TreatMent of ActInic KerAtosis Lesions : pharmacoepiDemiological Study of the Impact in Real Life of ingenOl Mebutate Gel (Picato®) on Patients Satisfaction
NCT ID: NCT04202445
Last Updated: 2023-06-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
1218 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2014-04-30
2016-02-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Data will be collected by physicians during 2 or 3 visits (according to their usual practice), from the patient file, questioning and clinical examination performed during these visits.
Data about the patient's perception (satisfaction, perception of local skin reactions, quality of life) will be collected directly by the patient using self-administered questionnaires at inclusion visit, day 7 and 2 months later.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Use of Picato® (Ingenol Mebutate) to Treat Actinic Keratosis in Standard Clinical Practice
NCT02594436
Assessment of Treatment Success and Quality of Life in Patients With Actinic Keratoses Under Therapy With Ingenol Mebutate in a Period of 8 Weeks
NCT02090465
PMS to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Picato® Gel
NCT02421471
Ingenol Mebutate (Picato®) With Methyl Aminolevulinate Photodynamic Therapy for the Treatment of Actinic Keratosis
NCT02354391
Efficacy and Safety of Ingenol Mebutate Gel 0.06% When Applied Once Daily for 2, 3 or 4 Consecutive Days to a Treatment Area of Approximately 250 cm2 on Trunk and Extremities in Subjects With Actinic Keratosis
NCT01998984
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Subjects at risk are light-skinned people (phototype I and II according to Fitzpatrick scale) with high cumulative sun exposure or phototherapy. Over 80% of patients have a light phototype and 37% of patients with AK have an outside professional activity.
Diagnosis of AK is usually clinical, during skin examination which is recommended for any physician's visit. There are often multiple lesions, some of which, in the absence of effective treatment, can progress to squamous cell carcinoma (0.025% to 20% per year/lesion).
Although the evolution rate of AKs to carcinoma remains low and disappearance or sole persistence of the lesion is possible, their evolution is unpredictable, and it is therefore recommended to monitor and treat the AKs.
Treatment options include cryotherapy, topical treatments, photodynamic therapy, vaporization of lesions by CO2 laser or electrocoagulation and curretage.
When there are few AK lesions, which are localized and with superficial forms, cryotherapy is the reference treatment (it is widely used by dermatologists, as it is simple, fast and does not require special equipment), whereas topical treatment (5-FU, imiquimod, diclofenac) is recommended in case of multiple keratosis or lesions on a larger area of the skin. The disadvantage of cryotherapy and photodynamic therapy is that these techniques can be painful and lead to depigmentation or scarring. Topical treatments which are available (imiquimod, 5-FU, diclofenac) may induce severe inflammatory reactions sometimes responsible for premature termination and thus ineffective.
Combined with their length (4 to 16 weeks), the complexity of current topical regimens would be the cause of poor compliance.
So, all dermatologists agree with the need to shorten duration of treatment and reduce the number of applications. Ingenol mebutate gel (Picato®), used in very short 2-3 days cycle, with one application per day, meets this need.
Development of ingenol mebutate gel included 4 pivotal phase III trials, evaluating its efficacy and safety. The results of these studies have established satisfactory efficacy and safety for Picato® with, on one hand, proven efficacy after two months for face, scalp, trunk and extremities and, on the other hand, transient local skin reactions (erythema, flaking/scaling, crusting,swelling,...), which appear early, peak in intensity after the end of treatment (day 3 or day 4) and disappear without sequelae within 2-4 weeks after application of the gel. At day 57, mean patient global satisfaction scores, either assessed with TSQM or Skindex-16, were statistically higher in the ingenol mebutate gel group than in the vehicle group. In a long term follow up study, ingenol mebutate produced clinically relevant sustained clearance and long-term lesion reduction.
These characteristics are a potentially important advantage for treatment compliance as well as for patient comfort.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ingenol mebutate
Topical field treatment as prescribed by dermatologist
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient with AK lesions and for whom the dermatologist decided to initiate a treatment with Picato®\* 150 or Picato®\* 500
* Patient informed and accepting the automatic processing of medical data \* To respect the physicians' independence, this study is conducted among patients for whom the decision of therapeutic care is not related to their inclusion.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient unable to read and/or to understand a self-administered questionnaire.
* Patient already included in the study.
* Patient participating or having participated in the previous month in a clinical trial in dermatology.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
LEO Pharma
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sarah Moumane, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
LEO Pharma
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Frost CA, Green AC. Epidemiology of solar keratoses. Br J Dermatol. 1994 Oct;131(4):455-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1994.tb08544.x.
Memon AA, Tomenson JA, Bothwell J, Friedmann PS. Prevalence of solar damage and actinic keratosis in a Merseyside population. Br J Dermatol. 2000 Jun;142(6):1154-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2000.03541.x.
Quaedvlieg PJ, Tirsi E, Thissen MR, Krekels GA. Actinic keratosis: how to differentiate the good from the bad ones? Eur J Dermatol. 2006 Jul-Aug;16(4):335-9.
Dinehart SM. The treatment of actinic keratoses. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000 Jan;42(1 Pt 2):25-8. doi: 10.1067/mjd.2000.103338.
French Society of Dermatology. [Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and precursor lesions. Arguments - May 2009]. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2009 Sep;136 Suppl 5:S189-242. No abstract available. French.
Thai KE, Fergin P, Freeman M, Vinciullo C, Francis D, Spelman L, Murrell D, Anderson C, Weightman W, Reid C, Watson A, Foley P. A prospective study of the use of cryosurgery for the treatment of actinic keratoses. Int J Dermatol. 2004 Sep;43(9):687-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2004.02056.x.
Burge SM, Bristol M, Millard PR, Dawber RP. Pigment changes in human skin after cryotherapy. Cryobiology. 1986 Oct;23(5):422-32. doi: 10.1016/0011-2240(86)90027-1.
Zouboulis CC. Cryosurgery in dermatology. Eur J Dermatol. 1998 Oct-Nov;8(7):466-74.
Fu W, Cockerell CJ. The actinic (solar) keratosis: a 21st-century perspective. Arch Dermatol. 2003 Jan;139(1):66-70. doi: 10.1001/archderm.139.1.66. No abstract available.
Lebwohl M, Swanson N, Anderson LL, Melgaard A, Xu Z, Berman B. Ingenol mebutate gel for actinic keratosis. N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 15;366(11):1010-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1111170.
Anderson L, Schmieder GJ, Werschler WP, Tschen EH, Ling MR, Stough DB, Katsamas J. Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, vehicle-controlled study of ingenol mebutate gel 0.025% and 0.05% for actinic keratosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009 Jun;60(6):934-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.01.008.
Berman B. New developments in the treatment of actinic keratosis: focus on ingenol mebutate gel. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2012;5:111-22. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S28905. Epub 2012 Aug 24.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NIS-PICATO-1087
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.