Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
222 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-11-29
2019-11-18
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Therefore, this study was designed to evaluate effects of the additional of single-dose GnRH agonist to the routine progestogens use for luteal phase support on IVF outcome as compared to progestogens only. The biochemical pregnancy rates, clinical pregnancy rates, live birth rates and miscarriage rate between these regimes were compared. The hypothesis of this study was women with addition of GnRH agonist as luteal phase support have higher biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate compare to patient with progestogens only luteal phase support.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Luteal-Phase GnRH Agonist Administration in Frozen-Thawed IVF Embryo Transfer Cycles
NCT00542126
Luteal Phase Support With GnRH Agonist After GnRH Agonist Triggering in IVF/ICSI Cycles
NCT06150703
GnRH Agonist for Dual Trigger in IVF and for Luteal Phase Support in FET
NCT04064840
Luteal Phase Support With Daily Administration of Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Agonist Compared to Progesterone/Estradiol in IVF/ICSI Cycles With Ovulation Triggering With GnRH-a
NCT05143723
Impact of Gonadotrophin Releasing Hormone Analogues on Oocyte and Embryo Quality
NCT03139474
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The sample size was calculated using Power \& Sample Size Calculator by Dupont \& Plummer 1998 for dichotomous response version 3.1.2 \[6\]. Based on this formula, a is the type I error probability for a two-sided test allowable about 5% in this study. The power of certainty is the percentage of estimated power of this study. On the other hand, p0 is the probability of the outcome for GnRH agonist used as luteal phase support by Zafardoust et al. \[7\] which is 30% (0.30). The p1 is the probability of the outcome in an experimental subject which expected in this study based on similar objective of higher rate of implantation with GnRH agonist. The investigators set the p1 is 0.50 as overall literature suggest that at cumulative successful of implantation post GnRH is around 30-50%. The m is the ratio of control to experimental subjects which is 1 to 1 in this study. Generated sample size from this program is 93 for one arm which result in total sample size is 186. The investigators then added 10% of additional sample for any bias or loss of data during follow up which concluded total sample size to be at least 200 samples (100 patients each arm).
All women who underwent control-ovarian stimulation (COH) regime using either gonadotrophin combination with GnRH antagonist protocol or mild stimulation protocol using oral letrozole or clomiphene citrate were included in this study. All women underwent follicle tracking by transvaginal ultrasound until dominant follicle size reached (\>18mm). IM Ovitrelle (6500 IU) was given and proceed with oocyte retrieval (OR) at least 35-36 hours under transvaginal ultrasonography guidance. The 17-gauge single -lumen needles used for oocyte retrieval under sedation.
ICSI were performed according to local protocol. Zygotes were cultured up to day 5 in G1 medium (Vitrolife). On day 5, embryos were graded according to previously described criteria. One or two embryos were transferred, depending on the morphological score and the developmental stage of the embryo, as well as the age of the patient.
Regardless the ovarian stimulation protocols, these women were assigned into two group; progestogens with additions of GnRH agonist and progestogen only for luteal phase support. Both groups were given routine progestogen support for two weeks duration started from the day of embryo transfer. This includes oral progestogen (Tablet Duphaston 10mg tds), vaginal progestogen (vaginal utrogestan 400mg bd) or intramuscular (IM Proluton 250 mg weekly) as prescribed by attending clinician .
In the first group, there were additional GnRH agonist administrated as a single dose of 0.2 mg decapeptyl given at day 3 after ICSI. The other group with no GnRH agonist given was the control group.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
GnRH agonist with progestogen support
Decapeptyl 0.2mg
IM Decapeptyl o.2 mg was given 2 days before embryo transfer
progestogen support only
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Decapeptyl 0.2mg
IM Decapeptyl o.2 mg was given 2 days before embryo transfer
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* given progestogens plus GnRH agonist or progestogens only as luteal phase support.
Exclusion Criteria
* frozen embryo transfer and
* missing medical records data
18 Years
40 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National University of Malaysia
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Azrai Abu
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Muhammad Azrai Abu, Medical Degree
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UKM Medical Centre
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Medically Assisted Conception Unit, UKM Medical Centre
Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Beckers NG, Macklon NS, Eijkemans MJ, Ludwig M, Felberbaum RE, Diedrich K, Bustion S, Loumaye E, Fauser BC. Nonsupplemented luteal phase characteristics after the administration of recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin, recombinant luteinizing hormone, or gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist to induce final oocyte maturation in in vitro fertilization patients after ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and GnRH antagonist cotreatment. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003 Sep;88(9):4186-92. doi: 10.1210/jc.2002-021953.
Kolibianakis EM, Bourgain C, Platteau P, Albano C, Van Steirteghem AC, Devroey P. Abnormal endometrial development occurs during the luteal phase of nonsupplemented donor cycles treated with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists. Fertil Steril. 2003 Aug;80(2):464-6. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(03)00663-0. No abstract available.
Smitz J, Bourgain C, Van Waesberghe L, Camus M, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. A prospective randomized study on oestradiol valerate supplementation in addition to intravaginal micronized progesterone in buserelin and HMG induced superovulation. Hum Reprod. 1993 Jan;8(1):40-5. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137871.
Pritts EA, Atwood AK. Luteal phase support in infertility treatment: a meta-analysis of the randomized trials. Hum Reprod. 2002 Sep;17(9):2287-99. doi: 10.1093/humrep/17.9.2287.
