IV Contrast-Enhanced Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) in Radiotherapy
NCT ID: NCT04199754
Last Updated: 2024-05-31
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
EARLY_PHASE1
6 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-10-01
2021-05-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
In-Room PET in Proton Radiation Therapy
NCT01228448
Improving Clinical PET/CT Image Quality in Retrospectively Reconstructed Breath-Hold Images
NCT01109953
Validating Low FDG Dose PET/CT Compared to Current Standard of Care Dose PET/CT
NCT03519659
Patient- and Task-specific Radiation Dose Optimization for Pediatric Abdominopelvic CT Applications
NCT03429712
PET-CT Imaging With PCD-CT
NCT07242690
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Subjects will be required to fast for at least 2 hours prior to study procedures, as determined by the treating physician based on the site to be irradiated. An 18- to 22-gauge peripheral IV will be placed in the subject's arm prior to being brought to clinical treatment room. The patient will be placed in position for radiotherapy as per standard of care and will be connected to IV contrast injector. Standard of care IGRT techniques will be performed to confirm correct positioning. Iodinated IV contrast will be administered and the contrast enhance cone beam CT will be initiated. Treatment will then be administered with the patient in the position determined by non-contrast cone beam CT, as per standard of care. Immediately after completion of treatment of the subject, the study physician will complete physician survey of attitude about the utility of contrast-enhanced cone beam CT.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Contrast Enhanced Cone Beam CT
60 seconds after the start of the administration of IV contrast, cone beam CT will be initiated.
Omnipaque 300mg/mL Solution for Injection
Prior to the contrast enhanced Cone Beam CT, 100mL of Omnipaque will be administered by IV at a rate of 2mL per second, followed by administration of 50mL of 0.9% saline.
Cone Beam CT
60 seconds after contrast administration, a Cone Beam CT will be performed.
Radiation Therapy
Standard of Care Radiation Therapy will be administered, dosage depends on the type of tumor being treated.
0.9% Saline
50 ML of 0.9% Saline will be administered immediately after Omnipaque administration
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Omnipaque 300mg/mL Solution for Injection
Prior to the contrast enhanced Cone Beam CT, 100mL of Omnipaque will be administered by IV at a rate of 2mL per second, followed by administration of 50mL of 0.9% saline.
Cone Beam CT
60 seconds after contrast administration, a Cone Beam CT will be performed.
Radiation Therapy
Standard of Care Radiation Therapy will be administered, dosage depends on the type of tumor being treated.
0.9% Saline
50 ML of 0.9% Saline will be administered immediately after Omnipaque administration
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Subject must be able and willing to sign a written informed consent document.
3. Subject requiring image-guided external beam radiotherapy to abdominal or pelvic tumor with cone beam CT deemed clinically necessary by the treating physician.
4. No history of prior allergic reaction to intravenous CT contrast medium.
5. Creatinine of less than 1.9 mg/dL measured within one month prior to enrollment on the study.
6. No administration of intravenous contrast within 24 hours of administration of intravenous contrast on protocol.
7. Ability to complete New York Presbyterian Hospital iodinated contrast media administration questionnaire.
8. Negative pregnancy test for females of childbearing potential, in accordance to institutional guidelines.
9. Ability to fast for at least 2 hours prior to study procedures.
10. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 0-3.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Fluid overload that would contraindicate bolus administration of intravenous contrast.
3. Pregnant or nursing subjects.
4. Presence of single kidney or transplanted kidney
5. Acute renal failure
6. Chronic renal insufficiency, stage IV or V.
7. Administration of iodinated intravenous CT contrast medium within 24 hours of study procedures.
8. Inability to fast for at least 2 hours prior to study procedures.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Columbia University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
David P. Horowitz, M.D.
Assistant Professor of Radiation Oncology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
David Horowitz, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Assistant Professor of Radiation Oncology at Columbia University Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center/Department of Radiation Oncology
New York, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Katz MHG, Ou FS, Herman JM, Ahmad SA, Wolpin B, Marsh R, Behr S, Shi Q, Chuong M, Schwartz LH, Frankel W, Collisson E, Koay EJ, Hubbard JM, Leenstra JL, Meyerhardt J, O'Reilly E; Alliance for Clinical Trials on Oncology. Alliance for clinical trials in oncology (ALLIANCE) trial A021501: preoperative extended chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy plus hypofractionated radiation therapy for borderline resectable adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas. BMC Cancer. 2017 Jul 27;17(1):505. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3441-z.
Murphy JD, Adusumilli S, Griffith KA, Ray ME, Zalupski MM, Lawrence TS, Ben-Josef E. Full-dose gemcitabine and concurrent radiotherapy for unresectable pancreatic cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Jul 1;68(3):801-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.12.053. Epub 2007 Mar 26.
Krishnan S, Chadha AS, Suh Y, Chen HC, Rao A, Das P, Minsky BD, Mahmood U, Delclos ME, Sawakuchi GO, Beddar S, Katz MH, Fleming JB, Javle MM, Varadhachary GR, Wolff RA, Crane CH. Focal Radiation Therapy Dose Escalation Improves Overall Survival in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Patients Receiving Induction Chemotherapy and Consolidative Chemoradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Mar 15;94(4):755-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.12.003. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
Crane CH. Hypofractionated ablative radiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. J Radiat Res. 2016 Aug;57 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i53-i57. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrw016. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
Jones B, Altunbas C, Kavanagh B, Miften M. WE-G-217BCD-08: Image Quality Effects of Dynamic Iodine Concentrations for Contrast-Enhanced Cone-Beam CT. Med Phys. 2012 Jun;39(6Part28):3974. doi: 10.1118/1.4736216.
Klostranec JM, Ehtiati T, Rao S, Radvany MG. Comparison of aortic arch and intravenous contrast injection techniques for C-arm cone beam CT: implications for cerebral perfusion imaging in the angiography suite. Acad Radiol. 2013 Apr;20(4):509-18. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.10.008.
Eccles CL, Tse RV, Hawkins MA, Lee MT, Moseley DJ, Dawson LA. Intravenous contrast-enhanced cone beam computed tomography (IVCBCT) of intrahepatic tumors and vessels. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2016 Jan 26;1(1):43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2016.01.001. eCollection 2016 Jan-Mar.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AAAS0632
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.