Trial Outcomes & Findings for Audiovestibular Function in Infratentorial Superficial Siderosis (NCT NCT04200664)
NCT ID: NCT04200664
Last Updated: 2025-06-10
Results Overview
Clinical audiological (hearing) tests were performed to assess hearing function. The hearing tests included psychophysical, physiological and electrophysiological measures, (pure-tone audiometry, tympanometry, auditory brainstem responses and acoustic reflexes). The tests were perfomed in line with the procedure guidelines by the British Society of Audiology (www.thebsa.org.uk). The mean value of pure-tone audiometric thresholds for both ears measured in decibel hearing level (as described in the guidelines by the British Society of Audiology) was calculated and reported. Other parameters were reported as normal or abnormal (in at least one ear) or inconclusive.
COMPLETED
11 participants
Baseline visit
2025-06-10
Participant Flow
Of the 90 anticipated participants, only 11 participants were recruited to the study - into the Siderosis group. Participants were not recruited into the non siderosis groups (ie Age-Related Hearing Loss group and Control group) due COVID19 restrictions at the time of the study, which impacted significantly on recruitment opportunities and dramatically reduced the participant number in the study.
There were limited opportunities to recruit participants into study, (we anticipated 30 participants in each group). The apparent discrepancy between the anticipated recruitment number and the actual number of participants across all groups was due to COVID-19 pandemic and social restrictions placed. Subsequent easing off of the restrictions allowed to recruit 11 participants (from November 2019 to July 2021) but study-related time constraints did not allow to proceed with further recruitment.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Siderosis (iSS) Group
participants with a known diagnosis of infratentorial superficial siderosis (defined using standardised radiological criteria) confirmed by a consultant neurologist with expertise in this condition at University College London Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust
|
Age-related Hearing Loss (ARHL) Group
Age-Related Hearing Loss group not recruited due to the impact of COVID19 on recruitment opportunities.
|
Control Group
Control group not recruited due to the impact of COVID19 on recruitment opportunities.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
11
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
10
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Siderosis (iSS) Group
participants with a known diagnosis of infratentorial superficial siderosis (defined using standardised radiological criteria) confirmed by a consultant neurologist with expertise in this condition at University College London Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust
|
Age-related Hearing Loss (ARHL) Group
Age-Related Hearing Loss group not recruited due to the impact of COVID19 on recruitment opportunities.
|
Control Group
Control group not recruited due to the impact of COVID19 on recruitment opportunities.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Siderosis (iSS) Group
n=10 Participants
Participants with a known diagnosis of infratentorial superficial siderosis (defined using standardised radiological criteria) confirmed by a consultant neurologist with expertise in this condition at University College London Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Customized
|
52.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.5 • n=10 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
2 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
8 Participants
n=10 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline visitPopulation: Participants with known diagnosis of infratentorial superficial siderosis.
Clinical audiological (hearing) tests were performed to assess hearing function. The hearing tests included psychophysical, physiological and electrophysiological measures, (pure-tone audiometry, tympanometry, auditory brainstem responses and acoustic reflexes). The tests were perfomed in line with the procedure guidelines by the British Society of Audiology (www.thebsa.org.uk). The mean value of pure-tone audiometric thresholds for both ears measured in decibel hearing level (as described in the guidelines by the British Society of Audiology) was calculated and reported. Other parameters were reported as normal or abnormal (in at least one ear) or inconclusive.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Siderosis (iSS) Group
n=11 Participants
Participants with a known diagnosis of infratentorial superficial siderosis (defined using standardised radiological criteria) confirmed by a consultant neurologist with expertise in this condition at University College London Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust
|
|---|---|
|
Hearing Evaluation - Pure Tone Audiometry
|
57.3 decibel hearing level
Standard Deviation 39.9
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline visitPopulation: Vestibular tests included video head impulse test, oculomotor and rotatory chair testing using video or electronystagmography; bithermal calorics, ocular and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials. The results are presented as normal if bilateral or unilateral normal findings;
