Clinical Decision Support for Opioid Use Disorders in Medical Settings (COMPUTE 2.0)

NCT ID: NCT04198428

Last Updated: 2025-10-02

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

10891 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-11-12

Study Completion Date

2023-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Through CTN-0076-Ot (Clinical Decision Support for Opioid Use Disorders in Medical Settings: Pilot Usability Testing in an EMR (COMPUTE)), our team has iteratively developed and piloted a web-based and electronic health record (EHR)-integrated Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) Clinical Decision Support (CDS) system to offer expert guidance to primary care providers (PCPs) on the diagnosis and management of OUD. The OUD-CDS has been implemented within the EPIC EHR of one large care system and was piloted with 55 providers to ensure content validity and provider satisfaction. The team will now implement this OUD-CDS in a large multi-site clinic-randomized controlled trial to evaluate its impact on practice process measures and patient outcomes. The investigators also aim to prepare for scalability (i.e., integration into usual primary care practice after the study is complete) and dissemination by evaluating facilitators and barriers to implementation, determining the costs of implementation and maintenance, and assessing the short-term cost impacts of the OUD-CDS.

The study will include three large diverse care systems and randomize a minimum of 30 clinics to receive the OUD-CDS intervention or usual care (UC). In intervention clinics, the OUD-CDS will identify patients who are at high risk for OUD or diagnosed with OUD; use data stored in the EHR for each eligible patient to assemble treatment recommendations tailored to each patient's current needs; display these recommendations to PCPs via the OUD-CDS user interface; and store analytic data from all targeted visits. In UC clinics, the OUD-CDS will run invisibly in the background to identify high-risk or OUD patients, assemble treatment recommendations tailored to each eligible patient's needs, and store analytic data from all targeted visits.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The proposed study will include 3 large diverse healthcare systems and randomize a minimum of 30 clinics equally within each system to receive the OUD-CDS intervention or UC. In intervention and UC clinics, the OUD-CDS will identify study-eligible patients, those who are at high risk for OUD or diagnosed with OUD; and will use data stored in the EHR to assemble treatment recommendations tailored to the needs of each study-eligible patient. In intervention clinics, these treatment recommendations will be displayed via the OUD-CDS user interface. Finally, data from all targeted visits in all randomized clinics will be stored in a data repository for analysis and reporting needs. The targeted visits for each study-eligible patient in all randomized clinics will be the index visit, the first visit at which the OUD-CDS identifies that the patient is study eligible, and all post-index visits through the end of the intervention period, regardless of continued eligibility. This pragmatic cluster-randomized design is the optimal design to effectively and efficiently implement this tool in primary care clinics while protecting against study contamination and allowing for collection of process and outcome data at UC clinics.

Mixed Methods Approach: Virtually every evidence-based intervention in medicine has turned out to be difficult to implement and maintain in real life practice and to fall far short of fidelity to the process used in randomized trials. As a result, a whole new field of dissemination and implementation research has been developing over the last 20 years. These studies have now gone well beyond the previous paradigm of focusing on changing the attitudes and behaviors of individual physicians to a growing awareness that the need instead is to alter the environment in which physicians work so that it is easier to do the desired evidence-based thing than to stick with old established habit patterns. That means focusing change efforts on organizational factors and practice systems. The Solberg conceptual framework has proven to be particularly helpful in clarifying this new approach.

Simultaneously, there has been increasing interest in transitioning effectiveness clinical trials from traditionally highly selective and controlled circumstances to pragmatic trials that make use of normal care delivery processes and patients.\[35\] The measurement of such trials has been facilitated by the development of a conceptual framework called RE-AIM, an acronym for 5 key facets of such studies - Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance. Recently, the developers of RE-AIM have recognized the need for more flexible use of this framework, greater use of qualitative methods to understand why interventions are not used consistently, and making adaptations in the implementation approach based on such understandings. The investigators propose to use the RE-AIM framework to guide (1) a monitoring system for intervention problems, (2) a mixed methods evaluation of the reasons for those problems, and (3) modification of the intervention to reduce those problems. These steps will be reiterated in a cyclic fashion, resulting in a more sophisticated approach to the long-standing quality improvement emphasis on Plan-Do-Study-Act rapid cycle tests of change. Furthermore, the team will take advantage of the staggered implementation of the study through three different care systems to ensure that the solutions for intervention problems in Site 1 are not assumed to be the same as the approach in subsequent sites without further RE-AIM monitoring and evaluation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Opioid-use Disorder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Receives OUD-CDS

Clinics will have access to the OUD-CDS (Opioid Wizard)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Opioid Wizard

Intervention Type OTHER

The Opioid Wizard is an OUD clinical decision support tool for primary care providers to help assess, diagnose, and treat OUD in primary care (where appropriate).

Does not Receive the OUD-CDS

Clinics will not have access to the OUD-CDS (Opioid Wizard). These will be "usual care" clinics.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Opioid Wizard

The Opioid Wizard is an OUD clinical decision support tool for primary care providers to help assess, diagnose, and treat OUD in primary care (where appropriate).

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* be aged 18-75 years, inclusive, at the time of an index visit;
* have been diagnosed with OUD, currently prescribed MOUD, or identified by study algorithms as being at high risk of OUD.
* Be a patient at a study randomized clinic

Exclusion Criteria

* those receiving active parenteral chemotherapy within the last year,
* those with stage 4 or equivalent cancer diagnosis
* those enrolled in hospice care or palliative care programs.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

The Emmes Company, LLC

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Geisinger Clinic

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Essentia Health

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

HealthPartners Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gavin Bart, MD PhD FACP DFASAM

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hennepin Healthcare

Rebecca Rossom, MD, MSCR

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

HealthPartners Institute

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

HealthPartners

Bloomington, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Essentia Health

Duluth, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Geisinger

Danville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Rossom RC, Crain AL, Wright EA, Olson AW, Haller I, Haapala J, Dehmer SP, Hooker SA, Solberg L, O'Connor PJ, Borgert-Spaniol C, Gorodisher J, Miley K, Romagnoli K, Allen C, Tusing L, Ekstrom H, Appana D, Sperl-Hillen JM, Kobylinski M, Huntley K, McCormack J, Chen W, Bart G. Clinical Decision Support System for Primary Care of Opioid Use Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2025 Sep 1;185(9):1079-1089. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.2535.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40658392 (View on PubMed)

Olson AW, Bucaloiu A, Allen CI, Tusing LD, Henzler-Buckingham HA, Gregor CM, Freitag LA, Hooker SA, Rossom RC, Solberg LI, Wright EA, Haller IV, Romagnoli KM. 'Do they care?': a qualitative examination of patient perspectives on primary care clinician communication related to opioids in the USA. BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 7;15(1):e090462. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090462.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39773800 (View on PubMed)

Olson AW, Haapala JL, Hooker SA, Solberg LI, Borgert-Spaniol CM, Romagnoli KM, Allen CI, Tusing LD, Wright EA, Haller IV, Rossom RC. The potential impact of clinical decision support on nonwaivered primary care clinicians' prescribing of buprenorphine. Health Aff Sch. 2023 Oct 11;1(4):qxad051. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxad051. eCollection 2023 Oct.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38756745 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UG1DA040316

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

CTN - 0095

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Pilot Trial of Opioid Taper Support
NCT01883882 COMPLETED NA