Trial Outcomes & Findings for Nonablative Fractional Diode Laser for Treatment of Pigmented Lesions (NCT NCT04202419)
NCT ID: NCT04202419
Last Updated: 2023-08-07
Results Overview
The primary efficacy endpoint was defined as improvement in the clearance of pigmented lesions, as assessed by three (3) blinded evaluators comparing photographs taken at Baseline/Pre-treatment and at the 1-month follow-up (post final treatment)
COMPLETED
NA
30 participants
1 month follow-up post treatment series, where treatment could last up to 10 weeks after baseline
2023-08-07
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Nonablative Fractional Diode Laser
Single Arm: All subjects will undergo treatment of pigmented lesions with a 1940 nm diode laser
FRAX 1940 nm laser: A fractional 1940 nm solid-state diode laser will deliver linear arrays of microbeams to create nonablative microscopic treatment zones (MTZs) in the skin, in order to treat pigmented skin lesions.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
30
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
20
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
10
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Nonablative Fractional Diode Laser for Treatment of Pigmented Lesions
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Single Group
n=30 treatment areas
Single Arm: All subjects will undergo treatment of pigmented lesions with a 1940 nm diode laser
FRAX 1940 nm laser: A fractional 1940 nm solid-state diode laser will deliver linear arrays of microbeams to create nonablative microscopic treatment zones (MTZs) in the skin, in order to treat pigmented skin lesions.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
56.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
29 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
30 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 month follow-up post treatment series, where treatment could last up to 10 weeks after baselinePopulation: Data from FRX19005 study was combined with FRX19004 study (NCT04203745) for ad-hoc primary efficacy analysis via blinded evaluation. Both trials assessed the 'treatment of pigmented lesions' and are directly comparable due to equivalence of patient populations and efficacy endpoints, therefore, the exact same analyses were performed. The treated area was considered a "success" if at least 2 of the 3 reviewers correctly identified the post-treatment photograph (i.e. left or right side).
The primary efficacy endpoint was defined as improvement in the clearance of pigmented lesions, as assessed by three (3) blinded evaluators comparing photographs taken at Baseline/Pre-treatment and at the 1-month follow-up (post final treatment)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Nonablative Fractional Diode Laser
n=45 Observations
Single Arm: All subjects will undergo treatment of pigmented lesions with a 1940 nm diode laser
FRAX 1940 nm laser: A fractional 1940 nm solid-state diode laser will deliver linear arrays of microbeams to create nonablative microscopic treatment zones (MTZs) in the skin, in order to treat pigmented skin lesions.
|
|---|---|
|
Pigmented Lesion Improvement by Blinded Evaluation
|
41 Observations
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 3-months post final treatment, where treatment series could last up to 10 weeks after baselinePopulation: Data from FRX19004 study was combined with FRX19005 study (NCT04202419) for ad-hoc primary efficacy analysis via blinded evaluation. 42 slides containing 1 pair of photos (taken pre-treatment and 3-months post-treatment) were presented to three blinded evaluators. The treated area was considered a "success" if at least 2 of the 3 reviewers correctly identified the post-treatment photograph (i.e. left or right side).
The secondary endpoint was pigmentation improvement at the 3-month follow-up, as assessed by three (3) blinded evaluators comparing photographs taken at Baseline/Pre-treatment and at the 3-month follow-up (post final treatment). The treated area was considered a "success" if at least two of the three reviewers correctly identified the post-treatment photograph (i.e. left or right side).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Nonablative Fractional Diode Laser
n=42 observations
Single Arm: All subjects will undergo treatment of pigmented lesions with a 1940 nm diode laser
FRAX 1940 nm laser: A fractional 1940 nm solid-state diode laser will deliver linear arrays of microbeams to create nonablative microscopic treatment zones (MTZs) in the skin, in order to treat pigmented skin lesions.
|
|---|---|
|
Pigmentation Improvement at the 3-month Follow-up, by Blinded Evaluation
|
35 observations
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 month follow-up post treatment series, where treatment could last up to 10 weeks after baselinePopulation: Data from FRX19005 study was combined with FRX19004 study (NCT04203745) for ad-hoc efficacy analysis via blinded evaluation. Both trials assessed the 'treatment of pigmented lesions' and are directly comparable due to equivalence of patient populations and efficacy endpoints, therefore, the exact same analyses were performed.