Clinical vestibular and balance tests were performed to assess vestibular/balance function.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Siderosis (iSS) Group
n=10 Participants
Participants with a known diagnosis of infratentorial superficial siderosis (defined using standardised radiological criteria) confirmed by a consultant neurologist with expertise in this condition at University College London Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust
|
|---|---|
|
Vestibular/Balance Evaluation
Bithermal calorics · Normal
|
2 Participants
|
|
Vestibular/Balance Evaluation
Bithermal calorics · Not tested
|
7 Participants
|
|
Vestibular/Balance Evaluation
Video head impulse test · Abnormal
|
6 Participants
|
|
Vestibular/Balance Evaluation
Video head impulse test · Normal
|
1 Participants
|
|
Vestibular/Balance Evaluation
Video head impulse test · Not tested
|
3 Participants
|
|
Vestibular/Balance Evaluation
Video- electro-nystagmography (oculomotor; rotatory chair) - central vestibular assessment · Abnormal
|
9 Participants
|
|
Vestibular/Balance Evaluation
Video- electro-nystagmography (oculomotor; rotatory chair) - central vestibular assessment · Normal
|
1 Participants
|
|
Vestibular/Balance Evaluation
Video- electro-nystagmography (oculomotor; rotatory chair) - central vestibular assessment · Not tested
|
0 Participants
|
|
Vestibular/Balance Evaluation
Video- electronystagmography (oculomotor; rotatory chair) - peripheral vestibular assessment · Abnormal
|
7 Participants
|
|
Vestibular/Balance Evaluation
Video- electronystagmography (oculomotor; rotatory chair) - peripheral vestibular assessment · Normal
|
3 Participants
|
|
Vestibular/Balance Evaluation
Video- electronystagmography (oculomotor; rotatory chair) - peripheral vestibular assessment · Not tested
|
0 Participants
|
|
Vestibular/Balance Evaluation
Bithermal calorics · Abnormal
|
1 Participants
|
|
Vestibular/Balance Evaluation
ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials · Abnormal
|
0 Participants
|
|
Vestibular/Balance Evaluation
ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials · Normal
|
9 Participants
|
|
Vestibular/Balance Evaluation
ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials · Not tested
|
1 Participants
|
|
Vestibular/Balance Evaluation
cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials · Abnormal
|
3 Participants
|
|
Vestibular/Balance Evaluation
cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials · Normal
|
7 Participants
|
|
Vestibular/Balance Evaluation
cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials · Not tested
|
0 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline visitPopulation: Results for psychophysical, physiological/electrophysiological measures (units: participants); normal if bilateral or unilateral normal findings; Auditory brainstem responses were recorded as normal, abnormal or inconclusive
Clinical audiological (hearing) tests were performed to assess hearing function. The hearing tests included psychophysical, physiological and electrophysiological measures, (pure-tone audiometry, tympanometry, auditory brainstem responses and acoustic reflexes). The tests were perfomed in line with the procedure guidelines by the British Society of Audiology (www.thebsa.org.uk). The mean value of pure-tone audiometric thresholds for both ears measured in decibel hearing level (as described in the guidelines by the British Society of Audiology) was calculated and reported. Other parameters were reported as normal or abnormal (in at least one ear) or inconclusive.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Siderosis (iSS) Group
n=11 Participants
Participants with a known diagnosis of infratentorial superficial siderosis (defined using standardised radiological criteria) confirmed by a consultant neurologist with expertise in this condition at University College London Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust
|
|---|---|
|
Hearing Evaluation - Auditory Brainstem Responses/Acoustic Reflexes
Abnormal
|
5 Participants
|
|
Hearing Evaluation - Auditory Brainstem Responses/Acoustic Reflexes
Inconclusive
|
2 Participants
|
|
Hearing Evaluation - Auditory Brainstem Responses/Acoustic Reflexes
Not performed
|
4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselineClinical audiological (hearing) tests were performed to assess hearing function. The hearing tests included psychophysical, physiological and electrophysiological measures, (pure-tone audiometry, tympanometry, auditory brainstem responses and acoustic reflexes). The tests were perfomed in line with the procedure guidelines by the British Society of Audiology (www.thebsa.org.uk). The mean value of pure-tone audiometric thresholds for both ears measured in decibel hearing level (as described in the guidelines by the British Society of Audiology) was calculated and reported. Other parameters were reported as normal or abnormal (in at least one ear) or inconclusive.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Siderosis (iSS) Group
n=11 Participants
Participants with a known diagnosis of infratentorial superficial siderosis (defined using standardised radiological criteria) confirmed by a consultant neurologist with expertise in this condition at University College London Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust
|
|---|---|
|
