To a Sustainable Quality Policy

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

400 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-08-15

Study Completion Date

2026-06-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators need stronger feedback loops and a quality monitoring and management system to improve the quality of care in sustainable way. The Chair Sint-Trudo "To a sustainable quality policy" was established to scientifically develop prerequisites for a sustainable quality of care. In this study protocol, a monocentric mixed-method quasi-experimental study will be used to assess the impact of a rapid-cycle quality indicator feedback mechanism on both patients and professionals.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Implementation of a Multidimensional Quality Model

NCT04886427

Management Systems Quality Improvement Public Health

UNKNOWN

The Use of QST to Characterize Somatosensory Functionality

NCT06439004

Pain

COMPLETED NA

Impact Study of the MSProgress Quality Approach Support Tool for Healthcare Centers Multiprofessionals (MSP) of the AUvergne-Rhône-Alpes Region Using a Mixed Method Evaluating the Evolution of Indicators Chosen by MSPs and Their Use in Multi-professional Teams

NCT07179289

Evaluation of the Impact of the MSProgress Quality Approach Support Tool on the Evolution of the Indicators Chosen by the MSPs in Comparison With Standard Care

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Dropout Factors in Chronic Pain Management

NCT04218227

Chronic Pain

COMPLETED

Treatment Comparison in Chronic Pain

NCT04261530

Comparison of Different Treatment for Chronic Pain

COMPLETED NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Quality Improvement Public Health Management Systems

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Hospital

Twelve wards of the hospital will be evaluated at the same time.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Implementation of a quality indicator feedback mechanism

Intervention Type OTHER

1. Audit and feedback: A summary of clinical performance and hospital safety culture over a specified period of time.
2. Benchmarking Achievable: benchmarks are calculated from the performance of all members of a peer group and represents a realistic standard of excellence attained by the top performers in that group (i.e. comparing to the top 10% of peers).
3. Educational outreach: A trained independent person or investigator will meet with health professionals or managers in their practice setting to provide information (e.g. feedback of quality indicators).
4. Action planning: The purpose of action planning is to support quality improvement efforts by identifying opportunities for improvement, strategies and steps to accomplish the work.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Implementation of a quality indicator feedback mechanism

1. Audit and feedback: A summary of clinical performance and hospital safety culture over a specified period of time.
2. Benchmarking Achievable: benchmarks are calculated from the performance of all members of a peer group and represents a realistic standard of excellence attained by the top performers in that group (i.e. comparing to the top 10% of peers).
3. Educational outreach: A trained independent person or investigator will meet with health professionals or managers in their practice setting to provide information (e.g. feedback of quality indicators).
4. Action planning: The purpose of action planning is to support quality improvement efforts by identifying opportunities for improvement, strategies and steps to accomplish the work.

Intervention Type OTHER