Trial Outcomes & Findings for Sling vs Botox for Mixed Incontinence (NCT NCT04171531)

NCT ID: NCT04171531

Last Updated: 2025-06-03

Results Overview

The Urogenital Distress Inventory is a standardized a measure of overactive bladder symptoms and health-related quality of life. The UDI scale has a range from 0 to 300 with higher scores indicating greater distress. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

150 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

3, 6, 9, and 12 Months

Results posted on

2025-06-03

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Botox A
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incontinence
Overall Study
STARTED
72
78
Overall Study
Received Treatment
71
69
Overall Study
Provided Follow-up Data
71
66
Overall Study
COMPLETED
66
63
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
6
15

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Botox A
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incontinence
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
4
5
Overall Study
Consent only through 6 months
1
1
Overall Study
Insurance did not cover procedure
0
1
Overall Study
Physician Decision
0
3
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
1
5

Baseline Characteristics

Sling vs Botox for Mixed Incontinence

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Botox A
n=71 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=66 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
Total
n=137 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
59.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4 • n=5 Participants
59 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7 • n=7 Participants
59 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5 • n=5 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
71 Participants
n=5 Participants
66 Participants
n=7 Participants
137 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black/African American
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
10 Participants
n=7 Participants
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
55 Participants
n=5 Participants
54 Participants
n=7 Participants
109 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic/Latina
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic/Not Latina
56 Participants
n=5 Participants
59 Participants
n=7 Participants
115 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown/Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Menopausal Status, Customized
Not sure
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
Menopausal Status, Customized
Post-menopausal
56 Participants
n=5 Participants
49 Participants
n=7 Participants
105 Participants
n=5 Participants
Menopausal Status, Customized
Pre-menopausal
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
14 Participants
n=7 Participants
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
Education
4-Year College Degree
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
Education
Associate College Degree
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
Education
Graduate Degree
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
Education
High School/GED
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
29 Participants
n=7 Participants
48 Participants
n=5 Participants
Education
Less than High School
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
Education
Unknown/Not Reported
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
6 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Urogenital Distress Inventory is a standardized a measure of overactive bladder symptoms and health-related quality of life. The UDI scale has a range from 0 to 300 with higher scores indicating greater distress. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=71 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=66 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
UDI-LF Total Score Change From Baseline
3.0
-82.2 units on a scale
Interval -100.0 to -64.4
-84.6 units on a scale
Interval -101.0 to -68.3
UDI-LF Total Score Change From Baseline
6.0
-74.9 units on a scale
Interval -93.6 to -56.1
-89.1 units on a scale
Interval -104.7 to -73.5
UDI-LF Total Score Change From Baseline
9.0
-63.1 units on a scale
Interval -81.8 to -44.5
-85.6 units on a scale
Interval -102.7 to -68.6
UDI-LF Total Score Change From Baseline
12.0
-67.7 units on a scale
Interval -85.7 to -49.8
-89.2 units on a scale
Interval -107.5 to -70.9

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Urogenital Distress Inventory is a standardized a measure of overactive bladder symptoms and health-related quality of life. The UDI Stress subscale has a range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating greater distress. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=71 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=66 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
UDI-LF Stress Score Change From Baseline
3.0
-27.9 units on a scale
Interval -37.7 to -18.1
-46.4 units on a scale
Interval -55.4 to -37.3
UDI-LF Stress Score Change From Baseline
6.0
-30.2 units on a scale
Interval -39.6 to -20.9
-45.1 units on a scale
Interval -53.6 to -36.7
UDI-LF Stress Score Change From Baseline
9.0
-20.2 units on a scale
Interval -30.1 to -10.4
-42.3 units on a scale
Interval -53.1 to -31.4
UDI-LF Stress Score Change From Baseline
12.0
-24.3 units on a scale
Interval -34.6 to -14.1
-44.4 units on a scale
Interval -53.8 to -35.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Urogenital Distress Inventory is a standardized a measure of overactive bladder symptoms and health-related quality of life. The UDI Irritative subscale has a range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating greater distress. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=71 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=66 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
UDI-LF Irritative Score Change From Baseline
6.0
-35.8 units on a scale
Interval -43.3 to -28.3
-30.6 units on a scale
Interval -37.4 to -23.8
UDI-LF Irritative Score Change From Baseline
3.0
-40.8 units on a scale
Interval -47.3 to -34.2
-28.1 units on a scale
Interval -35.6 to -20.6
UDI-LF Irritative Score Change From Baseline
9.0
-32.7 units on a scale
Interval -40.5 to -25.0
-30.8 units on a scale
Interval -38.8 to -22.7
UDI-LF Irritative Score Change From Baseline
12.0
-31.6 units on a scale
Interval -39.0 to -24.2
-33 units on a scale
Interval -41.4 to -24.6

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Urogenital Distress Inventory is a standardized a measure of overactive bladder symptoms and health-related quality of life. The UDI Obstructive subscale has a range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating greater distress. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=71 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=66 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
UDI-LF Obstructive Score Change From Baseline
6.0
-8.9 units on a scale
Interval -13.8 to -4.0
-13.4 units on a scale
Interval -17.5 to -9.3
UDI-LF Obstructive Score Change From Baseline
9.0
-10.2 units on a scale
Interval -15.7 to -4.7
-12.6 units on a scale
Interval -17.0 to -8.2
UDI-LF Obstructive Score Change From Baseline
12.0
-11.8 units on a scale
Interval -16.4 to -7.2
-11.7 units on a scale
Interval -16.5 to -6.9
UDI-LF Obstructive Score Change From Baseline
3.0
-13.5 units on a scale
Interval -18.8 to -8.1
-10.1 units on a scale
Interval -14.6 to -5.7

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 3, 6, and 12 Months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries, average daily frequency of combined mixed stress/urge and non-categorized incontinence epsiodes. The outcome variable is computed as the difference in number of episodes at 3, 6, and 12 months and the number of episodes at baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=65 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=65 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
Average Daily Frequency of Combined Mixed Stress/Urge and Non-categorized Incontinence Epsiodes Change From Baseline
12.0
-0.2 incontinence episodes/day
Interval -0.6 to 0.2
-0.7 incontinence episodes/day
Interval -1.3 to -0.2
Average Daily Frequency of Combined Mixed Stress/Urge and Non-categorized Incontinence Epsiodes Change From Baseline
3.0
-0.4 incontinence episodes/day
Interval -0.9 to 0.0
-0.4 incontinence episodes/day
Interval -0.9 to 0.1
Average Daily Frequency of Combined Mixed Stress/Urge and Non-categorized Incontinence Epsiodes Change From Baseline
6.0
-0.2 incontinence episodes/day
Interval -0.5 to 0.1
-0.7 incontinence episodes/day
Interval -1.1 to -0.3

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 3, 6, and 12 Months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries, average daily frequency of all incontinence epsiodes. The outcome variable is computed as the difference in number of episodes at 3, 6, and 12 months and the number of episodes at baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=67 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=65 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
Average Daily Frequency of All Incontinence Epsiodes Change From Baseline
3.0
-4 incontinence episodes/day
Interval -4.9 to -3.2
-3.9 incontinence episodes/day
Interval -5.0 to -2.8
Average Daily Frequency of All Incontinence Epsiodes Change From Baseline
6.0
-3.2 incontinence episodes/day
Interval -3.9 to -2.4
-4.1 incontinence episodes/day
Interval -5.2 to -3.1
Average Daily Frequency of All Incontinence Epsiodes Change From Baseline
12.0
-3.6 incontinence episodes/day
Interval -4.7 to -2.6
-4.5 incontinence episodes/day
Interval -5.8 to -3.2