Hearing Evaluation - Tympanogram
Abnormal
|
0 Participants
|
|
Hearing Evaluation - Tympanogram
Normal
|
11 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselineClinical audiological (hearing) tests were performed to assess hearing function. The hearing tests included psychophysical, physiological and electrophysiological measures, (pure-tone audiometry, tympanometry, auditory brainstem responses and acoustic reflexes). The tests were perfomed in line with the procedure guidelines by the British Society of Audiology (www.thebsa.org.uk). The mean value of pure-tone audiometric thresholds for both ears measured in decibel hearing level (as described in the guidelines by the British Society of Audiology) was calculated and reported. Other parameters were reported as normal or abnormal (in at least one ear) or inconclusive.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Siderosis (iSS) Group
n=11 Participants
Participants with a known diagnosis of infratentorial superficial siderosis (defined using standardised radiological criteria) confirmed by a consultant neurologist with expertise in this condition at University College London Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust
|
|---|---|
|
Hearing Evaluation - Otoacoustic Emissions
Present
|
3 Participants
|
|
Hearing Evaluation - Otoacoustic Emissions
Absent
|
3 Participants
|
|
Hearing Evaluation - Otoacoustic Emissions
Not performed
|
5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselineClinical audiological (hearing) tests were performed to assess hearing function. The hearing tests included psychophysical, physiological and electrophysiological measures, (pure-tone audiometry, tympanometry, auditory brainstem responses and acoustic reflexes). The tests were perfomed in line with the procedure guidelines by the British Society of Audiology (www.thebsa.org.uk). The mean value of pure-tone audiometric thresholds for both ears measured in decibel hearing level (as described in the guidelines by the British Society of Audiology) was calculated and reported. Other parameters were reported as normal or abnormal (in at least one ear) or inconclusive. Cameron S, Dillon H. The listening in spatialized noise-sentences test (LISN-S): comparison to the prototype LISN and results from children with either a suspected (central) auditory processing disorder or a confirmed language disorder. J Am Acad Audiol. 2008 May;19(5):377-91.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Siderosis (iSS) Group
n=11 Participants
Participants with a known diagnosis of infratentorial superficial siderosis (defined using standardised radiological criteria) confirmed by a consultant neurologist with expertise in this condition at University College London Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust
|
|---|---|
|
Hearing Evaluation - Listening in Spatialised Sentences Noise Test
Abnormal
|
4 Participants
|
|
Hearing Evaluation - Listening in Spatialised Sentences Noise Test
Normal
|
1 Participants
|
|
Hearing Evaluation - Listening in Spatialised Sentences Noise Test
Not tested
|
6 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline visitSiderosis group participants underwent formal imaging procedures as part of their clinical care pathway. The imaging results were reviewed with the results obtained from hearing and vestibular/balance assessments. All participants had MRI Brain, as part of their clinical care pathway; susceptibility-weighted images were reviewed to identify the appearance of superficial siderosis, in keeping with the radiological diagnostic criteria (Reference: Wilson et al, 2017).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Siderosis (iSS) Group
n=10 Participants
Participants with a known diagnosis of infratentorial superficial siderosis (defined using standardised radiological criteria) confirmed by a consultant neurologist with expertise in this condition at University College London Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust
|
|---|---|
|
Correlation Between Clinically Obtained Imaging (Siderosis Group Participants) and the Hearing and Balance Assessment Results
Superior cerebellar vermis · Hypointense signal consistent with superficial siderosis observed
|
10 Participants
|
|
Correlation Between Clinically Obtained Imaging (Siderosis Group Participants) and the Hearing and Balance Assessment Results
Superior cerebellar vermis · Hypointense signal consistent with superficial siderosis not observed
|
0 Participants
|
|
Correlation Between Clinically Obtained Imaging (Siderosis Group Participants) and the Hearing and Balance Assessment Results
Cerebellar folia · Hypointense signal consistent with superficial siderosis observed
|
10 Participants
|
|
Correlation Between Clinically Obtained Imaging (Siderosis Group Participants) and the Hearing and Balance Assessment Results
Cerebellar folia · Hypointense signal consistent with superficial siderosis not observed
|
0 Participants
|
|
Correlation Between Clinically Obtained Imaging (Siderosis Group Participants) and the Hearing and Balance Assessment Results
Midbrain · Hypointense signal consistent with superficial siderosis observed
|
10 Participants
|
|
Correlation Between Clinically Obtained Imaging (Siderosis Group Participants) and the Hearing and Balance Assessment Results
Midbrain · Hypointense signal consistent with superficial siderosis not observed
