Clinical Decision Support for Opioid Use Disorders in Medical Settings (COMPUTE 2.0)
NCT ID: NCT04198428
Last Updated: 2025-10-02
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
10891 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-11-12
2023-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The study will include three large diverse care systems and randomize a minimum of 30 clinics to receive the OUD-CDS intervention or usual care (UC). In intervention clinics, the OUD-CDS will identify patients who are at high risk for OUD or diagnosed with OUD; use data stored in the EHR for each eligible patient to assemble treatment recommendations tailored to each patient's current needs; display these recommendations to PCPs via the OUD-CDS user interface; and store analytic data from all targeted visits. In UC clinics, the OUD-CDS will run invisibly in the background to identify high-risk or OUD patients, assemble treatment recommendations tailored to each eligible patient's needs, and store analytic data from all targeted visits.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Electronic Intervention to Chronic Opioid Therapy
NCT04198961
Emergency Department Longitudinal Integrated Care
NCT03699085
Delivering Transcutaneous Auricular Neurostimulation to Improve Relapse Prevention in Opioid Use Disorder
NCT05053503
Informational App Development for mHealth for Patient Self-Management of Opioid Use Disorder
NCT05859035
Pilot Research on Opioid Use Disorder
NCT04244227
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Mixed Methods Approach: Virtually every evidence-based intervention in medicine has turned out to be difficult to implement and maintain in real life practice and to fall far short of fidelity to the process used in randomized trials. As a result, a whole new field of dissemination and implementation research has been developing over the last 20 years. These studies have now gone well beyond the previous paradigm of focusing on changing the attitudes and behaviors of individual physicians to a growing awareness that the need instead is to alter the environment in which physicians work so that it is easier to do the desired evidence-based thing than to stick with old established habit patterns. That means focusing change efforts on organizational factors and practice systems. The Solberg conceptual framework has proven to be particularly helpful in clarifying this new approach.
Simultaneously, there has been increasing interest in transitioning effectiveness clinical trials from traditionally highly selective and controlled circumstances to pragmatic trials that make use of normal care delivery processes and patients.\[35\] The measurement of such trials has been facilitated by the development of a conceptual framework called RE-AIM, an acronym for 5 key facets of such studies - Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance. Recently, the developers of RE-AIM have recognized the need for more flexible use of this framework, greater use of qualitative methods to understand why interventions are not used consistently, and making adaptations in the implementation approach based on such understandings. The investigators propose to use the RE-AIM framework to guide (1) a monitoring system for intervention problems, (2) a mixed methods evaluation of the reasons for those problems, and (3) modification of the intervention to reduce those problems. These steps will be reiterated in a cyclic fashion, resulting in a more sophisticated approach to the long-standing quality improvement emphasis on Plan-Do-Study-Act rapid cycle tests of change. Furthermore, the team will take advantage of the staggered implementation of the study through three different care systems to ensure that the solutions for intervention problems in Site 1 are not assumed to be the same as the approach in subsequent sites without further RE-AIM monitoring and evaluation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Receives OUD-CDS
Clinics will have access to the OUD-CDS (Opioid Wizard)
Opioid Wizard
The Opioid Wizard is an OUD clinical decision support tool for primary care providers to help assess, diagnose, and treat OUD in primary care (where appropriate).
Does not Receive the OUD-CDS
Clinics will not have access to the OUD-CDS (Opioid Wizard). These will be "usual care" clinics.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Opioid Wizard
The Opioid Wizard is an OUD clinical decision support tool for primary care providers to help assess, diagnose, and treat OUD in primary care (where appropriate).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* have been diagnosed with OUD, currently prescribed MOUD, or identified by study algorithms as being at high risk of OUD.
* Be a patient at a study randomized clinic
Exclusion Criteria
* those with stage 4 or equivalent cancer diagnosis
* those enrolled in hospice care or palliative care programs.
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
NIH
The Emmes Company, LLC
INDUSTRY
Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute
OTHER
Geisinger Clinic
OTHER
Essentia Health
OTHER
HealthPartners Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gavin Bart, MD PhD FACP DFASAM
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hennepin Healthcare
Rebecca Rossom, MD, MSCR
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
HealthPartners Institute
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
HealthPartners
Bloomington, Minnesota, United States
Essentia Health
Duluth, Minnesota, United States
Geisinger
Danville, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Rossom RC, Crain AL, Wright EA, Olson AW, Haller I, Haapala J, Dehmer SP, Hooker SA, Solberg L, O'Connor PJ, Borgert-Spaniol C, Gorodisher J, Miley K, Romagnoli K, Allen C, Tusing L, Ekstrom H, Appana D, Sperl-Hillen JM, Kobylinski M, Huntley K, McCormack J, Chen W, Bart G. Clinical Decision Support System for Primary Care of Opioid Use Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2025 Sep 1;185(9):1079-1089. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.2535.
Olson AW, Bucaloiu A, Allen CI, Tusing LD, Henzler-Buckingham HA, Gregor CM, Freitag LA, Hooker SA, Rossom RC, Solberg LI, Wright EA, Haller IV, Romagnoli KM. 'Do they care?': a qualitative examination of patient perspectives on primary care clinician communication related to opioids in the USA. BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 7;15(1):e090462. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090462.
Olson AW, Haapala JL, Hooker SA, Solberg LI, Borgert-Spaniol CM, Romagnoli KM, Allen CI, Tusing LD, Wright EA, Haller IV, Rossom RC. The potential impact of clinical decision support on nonwaivered primary care clinicians' prescribing of buprenorphine. Health Aff Sch. 2023 Oct 11;1(4):qxad051. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxad051. eCollection 2023 Oct.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CTN - 0095
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.