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 3, 6, and 12 Months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries, average daily frequency of diurnal voids. The outcome variable is computed as the difference in number of voids at 3, 6, and 12 months and the number of voids at baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=67 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=65 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
Average Daily Frequency of Diurnal Voids Change From Baseline
3.0
-1.2 diurnal voids/day
Interval -1.7 to -0.7
0 diurnal voids/day
Interval -0.6 to 0.6
Average Daily Frequency of Diurnal Voids Change From Baseline
6.0
-0.8 diurnal voids/day
Interval -1.3 to -0.2
-0.2 diurnal voids/day
Interval -0.9 to 0.6
Average Daily Frequency of Diurnal Voids Change From Baseline
12.0
-0.8 diurnal voids/day
Interval -1.5 to -0.2
-0.3 diurnal voids/day
Interval -1.0 to 0.4

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 3, 6, and 12 Months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries, average daily frequency of nocturnal voids. The outcome variable is computed as the difference in number of voids at 3, 6, and 12 months and the number of voids at baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=66 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=65 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
Average Daily Frequency of Nocturnal Voids Change From Baseline
3.0
-0.5 nocturnal voids/day
Interval -0.7 to -0.2
-0.5 nocturnal voids/day
Interval -0.8 to -0.1
Average Daily Frequency of Nocturnal Voids Change From Baseline
6.0
-0.3 nocturnal voids/day
Interval -0.6 to -0.1
-0.2 nocturnal voids/day
Interval -0.5 to 0.2
Average Daily Frequency of Nocturnal Voids Change From Baseline
12.0
-0.4 nocturnal voids/day
Interval -0.7 to -0.1
-0.4 nocturnal voids/day
Interval -0.9 to 0.0

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 3, 6, and 12 Months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries, average daily frequency of all voids. The outcome variable is computed as the difference in number of voids at 3, 6, and 12 months and the number of voids at baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=67 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=65 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
Average Daily Frequency of All Voids Change From Baseline
3.0
-1.6 voids/day
Interval -2.2 to -1.0
-0.4 voids/day
Interval -1.1 to 0.2
Average Daily Frequency of All Voids Change From Baseline
6.0
-1.1 voids/day
Interval -1.7 to -0.5
-0.4 voids/day
Interval -1.1 to 0.4
Average Daily Frequency of All Voids Change From Baseline
12.0
-1.2 voids/day
Interval -2.0 to -0.5
-0.7 voids/day
Interval -1.6 to 0.1

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 3, 6, and 12 Months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months, for participants with \>8 voids at baseline, the outcome is calculated as Yes=no more than 8 voids noted at the time point, No=Otherwise

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=43 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=40 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
Normalization of Voiding Frequency
6.0 · No
17 Participants
25 Participants
Normalization of Voiding Frequency
6.0 · Yes
18 Participants
10 Participants
Normalization of Voiding Frequency
12.0 · No
13 Participants
21 Participants
Normalization of Voiding Frequency
3.0 · No
17 Participants
24 Participants
Normalization of Voiding Frequency
3.0 · Yes
23 Participants
13 Participants
Normalization of Voiding Frequency
12.0 · Yes
24 Participants
12 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 3, 6, and 12 Months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months, the outcome is calculated as Yes=at least 50% reduction in the number of voids between the timepoint and baseline, No=Otherwise

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=67 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=65 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
Improvement of 50% or More in Voiding Frequency Post Baseline
3.0 · No
60 Participants
61 Participants
Improvement of 50% or More in Voiding Frequency Post Baseline
3.0 · Yes
1 Participants
0 Participants
Improvement of 50% or More in Voiding Frequency Post Baseline
6.0 · No
53 Participants
59 Participants
Improvement of 50% or More in Voiding Frequency Post Baseline
6.0 · Yes
0 Participants
1 Participants
Improvement of 50% or More in Voiding Frequency Post Baseline
12.0 · No
50 Participants
54 Participants
Improvement of 50% or More in Voiding Frequency Post Baseline
12.0 · Yes
3 Participants
2 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 3, 6, and 12 Months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months, the outcome is calculated as Yes=greater than baseline number of voids at the time point or with greater than 8 voids at the time point, No=Otherwise

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=67 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=65 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
Worsening Voiding Frequency Post Baseline
3.0 · No
49 Participants
39 Participants
Worsening Voiding Frequency Post Baseline
3.0 · Yes
12 Participants
22 Participants
Worsening Voiding Frequency Post Baseline
6.0 · No
36 Participants
32 Participants
Worsening Voiding Frequency Post Baseline
6.0 · Yes
17 Participants
28 Participants
Worsening Voiding Frequency Post Baseline
12.0 · No
37 Participants
34 Participants
Worsening Voiding Frequency Post Baseline
12.0 · Yes
16 Participants
22 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 0.5 Months (2 Weeks) and 3, 6, and 12 Months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

EQ-5D is a standardized instrument developed by the EuroQol Group as a measure of health-related quality of life. The visual analog scale (VAS) score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a better quality of life. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=68 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=64 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
Change From Baseline EQ-5D Visual Analog Score
3.0
2.2 units on a scale
Interval -2.1 to 6.5
6.7 units on a scale
Interval 1.9 to 11.5
Change From Baseline EQ-5D Visual Analog Score
6.0
1.5 units on a scale
Interval -2.9 to 5.9
7.1 units on a scale
Interval 3.0 to 11.3
Change From Baseline EQ-5D Visual Analog Score
9.0
1.4 units on a scale
Interval -3.6 to 6.4
6.9 units on a scale
Interval 2.8 to 11.1
Change From Baseline EQ-5D Visual Analog Score
0.5
3.1 units on a scale
Interval -0.6 to 6.8
9.3 units on a scale
Interval 4.7 to 13.8
Change From Baseline EQ-5D Visual Analog Score
12.0
1.6 units on a scale
Interval -2.7 to 5.8
7.4 units on a scale
Interval 2.3 to 12.5

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 0.5 Months (2 Weeks) and 3, 6, and 12 Months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

EQ-5D is a standardized instrument developed by the EuroQol Group as a measure of health-related quality of life. The index score ranges from 0 to 1 with higher scores indicating a better quality of life. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=70 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=64 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
Change From Baseline EQ-5D Index Score
0.5
0 units on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0 units on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Change From Baseline EQ-5D Index Score
3.0
0 units on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 0.1
0 units on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 0.1
Change From Baseline EQ-5D Index Score
6.0
0 units on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 0.1
0 units on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 0.1
Change From Baseline EQ-5D Index Score
9.0
0 units on a scale
Interval -0.1 to 0.0
0 units on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 0.1
Change From Baseline EQ-5D Index Score
12.0
0 units on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 0.1
0 units on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 0.1

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of health-related quality of life. The IIq-LF Physical Activity score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating worse impact. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=71 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=66 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
Change From Baseline IIQ-LF Physical Activity Score
3.0
-19.5 units on a scale
Interval -27.1 to -12.0
-20.3 units on a scale
Interval -28.0 to -12.6
Change From Baseline IIQ-LF Physical Activity Score
6.0
-20.7 units on a scale
Interval -26.2 to -15.2
-21.1 units on a scale
Interval -28.5 to -13.8
Change From Baseline IIQ-LF Physical Activity Score
9.0
-16.9 units on a scale
Interval -23.2 to -10.6
-21.2 units on a scale
Interval -29.0 to -13.4
Change From Baseline IIQ-LF Physical Activity Score
12.0
-18.1 units on a scale
Interval -24.5 to -11.7
-25.3 units on a scale
Interval -32.9 to -17.8

