Trial Outcomes & Findings for Magnetic Muscle Stimulation of Abdominal Muscle (NCT NCT04199312)
NCT ID: NCT04199312
Last Updated: 2025-07-02
Results Overview
Measurement of participant's perception about body shape, assessed using the Body Satisfaction Questionnaire (BSQ) at the 1-month post-treatment follow-up visit. The scale measures body image using a set of dichotomous items used to describe aspects of shape and appearance. The questionnaire has total score range from 10 to 50. An increase in score (when compared to baseline) reflects the participant's perceived improvement in appearance in the treated region (abdomen). Questionnaire results were tabulated as the numerical change between mean baseline scores and scores recorded at the 1-month post-treatment follow-up visit. A positive change reflects an increase in the body satisfaction questionnaire total score.
TERMINATED
NA
30 participants
Baseline, 1-month post-treatment follow-up visit
2025-07-02
Participant Flow
Participants were assigned to 1 of 3 MMS treatment cohorts. As-Treated (Safety) Population includes all enrolled participants who received at least 1 treatment per protocol.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Cohort 1
Participants had 4 MMS treatment sessions completed twice a week, within a 2-week period.
|
Cohort 2
Participants had 6 MMS treatment sessions completed twice a week, within a 3-week period.
|
Cohort 3
Participants had 8 MMS treatments completed twice per week within a 4-week period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
19
|
6
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
19
|
6
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Magnetic Muscle Stimulation of Abdominal Muscle
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Cohort 1
n=19 Participants
Participants had 4 MMS treatment sessions completed twice a week, within a 2-week period.
|
Cohort 2
n=6 Participants
Participants had 6 MMS treatment sessions completed twice a week, within a 3-week period.
|
Cohort 3
n=5 Participants
Participants had 8 MMS treatments completed twice per week within a 4-week period.
|
Total
n=30 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
46.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3 • n=5 Participants
|
43.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5 • n=7 Participants
|
44.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.2 • n=5 Participants
|
45.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
24 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 1-month post-treatment follow-up visitPopulation: As-Treated Population.
Measurement of participant's perception about body shape, assessed using the Body Satisfaction Questionnaire (BSQ) at the 1-month post-treatment follow-up visit. The scale measures body image using a set of dichotomous items used to describe aspects of shape and appearance. The questionnaire has total score range from 10 to 50. An increase in score (when compared to baseline) reflects the participant's perceived improvement in appearance in the treated region (abdomen). Questionnaire results were tabulated as the numerical change between mean baseline scores and scores recorded at the 1-month post-treatment follow-up visit. A positive change reflects an increase in the body satisfaction questionnaire total score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1
n=19 Participants
Participants had 4 MMS treatment sessions completed twice a week, within a 2-week period.
|
Cohort 2
n=6 Participants
Participants had 6 MMS treatment sessions completed twice a week, within a 3-week period.
|
Cohort 3
n=5 Participants
Participants had 8 MMS treatments completed twice per week within a 4-week period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Body Satisfaction Questionnaire From Baseline to 1-Month Post-Treatment Follow-up Visit
|
6.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.9
|
4.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.1
|
2.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.1
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: AE information will be collected from the time of enrollment to the final follow-up visit at 3-months following the final treatment.Population: Safety Population.
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence, unintended disease or injury, or untoward clinical signs (including abnormal laboratory findings) in participants, whether or not considered related to treatment. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE that resulted in death, serious deterioration in health, permanent impairment of a body structure/function, was life-threatening, required hospitalization or medical/surgical intervention, led to fetal distress or death, congenital abnormality, or birth defect. An ADE was any sign, symptom, or disease that was determined by the Investigator to have a causal relationship or possible causal relationship with the investigational device, including any AE resulting from insufficient or inadequate instructions for use, deployment, implantation, installation, or operation, or any malfunction of the device or from use error or intentional misuse of the device. A SADE was an ADE that resulted in any of the consequences characteristic of an SAE.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cohort 1
n=19 Participants
Participants had 4 MMS treatment sessions completed twice a week, within a 2-week period.
|
Cohort 2
n=6 Participants
Participants had 6 MMS treatment sessions completed twice a week, within a 3-week period.
|
Cohort 3
n=5 Participants
Participants had 8 MMS treatments completed twice per week within a 4-week period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Device and/or Procedure Related Adverse Events (AEs) and Device-related Serious Adverse Events (SADEs)
SADEs
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Device and/or Procedure Related Adverse Events (AEs) and Device-related Serious Adverse Events (SADEs)
Device and/ or Procedure Related AEs
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Cohort 1
Cohort 2
Cohort 3
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Cohort 1
n=19 participants at risk
Participants had 4 MMS treatment sessions completed twice a week, within a 2-week period.
|
Cohort 2
n=6 participants at risk
Participants had 6 MMS treatment sessions completed twice a week, within a 3-week period.
|
Cohort 3
n=5 participants at risk
Participants had 8 MMS treatments completed twice per week within a 4-week period.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Menstrual Cycle Irregularity
|
5.3%
1/19 • Adverse event data was collected from the time of enrollment through the 8-week post-treatment follow-up visit, approximately 3 months.
Safety data is presented here as planned and collected per protocol, by the total As-Treated Population (defined as all treated participants regardless of weight change).
|
0.00%
0/6 • Adverse event data was collected from the time of enrollment through the 8-week post-treatment follow-up visit, approximately 3 months.
Safety data is presented here as planned and collected per protocol, by the total As-Treated Population (defined as all treated participants regardless of weight change).
|
0.00%
0/5 • Adverse event data was collected from the time of enrollment through the 8-week post-treatment follow-up visit, approximately 3 months.
Safety data is presented here as planned and collected per protocol, by the total As-Treated Population (defined as all treated participants regardless of weight change).
|
Additional Information
Sally Hallas, RN, Director Clinical Development - Body Contouring
Zeltiq Aesthetics
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place