Post-traumatic Stress Injuries Among Paramedics and Emergency Dispatchers

NCT ID: NCT04202042

Last Updated: 2019-12-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

70 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-10-21

Study Completion Date

2020-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

As part of their work, emergency first responders, such as paramedics and emergency medical dispatchers are exposed daily to traumatic events. These traumatic events can have many impacts on mental health, such as acute stress disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder. Research has shown that intervening early after exposure to a traumatic event helps to identify people at risk and to prevent post-traumatic stress disorder. The Psychological First Aid approach originally developed for mass traumas, is an intervention advocated by international experts today following a traumatic event. However, this approach is still very little studied, especially when it is part of an organization of emergency first responders. It therefore still lacks scientific validity. The main objective of this research will be to assess whether the Psychological First Aid program provided by peer-support workers helps to reduce the initial distress caused by traumatic events and to foster short- and long-term adaptive functioning and coping.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In May 2018, Urgences-Santé (i.e., EMT corporation for the Montreal area) implemented PFA as a peer-support intervention for EMT affected by traumatic events in the course of their work. In collaboration with Urgences-Santé, this project aims to evaluate the feasibility of PFA as a post-traumatic peer-support intervention among EMT. Feasibility studies are used to determine whether an intervention should be recommended for efficacy testing when there are few previously published studies or existing data using a specific intervention technique. This catalyst project relies on participatory research principles. With Urgences-Santé stakeholders, three specific research objectives were elaborated in order to answer the question "Can PFA work for EMT?":

1. To assess the acceptability of PFA for EMT;
2. To assess the implementation of PFA in Urgences-Santé;
3. To test the limited-efficacy (i.e., efficacy within limitations such as small sample size and convenience sampling of PFA among Urgences-Santé trauma-exposed EMT).

Based on the few studies that assess different aspects of the feasibility of PFA in high-risk organizations, this project relies on three working hypotheses. First, we expect that PFA be acceptable among EMT. Second, we stipulate that few obstacles limited the implementation of PFA in Urgences-Santé given that this organization followed Forbes' implementation framework and favored a train-the-trainer approach. Third, we foresee that PFA will accelerate the recovery process of EMT, as measured by a greater decrease in PTSI, heart rate and absenteeism in the days following the traumatic event among those who received PFA compared to those who received the standard intervention (i.e., reference to employee aid program). If confirmed, these hypotheses will allow us to affirm that PFA can work as a post-traumatic intervention among EMT for the prevention of PTSI. Our results would therefore represent a catalyst towards a larger RCT that would answer the question "Does PFA work for EMT?" with an adequate sample size.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic Acute Stress Disorder Anxiety Disorders Depressive Disorder Substance Abuse Absenteeism

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

PFA PTSD Public safety personnel

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Psychological first aid

PFA responders are trained to deliver 8 core actions in the aftermath of traumatic event (: contact and engagement, safety and comfort, stabilization, information gathering, practical assistance, connection with social supports, information on coping, and linkage with collaborative services (within the first 24 hours)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Psychological first aid

Intervention Type OTHER

PFA responders (peer support workers) are trained to deliver 8 core actions: contact and engagement, safety and comfort, stabilization, information gathering, practical assistance, connection with social supports, information on coping, and linkage with collaborative services

Usual organisational intervention

One phone call by workplace psychologist (within the first 48 hours) and reference to employee aid program

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Usual organisational intervention

Intervention Type OTHER

Emergency intervention by workplace psychologist and limited therapeutic sessions with employee aid program

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Psychological first aid

PFA responders (peer support workers) are trained to deliver 8 core actions: contact and engagement, safety and comfort, stabilization, information gathering, practical assistance, connection with social supports, information on coping, and linkage with collaborative services

Intervention Type OTHER

Usual organisational intervention

Emergency intervention by workplace psychologist and limited therapeutic sessions with employee aid program

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Actively working at Urgence-Santé organization as paramedics or emergency medical dispatchers
* Exposed to a traumatic event at work (after the baseline)

Exclusion Criteria

\- at high risk of suicidal behaviour
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire en santé Mentale de Montréal

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Steve Geoffrion

Researcher and Assistant professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Luc De Montigny

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Urgences-santé

Stephane Guay

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Research Center of the Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Urgences-santé

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Steve Geoffrion

Role: CONTACT

Phone: +1 514 343-6111

Email: [email protected]

Marine Tessier

Role: CONTACT

Phone: +1 438 388-1890

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Luc De Montigny

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bryant RA. Acute stress reactions: can biological responses predict posttraumatic stress disorder? CNS Spectr. 2003 Sep;8(9):668-74. doi: 10.1017/s1092852900008853.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15079140 (View on PubMed)

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders DSM-5 (5e éd.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Brymer, M. Jacobs, A. Layne, C., Pynoos, R., Ruzek, J., Steinberg, A., Vernberg. E. & Watson, P. (2006). Psychological First Aid: Field Operations Guide: 2nd Edition. National Child Traumatic Stress Network. Doi:10.1037/e536202011-001

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Ruzek, J. I., Brymer, M. J., Jacobs, A. K., Layne, C. M., Vernberg, E. M. & Watson, P. J. (2007). Psychological first aid. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 29(1), 17-49.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Guidelines for the Management of Conditions Specifically Related to Stress. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK159725/

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24049868 (View on PubMed)

Bryant RA, Moulds ML, Guthrie RM. Acute Stress Disorder Scale: a self-report measure of acute stress disorder. Psychol Assess. 2000 Mar;12(1):61-8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10752364 (View on PubMed)

Ashbaugh AR, Houle-Johnson S, Herbert C, El-Hage W, Brunet A. Psychometric Validation of the English and French Versions of the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). PLoS One. 2016 Oct 10;11(10):e0161645. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161645. eCollection 2016.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27723815 (View on PubMed)

Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11556941 (View on PubMed)

Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16717171 (View on PubMed)

Saunders JB, Aasland OG, Babor TF, de la Fuente JR, Grant M. Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption--II. Addiction. 1993 Jun;88(6):791-804. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1993.tb02093.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8329970 (View on PubMed)

Villalobos-Gallegos, L., Perez-Lopez, A., Graue-Moreno, J., Marin-Navarrete, R., & Mendoza-Hassey, R. (2015). Psychometric and diagnostic properties of the Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST): Comparing the DAST-20 vs. the DAST-10. Salud Mental, 38, 2, 89-94.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Skevington SM, Lotfy M, O'Connell KA; WHOQOL Group. The World Health Organization's WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Qual Life Res. 2004 Mar;13(2):299-310. doi: 10.1023/B:QURE.0000018486.91360.00.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15085902 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

162535

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id