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of health-related quality of life. The IIq-LF Travel score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating worse impact. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=71 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=66 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
Change From Baseline IIQ-LF Travel Score
12.0
-19.7 units on a scale
Interval -26.2 to -13.3
-28.1 units on a scale
Interval -36.7 to -19.6
Change From Baseline IIQ-LF Travel Score
3.0
-19.6 units on a scale
Interval -27.6 to -11.7
-22.2 units on a scale
Interval -30.5 to -13.9
Change From Baseline IIQ-LF Travel Score
6.0
-23.3 units on a scale
Interval -29.4 to -17.1
-25.4 units on a scale
Interval -33.7 to -17.1
Change From Baseline IIQ-LF Travel Score
9.0
-14.3 units on a scale
Interval -21.0 to -7.7
-25.8 units on a scale
Interval -34.5 to -17.0

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of health-related quality of life. The IIq-LF Social Relationship score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating worse impact. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=71 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=66 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
Change From Baseline IIQ-LF Social/Relationships Score
3.0
-15.7 units on a scale
Interval -22.6 to -8.7
-18.9 units on a scale
Interval -26.8 to -11.0
Change From Baseline IIQ-LF Social/Relationships Score
6.0
-16.9 units on a scale
Interval -22.8 to -11.0
-20.3 units on a scale
Interval -27.8 to -12.8
Change From Baseline IIQ-LF Social/Relationships Score
9.0
-10.3 units on a scale
Interval -15.8 to -4.7
-19.9 units on a scale
Interval -27.8 to -12.0
Change From Baseline IIQ-LF Social/Relationships Score
12.0
-15.7 units on a scale
Interval -21.8 to -9.5
-22.3 units on a scale
Interval -30.7 to -13.9

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of health-related quality of life. The IIq-LF Emotional Health score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating worse impact. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=71 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=66 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
Change From Baseline IIQ-LF Emotional Health Score
3.0
-17.7 units on a scale
Interval -24.8 to -10.6
-19.5 units on a scale
Interval -26.0 to -12.9
Change From Baseline IIQ-LF Emotional Health Score
6.0
-20.2 units on a scale
Interval -26.5 to -13.9
-21.5 units on a scale
Interval -28.3 to -14.8
Change From Baseline IIQ-LF Emotional Health Score
9.0
-12.5 units on a scale
Interval -19.4 to -5.6
-19.7 units on a scale
Interval -26.0 to -13.5
Change From Baseline IIQ-LF Emotional Health Score
12.0
-17.5 units on a scale
Interval -24.5 to -10.5
-26.8 units on a scale
Interval -35.2 to -18.4

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of health-related quality of life. The IIq-LF Total score ranges from 0 to 400 with higher scores indicating worse impact. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=71 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=66 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
Change From Baseline IIQ-LF Total Score
3.0
-72.9 units on a scale
Interval -99.5 to -46.2
-80.8 units on a scale
Interval -108.4 to -53.2
Change From Baseline IIQ-LF Total Score
6.0
-81.1 units on a scale
Interval -101.3 to -60.9
-88.4 units on a scale
Interval -115.4 to -61.4
Change From Baseline IIQ-LF Total Score
9.0
-54 units on a scale
Interval -75.7 to -32.2
-86.6 units on a scale
Interval -113.9 to -59.3
Change From Baseline IIQ-LF Total Score
12.0
-71 units on a scale
Interval -93.4 to -48.6
-102.5 units on a scale
Interval -133.1 to -71.9

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of overactive bladder symptoms and health-related quality of life. The OABq-LF Symptom Severity score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher score indicating worse quality of life. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=71 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=66 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
Change From Baseline OABq-LF Symptom Severity Score
3.0
-41 units on a scale
Interval -47.9 to -34.0
-28.7 units on a scale
Interval -36.6 to -20.7
Change From Baseline OABq-LF Symptom Severity Score
6.0
-34.3 units on a scale
Interval -41.0 to -27.6
-32 units on a scale
Interval -39.6 to -24.3
Change From Baseline OABq-LF Symptom Severity Score
9.0
-26.7 units on a scale
Interval -33.9 to -19.4
-28.8 units on a scale
Interval -37.5 to -20.1
Change From Baseline OABq-LF Symptom Severity Score
12.0
-30.6 units on a scale
Interval -38.3 to -22.8
-36.1 units on a scale
Interval -44.3 to -27.9

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of overactive bladder symptoms and health-related quality of life. The OABq-LF Coping score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher score indicating better quality of life. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=71 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=66 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
Change From Baseline OABq-LF Coping Score
3.0
29.7 units on a scale
Interval 21.7 to 37.8
29.5 units on a scale
Interval 21.9 to 37.1
Change From Baseline OABq-LF Coping Score
6.0
24.3 units on a scale
Interval 17.2 to 31.4
29.8 units on a scale
Interval 22.0 to 37.5
Change From Baseline OABq-LF Coping Score
9.0
18.8 units on a scale
Interval 11.8 to 25.8
26.4 units on a scale
Interval 18.0 to 34.9
Change From Baseline OABq-LF Coping Score
12.0
24.7 units on a scale
Interval 17.9 to 31.5
34.4 units on a scale
Interval 25.6 to 43.2

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of overactive bladder symptoms and health-related quality of life. The OABq-LF Concern score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher score indicating better quality of life. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=71 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=66 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
Change From Baseline OABq-LF Concern Score
3.0
32.3 units on a scale
Interval 24.6 to 40.0
29.6 units on a scale
Interval 22.3 to 36.9
Change From Baseline OABq-LF Concern Score
6.0
26.1 units on a scale
Interval 19.7 to 32.5
31.2 units on a scale
Interval 23.7 to 38.7
Change From Baseline OABq-LF Concern Score
9.0
16.7 units on a scale
Interval 9.2 to 24.2
28.2 units on a scale
Interval 20.3 to 36.1
Change From Baseline OABq-LF Concern Score
12.0
24.5 units on a scale
Interval 16.8 to 32.2
35.6 units on a scale
Interval 27.1 to 44.1

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of overactive bladder symptoms and health-related quality of life. The OABq-LF Sleep score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher score indicating better quality of life. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=71 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=66 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
Change From Baseline OABq-LF Sleep Score
3.0
23.8 units on a scale
Interval 16.3 to 31.3
20.7 units on a scale
Interval 12.4 to 29.0
Change From Baseline OABq-LF Sleep Score
6.0
21.6 units on a scale
Interval 14.4 to 28.8
18.4 units on a scale
Interval 10.8 to 25.9
Change From Baseline OABq-LF Sleep Score
9.0
15.6 units on a scale
Interval 8.4 to 22.7
19 units on a scale
Interval 11.4 to 26.7
Change From Baseline OABq-LF Sleep Score
12.0
16.8 units on a scale
Interval 9.3 to 24.3
19.8 units on a scale
Interval 9.7 to 29.8

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of overactive bladder symptoms and health-related quality of life. The OABq-LF Social score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher score indicating better quality of life. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=71 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=66 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
Change From Baseline OABq-LF Social Score
3.0
15.1 units on a scale
Interval 8.7 to 21.5
20 units on a scale
Interval 13.0 to 27.0
Change From Baseline OABq-LF Social Score
6.0
11.8 units on a scale
Interval 5.5 to 18.0
19.6 units on a scale
Interval 13.4 to 25.8
Change From Baseline OABq-LF Social Score
9.0
4.8 units on a scale
Interval -0.5 to 10.1
18.4 units on a scale
Interval 10.9 to 26.0
Change From Baseline OABq-LF Social Score
12.0
11 units on a scale
Interval 4.7 to 17.4
21 units on a scale
Interval 13.6 to 28.4