|
0 Participants
|
|
Correlation Between Clinically Obtained Imaging (Siderosis Group Participants) and the Hearing and Balance Assessment Results
Pons · Hypointense signal consistent with superficial siderosis observed
|
9 Participants
|
|
Correlation Between Clinically Obtained Imaging (Siderosis Group Participants) and the Hearing and Balance Assessment Results
Pons · Hypointense signal consistent with superficial siderosis not observed
|
1 Participants
|
|
Correlation Between Clinically Obtained Imaging (Siderosis Group Participants) and the Hearing and Balance Assessment Results
Medulla · Hypointense signal consistent with superficial siderosis observed
|
9 Participants
|
|
Correlation Between Clinically Obtained Imaging (Siderosis Group Participants) and the Hearing and Balance Assessment Results
Medulla · Hypointense signal consistent with superficial siderosis not observed
|
1 Participants
|
|
Correlation Between Clinically Obtained Imaging (Siderosis Group Participants) and the Hearing and Balance Assessment Results
8th cranial nerve (unilateral or bilateral) · Hypointense signal consistent with superficial siderosis observed
|
9 Participants
|
|
Correlation Between Clinically Obtained Imaging (Siderosis Group Participants) and the Hearing and Balance Assessment Results
8th cranial nerve (unilateral or bilateral) · Hypointense signal consistent with superficial siderosis not observed
|
1 Participants
|
|
Correlation Between Clinically Obtained Imaging (Siderosis Group Participants) and the Hearing and Balance Assessment Results
Supratentorial extension · Hypointense signal consistent with superficial siderosis observed
|
10 Participants
|
|
Correlation Between Clinically Obtained Imaging (Siderosis Group Participants) and the Hearing and Balance Assessment Results
Supratentorial extension · Hypointense signal consistent with superficial siderosis not observed
|
0 Participants
|
|
Correlation Between Clinically Obtained Imaging (Siderosis Group Participants) and the Hearing and Balance Assessment Results
Sylvian fissures · Hypointense signal consistent with superficial siderosis observed
|
9 Participants
|
|
Correlation Between Clinically Obtained Imaging (Siderosis Group Participants) and the Hearing and Balance Assessment Results
Sylvian fissures · Hypointense signal consistent with superficial siderosis not observed
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline visitSiderosis group participants underwent a formal neuro-cognitive assessment as part of their clinical care pathway. The results of this clinical assessment were reviewed to determine if an association exists between the cognitive assessment results and the results obtained from hearing and vestibular/balance assessments performed during the study. A formal neuro-cognitive assessment was performed using the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale test. Cognitive impairment in a domain was defined as scoring at or below the fifth percentile on any one test in that domain.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Siderosis (iSS) Group
n=7 Participants
Participants with a known diagnosis of infratentorial superficial siderosis (defined using standardised radiological criteria) confirmed by a consultant neurologist with expertise in this condition at University College London Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust
|
|---|---|
|
Correlation Between Clinically Obtained Results of Cognitive Function Assessment (Siderosis Group Participants) and the Hearing and Balance Assessments
Participants who underwent neurocognitive assessment
|
7 Participants
|
|
Correlation Between Clinically Obtained Results of Cognitive Function Assessment (Siderosis Group Participants) and the Hearing and Balance Assessments
Executive function abnormal
|
5 Participants
|
|
Correlation Between Clinically Obtained Results of Cognitive Function Assessment (Siderosis Group Participants) and the Hearing and Balance Assessments
Visual memory abnormal
|
5 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline visitUniversity of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT, British version) was performed (siderosis group participants) to assess their olfactory function. UPSIT is a forced-choice 40-item self-administered test. The scores are calculated using manufacturer's answer key as the sum of correct answers (maximum best = 40, minimum score 6; anosmia \<19(males, females); normosmia \>33 (males) and \>34 (females)), and compared to the age- and gender-matched norms. The scores are also grouped into categories (ranging from normosmia to anosmia), with higher scores indicating better olfactory function.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Siderosis (iSS) Group
n=10 Participants
Participants with a known diagnosis of infratentorial superficial siderosis (defined using standardised radiological criteria) confirmed by a consultant neurologist with expertise in this condition at University College London Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust
|
|---|---|
|
Smell Identification Test
|
25.5 UPSIT score
Standard Deviation 7.8
|
Adverse Events
Siderosis (iSS) Group
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Dr N Kharytaniuk (Clinical Research Fellow)
Ear Institute, University College London
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place