Evaluation and Optimization of Hearing Devices in 3-D Complex Audio Environments Study 3 (HEAR3D_CE3)
NCT ID: NCT04180254
Last Updated: 2020-09-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
45 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-11-18
2020-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation and Optimization of Hearing Devices in 3-D Complex Audio Environments
NCT03514758
Evaluation and Optimization of Hearing Devices in 3-D Complex Audio Environments Study 2
NCT03774030
Assessment of Novel Sound Changing Principles in Hearing Instruments to Determine Their Application - 2018_12
NCT03554577
Assessment of Novel Sound Changing Principles in Hearing Instruments to Determine Their Application - 2019_20
NCT04018911
Evaluation of a Binaural Spatialization Method for Hearing Aids
NCT02693704
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental: normal-hearing and hearing-impaired participants
normal and hearing-impaired participants
Effect of several processing on the auditory distance perception
The focus is a comparison of hearing instrument algorithms on the auditory distance perception
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Effect of several processing on the auditory distance perception
The focus is a comparison of hearing instrument algorithms on the auditory distance perception
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Healthy outer ear (without previous surgical procedures, except cochlear implantation)
* Ability to fill in a questionnaire conscientiously
* Informed Consent as documented by signature
Normal hearing participants
• Adult persons with audiometric normal hearing thresholds
Hearing impaired participants
* Adult hearing impaired persons with and without (experience with) hearing aids
* Adult hearing impaired persons with cochlear implant(s)
Exclusion Criteria
* Limited mobility and not in the position to attend weekly appointments
* Limited ability to describe listening impressions/experiences and the use of the hearing aid
* Inability to produce a reliable hearing test result
* Massively limited dexterity
* Known psychological problems
* Known central hearing disorders
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Swiss Commission for Technology and Innovation
OTHER
Sonova AG
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospital Zurich
Zurich, , Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gatehouse S, Noble W. The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ). Int J Audiol. 2004 Feb;43(2):85-99. doi: 10.1080/14992020400050014.
Mueller MF, Meisenbacher K, Lai WK, Dillier N. Sound localization with bilateral cochlear implants in noise: how much do head movements contribute to localization? Cochlear Implants Int. 2014 Jan;15(1):36-42. doi: 10.1179/1754762813Y.0000000040. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
Catic J, Santurette S, Dau T. The role of reverberation-related binaural cues in the externalization of speech. J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Aug;138(2):1154-67. doi: 10.1121/1.4928132.
Simon LS, Zacharov N, Katz BF. Perceptual attributes for the comparison of head-related transfer functions. J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Nov;140(5):3623. doi: 10.1121/1.4966115.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Link the the previous part of the study
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2017-02051-3
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.