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Overactive Bladder Questionnaire-Long Form is a standardized a measure of overactive bladder symptoms and health-related quality of life. The OABq-LF HRQL score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher score indicating better quality of life. The change from baseline outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=71 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=66 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
Change From Baseline OABq-LF HRQL Total Score
3.0
26.4 units on a scale
Interval 19.8 to 33.0
25.9 units on a scale
Interval 19.2 to 32.6
Change From Baseline OABq-LF HRQL Total Score
6.0
21.8 units on a scale
Interval 16.0 to 27.5
25.9 units on a scale
Interval 19.4 to 32.3
Change From Baseline OABq-LF HRQL Total Score
9.0
14.8 units on a scale
Interval 9.2 to 20.4
23.9 units on a scale
Interval 16.8 to 30.9
Change From Baseline OABq-LF HRQL Total Score
12.0
20.3 units on a scale
Interval 14.3 to 26.4
29.1 units on a scale
Interval 21.4 to 36.9

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Overactive Bladder Satisfaction with Treatment Questionnaire is a standardized a measure of satisfaction with treatment for overactive bladder symptoms. The OAB-SATq Satisfaction score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating higher satisfaction.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=71 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=66 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
OAB-SATq-LF Satisfaction Score
3.0
65.7 units on a scale
Interval 58.7 to 72.7
60.1 units on a scale
Interval 51.9 to 68.3
OAB-SATq-LF Satisfaction Score
6.0
64.5 units on a scale
Interval 57.6 to 71.3
60.3 units on a scale
Interval 52.5 to 68.2
OAB-SATq-LF Satisfaction Score
9.0
64.4 units on a scale
Interval 57.5 to 71.2
57.5 units on a scale
Interval 48.8 to 66.2
OAB-SATq-LF Satisfaction Score
12.0
60.4 units on a scale
Interval 53.0 to 67.8
56.3 units on a scale
Interval 46.8 to 65.9

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Overactive Bladder Satisfaction with Treatment Questionnaire is a standardized a measure of satisfaction with treatment for overactive bladder symptoms. The OAB-SATq Side Effect score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating fewer side effects.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=71 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=66 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
OAB-SATq-LF Side Effects Score
3.0
91.9 units on a scale
Interval 87.5 to 96.4
93.5 units on a scale
Interval 89.7 to 97.3
OAB-SATq-LF Side Effects Score
6.0
89 units on a scale
Interval 83.5 to 94.5
87.4 units on a scale
Interval 81.5 to 93.4
OAB-SATq-LF Side Effects Score
9.0
90.2 units on a scale
Interval 84.4 to 95.9
86.3 units on a scale
Interval 79.7 to 92.9
OAB-SATq-LF Side Effects Score
12.0
91.8 units on a scale
Interval 87.0 to 96.6
88.5 units on a scale
Interval 82.2 to 94.8

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Overactive Bladder Satisfaction with Treatment Questionnaire is a standardized a measure of satisfaction with treatment for overactive bladder symptoms. The OAB-SATq Endorsement score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating greater endorsement.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=71 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=66 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
OAB-SATq-LF Endorsement Score
3.0
74.3 units on a scale
Interval 67.8 to 80.9
67.9 units on a scale
Interval 59.8 to 76.0
OAB-SATq-LF Endorsement Score
6.0
72 units on a scale
Interval 64.4 to 79.6
68.3 units on a scale
Interval 60.5 to 76.0
OAB-SATq-LF Endorsement Score
9.0
77.7 units on a scale
Interval 70.5 to 84.9
73.6 units on a scale
Interval 65.6 to 81.7
OAB-SATq-LF Endorsement Score
12.0
71.7 units on a scale
Interval 63.8 to 79.5
68.2 units on a scale
Interval 59.0 to 77.3

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Overactive Bladder Satisfaction with Treatment Questionnaire is a standardized a measure of satisfaction with treatment for overactive bladder symptoms. The OAB-SATq Convenience score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating greater convenience.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=71 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=66 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
OAB-SATq-LF Convenience Score
3.0
64.2 units on a scale
Interval 57.6 to 70.7
64.1 units on a scale
Interval 56.7 to 71.4
OAB-SATq-LF Convenience Score
6.0
66.5 units on a scale
Interval 59.3 to 73.6
66.8 units on a scale
Interval 60.0 to 73.5
OAB-SATq-LF Convenience Score
9.0
67.6 units on a scale
Interval 62.5 to 72.8
64.7 units on a scale
Interval 58.1 to 71.3
OAB-SATq-LF Convenience Score
12.0
65.6 units on a scale
Interval 59.7 to 71.4
66.3 units on a scale
Interval 58.5 to 74.2

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Overactive Bladder Satisfaction with Treatment Questionnaire is a standardized a measure of satisfaction with treatment for overactive bladder symptoms. The preference score is a binary \[yes/no\] indicator as to whether a subject indicated slight or definite preference for the treatment among women that have had previous treatment for overactive bladder. The outcome is the percentage of participants that prefer the current treatment to previous treatments.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=71 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=66 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
OAB-SAT-q Preference Indicator
3.0 · Unknown
16 Participants
24 Participants
OAB-SAT-q Preference Indicator
3.0 · No
5 Participants
5 Participants
OAB-SAT-q Preference Indicator
3.0 · Yes
47 Participants
35 Participants
OAB-SAT-q Preference Indicator
6.0 · Unknown
17 Participants
21 Participants
OAB-SAT-q Preference Indicator
6.0 · No
6 Participants
8 Participants
OAB-SAT-q Preference Indicator
6.0 · Yes
41 Participants
36 Participants
OAB-SAT-q Preference Indicator
9.0 · Unknown
17 Participants
15 Participants
OAB-SAT-q Preference Indicator
9.0 · No
5 Participants
5 Participants
OAB-SAT-q Preference Indicator
9.0 · Yes
33 Participants
36 Participants
OAB-SAT-q Preference Indicator
12.0 · Unknown
15 Participants
19 Participants
OAB-SAT-q Preference Indicator
12.0 · No
10 Participants
7 Participants
OAB-SAT-q Preference Indicator
12.0 · Yes
36 Participants
34 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) is a patient-reported measure of perceived improvement with treatment, as assessed on a scale of 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). Included here are participants who had improvement as indicated by a rating of 1 (very much better), 2 (much better).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=71 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=66 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
PGI-I Score Binary Improvement Indicator
3.0 · No
28 Participants
30 Participants
PGI-I Score Binary Improvement Indicator
3.0 · Yes
40 Participants
34 Participants
PGI-I Score Binary Improvement Indicator
6.0 · No
25 Participants
33 Participants
PGI-I Score Binary Improvement Indicator
6.0 · Yes
39 Participants
32 Participants
PGI-I Score Binary Improvement Indicator
9.0 · No
22 Participants
25 Participants
PGI-I Score Binary Improvement Indicator
9.0 · Yes
34 Participants
31 Participants
PGI-I Score Binary Improvement Indicator
12.0 · No
35 Participants
31 Participants
PGI-I Score Binary Improvement Indicator
12.0 · Yes
26 Participants
29 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S) is a patient-reported measure of perceived severity of condition, as assessed on a scale of 1 (Normal) to 4 (Severe). Included here are participants who reported Normal or Mild severity as indicated by a rating of 1 or 2.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=71 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=66 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
PGI-S Score Binary Condition Severity Indicator
Baseline · No
57 Participants
53 Participants
PGI-S Score Binary Condition Severity Indicator
Baseline · Yes
13 Participants
10 Participants
PGI-S Score Binary Condition Severity Indicator
3.0 · No
29 Participants
30 Participants
PGI-S Score Binary Condition Severity Indicator
3.0 · Yes
39 Participants
34 Participants
PGI-S Score Binary Condition Severity Indicator
6.0 · No
29 Participants
29 Participants
PGI-S Score Binary Condition Severity Indicator
6.0 · Yes
35 Participants
36 Participants
PGI-S Score Binary Condition Severity Indicator
9.0 · No
27 Participants
24 Participants
PGI-S Score Binary Condition Severity Indicator
9.0 · Yes
29 Participants
32 Participants
PGI-S Score Binary Condition Severity Indicator
12.0 · No
28 Participants
24 Participants
PGI-S Score Binary Condition Severity Indicator
12.0 · Yes
33 Participants
36 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 3, 6, 9, and 12 Months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

