Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
164 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-01-15
2020-06-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In order to investigate the ability of Fried scale to predict cardiac operative mortality and morbidity, groups will be compared in terms of surgical mortality, renal failure, stroke, prolonged mechanical ventilation, deep sternal wound infections, re-operation, prolonged length of stay, and readmission rates.
Power analysis was performed to estimate sample size using G\*Power (v3.1.7) software. A total 150 participants are needed in order to achieve an 80% (Beta=0.2) power at the 5% (Alpha=0.05) level of significance.
Categorical data will be presented as frequency and percentage. Continuous variables will be presented as mean \[±standard deviation\] and median \[interquartile range\]. Categorical variables will be compared using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test will be used to assess distribution of continuous variables. Continuous variables with a normal distribution will be compared using Student's t-test, and those with a non-normal distribution will be compared using Mann-Whitney U test.
SPSS for Windows v.17.0 (SPSS Statistics Inc., Chicago, Ill., USA) will be used for all statistical analyses. A two-sided p value of \<0.05 will be considered to be statistically significant.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Frail
Participants with 3 or more components of Fried frailty scale
No interventions assigned to this group
Moderately Frail
Participants with 1-2 components of Fried frailty scale
No interventions assigned to this group
Not Frail
Participants without any components of Fried frailty scale
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Planned elective cardiac surgery
Exclusion Criteria
* Emergent procedure
* Refusal to participate
* Clinical instability (recent myocardial infarction, decompensated cardiac failure, acutely symptomatic participants, abnormal vital signs)
* Canadian Cardiovascular Society grade IV angina pectoris
* New York Heart Association class IV heart failure
* Failure to cooperate due to neuropsychiatric disorders
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Turkish Society of Cardiovascular Surgery
UNKNOWN
Dr. Siyami Ersek Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Kamile Ozeren Topcu
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ilyas Kayacioglu, M.D.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Dr. Siyami Ersek Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Dr. Siyami Ersek Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Henry L, Halpin L, Barnett SD, Pritchard G, Sarin E, Speir AM. Frailty in the Cardiac Surgical Patient: Comparison of Frailty Tools and Associated Outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Jul;108(1):16-22. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.03.009. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
Rowe R, Iqbal J, Murali-Krishnan R, Sultan A, Orme R, Briffa N, Denvir M, Gunn J. Role of frailty assessment in patients undergoing cardiac interventions. Open Heart. 2014 Feb 1;1(1):e000033. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2013-000033. eCollection 2014.
Bagnall NM, Faiz O, Darzi A, Athanasiou T. What is the utility of preoperative frailty assessment for risk stratification in cardiac surgery? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013 Aug;17(2):398-402. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt197. Epub 2013 May 10.
Sundermann SH, Dademasch A, Seifert B, Rodriguez Cetina Biefer H, Emmert MY, Walther T, Jacobs S, Mohr FW, Falk V, Starck CT. Frailty is a predictor of short- and mid-term mortality after elective cardiac surgery independently of age. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 May;18(5):580-5. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivu006. Epub 2014 Feb 3.
Sundermann S, Dademasch A, Rastan A, Praetorius J, Rodriguez H, Walther T, Mohr FW, Falk V. One-year follow-up of patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery assessed with the Comprehensive Assessment of Frailty test and its simplified form. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011 Aug;13(2):119-23; discussion 123. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2010.251884. Epub 2011 Mar 4.
Sundermann S, Dademasch A, Praetorius J, Kempfert J, Dewey T, Falk V, Mohr FW, Walther T. Comprehensive assessment of frailty for elderly high-risk patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Jan;39(1):33-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.04.013.
Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, Seeman T, Tracy R, Kop WJ, Burke G, McBurnie MA; Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001 Mar;56(3):M146-56. doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.3.m146.
Afilalo J, Alexander KP, Mack MJ, Maurer MS, Green P, Allen LA, Popma JJ, Ferrucci L, Forman DE. Frailty assessment in the cardiovascular care of older adults. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Mar 4;63(8):747-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.09.070. Epub 2013 Nov 27.
Singh M, Stewart R, White H. Importance of frailty in patients with cardiovascular disease. Eur Heart J. 2014 Jul;35(26):1726-31. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu197. Epub 2014 May 26.
Afilalo J, Karunananthan S, Eisenberg MJ, Alexander KP, Bergman H. Role of frailty in patients with cardiovascular disease. Am J Cardiol. 2009 Jun 1;103(11):1616-21. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.01.375. Epub 2009 Apr 8.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HNEAH-KAEK 2019/76
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id