Tesarik J, Hazout A, Mendoza-Tesarik R, Mendoza N, Mendoza C. Beneficial effect of luteal-phase GnRH agonist administration on embryo implantation after ICSI in both GnRH agonist- and antagonist-treated ovarian stimulation cycles. Hum Reprod. 2006 Oct;21(10):2572-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del173. Epub 2006 Aug 22.
Dupont WD, Plummer WD Jr. Power and sample size calculations. A review and computer program. Control Clin Trials. 1990 Apr;11(2):116-28. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(90)90005-m.
Zafardoust S, Jeddi-Tehrani M, Akhondi MM, Sadeghi MR, Kamali K, Mokhtar S, Badehnoosh B, Arjmand-Teymouri F, Fatemi F, Mohammadzadeh A. Effect of Administration of Single Dose GnRH Agonist in Luteal Phase on Outcome of ICSI-ET Cycles in Women with Previous History of IVF/ICSI Failure: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Reprod Infertil. 2015 Apr-Jun;16(2):96-101.
Yildiz GA, Sukur YE, Ates C, Aytac R. The addition of gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist to routine luteal phase support in intracytoplasmic sperm injection and embryo transfer cycles: a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Nov;182:66-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.08.026. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
Qublan H, Amarin Z, Al-Qudah M, Diab F, Nawasreh M, Malkawi S, Balawneh M. Luteal phase support with GnRH-a improves implantation and pregnancy rates in IVF cycles with endometrium of <or=7 mm on day of egg retrieval. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2008 Mar;11(1):43-7. doi: 10.1080/14647270701704768.
Razieh DF, Maryam AR, Nasim T. Beneficial effect of luteal-phase gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist administration on implantation rate after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Sep;48(3):245-8. doi: 10.1016/S1028-4559(09)60297-7.
Ata B, Urman B. Single dose GnRH agonist administration in the luteal phase of assisted reproduction cycles: is the effect dependent on the type of GnRH analogue used for pituitary suppression? Reprod Biomed Online. 2010 Jan;20(1):165-6; author reply 167. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.10.022. Epub 2009 Nov 10. No abstract available.
Ata B, Yakin K, Balaban B, Urman B. GnRH agonist protocol administration in the luteal phase in ICSI-ET cycles stimulated with the long GnRH agonist protocol: a randomized, controlled double blind study. Hum Reprod. 2008 Mar;23(3):668-73. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dem421. Epub 2008 Jan 12.
Kung HF, Chen MJ, Guua HF, Chen YF, Yi YC, Yen-Ping Ho J, Chou MM. Luteal phase support with decapeptyl improves pregnancy outcomes in intracytoplasmic sperm injection with higher basal follicle-stimulating hormone or lower mature oocytes. J Chin Med Assoc. 2014 Oct;77(10):524-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2014.07.001. Epub 2014 Aug 24.
Tesarik J, Hazout A, Mendoza C. Enhancement of embryo developmental potential by a single administration of GnRH agonist at the time of implantation. Hum Reprod. 2004 May;19(5):1176-80. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh235. Epub 2004 Apr 7.
Davar R, Farid Mojtahedi M, Miraj S. Effects of single dose GnRH agonist as luteal support on pregnancy outcome in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: an RCT. Iran J Reprod Med. 2015 Aug;13(8):483-8.
Benmachiche A, Benbouhedja S, Zoghmar A, Boularak A, Humaidan P. Impact of Mid-Luteal Phase GnRH Agonist Administration on Reproductive Outcomes in GnRH Agonist-Triggered Cycles: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2017 Jun 15;8:124. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2017.00124. eCollection 2017.
Pirard C, Donnez J, Loumaye E. GnRH agonist as novel luteal support: results of a randomized, parallel group, feasibility study using intranasal administration of buserelin. Hum Reprod. 2005 Jul;20(7):1798-804. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh830. Epub 2005 May 12.
Pirard C, Donnez J, Loumaye E. GnRH agonist as luteal phase support in assisted reproduction technique cycles: results of a pilot study. Hum Reprod. 2006 Jul;21(7):1894-900. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del072. Epub 2006 Mar 23.
Fujii S, Sato S, Fukui A, Kimura H, Kasai G, Saito Y. Continuous administration of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist during the luteal phase in IVF. Hum Reprod. 2001 Aug;16(8):1671-5. doi: 10.1093/humrep/16.8.1671.
Isik AZ, Caglar GS, Sozen E, Akarsu C, Tuncay G, Ozbicer T, Vicdan K. Single-dose GnRH agonist administration in the luteal phase of GnRH antagonist cycles: a prospective randomized study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009 Oct;19(4):472-7. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.04.001.
Bar Hava I, Blueshtein M, Ganer Herman H, Omer Y, Ben David G. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue as sole luteal support in antagonist-based assisted reproductive technology cycles. Fertil Steril. 2017 Jan;107(1):130-135.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.10.011. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
Aboulghar MA, Marie H, Amin YM, Aboulghar MM, Nasr A, Serour GI, Mansour RT. GnRH agonist plus vaginal progesterone for luteal phase support in ICSI cycles: a randomized study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015 Jan;30(1):52-6. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.09.017. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
Chen SL, Wu FR, Luo C, Chen X, Shi XY, Zheng HY, Ni YP. Combined analysis of endometrial thickness and pattern in predicting outcome of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2010 Mar 24;8:30. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-8-30.
Ye H, Luo X, Pei L, Li F, Li C, Chen Y, Zhang X, Huang G. The addition of single dose GnRH agonist to luteal phase support in artificial cycle frozen embryo transfer: a randomized clinical trial. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2019 Jul;35(7):618-622. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2018.1563888. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PPI/111/8/JEP-2018-619
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.