Patient GLobal Impression of Symptom Control(PGSC) is a patient-reported measure of perceived adequate symptom control, as assessed on a scale of 1 (disagree strongly) to 5 (agree strongly). Included here are participants who had adequate control as indicated by a rating of 5 (agree strongly) or 4 (agree).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=71 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=66 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
PGSC Score Binary Improvement Indicator
3.0 · No
32 Participants
28 Participants
PGSC Score Binary Improvement Indicator
3.0 · Yes
36 Participants
36 Participants
PGSC Score Binary Improvement Indicator
6.0 · No
30 Participants
33 Participants
PGSC Score Binary Improvement Indicator
6.0 · Yes
34 Participants
32 Participants
PGSC Score Binary Improvement Indicator
9.0 · No
28 Participants
27 Participants
PGSC Score Binary Improvement Indicator
9.0 · Yes
28 Participants
29 Participants
PGSC Score Binary Improvement Indicator
12.0 · No
33 Participants
24 Participants
PGSC Score Binary Improvement Indicator
12.0 · Yes
29 Participants
36 Participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised measures the impact of incontinence symptoms on sexual function and satisfaction. The Not Sexually Active-Partner Related (NSA-PR) ranges from 1 to 4 with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and the score at baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=33 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=35 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR NSA-PR Score
3.0
0.3 units on a scale
Interval -0.1 to 0.7
0.3 units on a scale
Interval 0.1 to 0.5
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR NSA-PR Score
6.0
0 units on a scale
Interval -0.4 to 0.4
0.3 units on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 0.6
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR NSA-PR Score
9.0
0.1 units on a scale
Interval -0.3 to 0.6
0.1 units on a scale
Interval -0.3 to 0.5
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR NSA-PR Score
12.0
0.3 units on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 0.6
0.1 units on a scale
Interval -0.3 to 0.4

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised measures the impact of incontinence symptoms on sexual function and satisfaction. The Not Sexually Active-Condition Specific (NSA-CS) ranges from 1 to 4 with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and the score at baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=32 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=34 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR NSA-CS Score
3.0
-0.2 units on a scale
Interval -0.5 to 0.0
-0.1 units on a scale
Interval -0.5 to 0.2
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR NSA-CS Score
6.0
-0.2 units on a scale
Interval -0.7 to 0.2
0 units on a scale
Interval -0.3 to 0.4
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR NSA-CS Score
9.0
-0.2 units on a scale
Interval -0.4 to 0.1
-0.1 units on a scale
Interval -0.4 to 0.2
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR NSA-CS Score
12.0
0.2 units on a scale
Interval -0.1 to 0.6
-0.3 units on a scale
Interval -0.7 to 0.2

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised measures the impact of incontinence symptoms on sexual function and satisfaction. The Not Sexually Active-Global Quality Rating (NSA-GQA) ranges from 1 to 4.5 with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and the score at baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=32 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=34 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR NSA-GQA Score
3.0
-0.1 units on a scale
Interval -0.5 to 0.2
-0.3 units on a scale
Interval -0.6 to 0.1
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR NSA-GQA Score
6.0
-0.3 units on a scale
Interval -0.8 to 0.2
-0.3 units on a scale
Interval -0.8 to 0.1
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR NSA-GQA Score
9.0
-0.2 units on a scale
Interval -0.8 to 0.4
-0.4 units on a scale
Interval -0.8 to -0.1
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR NSA-GQA Score
12.0
-0.4 units on a scale
Interval -0.9 to 0.1
-0.2 units on a scale
Interval -0.7 to 0.2

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised measures the impact of incontinence symptoms on sexual function and satisfaction. The Not Sexually Active-Condition Impact (NSA-CI) ranges from 1 to 4 with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and the score at baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=32 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=35 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR NSA-CI Score
3.0
-0.3 units on a scale
Interval -0.6 to 0.0
-0.4 units on a scale
Interval -0.8 to 0.0
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR NSA-CI Score
6.0
-0.3 units on a scale
Interval -0.7 to 0.1
-0.3 units on a scale
Interval -0.8 to 0.1
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR NSA-CI Score
9.0
-0.3 units on a scale
Interval -0.8 to 0.1
-0.2 units on a scale
Interval -0.7 to 0.2
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR NSA-CI Score
12.0
-0.2 units on a scale
Interval -0.5 to 0.1
-0.4 units on a scale
Interval -0.8 to 0.0

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised measures the impact of incontinence symptoms on sexual function and satisfaction. The Sexually Active-Arousal Orgasm (SA-AO) ranges from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and the score at baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=31 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=28 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR SA-AO Score
12.0
0 units on a scale
Interval -0.3 to 0.3
0 units on a scale
Interval -0.3 to 0.2
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR SA-AO Score
3.0
0 units on a scale
Interval -0.1 to 0.2
-0.1 units on a scale
Interval -0.5 to 0.3
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR SA-AO Score
6.0
0 units on a scale
Interval -0.2 to 0.2
0.1 units on a scale
Interval -0.2 to 0.3
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR SA-AO Score
9.0
-0.1 units on a scale
Interval -0.4 to 0.2
0.1 units on a scale
Interval -0.2 to 0.3

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised measures the impact of incontinence symptoms on sexual function and satisfaction. The Sexually Active-Partner Related (SA-PR) ranges from 1 to 4 with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and the score at baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=28 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=26 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR SA-PR Score
3.0
0 units on a scale
Interval -0.3 to 0.2
0 units on a scale
Interval -0.3 to 0.2
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR SA-PR Score
6.0
0 units on a scale
Interval -0.2 to 0.3
0.1 units on a scale
Interval -0.2 to 0.5
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR SA-PR Score
9.0
-0.1 units on a scale
Interval -0.3 to 0.2
-0.3 units on a scale
Interval -0.6 to 0.0
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR SA-PR Score
12.0
-0.1 units on a scale
Interval -0.5 to 0.2
-0.1 units on a scale
Interval -0.4 to 0.1

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised measures the impact of incontinence symptoms on sexual function and satisfaction. The Sexually Active-Condition Specific (SA-CS) ranges from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and the score at baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=30 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=25 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR SA-CS Score
9.0
0.3 units on a scale
Interval -0.1 to 0.6
0.2 units on a scale
Interval -0.4 to 0.8
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR SA-CS Score
12.0
0.3 units on a scale
Interval -0.1 to 0.6
0.4 units on a scale
Interval -0.2 to 1.1
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR SA-CS Score
3.0
0.5 units on a scale
Interval 0.2 to 0.7
0.5 units on a scale
Interval 0.1 to 0.8
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR SA-CS Score
6.0
0.3 units on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 0.6
0.6 units on a scale
Interval 0.1 to 1.0

