-4. Epub 2018 Aug 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30078175 (View on PubMed)

Ventura-Abreu N, Garcia-Feijoo J, Pazos M, Biarnes M, Morales-Fernandez L, Martinez-de-la-Casa JM. Twelve-month results of ab interno trabeculectomy with Kahook Dual Blade: an interventional, randomized, controlled clinical study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021 Sep;259(9):2771-2781. doi: 10.1007/s00417-021-05213-0. Epub 2021 Apr 27.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33907888 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

16/560_P

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id