For each reviewer assessment: If the post-treatment photograph was identified correctly, the reviewer's assessment on the textural scale was coded as follows: -1=worse, 0=no change; 1=improved; 2=much improved; and 3=very much improved. If not identified correctly, the scale was reversed (-1=improved, 0=no change, 1=worsened, 2=much worsened and 3=very much worsened). Results were based on the majority rule of the assessments by the three blinded reviewers; in other words, the mode of the three blinded reviewers' scores was used as the treated area clearance results, while the median was used if three different scores were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Nonablative Fractional Diode Laser
n=45 Participants
Single Arm: All subjects will undergo treatment of pigmented lesions with a 1940 nm diode laser
FRAX 1940 nm laser: A fractional 1940 nm solid-state diode laser will deliver linear arrays of microbeams to create nonablative microscopic treatment zones (MTZs) in the skin, in order to treat pigmented skin lesions.
|
|---|---|
|
Blinded Assessment of Textural Improvement Using a 5-point Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)
No change (stable)
|
16 Participants
|
|
Blinded Assessment of Textural Improvement Using a 5-point Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)
Improved
|
28 Participants
|
|
Blinded Assessment of Textural Improvement Using a 5-point Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)
Worse
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 month follow-up post treatment series, where treatment could last up to 10 weeks after baselinePopulation: Data from FRX19005 study was combined with FRX19004 study (NCT04203745) for ad-hoc efficacy analysis via blinded evaluation. Both trials assessed the 'treatment of pigmented lesions' and are directly comparable due to equivalence of patient populations and efficacy endpoints, therefore, the exact same analyses were performed.
Subject assessments of treatment outcome were completed at the 1-month follow-up using the Global Assessment Improvement Scale (GAIS). The scale was coded as follows: -1=worse, 0=no change; 1=improved; 2=much improved; and 3=very much improved
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Nonablative Fractional Diode Laser
n=45 Participants
Single Arm: All subjects will undergo treatment of pigmented lesions with a 1940 nm diode laser
FRAX 1940 nm laser: A fractional 1940 nm solid-state diode laser will deliver linear arrays of microbeams to create nonablative microscopic treatment zones (MTZs) in the skin, in order to treat pigmented skin lesions.
|
|---|---|
|
Subject Assessment of Improvement Using a 5-point Global, Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)
Worse
|
1 Participants
|
|
Subject Assessment of Improvement Using a 5-point Global, Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)
No Change
|
3 Participants
|
|
Subject Assessment of Improvement Using a 5-point Global, Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)
Improved
|
17 Participants
|
|
Subject Assessment of Improvement Using a 5-point Global, Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)
Much Improved
|
10 Participants
|
|
Subject Assessment of Improvement Using a 5-point Global, Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS)
Very Much Improved
|
14 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 month follow-up post treatment series, where treatment could last up to 10 weeks after baselinePopulation: Data from FRX19005 study was combined with FRX19004 study (NCT04203745) for ad-hoc efficacy analysis via blinded evaluation. Both trials assessed the 'treatment of pigmented lesions' and are directly comparable due to equivalence of patient populations and efficacy endpoints, therefore, the exact same analyses were performed.
Subject satisfaction with treatment results completed at the 1-month follow-up using a 5 point scale coded as follows: -1=not satisfied, 0=little satisfied; 1=somewhat satisfied; 2=satisfied; and 3=very satisfied
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Nonablative Fractional Diode Laser
n=44 Participants
Single Arm: All subjects will undergo treatment of pigmented lesions with a 1940 nm diode laser
FRAX 1940 nm laser: A fractional 1940 nm solid-state diode laser will deliver linear arrays of microbeams to create nonablative microscopic treatment zones (MTZs) in the skin, in order to treat pigmented skin lesions.
|
|---|---|
|
Subject Satisfaction With Treatment Results
Not Satisfied
|
1 Participants
|
|
Subject Satisfaction With Treatment Results
Little Satisfied
|
2 Participants
|
|
Subject Satisfaction With Treatment Results
Somewhat Satisfied
|
14 Participants
|
|
Subject Satisfaction With Treatment Results
Satisfied
|
12 Participants
|
|
Subject Satisfaction With Treatment Results
Very Satisfied
|
15 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Nonablative Fractional Diode Laser
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Dr. Jill Waibel
Miami Dermatology and Laser Institute
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: LTE60