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised measures the impact of incontinence symptoms on sexual function and satisfaction. The Sexually Active-Global Quality Rating (SA-GQR) ranges from 1 to 4.75 with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and the score at baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=30 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=28 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR SA-GQR Score
6.0
0 units on a scale
Interval -0.3 to 0.4
0.2 units on a scale
Interval -0.2 to 0.5
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR SA-GQR Score
9.0
-0.1 units on a scale
Interval -0.6 to 0.3
-0.4 units on a scale
Interval -0.9 to 0.1
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR SA-GQR Score
3.0
0 units on a scale
Interval -0.4 to 0.3
0.3 units on a scale
Interval -0.1 to 0.7
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR SA-GQR Score
12.0
-0.1 units on a scale
Interval -0.4 to 0.3
-0.2 units on a scale
Interval -0.5 to 0.2

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised measures the impact of incontinence symptoms on sexual function and satisfaction. The Sexually Active-Condition Impact (SA-CI) ranges from 1 to 4 with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and the score at baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=31 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=28 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR SA-CI Score
3.0
0.4 units on a scale
Interval 0.1 to 0.7
0.6 units on a scale
Interval 0.3 to 1.0
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR SA-CI Score
6.0
0.2 units on a scale
Interval -0.1 to 0.5
0.8 units on a scale
Interval 0.4 to 1.1
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR SA-CI Score
9.0
0.3 units on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 0.6
0.3 units on a scale
Interval -0.1 to 0.7
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR SA-CI Score
12.0
0.3 units on a scale
Interval -0.1 to 0.6
0.9 units on a scale
Interval 0.5 to 1.4

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised measures the impact of incontinence symptoms on sexual function and satisfaction. The Sexually Active-Desire (SA-D) ranges from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and the score at baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=30 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=28 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR SA-D Score
3.0
0.1 units on a scale
Interval -0.1 to 0.4
0.1 units on a scale
Interval -0.2 to 0.3
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR SA-D Score
6.0
0 units on a scale
Interval -0.2 to 0.1
-0.1 units on a scale
Interval -0.3 to 0.1
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR SA-D Score
9.0
0 units on a scale
Interval -0.3 to 0.2
0.1 units on a scale
Interval -0.2 to 0.4
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR SA-D Score
12.0
-0.2 units on a scale
Interval -0.5 to 0.1
0 units on a scale
Interval -0.3 to 0.4

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

The Pelvic Organ Prolapse Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-revised measures the impact of incontinence symptoms on sexual function and satisfaction. The Sexually Active-Average (SA-AVG) ranges from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating greater sexual function. The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and the score at baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=31 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=28 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR SA Average Score
12.0
0 units on a scale
Interval -0.2 to 0.2
0.2 units on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 0.4
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR SA Average Score
3.0
0.2 units on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 0.3
0.2 units on a scale
Interval 0.1 to 0.4
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR SA Average Score
6.0
0.1 units on a scale
Interval -0.1 to 0.2
0.3 units on a scale
Interval 0.1 to 0.5
Change From Baseline PISQ-IR SA Average Score
9.0
0 units on a scale
Interval -0.1 to 0.2
0 units on a scale
Interval -0.2 to 0.2

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 0.5 Months (2 Weeks) and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains of functional health and wellbeing: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for physical function domain was an average of the individual question scores of this domain, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=71 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=66 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
SF-36 Physical Functioning Score
0.5
12.9 units on a scale
Interval 6.3 to 19.5
12.2 units on a scale
Interval 6.3 to 18.1
SF-36 Physical Functioning Score
3.0
10.9 units on a scale
Interval 4.8 to 17.0
13.9 units on a scale
Interval 7.1 to 20.6
SF-36 Physical Functioning Score
6.0
10.5 units on a scale
Interval 4.6 to 16.3
14 units on a scale
Interval 7.1 to 20.9
SF-36 Physical Functioning Score
9.0
8.9 units on a scale
Interval 1.8 to 15.9
9.7 units on a scale
Interval 3.6 to 15.7
SF-36 Physical Functioning Score
12.0
10 units on a scale
Interval 4.1 to 15.9
13.3 units on a scale
Interval 6.5 to 20.0

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 0.5 Months (2 Weeks) and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains of functional health and wellbeing: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for physical role limitations domain was an average of the individual question scores of this domain, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=71 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=66 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
SF-36 Role Physical Score
12.0
8.6 units on a scale
Interval -1.2 to 18.4
4.9 units on a scale
Interval -7.3 to 17.1
SF-36 Role Physical Score
0.5
14.1 units on a scale
Interval 3.1 to 25.2
-1.2 units on a scale
Interval -12.7 to 10.3
SF-36 Role Physical Score
3.0
12.5 units on a scale
Interval 2.2 to 22.8
11.3 units on a scale
Interval 1.6 to 21.1
SF-36 Role Physical Score
6.0
12.3 units on a scale
Interval 1.7 to 22.9
12.1 units on a scale
Interval 2.0 to 22.2
SF-36 Role Physical Score
9.0
3.6 units on a scale
Interval -8.3 to 15.6
7.7 units on a scale
Interval -4.3 to 19.8

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 0.5 Months (2 Weeks) and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains of functional health and wellbeing: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for bodily pain domain was an average of the individual question scores of this domain, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=71 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=66 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
SF-36 Bodily Pain Score
0.5
2.6 units on a scale
Interval -3.0 to 8.2
2.4 units on a scale
Interval -3.6 to 8.5
SF-36 Bodily Pain Score
3.0
5.1 units on a scale
Interval -0.6 to 10.9
0.6 units on a scale
Interval -5.4 to 6.5
SF-36 Bodily Pain Score
12.0
-0.8 units on a scale
Interval -6.9 to 5.2
6.4 units on a scale
Interval 0.1 to 12.7
SF-36 Bodily Pain Score
6.0
-0.4 units on a scale
Interval -6.3 to 5.5
0.8 units on a scale
Interval -5.1 to 6.6
SF-36 Bodily Pain Score
9.0
-1.6 units on a scale
Interval -8.1 to 5.0
4.2 units on a scale
Interval -1.8 to 10.2

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 0.5 Months (2 Weeks) and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains of functional health and wellbeing: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for general health domain was an average of the individual question scores of this domain, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=71 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=66 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
SF-36 General Health Score
9.0
-1.6 units on a scale
Interval -6.0 to 2.7
-2.2 units on a scale
Interval -6.5 to 2.2
SF-36 General Health Score
0.5
5.2 units on a scale
Interval 1.9 to 8.4
2.5 units on a scale
Interval -1.2 to 6.3
SF-36 General Health Score
3.0
2.4 units on a scale
Interval -1.3 to 6.0
-1.7 units on a scale
Interval -5.8 to 2.5
SF-36 General Health Score
6.0
2.6 units on a scale
Interval -1.4 to 6.7
-0.6 units on a scale
Interval -4.4 to 3.2
SF-36 General Health Score
12.0
-1.1 units on a scale
Interval -5.3 to 3.1
-0.3 units on a scale
Interval -4.8 to 4.1

