Ticagrelor in Remote Ischemic Preconditioning Study

NCT ID: NCT04174261

Last Updated: 2019-11-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

245 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-01-29

Study Completion Date

2018-01-17

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) reduces periprocedural myocardial injury (PMI) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) through various pathways, including an adenosine-triggered pathway. Ticagrelor inhibits adenosine uptake, thus may potentiate the effects of RIPC.

This randomized trial tested the hypothesis that ticagrelor potentiates the effect of RIPC and reduces PMI, as assessed by post-procedural troponin release

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is often complicated by peri-procedural myocardial injury, with widespread adoption of sensitive cardiac biomarkers assays allowing detection of smaller amounts of myocardial necrosis (1, 2). Peri-procedural cardiac troponin elevation has been associated with new irreversible myocardial injury, detected by delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (3), and even though the prognostic significance of peri-procedural cardiac troponin elevation has been highly debated (4), several studies have reported that peri-procedural injury is associated with worse prognosis (5, 6).

Peri-procedural myocardial injury attenuation is expected to improve cardiovascular outcomes following PCI, and this could be achieved through such cardioprotective interventions as ischemic preconditioning (IPC) (2). Converging experimental and clinical evidence suggests that the long-established therapeutic potential of remote IPC or ischemic perconditioning may find clinical use in the setting of elective PCI or ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MI)(7-9). Nevertheless, recent clinical trials suggest that the cardioprotective effect of remote IPC is moderate (10, 11), thus demonstrating the need to explore methods to augment it.

The ischemic conditioning signal is considered a summation of signals derived from multiple disparate receptor-ligand interactions, which reaches a threshold once sufficient combined signals are generated (12, 13). Adenosine, with its plasma levels increasing after cellular stresses and ischemia, is a crucial trigger of the preconditioning cascade (14), however it is rapidly taken up by cells through sodium-independent equilibrative nucleoside transporters (ENT 1/2) and sodium-dependent concentrative nucleoside transporters (CNT 2/3) (15).

Experimental data suggest that ticagrelor inhibits cellular reuptake of adenosine, thereby increasing systemic and tissue adenosine levels (15-17). Moreover, the antiplatelet effects of ticagrelor have been shown to be partly mediated by increased extracellular adenosine levels and ticagrelor enhances the hyperemic response to adenosine (16, 18). Clinical evidence suggests that in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) ticagrelor treatment is associated with higher adenosine levels and an augmentation of coronary blood flow velocity in response to adenosine (19, 20). The investigators hypothesized that ticagrelor treatment would potentiate the effects of remote IPC and would thereby reduce peri-procedural myocardial injury and the incidence of post-PCI MI.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

The TRIP study was a randomized, assessor-blind, active comparator-controlled, clinical trial using a 2×2 factorial design, with 1:1 patient allocation to ticagrelor or clopidogrel and within each treatment a 1:1 allocation to RIPC or control.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Patient randomization in the ticagrelor and the clopidogrel group took place using sealed, opaque envelopes containing a computer-generated randomization scheme. Using a similar procedure, patients were then randomly assigned to RIPC or no RIPC within 1 hour before the procedure.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Ticagrelor - Remote Ischemic Preconditioning

Ticagrelor 180mg loading dose, and 90mg b.i.d thereafter. 3 cycles of 5-minute ischemia/5-minute reperfusion using a BP cuff around the non-dominant arm

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ticagrelor

Intervention Type DRUG

Preprocedural ticagrelor loading and standard dose thereafter

Remote Ischemic Preconditioning

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Preprocedural remote ischemic preconditioning on the non-dominant arm

Ticagrelor - Control

Ticagrelor 180mg loading dose, and 90mg b.i.d thereafter. BP-cuff uninflated around the non-dominant arm

Group Type OTHER

Ticagrelor

Intervention Type DRUG

Preprocedural ticagrelor loading and standard dose thereafter

Clopidogrel - Remote Ischemic Preconditioning

Clopidogel 300mg loading dose, and 75mg q.d. thereafter. 3 cycles of 5-minute ischemia/5-minute reperfusion using a BP cuff around the non-dominant arm

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Remote Ischemic Preconditioning

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Preprocedural remote ischemic preconditioning on the non-dominant arm

Clopidogrel

Intervention Type DRUG

Preprocedural clopidogrel loading and standard dose thereafter

Clopidogrel - Control

Clopidogel 300mg loading dose, and 75mg q.d. thereafter. BP-cuff uninflated around the non-dominant arm

Group Type OTHER

Clopidogrel

Intervention Type DRUG

Preprocedural clopidogrel loading and standard dose thereafter

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ticagrelor

Preprocedural ticagrelor loading and standard dose thereafter

Intervention Type DRUG

Remote Ischemic Preconditioning

Preprocedural remote ischemic preconditioning on the non-dominant arm

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Clopidogrel

Preprocedural clopidogrel loading and standard dose thereafter

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Provision of informed consent prior to any study specific procedures
* Patients (Female and male) ≥ 18 of age
* Patients with NSTE-ACS undergoing coronary angiography, eligible for PCI

Exclusion Criteria

* Women of childbearing potential
* Severe comorbidity (estimated life expectancy \<6 months)
* Baseline cTnI before PCI that is not stable or falling or is \> 5 ×99th percentile URL.
* End-stage renal disease(eGFR\<15 ml/min/1.73 m2)
* CRUSADE Bleeding Score \>50
* Patients with an indication for oral anticoagulation
* On maintenance therapy with ticagrelor or those that have received clopidogrel for less than 3 days
* Use of nicorandil or glibenclamide
* Concomitant theophylline/aminophylline use
* Known contraindications to the use of ticagrelor Hypersensitivity to the active substance or to any of the excipients
* Active pathological bleeding
* History of intracranial haemorrhage
* Moderate to severe hepatic impairment
* Co-administration of ticagrelor with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors (e.g., ketoconazole, clarithromycin, nefazodone, ritonavir, and atazanavir).
* Patients meeting criteria for immediate or early (\<24h) invasive strategy based on the current relevant European Society of Cardiology guidelines
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hellenic Society of Interventional Cardiology

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Apostolos Katsivas

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Head Cardiology Department, Athens Red Cross Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Athens Red Cross Hospital

Athens, Attica, Greece

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Greece

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ESR-14-10310

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Ticagrelor Monotherapy After Stenting
NCT05149560 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE2
Ticagrelor for PCI Post Thrombolysis
NCT01930591 COMPLETED PHASE3