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 0.5 Months (2 Weeks) and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains of functional health and wellbeing: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for vitality domain was an average of the individual question scores of this domain, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=71 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=66 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
SF-36 Vitality Score
3.0
3.5 units on a scale
Interval -1.7 to 8.6
5.3 units on a scale
Interval 0.6 to 10.1
SF-36 Vitality Score
0.5
6.1 units on a scale
Interval 1.0 to 11.1
6.5 units on a scale
Interval 1.8 to 11.3
SF-36 Vitality Score
6.0
4.7 units on a scale
Interval -0.1 to 9.5
3.4 units on a scale
Interval -1.2 to 8.1
SF-36 Vitality Score
9.0
-0.8 units on a scale
Interval -5.8 to 4.2
-1.3 units on a scale
Interval -6.5 to 4.0
SF-36 Vitality Score
12.0
2.7 units on a scale
Interval -2.3 to 7.7
0.4 units on a scale
Interval -5.2 to 6.1

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 0.5 Months (2 Weeks) and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains of functional health and wellbeing: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for social functioning domain was an average of the individual question scores of this domain, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=71 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=66 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
SF-36 Social Functioning Score
9.0
4.5 units on a scale
Interval -1.3 to 10.4
12.3 units on a scale
Interval 5.0 to 19.5
SF-36 Social Functioning Score
12.0
6.4 units on a scale
Interval -0.4 to 13.1
7.1 units on a scale
Interval 0.3 to 13.8
SF-36 Social Functioning Score
0.5
10.9 units on a scale
Interval 5.0 to 16.7
9.1 units on a scale
Interval 3.2 to 15.0
SF-36 Social Functioning Score
3.0
11 units on a scale
Interval 4.9 to 17.2
5.7 units on a scale
Interval -1.4 to 12.7
SF-36 Social Functioning Score
6.0
11.5 units on a scale
Interval 5.6 to 17.4
6.6 units on a scale
Interval 0.1 to 13.2

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 0.5 Months (2 Weeks) and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains of functional health and wellbeing: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for emotional role limitation domain was an average of the individual question scores of this domain, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=71 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=66 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
SF-36 Emotional Role Limitations Score
12.0
9.8 units on a scale
Interval 1.8 to 17.8
13.3 units on a scale
Interval 2.0 to 24.7
SF-36 Emotional Role Limitations Score
0.5
16.4 units on a scale
Interval 5.8 to 27.0
12.2 units on a scale
Interval 0.9 to 23.5
SF-36 Emotional Role Limitations Score
3.0
19.9 units on a scale
Interval 9.1 to 30.6
14.6 units on a scale
Interval 3.0 to 26.2
SF-36 Emotional Role Limitations Score
6.0
12.7 units on a scale
Interval 4.7 to 20.7
12.5 units on a scale
Interval 0.9 to 24.1
SF-36 Emotional Role Limitations Score
9.0
13 units on a scale
Interval 1.9 to 24.2
7.4 units on a scale
Interval -3.3 to 18.2

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 0.5 Months (2 Weeks) and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains of functional health and wellbeing: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for social functioning domain was an average of the individual question scores of this domain, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=71 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=66 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
SF-36 Mental Health Score
0.5
0.2 units on a scale
Interval -3.7 to 4.1
5 units on a scale
Interval 1.3 to 8.7
SF-36 Mental Health Score
3.0
0.8 units on a scale
Interval -3.1 to 4.7
1.8 units on a scale
Interval -3.4 to 7.0
SF-36 Mental Health Score
6.0
-2 units on a scale
Interval -6.4 to 2.5
1 units on a scale
Interval -3.5 to 5.6
SF-36 Mental Health Score
9.0
-2.4 units on a scale
Interval -6.5 to 1.8
0.6 units on a scale
Interval -4.2 to 5.5
SF-36 Mental Health Score
12.0
-0.7 units on a scale
Interval -4.8 to 3.3
1.3 units on a scale
Interval -3.7 to 6.2

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 0.5 Months (2 Weeks) and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains of functional health and well-being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The physical composite score is a normalized t-score which combines the all 8 domains with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 (higher scores indicate greater physical function). A t-score below 50 is a good all-around cutoff for detecting physical condition (per the Ware manual). The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 2 weeks and 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=71 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=66 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
SF-36 Physical Composite Score
6.0
3 T-score
Interval 0.7 to 5.3
3.1 T-score
Interval 0.7 to 5.4
SF-36 Physical Composite Score
9.0
1.1 T-score
Interval -1.6 to 3.8
2.2 T-score
Interval -0.5 to 4.9
SF-36 Physical Composite Score
12.0
2 T-score
Interval -0.2 to 4.2
2.8 T-score
Interval 0.5 to 5.2
SF-36 Physical Composite Score
0.5
3.9 T-score
Interval 1.7 to 6.2
1.5 T-score
Interval -0.6 to 3.6
SF-36 Physical Composite Score
3.0
3.1 T-score
Interval 0.8 to 5.3
2.6 T-score
Interval 0.2 to 5.0

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 0.5 Months (2 Weeks) and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains of functional health and well-being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The mental composite score is a normalized t-score which combines the all 8 domains with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 (higher scores indicate greater mental health). A t-score below 52 is a well-documented cutoff for detecting depression (per the Ware manual). The outcome is calculated as the difference in score at 3, 6, or 12 months and the score at baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=71 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=66 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
SF-36 Mental Composite Score
0.5
2.2 T-score
Interval 0.0 to 4.5
3.5 T-score
Interval 1.2 to 5.8
SF-36 Mental Composite Score
6.0
1.6 T-score
Interval -0.8 to 3.9
1.2 T-score
Interval -1.2 to 3.6
SF-36 Mental Composite Score
9.0
0.6 T-score
Interval -1.9 to 3.1
1 T-score
Interval -1.8 to 3.7
SF-36 Mental Composite Score
12.0
0.9 T-score
Interval -1.3 to 3.1
1.2 T-score
Interval -1.7 to 4.1
SF-36 Mental Composite Score
3.0
2.7 T-score
Interval 0.1 to 5.4
1.9 T-score
Interval -0.8 to 4.5

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, 3, 6, and 12 Months

Population: An intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis which included all eligible participants who were randomized and who provided outcome data after baseline was performed. Data that was collected after a participant was retreated for urinary incontinence was excluded from the analysis.

Postvoid Residual Volume

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Botox A
n=71 Participants
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=66 Participants
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
Postvoid Residual Volume
Baseline
20.4 mL
Interval 14.6 to 26.3
22.7 mL
Interval 15.9 to 29.5
Postvoid Residual Volume
0.5
49.4 mL
Interval 33.8 to 65.1
26.5 mL
Interval 19.5 to 33.5
Postvoid Residual Volume
3.0
39.4 mL
Interval 25.0 to 53.7
27.2 mL
Interval 19.2 to 35.3
Postvoid Residual Volume
6.0
31.7 mL
Interval 19.2 to 44.2
37.1 mL
Interval 23.9 to 50.3

Adverse Events

Botox A

Serious events: 3 serious events
Other events: 40 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Mid-Urethral Sling

Serious events: 8 serious events
Other events: 41 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Botox A
n=71 participants at risk
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=69 participants at risk
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure
0.00%
0/71 • 12 Months
1.4%
1/69 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure congestive
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 2 • 12 Months
0.00%
0/69 • 12 Months
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial infarction
0.00%
0/71 • 12 Months
1.4%
1/69 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular extrasystoles
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
0.00%
0/69 • 12 Months
Infections and infestations
Chronic sinusitis
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
0.00%
0/69 • 12 Months
Infections and infestations
Pyelonephritis
0.00%
0/71 • 12 Months
1.4%
1/69 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Obesity
0.00%
0/71 • 12 Months
1.4%
1/69 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
0.00%
0/71 • 12 Months
1.4%
1/69 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
0.00%
0/71 • 12 Months
1.4%
1/69 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Spinal stenosis
0.00%
0/71 • 12 Months
1.4%
1/69 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
Nervous system disorders
Ischaemic stroke
0.00%
0/71 • 12 Months
1.4%
1/69 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
0.00%
0/69 • 12 Months
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute kidney injury
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
0.00%
0/69 • 12 Months
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
0.00%
0/71 • 12 Months
1.4%
1/69 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Tonsillar hypertrophy
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
0.00%
0/69 • 12 Months

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Botox A
n=71 participants at risk
Up to 2 administrations of Botulinum Toxin A
Mid-Urethral Sling
n=69 participants at risk
Mid-Urethral Sling for treatment of urinary incont
Infections and infestations
Vulvovaginal mycotic infection
0.00%
0/71 • 12 Months
2.9%
2/69 • Number of events 2 • 12 Months
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
0.00%
0/69 • 12 Months
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
1.4%
1/69 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ligament rupture
0.00%
0/71 • 12 Months
1.4%
1/69 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 2 • 12 Months
2.9%
2/69 • Number of events 2 • 12 Months
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ligament sprain
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
0.00%
0/69 • 12 Months
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthritis
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
0.00%
0/69 • 12 Months
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
1.4%
1/69 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Flank pain
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
0.00%
0/69 • 12 Months
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Basal cell carcinoma
0.00%
0/71 • 12 Months
1.4%
1/69 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Transitional cell carcinoma
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
0.00%
0/69 • 12 Months
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
0.00%
0/71 • 12 Months
1.4%
1/69 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
Nervous system disorders
Migraine
0.00%
0/71 • 12 Months
1.4%
1/69 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
0.00%
0/69 • 12 Months
Investigations
Biopsy breast
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
0.00%
0/69 • 12 Months
Investigations
Blood cholesterol increased
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
0.00%
0/69 • 12 Months
Investigations
Blood triglycerides increased
0.00%
0/71 • 12 Months
1.4%
1/69 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
Investigations
Residual urine volume
4.2%
3/71 • Number of events 3 • 12 Months
0.00%
0/69 • 12 Months
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetes mellitus
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
1.4%
1/69 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 2 • 12 Months
0.00%
0/69 • 12 Months
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Ear pain
0.00%
0/71 • 12 Months
1.4%
1/69 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
1.4%
1/69 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
0.00%
0/71 • 12 Months
2.9%
2/69 • Number of events 2 • 12 Months
Gastrointestinal disorders
Defaecation urgency
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
0.00%
0/69 • 12 Months
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
0.00%
0/69 • 12 Months
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyschezia
0.00%
0/71 • 12 Months
1.4%
1/69 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrooesophageal reflux disease
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
0.00%
0/69 • 12 Months
Gastrointestinal disorders
Levator syndrome
0.00%
0/71 • 12 Months
1.4%
1/69 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
General disorders
Adverse drug reaction
0.00%
0/71 • 12 Months
1.4%
1/69 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
General disorders
Chest pain
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
0.00%
0/69 • 12 Months
General disorders
Fatigue
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
0.00%
0/69 • 12 Months
General disorders
Medical device site erosion
0.00%
0/71 • 12 Months
2.9%
2/69 • Number of events 2 • 12 Months
General disorders
Oedema
0.00%
0/71 • 12 Months
1.4%
1/69 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
0.00%
0/69 • 12 Months
General disorders
Suprapubic pain
0.00%
0/71 • 12 Months
2.9%
2/69 • Number of events 2 • 12 Months
Immune system disorders
Multiple allergies
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
0.00%
0/69 • 12 Months
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
0.00%
0/71 • 12 Months
2.9%
2/69 • Number of events 2 • 12 Months
Infections and infestations
Coronavirus infection
5.6%
4/71 • Number of events 4 • 12 Months
0.00%
0/69 • 12 Months
Infections and infestations
Ear infection
0.00%
0/71 • 12 Months
2.9%
2/69 • Number of events 2 • 12 Months
Infections and infestations
Fungal skin infection
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
0.00%
0/69 • 12 Months
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
0.00%
0/69 • 12 Months
Infections and infestations
Gonococcal pelvic inflammatory disease
0.00%
0/71 • 12 Months
1.4%
1/69 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
Infections and infestations
Laryngitis
0.00%
0/71 • 12 Months
1.4%
1/69 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
Infections and infestations
Otitis externa fungal
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
0.00%
0/69 • 12 Months
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis
0.00%
0/71 • 12 Months
1.4%
1/69 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
Infections and infestations
Pyelonephritis
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
0.00%
0/69 • 12 Months
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
2.8%
2/71 • Number of events 2 • 12 Months
1.4%
1/69 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
Infections and infestations
Skin candida
0.00%
0/71 • 12 Months
1.4%
1/69 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
1.4%
1/69 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
33.8%
24/71 • Number of events 31 • 12 Months
37.7%
26/69 • Number of events 34 • 12 Months
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
0.00%
0/69 • 12 Months
Renal and urinary disorders
Dysuria
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
0.00%
0/69 • 12 Months
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary retention
4.2%
3/71 • Number of events 3 • 12 Months
8.7%
6/69 • Number of events 6 • 12 Months
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Atrophic vulvovaginitis
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
0.00%
0/69 • 12 Months
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Dyspareunia
0.00%
0/71 • 12 Months
1.4%
1/69 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Pelvic discomfort
0.00%
0/71 • 12 Months
2.9%
2/69 • Number of events 2 • 12 Months
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Pelvic pain
0.00%
0/71 • 12 Months
1.4%
1/69 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vaginal prolapse
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
0.00%
0/69 • 12 Months
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vulvovaginal pruritus
0.00%
0/71 • 12 Months
1.4%
1/69 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
0.00%
0/69 • 12 Months
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dysphonia
0.00%
0/71 • 12 Months
1.4%
1/69 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory symptom
0.00%
0/71 • 12 Months
1.4%
1/69 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Sleep apnoea syndrome
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
0.00%
0/69 • 12 Months
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Alopecia areata
1.4%
1/71 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
0.00%
0/69 • 12 Months
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Lichen sclerosus
0.00%
0/71 • 12 Months
2.9%
2/69 • Number of events 2 • 12 Months
Social circumstances
Contraindication to vaccination
0.00%
0/71 • 12 Months
1.4%
1/69 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
Surgical and medical procedures
Cataract operation
0.00%
0/71 • 12 Months
1.4%
1/69 • Number of events 2 • 12 Months
Surgical and medical procedures
Eye operation
0.00%
0/71 • 12 Months
1.4%
1/69 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
Surgical and medical procedures
Knee arthroplasty
0.00%
0/71 • 12 Months
1.4%
1/69 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
Surgical and medical procedures
Spinal nerve stimulator removal
0.00%
0/71 • 12 Months
1.4%
1/69 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
Surgical and medical procedures
Tooth extraction
0.00%
0/71 • 12 Months
1.4%
1/69 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
Surgical and medical procedures
Vaginal mesh removal surgery
0.00%
0/71 • 12 Months
1.4%
1/69 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
Vascular disorders
Haemorrhage
0.00%
0/71 • 12 Months
1.4%
1/69 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
0.00%
0/71 • 12 Months
1.4%
1/69 • Number of events 1 • 12 Months

Additional Information

Marie Gantz

RTI International

Phone: 919-541-5110

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place